Table of Contents
Textures and Microstructures
Volume 25, Issue 2-4, Pages 211-222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/TSM.25.211

Preferred Orientations of Mica Bearing Rocks Described by Texture Components

1Department of Physical Metallurgy, TU Clausthal, Großer Bruch 23, Clausthal-Zellerfeld D-38678, Germany
2Institute of Geology and Paleontology, TU Clausthal, Leibnizstr. 10, Clausthal-Zellerfeld D-38678, Germany
3joint Institute of Nuclear Research, Frank Laboratory for Neutron Physics, Dubna, Moscow Region 141980, Russia

Received 26 July 1995

Copyright © 1996 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [3 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Hans-Rudolf Wenk, Waruntorn Kanitpanyacharoen, and Marco Voltolini, “Preferred orientation of phyllosilicates: Comparison of fault gouge, shale and schist,” Journal of Structural Geology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 478–489, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Luiz F.G. Morales, Martin Casey, Geoffrey E. Lloyd, and Danielle M. Williams, “Kinematic and temporal relationships between parallel fold hinge lines and stretching lineations: A microstructural and crystallographic preferred orientation approach,” Tectonophysics, vol. 503, no. 3-4, pp. 207–221, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • T I Savyolova, and S V Filatov, “About normal distribution on SO(3) group in texture analysis,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 937, pp. 012045, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar