Prevalence and Associated Factors of Tuberculosis among Adult Household Contacts of Smear Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients Treated in Public Health Facilities of Haramaya District, Oromia Region, Eastern Ethiopia

Abstract

Background. Tuberculosis is an infectious airborne disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It still remains a major public health problem which affects all age groups. Risk of exposure is higher in household contact than members of the general population. Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and associated factors of tuberculosis among adult household contacts of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis in Haramaya district, Oromia Region, Eastern Ethiopia from February to March, 2019. Method. A community based cross-sectional study design was conducted. A total of 454 study participants were selected using systematic sampling method from all adult household contacts of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients treated from July 2017 to December 2018. Data were collected using a pretested and structured questionnaire; and laboratory examination was processed using fluorescent smear microscope. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with the infection of pulmonary tuberculosis and a statistically significant association was declared at -value < 0.05. Result. The overall prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis among adult household contacts was 7.8% (95% CI: 5.8–10.0). The risk factors for tuberculosis infection among household contacts were eating meals less than three times per day (AOR = 4.31; 95% CI: 1.61, 11.55), drinking raw milk (AOR = 4.12; 95% CI: 1.43, 11.90), having family history of tuberculosis with more than one index case (AOR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.02, 6.92), living in poor ventilated houses (AOR = 4.02; 95% CI: 1.38, 11.76), and living in inadequate size of living room (AOR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.30, 8.86). Conclusion. In this study, the prevalence of tuberculosis among adult household contacts of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis is high. Eating meals less than three times per day, drinking raw milk, living in poor ventilated houses, and inadequate sizes of the rooms were identified as contributing factors. Therefore, we recommend that the transmission of tuberculosis can potentially be reduced by a better contact tracing and treatment strategies along with appropriate health education.

1. Introduction

Pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is an infectious airborne disease caused mainly by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The main source of infection is untreated smear-positive PTB patients. It typically affects the lungs (PTB) but can also affect other sites as well (extra PTB) [1]. The chance of developing TB is much higher among people with low immune status [2, 3]. Tuberculosis (TB) disease remains a major public health problem which affects all age groups globally [1]. It is one of the top 10 causes of death and the leading cause from a single infectious agent and millions of people continue to fall sick with TB each year [2].

The global TB report showed that there were an estimated 10 million incident cases and 12 million prevalent cases of TB globally. Overall 90% of the infection occurred in adults; of this 9% were people living with HIV (72% in Africa). About 26% of incident TB cases occurred in Africa and 23% of the world’s population are estimated to have a latent TB infection, and are thus at risk of developing active TB during their lifetime [2]. Currently, Ethiopia is ranked eighth among the 22 high TB burden countries in the world and at rank three, in Africa. The incidence rate of all forms of TB is estimated at 164 per 100,000 population, leading to an annual mortality rate of 27.5 per 100,000 population [1, 2].

Tuberculosis is exclusively transmitted based on environmental and personal risk factors, especially in a social mixing setting (together with overcrowding) and conditions which prolong the length of exposure to an infectious patient like health system-related factor including delay in diagnosis can increase TB transmission [4, 5]. In addition, the risk of infection following TB exposure is primarily governed by exogenous factors and intrinsic combination of the infectiousness of the source case, proximity to contact and social and behavioral risk factors including smoking, alcohol, and indoor air pollution [4].

Patients with asymptomatic pulmonary tuberculosis transmit the bacilli to risky groups through inhalation. Identify and investigating infected individual among contacts of patients with infectious tuberculosis is the best method of preventing the later development of the disease in populations. In addition to this, contact tracing is very important to establish the primary source of the TB disease and to detect those who are secondarily infected by proper diagnosis and prompt treatment [6–8]. Furthermore, the likelihood of progression from latent TB infection (LTBI) to TB in household contacts is usually higher than in the general population. Household contacts of PTB patients are considered a high-priority population for contact investigation [9–11].

Pulmonary tuberculosis contact investigations are rarely and inconsistently carried out in resource-limited settings of low- and middle-income countries like Ethiopia [12, 13]. Studies conducted in Ethiopia on the prevalence and associated factors of PTB among household contacts were very limited. So, it is necessary to identify the factors which contribute to TB infection and overall status of PTB among household contacts of smears positive TB in the district.

2. Methods and Materials

2.1. Study Area and Period

The study was conducted in Haramaya district, Oromia region, eastern Ethiopia from February to March, 2019. Haramaya is one of 24 districts in east Hararghe zone which is located at 520 km from Addis Ababa; capital city of Ethiopia, and 20 km from the historical city, Harar, with a total land area of 525.64 sq km. It is bordered by Kurfachelle district in north, Dire-Dawa administration in south, Kersa and Kombolcha districts in west and east, respectively. According to population projection set in 2018, the total population of the district is 304,276 among which 152,442 (50.1%) were males and 151,834 (49.9%) were females. Administratively, the district has 2 urban and 31 rural kebeles, with one district hospital, eight health centers, 12 private clinics, and 33 healthposts. All governmental health facilities are providing diagnostic and treatment services for tuberculosis [14].

2.2. Study Design and Population

A community based cross-sectional study design was employed. Adults who had close household contact with PTB infected patients who were on treatment from July 2017 to December 2018 were included while critically sick and mentally ill were excluded from the study.

2.3. Sample Size Determination and Sampling Procedure

The sample size was computed using a single population proportion formula by considering 4.3% proportion of TB cases among household contacts of smear-positive PTB (1), 95% confidence interval, and 2% margin of error. Accordingly, the final sample size with a 5% non-response rate was 454. All public health facilities (one hospital and eight health centers), providing TB diagnosis and treatment services in the district were considered for the study. According to the information retrieved from these health facilities, a total of 240 TB patients were registered and treated from July 2017 to December 2018. First, the total adult household contacts of smear-positive PTB patients () were obtained from the district’s Community Health Information System registries available at health post. Then the sample size was proportionally allocated to each health facility according to the number of adult household contacts of smear positive PTB patient. Finally, 454 study participants were randomly selected from households.

2.4. Data Collection Tools and Methods

Data were collected using a structured questionnaire developed from previous literature [15–17] and it was pretested on 5% of the study participants in a nearby district (i.e., Aweday district). Data collectors and supervisors were trained on data collection tools and how to observe measure, collect, and transport samples to health facility that helped minimize bias, and maintain the quality of data. Moreover, the supervisors and principal investigator have been supervising field works and they checked the quality of collected data on a daily basis.

The data were collected through face to face interview, observing the house condition, measuring area of house, and collecting data from adult household contacts. Interview and observation were conducted prior to sputum sample collection after informing; getting consents and screen household contacts by using symptoms based algorithm. Household contacts were traced by home to home visits. Sputum microscopy was used to determine tuberculosis among adult household contacts. Household contacts were requested to submit two sputum specimens. Sputum collected at household level was transported to health facility using triple packaging by maintaining cold chain within 5 days. Participants were advised to submit sputum not containing food particle and minimize amount of saliva. Sputum microscopy was done in Haramaya district hospital laboratory using fluorochrome staining technique. In this study Presumptive TB cases were diagnosed if an individual had one or more of the clinical manifestations consistent with TB (i.e. persistent cough of 2 weeks or more, fever for more than 2 weeks, night sweats, and unexplained weight loss) and TB patients were diagnosed if participants had at least one sputum smear positive (1).

2.5. Data Quality Control

Data collectors and supervisors were trained for two days on the data collection tools. The collected data were checked manually on daily basis to check for its completeness and consistency. Double data entry were done by two separate individuals to crosscheck the data entered. The recommended procedure for specimen collection, proper labeling, and storage was followed strictly. The sample was rejected if it contained food particles. Internal and external quality control was also ensured for AFB smear microscopy.

2.6. Data Processing and Analysis

The data were coded and double entered to Epi data version 3.1 and then exported to Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21 for analysis. Data cleaning was performed by running frequencies and cross tabulation to check accuracy, outliers, consistencies, and missing values. Descriptive statistics (i.e. frequency distribution, proportion, mean, and standard deviation) was used to summarize the variables. Bivariate analysis was performed to assess the potential associations between categorical variables and the outcome. Variables with a -value of less than 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were entered into the final multivariable logistic regression model to identify the predictors of the outcome. A variable with a -value less than 0.05 at 95% confidence level was considered statistically significant. The absence of multi-co-linearity was checked by using VIF/tolerance. The model of fitness was checked by Hosmer and Lemeshow, which provided evidence of fitness with a predictor test level of .

3. Results

3.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics

A total of 240 index cases registered in selected public health facilities in the district were included in the study. More than half of the index cases 122 (50.8%) were male and most of them (80%) were from rural areas. From a total of 454 planned household contacts, 451 were included in the study, with a response rate of 99.3%. The mean (±SD) age of the household contacts patients was 31.0 (±11.7) years, range from 18 to 75 years. More than half, 228 (50.6%), of the household contacts were female, majority (73.8%) were from rural areas, and 60.1% were married. One hundred seventy six (39%) of household contacts’ relationships with index cases were siblings followed by husband (24.8%) and wife (23.3%). Three hundred thirty eight (74.9%) of the household contacts were farmer in occupation (Table 1).

3.2. Housing Condition of the Participants

Four hundred sixteen (92.7%) of houses of the study participants were made from mud and wood. Majority 305 (67.6%) of the household contact houses had good ventilation and 314 (69.6%) of the houses had good lighting status. Three hundred sixty sixes (81.2%) of the respondents had separate kitchen room and 408 (90.5%) of household contacts used wood for cooking food (Table 2).

One hundred nine (24.2%), 206 (45.7%), 104 (23.1%), and 12 (2.7%) of household contacts had habit of cigarette smoking, khat chewing, raw milk consuming and alcohol drinking, respectively. Majority (86.3%) of the household contacts had a habit of eating meals ≥3 times per day. Two third (67.6%) of study participants had no family history of TB (Table 3). 362 (80.3%) of household contacts had adequate knowledge about TB.

3.3. Prevalence of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

The overall prevalence of tuberculosis among adult household contacts was 35 (7.8%) (95% CI: 5.8–10). Among household contacts, 206 (45.6%) were symptomatic (had cough > 2 week), and of these 91 (44%) had chest pain, night sweating, and fever. The proportion of tuberculosis among presumptive TB cases was 35 (16.9%). Among detected tuberculosis cases, a relatively higher proportion was observed among age group of 28–37 years (48.6%), male (57.1%), married (71.4%), farmer (85.7%), having monthly average income of <1000 Birr (82.9%), and illiterate (74.3%) adult household contacts (Table 4).

3.4. Associated Factors

In bivariable analyses, age of the adult household contacts, income, ventilation status of houses, lighting status of houses, overcrowdings, presence of separate kitchen, the size of living room, proximity to index case, treatment duration of TB index case, family history of TB, smoking cigarette, chewing khat, drinking raw milk, and frequency of meals per day on TB were found to be associated with PTB at -values less than 0.25.

In multivariable analysis frequency of meals per day, house ventilation status, living room size, drinking raw milk, and family history of TB other than index case remained statistically significant at -value less than 0.05. Study participants eating meals less than three times per day were 4 times more likely to acquire TB (AOR = 4.31; 95% CI: 1.617, 11.545) as compared to those eating meals more than three times per day. Study participants who had history of drinking raw milk were about 4 times more likely to develop tuberculosis (AOR = 4.12; 95% CI: 1.43, 11.90) than their counterparts. The odds of getting TB was about 3 times higher among household contacts who had history of TB within family other than index case (AOR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.02, 6.92) compared to those who were not.

The study participants living in the houses with poor ventilation were at risk of getting TB 4.0 times more than likely to develop tuberculosis (AOR = 4.02; 95% CI: 1.38, 11.76) compared to their counterparts. Similarly, the likelihood of having TB was about 3 times higher among the contacts dwelling in inadequate room size (less than 4 × 4 m per person) (AOR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.30, 8.867) when compared to those who were living in an adequately sized room (Table 4).

4. Discussion

The prevalence of TB among adult household contacts of PTB patients was 7.8% (95% CI: 5.8–10.0). Frequency of meals per day, ventilation status of houses, sizes of living rooms, drinking raw milk, and family history of TB other than the index case, were identified as the factors significantly associated with tuberculosis.

The finding is comparable with the other studies in sub-Saharan Africa (7.8%) [18], Peshawar (0.1–14%) [19], and Tanzania (6.4%) [20], but, higher than that reported from Nepal (1.6%) [21], India (1.15%) [7], Pondicherry of India (4.3%) [22], South Africa (3.9%) [23], and Ethiopia (1%) [24]. The variation might be related to differences in the study population, living situation, and overcrowding which are important risks for respiratory diseases, including tuberculosis [25]. Differently, it is lower than the finding reported in a few of the previous studies conducted in Peru (34%) [26], Philippines (12.8%) [27], and Pakistan (15.6%) [28]. This difference could be associated with sample size of the study and diagnostic methods [1].

This study revealed that the likelihood of TB among household contacts eating meals less than three times per day was 4 times higher than that of individuals who eat meals three times or more per day. This is in line with the studies conducted in Tanzania [20] and Pakistan [29]. This might be due to undernutrition or nutritional deficiency that impairs cell-mediated immunity which can lead to progression of latent infection to active TB disease. The differences in the socioeconomic status, lifestyle, and feeding patterns of the household contacts might also explain these differences [30, 31].

Our study showed that household contacts who drink raw milk were 4 times more likely to develop TB compared to their counterparts. This is comparable with the studies conducted in Tanzania [32] and Gojam district of Ethiopia [15]. This might be due to intake of infected milk with the bacteria and which could disseminate from the initial location in the abdomen to other parts of the body via the blood stream, the lymphatic system, or by direct extension to other organs, which can be explained by the high prevalence of Bovine TB in the country [33, 34], and particularly in the study areas.

The likelihood of TB among household contacts with family history of TB other than index case were 8 times higher than that of individuals who did not have family history of TB (AOR = 2.78 CI: 1.01–6.92). This is in line with the studies done in India [10], Metema and Gojam in Ethiopia [15]. It is also in support of the WHO report which stated that there was greater occurrence of TB when the contact lived with more than one TB case [9]. It might be due to increased expelled bacilli that maximize the exposure within households.

The study finding showed that contacts dwelling in the house with poor ventilation were 4.0 times more likely at risk of getting TB than those dwelling in the house with good ventilation. This is consistent with the findings of other studies done in Pakistan [34], India [29], meta-analysis in sub-Saharan Africa [35], Addis Ababa, Ethiopia [36], Metema district, Ethiopia [16], and Gojam, Ethiopia [15]. This might be due to poor house ventilation that could increase the likelihood of exposure to tuberculosis by increasing the concentration of TB bacteria within households. However, good ventilation reduces the concentration of TB bacteria so it will decrease the transmission of the TB [37].

Household contacts living in inadequate sizes of rooms were 3 times more likely to get TB than those living in adequate sizes of rooms. This is in agreement with other studies done in sub-Saharan Africa [35], Pakistan [29], and Metema district of Ethiopia [16].This might be related with enclosed spaces and poor air circulation that can accelerate the transmission of TB [37].

Majority of socio-demographic factors assessed in this study did not show a statically significant association with the presence of TB in household contacts. However, community-based study done in high burden settings in Ethiopia [15] and Philippines [27] showed significant association of older age groups with the presence of TB. Similarly, occupational status of the household contacts were not significantly associated with the occurrence of TB in this study which is inconsistent with the study conducted in West Ethiopia [17]. This might be due to difference with study participants, lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors.

This study was not performed without limitations. Causal inferences (temporal relationship) cannot be drawn out since the study is a cross-sectional study. Smear negative cases were not verified using gold standard technique. During observation, there might be intra-observer variations. However, proper training was given to data collectors to minimize these biases. Therefore, this study could provide insights about the prevalence and associated factors of with TB disease among adult household contacts of PTB patients.

5. Conclusion

The overall prevalence of tuberculosis among adult household contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis patients is high. Eating meals less than three times per day, drinking raw milk, having family history of TB other than index case, living in poorly ventilated houses, and inadequate sizes in the living rooms were the independent predictors of the outcome. Appropriate health intervention should be given to the community by health extension workers on TB disease transmission, adequate and balanced diet, and safe dealing with diseased family member. Health facilities should screen all contacts of PTB patients as early as possible to reduce the number of active TB cases, and appropriate prompt treatment should be given to minimize the transmission. Health care providers should strengthen the information given to index cases that their close contacts and perform screening especially to those having the symptoms of TB (coughing, weight loss, and fever) and treat if required.

Data Availability

All the necessary data supporting our findings are contained within the manuscript.

Ethical Approval

Ethical clearance was obtained from Institutional Health Research Ethics Review Committee (IHRERC), College of Health and Medical Sciences of Haramaya University. Informed written consent was obtained from each participant, after explanation about the purpose, procedure, potential risk, and benefit of the study was given. The confidentiality was maintained through omitting their personal identification, and conducting the interview in a private place. Identification of patient was done through numeric code and the identified TB case was linked to health facility, to start the treatment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed toward design of the study, writing the proposal, developing tools, data analysis, drafting, and revising the paper and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This study was funded by Haramaya University post graduate directorate.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Haramaya University for financial support. We are also very grateful to the study participants for their participation in the study, and valuable information.

References

1. FMOH, Guidelines for Clinical and Programatic Managment TB, TB/HIV and Leprosy in Ethiopia, Federal Ministry of Health, Addsi Ababa, Ethiopia, 6th edition, 2016.
2. WHO, Global Tuberculosis Report, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
3. USAID, “Committed to ending TB: Tuberculosis Report to Congress,” 2016. View at: Google Scholar
4. J. Singh, M. M. Sankar, S. Kumar et al., “Incidence and prevalence of tuberculosis among household contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis patients in a peri-urban population of South Delhi, India,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 7, p. e69730, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
5. KFF, “The U.S. Government and Global Tuberculosis Efforts, Key Facts,” 2018, Fact Sheet. View at: Google Scholar
6. B. I. Omotowo, O. C. Ekwueme, and M. N. Aghaji, “Tuberculosis control mechanisms and contact tracing: knowledge and practice among TB patients at dots centers in southeast Nigeria,” Journal of Biometrics & Biostatistics, vol. 1, no. 9, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
7. M. Gupta, A. A. Saibannavar, and V. Kumar, “Household symptomatic contact screening of newly diagnosed sputum smears positive tuberculosis patients – an effective case detection tool,” Lung India, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 159–162, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
8. A. C. Lemos, E. D. Matos, D. B. Sampaio, and E. M. Netto, “Risk of tuberculosis among household contacts in Salvador, Bahia,” Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 424–430, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
9. WHO, Recommendations for Investigating Contacts of Persons with Infectious Tuberculosis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2012.
10. D. Nair, N. Rajshekhar, J. S. Klinton et al., “Household contact screening and yield of tuberculosis cases—a clinic based study in Chennai, South India,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 9, p. e0162090, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
11. FMOH, Pocket Guide on Clinical Management of TBL and TB/HIV for General Health Workers, Federal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2013.
12. Word Vision, Technical Guideline for Tuberculosis (TB) and TB-HIV Program Implementation, World Vision, Uxbridge, UK, 2017.
13. EHZHO, East Hararghe Zonal Annual TB Program Performance Report, East Hararghe Zone Tuberculosis Control, Harar, Ethiopia, 2018.
14. Haramaya Woreda Administrative Office, Annual Administrative Report, East Hararghe, Oromia, Ethiopia, 2018.
15. M. Meseret, M. Shibabaw, and G. Tsegaye, “Determinants of tuberculosis among adults in Jabi Tehnan district, West Gojjam zone, Northwest Ethiopia: a case control study,” International Journal of Public Health & Safety, vol. 2, no. 3, Article ID 1000128, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
16. C. Tesema, T. Tadesse, M. Gebrehiwot, A. Tsegaw, and F. Weldegebreal, “Environmental and host-related determinants of tuberculosis in Metema district, north-west Ethiopia,” Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety, pp. 87–95, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
17. T. Ephrem, B. Mengiste, F. Mesfin, and W. Godana, “Determinants of active pulmonary tuberculosis in Ambo Hospital, West Ethiopia,” African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 8, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
18. N. S. Shah, C. M. Yuen, M. Heo, A. W. Tolman, and M. C. Becerra, “Yield of contact investigations in households of patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 58, pp. 381–391, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
19. A. Javaid, A. M. Khan, M. A. Khan et al., “Screening outcomes of household contacts of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Peshawar, Pakistan,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 909–912, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
20. M. Beyanga, B. R. Kidenya, L. G. Adima, E. Ochodo, S. E. Mshana, and C. H. Kasang, “Investigation of household contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis patients increases case detection in Mwanza City, Tanzania,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 18, p. 110, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
