The Scientific World Journal / 2012 / Article / Tab 1 / Research Article
Accuracy Verification of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Technology for Lower-Limb Prosthetic Research: Utilising Animal Soft Tissue Specimen and Common Socket Casting Materials Table 1 The minimum, maximum, and mean difference and absolute difference, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, the results of paired samples t -test significance, and 95% confidence interval of the difference.
Measurement difference Material n Absolute difference Difference Correlation coefficient
(
𝑃
)
∗
𝑃
(95% CI of the difference)Min (%) Max (%) Mean (%) SD Min (%) Max (%) Mean (%) SD Calliper—photo diameter measurement (mm) NA 24 0.04 (0.03) 1.67 (2.29) 0.77 (0.85) 0.49 −1.31 (−1.29) 1.67 (1.65) −0.18 (−0.17) 0.09 0.999 (0.000) 0.326 (−0.56, 0.19) MRI—photo diameter measurement (mm) POP 12 0.11 (0.08) 1.25 (1.53) 0.66 (0.73) 0.36 1.25 (−1.53) 0.61 (0.81) −0.31 (−0.33) 0.71 1.000 (0.000) 0.16 (−0.14, 0.76) Silicone 12 0.24 (0.19) 1.20 (1.59) 0.73 (0.79) 0.26 −1.20 (−1.59) 0.74 (1.17) −0.42 (−0.41) 0.67 1.000 (0.000) 0.053 (−0.01, 0.84) MRI—photo Surface area measurement (mm2 ) POP 6 6.33 (0.05) 51.03 (0.78) 24.31 (0.35) 18.54 −15.06 (−0.10) 51.03 (0.78) 19.29 (0.31) 24.62 1.000 (0.000) 0.113 (−6.55, 45.13) Silicone 6 15.83 (0.12) 68.87 (1.04) 37.72 (0.51) 21.25 −15.83 (−0.12) 68.87 (1.04) 32.44 (0.47) 29.93 1.000 (0.000) 0.045 (1.03, 63.85) MRI—water suspension volume measurement (mm3 ) POP 3 8855 (1.31) 9443 (4.31) 9110 (2.72) 301 −8855 (−1.31) 9443 (4.31) 3207 (1.85) 10448 1.000 (0.000) 0.648 (−17689, 24103) Silicone 3 831 (0.13) 10243 (3.00) 5521 (1.79) 4706 −10243 (−3.00) −831 (−0.13) −5521 (−1.79) 4706 1.000 (0.009) 0.179 (−14933, 3890)
*Correlation is significant at alpha = 0.01.