Case Report | Open Access
Atypical Hyperperfusion Encephalopathy in Post-Carotid Stenting
Hyperperfusion encephalopathy (HPE) is a condition due to increased perfusion of the brain which is clinically characterized by headache, seizures, and other neurologic signs associated with increased (or not) systemic blood pressures and edema in the subcortical white matter (predominantly in the occipital lobe). Patients with critical carotid stenosis treated with endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting may develop a HPE syndrome of the ipsilateral hemisphere which closely resembles the unilateral HPE and that usually involves the vascular area subjected ipsilaterally to the carotid stenosis. We present here a case of a 62-year-old woman who developed atypical hyperperfusion syndrome after a carotid stenting for high-grade carotid artery stenosis. In our patient, the HPE involved bilaterally both hemispheres, even though the treatment of the carotid stenosis was unilaterally. Some authors have hypothesized that a high dose of contrast, in combination with an unidentified personal vulnerability, may result in the rupture of the blood-brain barrier, carrying the CA into the cerebral parenchyma (both hemispheres), leading to the encephalopathy. The course and prognosis of HPE in post-carotid stenting are excellent with conservative treatment and full recovery usually occurs within 24 to 48 hours.
- R. B. Schwartz, “Hyperperfusion encephalopathies: hypertensive encephalopathy and related conditions,” Neurologist, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 22–34, 2002.
- S. Macdonald, “Brain injury secondary to carotid intervention,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 219–231, 2007.
- J. G. Heckmann, B. Neundörfer, C. J. G. Lang, and D. Werner, “Hyperdensity of cortex with a swollen hemisphere: what happened?,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 149–150, 2002.
- G. Dangas, L. H. Monsein, R. Laureno et al., “Transient contrast encephalopathy after carotid artery stenting,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 111–113, 2001.
- A. A. Penn, D. F. Schomer, and G. K. Steinberg, “Imaging studies of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy: case report,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 133–137, 1995.
- E. G. Grant, C. B. Benson, G. L. Moneta et al., “Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference,” Ultrasound Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 190–198, 2003.
- H. J. M. Barnett, D. W. Taylor, M. Eliasziw et al., “Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 20, pp. 1415–1425, 1998.
- E. Tatli, M. Buyuklu, and A. Altun, “An unusual but dramatic complication of coronary angiography: transient cortical blindness,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. e4–e6, 2007.
- R. Parry, J. R. Rees, and P. Wilde, “Transient cortical blindness after coronary angiography,” British Heart Journal, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 563–564, 1993.
- J. M. Caille and M. Allard, “Neurotoxicity of hydrosoluble iodine contrast media,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 23, pp. S210–S212, 1988.
Copyright © 2009 Nicola Morelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.