Table of Contents
Scholarly Research Exchange
Volume 2008, Article ID 360572, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.3814/2008/360572
Research Article

HomoSAR: An Integrated Approach Using Homology Modeling and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship for Activity Prediction of Peptides

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Bombay College of Pharmacy, Kalina, Santacruz (E), Mumbai 400098, India

Received 24 March 2008; Revised 4 August 2008; Accepted 12 August 2008

Copyright © 2008 Raghuvir R. S. Pissurlenkar and Evans C. Coutinho. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Loughnan, T. Bond, A. Atkins et al., “α-conotoxin EpI, a novel sulfated peptide from Conus episcopatus that selectively targets neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 25, pp. 15667–15674, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  2. W. Brandt, T. Lehmann, A. Barth, and S. Fittkaui, “Molecular modeling and CoMFA investigations of the serine proteases thermitase and dipeptidyl peptidase IV and their inhibitors,” Journal of Molecular Graphics, vol. 11, pp. 277–278, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  3. I. A. Doytchinova and D. R. Flower, “Toward the quantitative prediction of T-cell epitopes: CoMFA and CoMSIA studies of peptides with affinity for the class I MHC molecule HLA-A0201,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 22, pp. 3572–3581, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. I. A. Doytchinova and D. R. Flower, “Quantitative approaches to computational vaccinology,” Immunology and Cell Biology, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 270–279, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. I. A. Doytchinova and D. R. Flower, “Physicochemical explanation of peptide binding to HLA-A0201 major histocompatibility complex: a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship study,” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 505–518, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  6. I. A. Doytchinova and D. R. Flower, “A comparative molecular similarity index analysis (CoMSIA) study identifies an HLA-A2 binding supermotif,” Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol. 16, no. 8-9, pp. 535–544, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. N. Davies, C. K. Hattotuwagama, D. S. Moss, M. G. B. Drew, and D. R. Flower, “Statistical deconvolution of enthalpic energetic contributions to MHC-peptide binding affinity,” BMC Structural Biology, vol. 6, article 5, pp. 1–13, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  8. J. Caballero, M. Saavedra, M. Fernández, and F. D. González-Nilo, “Quantitative structure-activity relationship of rubiscolin analogues as δ opioid peptides using comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA),” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 20, pp. 8101–8104, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. P. H. A. Sneath, “Relations between chemical structure and biological activity in peptides,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 157–195, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  10. A. Kidera, Y. Konishi, M. Oka, T. Ooi, and H. A. Scheraga, “Statistical analysis of the physical properties of the 20 naturally occurring amino acids,” Journal of Protein Chemistry, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–55, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  11. S. Hellberg, M. Sjöström, B. Skagerberg, and S. Wold, “Peptide quantitative structure-activity relationships, a multivariate approach,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1126–1135, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Cocchi and E. Johansson, “Amino acids characterization by GRID and multivariate data analysis,” Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  13. E. R. Collantes and W. J. Dunn, III, “Amino acid side chain descriptors for quantitative structure-activity relationship studies of peptide analogues,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 38, no. 14, pp. 2705–2713, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Zaliani and E. Gancia, “MS-WHIM scores for amino acids: a new 3D-description for peptide QSAR and QSPR studies,” Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 525–533, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  15. N. El Tayar, R.-S. Tsai, P.-A. Carrupt, and B. Testa, “Octan-1-ol-water partition coefficients of zwitterionic α-amino acids. Determination by centrifugal partition chromatography and factorization into steric/hydrophobic and polar components,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2, no. 1, pp. 79–84, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. I. A. Doytchinova and D. R. Flower, “Towards the in silico identification of class II restricted T-cell epitopes: a partial least squares iterative self-consistent algorithm for affinity prediction,” Bioinformatics, vol. 19, no. 17, pp. 2263–2270, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. I. A. Doytchinova, M. J. Blythe, and D. R. Flower, “Additive method for the prediction of protein-peptide binding affinity. Application to the MHC class I molecule HLA-A0201,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 263–272, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. P. Guan, I. A. Doytchinova, and D. R. Flower, “HLA-A3 supermotif defined by quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis,” Protein Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  19. I. A. Doytchinova, P. Guan, and D. R. Flower, “Quantitative structure-activity relationships and the prediction of MHC supermotifs,” Methods, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 444–453, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  20. D. R. Flower, H. McSparron, M. J. Blythe et al., “Computational vaccinology: quantitative approaches,” Novartis Foundation Symposium, vol. 254, pp. 102–120, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  21. P. Guan, I. A. Doytchinova, V. A. Walshe, P. Borrow, and D. R. Flower, “Analysis of peptide-protein binding using amino acid descriptors: prediction and experimental verification for human histocompatibility complex HLA-A0201,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 23, pp. 7418–7425, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  22. I. A. Doytchinova, V. A. Walshe, P. Borrow, and D. R. Flower, “Towards the chemometric dissection of peptide-HLA-A0201 binding affinity: comparison of local and global QSAR models,” Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 203–212, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  23. J. Salomon and D. R. Flower, “Predicting class II MHC-peptide binding: a kernel based approach using similarity scores,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 7, article 501, pp. 1–11, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  24. R. R. S. Pissurlenkar, A. K. Malde, S. A. Khedkar, and E. C. Coutinho, “Encoding type and position in peptide QSAR: application to peptides binding to class I MHC molecule HLA-A0201,” QSAR and Combinatorial Science, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 189–203, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. S. B. Needleman and C. D. Wunsch, “A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 443–453, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  26. J. Devereux, P. Haeberli, and O. Smithies, “A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 12, no. 1, part 1, pp. 387–395, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  27. C. Sander and R. Schneider, “Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment,” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 56–68, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. G. D. Schuler, S. F. Altschul, and D. J. Lipman, “A workbench for multiple alignment construction and analysis,” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 180–190, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. M. Vingron and P. Argos, “A fast and sensitive multiple sequence alignment algorithm,” Computer Applications in the Biosciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 115–121, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  30. D. R. Boswell and A. D. McLachlan, “Sequence comparison by exponentially-damped alignment,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 12, no. 1, part 2, pp. 457–464, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  31. M. O. Dayhoff, R. M. Schwartz, and B. C. Orcutt, “A model of evolutionary change in proteins,” in Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, M. O. Dayhoff, Ed., vol. 5, supplement 3, pp. 345–352, National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, DC, USA, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  32. M. Gribskov, A. D. McLachlan, and D. Eisenberg, “Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 84, no. 13, pp. 4355–4358, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  33. J. L. Risler, M. O. Delorme, H. Delacroix, and A. Henaut, “Amino acid substitutions in structurally related proteins. A pattern recognition approach. Determination of a new and efficient scoring matrix,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 204, no. 4, pp. 1019–1029, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  34. D. M. Engelman, T. A. Steitz, and A. Goldman, “Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins,” Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, vol. 15, pp. 321–353, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. G. H. Gonnet, M. A. Cohen, and S. A. Benner, “Exhaustive matching of the entire protein sequence database,” Science, vol. 256, no. 5062, pp. 1443–1445, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  36. Y. Rongcun, F. Salazar-Onfray, J. Charo et al., “Identification of new HER2/neu-derived peptide epitopes that can elicit specific CTL against autologous and allogeneic carcinomas and melanomas,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 1037–1044, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  37. L. Rivoltini, Y. Kawakami, K. Sakaguchi et al., “Induction of tumor-reactive CTL from peripheral blood and tumor- infiltrating lymphocytes of melanoma patients by in vitro stimulation with an immunodominant peptide of the human melanoma antigen MART-1,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 154, no. 5, pp. 2257–2265, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  38. M. R. Parkhurst, E. B. Fitzgerald, S. Southwood, A. Sette, S. A. Rosenberg, and Y. Kawakami, “Identification of a shared HLA-A0201-restricted T-cell epitope from the melanoma antigen tyrosinase-related protein 2 (TRP2),” Cancer Research, vol. 58, no. 21, pp. 4895–4901, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  39. W. M. Kast, R. M. P. Brandt, J. Sidney et al., “Role of HLA-A motifs in identification of potential CTL epitopes in human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 proteins,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 152, no. 8, pp. 3904–3912, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  40. A. Sette, A. Vitiello, B. Reherman et al., “The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 153, no. 12, pp. 5586–5592, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  41. M. R. Parkhurst, M. L. Salgaller, S. Southwood et al., “Improved induction of melanoma-reactive CTL with peptides from the melanoma antigen gp100 modified at HLA-A0201-binding residues,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 157, no. 6, pp. 2539–2548, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  42. A. Vitiello, A. Sette, L. Yuan et al., “Comparison of cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses induced by peptide or DNA immunization: implications on immunogenicity and immunodominance,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 671–678, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. M.-F. del Guercio, J. Sidney, G. Hermanson et al., “Binding of a peptide antigen to multiple HLA alleles allows definition of an A2-like supertype,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 685–693, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  44. V. Tsai, S. Southwood, J. Sidney et al., “Identification of subdominant CTL epitopes of the gp100 melanoma-associated tumor antigen by primary in vitro immunization with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 158, no. 4, pp. 1796–1802, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  45. Y. Kawakami, S. Eliyahu, C. Jennings et al., “Recognition of multiple epitopes in the human melanoma antigen gp100 by tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes associated with in vivo tumor regression,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 154, no. 8, pp. 3961–3968, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  46. T. S. Jardetzky, W. S. Lane, R. A. Robinson, D. R. Madden, and D. C. Wiley, “Identification of self peptides bound to purified HLA-B27,” Nature, vol. 353, no. 6342, pp. 326–329, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. A. Y. Rudensky, P. Preston-Hurlburt, S.-C. Hong, A. Barlow, and C. A. Janeway, Jr., “Sequence analysis of peptides bound to MHC class II molecules,” Nature, vol. 353, no. 6345, pp. 622–627, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  48. K. C. Parker, M. A. Bednarek, and J. E. Coligan, “Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 163–175, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  49. DNasisMax2.7, Hitachi Software Engineering America, Ltd. MiraiBio Group, South San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2007.
  50. R. Natarajan, S. C. Basak, and T. S. Neumann, “Novel approach for the numerical characterization of molecular chirality,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 771–775, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  51. P. A. Karplus, “Hydrophobicity regained,” Protein Science, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1302–1307, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  52. R. J. Abraham and G. H. Grant, “Charge calculations in molecular mechanics. V. Silicon compounds and π bonding,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 244–256, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. R. J. Abraham and P. E. Smith, “Charge calculations in molecular mechanics IV: a general method for conjugated systems,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 288–297, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. R. J. Abraham and P. E. Smith, “Charge calculations in molecular mechanics 7: application to polar π systems incorporating nitro, cyano, amino, C=S and thio substituents,” Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 175–187, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. R. J. Abraham, G. H. Grant, I. S. Haworth, and P. E. Smith, “Charge calculations in molecular mechanics. Part 8 partial atomic charges from classical calculations,” Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 21–39, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. Tsar3.3, Oxford Molecular Ltd., Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK, 2002.
  57. V. N. Viswanadhan, A. K. Ghose, G. R. Revankar, and R. K. Robins, “Atomic physicochemical parameters for three dimensional structure directed quantitative structure-activity relationships. 4. Additional parameters for hydrophobic and dispersive interactions and their application for an automated superposition of certain naturally occurring nucleoside antibiotics,” Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, vol. 29, pp. 163–172, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  58. Cerius2 4.11 and InsightII, v2005L, Accelrys Inc., San Diego, Calif, USA, 2005.
  59. W. J. Dunn, III, S. Wold, U. Edlund, S. Hellberg, and J. Gasteiger, “Multivariate structure-activity relationships between data from a battery of biological tests and an ensemble of structure descriptors: the PLS method,” Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 131–137, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. R. D. Cramer, III, J. D. Bunce, D. E. Patterson, and I. E. Frank, “Cross-validation, bootstrapping, and partial least squares compared with multiple regression in conventional QSAR studies,” Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, vol. 7, pp. 18–25, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  61. H.-D. Holtje, W. Sippl, D. Rognan, and G. Folkers, “Example for the modeling of protein-ligand complexes: Antigen presentation by MHC class I,” in MolecularModeling: Basic Principles and Applications, H.-D. Holtje and G. Folkers, Eds., pp. 179–215, WILEY-VCH GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2nd edition, 2003. View at Google Scholar