Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2012, Article ID 242403, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/242403
Research Article

Bone Mineral Densities and Mechanical Properties of Retrieved Femoral Bone Samples in relation to Bone Mineral Densities Measured in the Respective Patients

1Biomechanics and Implant Technology Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany
2Inorganic Solid State Chemistry Group, Institute of Chemistry, University of Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany

Received 9 August 2012; Accepted 18 September 2012

Academic Editors: D. H. Lee, C. C. Niu, and J. B. Renner

Copyright © 2012 Yvonne Haba et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. D. Leslie and L. M. Lix, “Absolute fracture risk assessment using lumbar spine and femoral neck bone density measurements: derivation and validation of a hybrid system,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 460–467, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. Donnelly, “Methods for assessing bone quality: a review,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 469, no. 8, pp. 2128–2138, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. M. Keaveny, P. F. Hoffmann, M. Singh et al., “Femoral bone strength and its relation to cortical and trabecular changes after treatment with PTH, alendronate, and their combination as assessed by finite element analysis of quantitative CT scans,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1974–1982, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. M. Schoenfeld, E. P. Lautenschlager, and P. R. Jr. Meyer, “Mechanical properties of human cancellous bone in the femoral head,” Medical and Biological Engineering, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 313–317, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. M. Bagi, N. Hanson, C. Andresen et al., “The use of micro-CT to evaluate cortical bone geometry and strength in nude rats: correlation with mechanical testing, pQCT and DXA,” Bone, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 136–144, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Mosekilde, S. M. Bentzen, G. Ortoft, and J. Jorgensen, “The predictive value of quantitative computed tomography for vertebral body compressive strength and ash density,” Bone, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 465–470, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Lee, H. I. Shin, and S. Y. Kim, “Fractional quantitative computed tomography for bone mineral density evaluation: accuracy, precision, and comparison to quantitative computed tomography,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 566–571, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. L. Bouxsein, D. A. Michaeli, D. B. Plass, D. A. Schick, and M. E. Melton, “Precision and accuracy of computed digital absorptiometry for assessment of bone density of the hand,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 444–449, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Öhman, M. Baleani, E. Perilli et al., “Mechanical testing of cancellous bone from the femoral head: experimental errors due to off-axis measurements,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 2426–2433, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. Steinhauser, P. Diehl, M. Hadaller et al., “Biomechanical investigation of the effect of high hydrostatic pressure treatment on the mechanical properties of human bone,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 130–135, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Sierpowska, M. A. Hakulinen, J. Töyräs et al., “Prediction of mechanical properties of human trabecular bone by electrical measurements,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. S119–S131, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. N. Ebbesen, J. S. Thomsen, H. Beck-Nielsen, H. J. Nepper-Rasmussen, and L. Mosekilde, “Lumbar vertebral body compressive strength evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and ashing,” Bone, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 713–724, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. L. Fazzalari, M. R. Forwood, K. Smith, B. A. Manthey, and P. Herreen, “Assessment of cancellous bone quality in severe osteoarthrosis: bone mineral density, mechanics, and microdamage,” Bone, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 381–388, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. P. Matter, T. v. Garrel, U. Bilderbeek, and W. Mittelmeier, “Biomechanical examinations of cancellous bone concerning the influence of duration and temperature of cryopreservation,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 40–44, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  15. DIN 50106 Testing of Metallic Materials Compression Test, 1978.
  16. C. Becker, A. W. Baltzer, M. Schneppenheim et al., “Experimentelle Validierung einer DXA- und MRT-basierten Knochendichtemessung durch Veraschung,” Zentralblatt für Chirurgie, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. 402–406, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  17. B. Li and R. M. Aspden, “Composition and mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the femoral head of patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 641–651, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Rohlmann, H. Zilch, G. Bergmann, and R. Kolbel, “Material properties of femoral cancellous bone in axial loading—I: time-independent properties,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Traumatic Surgery, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 95–102, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Uchiyama, T. Tanizawa, H. Muramatsu, N. Endo, H. E. Takahashi, and T. Hara, “Three-dimensional microstructural analysis of human trabecular bone in relation to its mechanical properties,” Bone, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 487–491, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. K. Au, W. Y. Choy, K. M. Chan et al., “Correlation of bone mineral density measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA),” in Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 2, pp. 629–631, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1998.
  21. A. Mazurkiewicz and T. Topoliński, “Relationships between structure, density and strength of human trabecular bone,” Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 55–61, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. D. Cody, G. J. Gross, F. J. Hou, H. J. Spencer, S. A. Goldstein, and D. P. Fyhrie, “Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1013–1020, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. Y. Ko, T. W. Lee, D. G. Woo, H. S. Kim, and B. Y. Lee, “Improved non-invasive biomechanical evaluation method for the virtue of risedronate,” Key Engineering Materials, vol. 342-343, pp. 921–924, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus