The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2012 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 308265 |

Simona Ronchetti, Giuseppe Nocentini, Maria Grazia Petrillo, Carlo Riccardi, "CD8+ T Cells: GITR Matters", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2012, Article ID 308265, 7 pages, 2012.

CD8+ T Cells: GITR Matters

Academic Editor: N. Isakov
Received26 Oct 2011
Accepted25 Dec 2011
Published30 Apr 2012


As many members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related gene (GITR) plays multiple roles mostly in the cells of immune system. CD8+ T cells are key players in the immunity against viruses and tumors, and GITR has been demonstrated to be an essential molecule for these cells to mount an immune response. The aim of this paper is to focus on GITR function in CD8+ cells, paying particular attention to numerous and recent studies that suggest its crucial role in mouse disease models.

1. Introduction

Known as an important costimulatory molecule in all T-cell subsets, glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related gene (GITR), a member of the TNFR superfamily, is considered a key regulator in a multitude of immune functions and in some tissues [1, 2]. GITR is expressed and further upregulated on most immune cell types like T regulatory cells (Tregs), naïve T cells, natural killer cells (NKs), and at low levels in B cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells [3, 4]. Different splicings of GITR gene have been identified, including a soluble form [5]. GITR’s role has been studied in a number of physiological conditions and cells like keratinocytes [6], bone [7], sympathetic neuron development [8], bone marrow stromal cells [9], microglia [10], and in a variety of autoimmune/inflammatory pathologies in murine models. Such studies reveal GITR as a pivotal mediator in inflammation processes and autoimmune diseases as described in murine experimental colitis [11, 12], acute and chronic inflammation of the lung [13, 14], collagen-induced arthritis [15], splanchnic artery occlusion (SAO) shock [16], thyroiditis [17], experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis [18], acute pancreatitis [19], and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) [20]. Despite their name, glucocorticoids are unnecessary for GITR upregulation [21], unlike demonstrated for another glucocorticoid-induced gene [22, 23]. GITR-derived signals promote an inflammatory environment as indicated by the attenuated course taken by GITR−/− mice during the aforementioned autoimmune/inflammatory experimental diseases.

GITR is triggered by its ligand (GITRL), mainly expressed in antigen-presenting cells and endothelial cells [24, 25]. The costimulatory effect of GITR triggering in T cells, both conventional CD4+ and CD8+ cells, causes enhanced T-cell expansion and cytokine production [2630]. Conversely, GITR engagement in NK cells induces an inhibitory effect [3133], even though a separate study provides opposite results [34]. Costimulation by GITR is also found either to activate [35] or to inhibit NKT cells [36]. The role played by GITR in Tregs appears to be more complex. When it was found highly expressed in Treg cells, GITR appeared to abrogate Treg-mediated suppression, when triggered by an anti-GITR mAb [37, 38]. However, one later study suggested that strong co-activation of effector T cells was responsible for this effect, since GITR-triggered effectors were found to be resistant to Treg-mediated suppression [39]. Although GITR influences Treg function, it does not take part to the mechanism of suppression, since we found that GITR-KO Treg cells are able to suppress as well [26]. Furthermore, an anti-GITR treatment in mouse tumor models alters the number of tumor infiltrating Treg cells [40], and GITRL transgenic mice show an increased absolute number of T regulatory cells [41]. So there has been confusion about the actual function of GITR on Treg cells. Currently, the most accepted explanation about GITR function in Treg and T effector cells is that GITR engagement activates both cells thereby causing resistance of effector cells to Treg suppression, inhibition of Treg cell activity and Treg expansion [4, 26, 4244]. Another piece of the puzzling function of GITR in Treg cells has been recently added by the discovery of a human CD4+ subpopulation with regulatory activity that expresses GITR and CD127 but only low levels of CD25, so that GITR can now be considered as a marker of these cells [45, 46].

Recent works have found a correlation between GITR and some human pathologies: in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the expression of GITR on macrophages in human RA synovium may enhance inflammatory activation of these cells [47]; in atopic dermatitis, the interaction of GITR with its cognate ligand, GITRL, may perpetuate local inflammation [48]; finally, one polymorphism of GITR gene seems to be associated with Hashimoto’s disease prognosis [49]. A separate issue deals with the relationship of GITR and tumors, well reviewed by Placke et al. [50] and Schaer et al. [44], who describe how GITR importance has grown up since it was found to be involved in tumor rejection, in studies that used anti-GITR antibodies or GITR recombinant proteins, as also described below in this paper. Accordingly, GITR expression in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been found to be associated with cancer progression in patients suffering from esophageal adenocarcinomas. Although studies in mice and men could lead to contrasting conclusions about the exact role of GITR in the same cell type, many efforts are being made to transfer the knowledge of GITR function to the clinics. The aim is the application of tools like anti-GITR mAbs or recombinant proteins like GITR-Fc to therapy of cancer and infectious or inflammatory diseases.

This paper focuses on the role of GITR in the powerful modulation of CD8+ T-cell function, a field that still needs more investigation owing to the pivotal role played by CD8+ cells in cancer rejection and infectious diseases.

2. Expression of GITR in CD8+ T Cells

Despite the role of GITR has been poorly investigated in CD8+ cells as compared to the wide range of studies in CD4+ cells, a picture of GITR expression and function in CD8+ cells begins to be elucidated. Mouse CD8+ T cells express GITR at basal level and upregulate GITR after activation [26, 27, 5153], while human CD8+ cells show GITR expression only after activation [54, 55]. In a study aimed at identifying molecular markers of human CD8+CD28 cells, GITR is found to be one of the expressed genes in primed cells [55], confirming that no GITR can be detected at the steady state in human CD8+ cells, either in CTLs or in peripheral regulatory T cells. Only a regulatory population of human thymic CD8+CD25+ cells spontaneously expresses GITR. In a pathologic condition such as viral infection, in vivo kinetics of GITR expression shows its increase on antigen-specific CD8+ T cells after ocular HSV infection in the draining lymph nodes, suggesting an involvement of GITR/GITRL system in the regulation of virus-induced immuno-inflammatory lesions [56]. Interestingly, GITR expression is found to be enhanced in CD8+ tumor-specific cells thus suggesting an involvement of GITR in CTL-mediated tumor rejection (see below).

3. The Major Role of GITR in CD8+ Cells

The unquestioned role of GITR as a costimulatory molecule in T cells has been deeply investigated over the last years and has yielded a flourishing literature predominantly dealing with either conventional or Treg CD4+ cells [2, 4, 50]. However, the importance of GITR in CD8+ cells has been established as well by ex vivo and in vivo studies as described below. We have demonstrated that the costimulatory role of GITR is indispensable to fully activate CD8+ cells since its absence impairs the proliferation response of these cells to CD28 costimulation [51]. Conversely, CD28−/− CD8+ cells can be fully activated by GITR costimulation. Interestingly, no differences are observed in CD4+ cells between GITR−/− and control mice, suggesting a specific role for GITR-mediated costimulatory signals in CD8+ cells. As a consequence, NF- 𝜅 B, one of the best characterized mediator of GITR signalling pathway, is impaired in CD28-costimulated GITR−/− CD8+ cells, indicating GITR as a unique costimulatory molecule independent of CD28 [51]. To support the peculiar role of GITR in CD8+ cells, two brilliant works have previously demonstrated a separate function of GITR in CD4+ and CD8+ cells. Muriglan et al. show that GITR stimulation by an anti-GITR mAb (DTA-1) enhances alloreactive CD8+CD25 T-cell proliferation increasing GVHD and exerting opposite effects in alloreactive CD4+CD25 cells [52]. Moreover, Kim et al. show that the engagement of GITR by the same antibody DTA-1 regulates the ability of donor CD8+ cells to respond while they are in the process to become tolerant, pushing the shift from chronic GVHD to acute GVHD [53]. Therefore, dissecting the immunological mechanisms that determine the development of GVHD holds therapeutic promise for manipulation of the GITR/GITRL system in the prevention of GVHD and other related pathologies.