21. N. Gyawali, R. Gurung, N. Poudyal et al., “ Prevalence of tuberculosis in household contacts of sputum smears positive cases and associated demographic risk factors,” Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 303–307, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
22. V. A. Kumar, G. Kalaiselvan, and A. R. Dongre, “Prevalence of tuberculosis among household contacts in Pondicherry: active case finding among new smear positive cases,” Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 4, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
23. K. M. Little, R. Msandiwa, N. Martinson, J. Golub, R. Chaisson, and D. Dowdy, “Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 18, p. 299, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
24. Z. Gashu, D. Jerene, M. Ensermu et al., “The yield of community-based “retrospective” tuberculosis contact investigation in a high burden setting in Ethiopia,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 8, p. e0160514, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
25. T. Kompala, S. Shenoi, and G. Friedland, “Transmission of tuberculosis in resource-limited settings,” Current HIV/AIDS Reports, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 264–272, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
26. L. Otero, L. Shah, K. Verdonck et al., “A prospective longitudinal study of tuberculosis among household contacts of smear-positive tuberculosis cases in Lima, Peru,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 16, no. 1, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
27. I. G. Sia, B. R. Orillaza, J. L. Sauver et al., “Tuberculosis attributed to household contacts in the Philippines,” International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 122–125, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
28. R. Iqbal, K. Munir, S. Bashir et al., “Screening for tuberculosis among household contacts of index patients,” Pakistan Journal of Medical Research, vol. 52, no. 4, p. 96, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
29. A. Khaliq, I. H. Khan, M. W. Akhtar, and M. N. Chaudhry, “Environmental risk factors and social determinants of pulmonary tuberculosis in Pakistan,” Epidemiology (Sunnyvale), vol. 2015, no. 5, p. 3, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
30. WHO, Guideline: Nutritional Care and Support for Patients with Tuberculosis, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2013.
31. P. Chandrasekaran, N. Saravanan, R. Bethunaickan, and S. Tripathy, “Malnutrition: modulator of immune responses in tuberculosis,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 8, p. 1316, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
32. S. G. Finanga, O. Mørkve, R. R. Kazwala, S. Cleaveland, J. M. Sharp, and G. Shirima, “The role of livestock keeping in tuberculosis trends in Arusha, Tanzania,” International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, vol. 7, pp. 695–704, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
33. A. Girmay, S. Weldegbriel, and B. Afera, “Assessment of bovine tuberculosis in dairy farms and its public health importance in and around Adigrat district,” 2015. View at: Google Scholar
34. K. Srivastava, S. Kant, and A. Verma, “Role of environmental factors in transmission of tuberculosis,” Dynamics of Human Health, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 12, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
35. I. S. Saidu, Z. Nasir, and B. W. Goni, “Social determinants of tuberculosis in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review,” Global Journal of Medicen and Public Health, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 14, 2014, 2277-9604. View at: Google Scholar
36. E. Shimeles, F. Enquselassie, A. Aseffa, M. Tilahun, A. Mekonen, and G. Wondimagegn, “Risk factors for tuberculosis: a case–control study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 4, p. e0214235, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
37. WHO, WHO Policy on TB Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities, Congregate Settings and Households, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
38. Th. H. Th. Thanh, S. D. Ngoc, N. N. Viet et al., “A household survey on screening practices of household contacts of smear positive tuberculosis patients in Vietnam,” BMC Public Health, vol. 2014, no. 14, p. 713, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
39. M. Worku, B. Seyum, and H. Kadir, “Assesment of goiter prevalence and associated factors among school age (7–12 years) children of rular primary school of Bedeno Woreda, East Hararghe zone, Ooromia Region, Ethiopia,” 2014. View at: Google Scholar
40. H. Olijira, M. Ifa, and A. Birhanu, “Determinants of active tuberculosis among HIV-positive adults attending clinical care in ambo general hospital and Gedo hospital, West Shoa zone, Oromia regional state, Central Ethiopia,” Journal of Pharmacy and Alternative Medicine, vol. 10, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
41. S. M. Gelaw, “Socioeconomic factors associated with knowledge on tuberculosis among adults in Ethiopia,” Tuberculosis Research and Treatment, vol. 2016, Article ID 6207457, 11 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
42. S. Paramasivam, B. Thomas, J. Thayyil et al., “Knowledge and health seeking behaviour of tuberculosis patients in Kerala, India,” International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 2464–247, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Abinet Adane et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.