4. GITR Function in Viral Infections

A few in vivo studies evidence how GITR signals may be important for antiviral activity of CD8+ cells. In a mouse model of HSV-1 infection, La and coworkers found that treatment with anti-GITR agonistic antibody (DTA-1) causes an expansion of both CD4+ and CD8+ cells in the draining lymph nodes, with a higher increased number of CD8+ cells. Notably, antigen-specific IFN- 𝛾 -secreting CD8+ cells are increased, suggesting GITR stimulation as an important mediator of virus clearance by the immune response [57]. The increase in T-cell responses and the reduction in viral load are also observed when persistently infected mice with Friend virus are treated with anti-GITR therapy combined with adoptive transfer of CD8+ cells [58]. In another study by Suvas et al., the same anti-GITR antibody DTA-1 enhances virus-specific T-cell responses mediated by CD4+ and CD8+. In particular there is an increase of in vivo CD8+ T-cell cytotoxicity, as demonstrated [56] by rise in Granzyme B levels in a mouse model of ocular HSV infection, while a decrease of proinflammatory responses of CD11b+ cells. The role of GITR stimulation for the expansion of CD8+ cells is further and definitely demonstrated by Snell et al. who use GITR−/− OT-I transgenic mice in an in vivo model of severe influenza infection in which purified CD8+ GITR−/− OT-I cells are transferred into recipient mice successively infected with influenza A/HK-X31-OVA [59]. They find that GITR is critical for CD8+ expansion in both the primary and secondary response to severe influenza virus infection and is required for CD8+ survival. Of note anti-GITR DTA-1 antibody induces an enhanced expression of BcL-xL, a prosurvival molecule downstream of NF- 𝜅 B, previously shown to be important in CD8+ cells in GITR-sufficient mice [51].

Overall, all studies frame GITR as a pivotal molecule in CD8+ cells, which seems to contribute to viral clearance and mouse survival in infections in which CD8+ cells play a critical role (Figure 1). The only data in contrast with the aforementioned studies are obtained analyzing GITRL transgenic mice, which overexpress GITRL transgene in B cells, where CD8+ cells are not expanded while both effector and regulatory CD4+ cell numbers are increased [41]. This discrepancy can be explained either with a lack of interaction between CD8+ T cells and B lymphocytes or with the fact that GITR is already stimulated at maximum levels in WT mice so that a GITRL increase does not influence the CD8+ response.

5. GITR, CD8+ Cells, and Antitumor Immunity

Several studies have recently revealed a strong tumor rejection potential for both the anti-GITR antibody DTA-1 and the recombinant protein Fc-GITRL [1, 44]. In the attempt to find which cells are involved in such a mechanism, some studies focused their attention on CD8+ cells. Although CD4+ cells play a role in mediating anti-GITR-induced immune activation against tumors [60, 61], CD8+ cells are indispensable for tumor rejection [6064]. Studies of T-cell depletion effectively demonstrate the major role for CD8+ cells. CD8+ depletion, in combination with Fc-mGITRL treatment, significantly lowers tumor regression as compared to Fc-mGITRL alone in tumor-bearing BALB/c mice [63]. In contrast, CD4+ depletion in combination with Fc-mGITRL treatment results in the same percent tumor regression as CD4+ depletion alone. Thus, in Fc-mGITRL immunotherapy, CD8+ cells play a critical role [63]. In another study, depletion of CD8+ cells in mice injected with GITRL-expressing tumor cells promotes tumor growth [65]. Furthermore, Nishikawa et al. demonstrate that GITRL inhibits CMS5a tumor growth in mice immunized with a CTL epitope and that depletion of CD8+ cells blocks the effect of coadministered GITRL [66]. Finally, Côte et al. show that depleting CD8+ cells together with the administration of anti-GITR Ab, at the time of inducing the primary tumor, significantly reduces the number of mice rejecting secondary tumors [67]. Therefore, T-cell-specific depletion studies invariably show that GITR stimulation, either by anti-GITR antibodies or recombinant GITRL proteins, activates CD8+ response against tumor, which appears to be crucial for tumor rejection.

Also studies of T-cell transfer further support CD8+ involvement in tumor rejection that seems to be somehow GITR-dependent. The study by Imai et al. shows that adoptively transferred CD8+ cells specific for the CMS5 tumor antigen mERK2 in tumor-challenged BALB/c mice induce tumor regression. Such effect is enhanced by the coadministration of anti-GITR DTA-1 mAb [62]. Another study demonstrates that anti-GITR treatment together with CD8+ cells in SCID recipient mice is sufficient to reject the tumor, while CD4+ transferred cells are not, although CD4+ cells play a central role in helping the functions of CD8+, NK and B cells [60]. Therefore, the cytolytic activity of CD8+ cells induced by GITR engagement is essential for successful tumor eradication.

But how do CD8+ cells exert their action? Do they expand? Experiments performed in vivo with various GITRL recombinant proteins and anti-GITR antibodies prove that the presence of the ligand, either inside the tumor or as a soluble molecule, or treatment with anti-GITR antibody augments CD8+ expansion and activity. These results confirm that GITR acts as a costimulatory molecule in CD8+  cells. Piao et al. use i.p. inoculated GITRL+ tumors to study CD8+ cell response and find an enhanced cytotoxicity and number of these cells [65]. Hu et al. use a soluble Fc-mGITRL in two BALB/c tumor models and demonstrate an increased CD8+ activity and Granzyme B production between controls and treated mice [63]. Another interesting study by Cho et al. induces ectopic expression of GITRL in tumor that causes accumulation and increase of activity of CD8+ cells [68]. Calmels et al. demonstrate that GITRL recombinant protein causes enhanced cell infiltration of both CD4+ and CD8+ cells once injected into the tumor [61]. GITRL, therefore, seems to be the key molecule to induce activation in CD8+ cells, which expand when GITR is triggered by its cognate ligand.

A contribute to antitumor immunity comes from GITRL transfection in dendritic cells, either murine or human, which have been demonstrated to cause expansion and intratumor accumulation of CD8+ antigen-specific IFN- 𝛾 -secreting cells. Once more the forced expression of GITRL enhances the cytolytic and antitumor activity of CD8+ cells, which are able to delay tumor growth through the production of IFN- 𝛾 [69, 70]. Whether GITRL is upregulated in solid tumors is still an open field, since its expression has been found in AML [31] and in some cell lines such as HUVEC EA.Hy926 or EBV-transformed B cell [70], but no study is so far available about GITRL expression in murine or human solid tumors (Figure 2).

When the anti-GITR mAb DTA-1 is used in tumor models, it can activate CD8+ and induce tumor rejection as GITRL recombinant proteins do. Mitsui et al. demonstrate that, while CD4+ cells provide essential “help” to activate CD8+ cells, CD8+ are effectively able to kill tumor cells in mice that received injection of a murine colon carcinoma cell line after anti-GITR/anti-CTLA-4 combined treatment. Moreover the number of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ cells is augmented, reflecting an enhanced CD8+ proliferation [40]. Another work by Cohen et al. studies tumor-specific CD8+ cells after adoptive transfer and demonstrates that anti-GITR treatment augments [21] their activation, proliferation, and accumulation in the tumor site leading to a long-term survival [71]. Finally, the work by Côte et al. demonstrates that GITR stimulation with the anti-GITR antibody skews the avidity of polyclonal CD8+ cells to tumor-specific Ags. They use a mouse model of melanoma, in which CD8+ cells are the major targets of anti-GITR therapy [67]. Such studies demonstrate that an anti-GITR antibody may help fight against tumor cells by stimulating CD8+ cells, opening the possibility about the use of these molecules in treatment of cancer also in humans. To this aim, a new clinical trial with an anti-GITR antibody in the therapy of human melanoma gained approval in December 2010 (trial no. NCT01239134). Overall, these studies demonstrate that the use of anti-GITR mAbs and the treatment, or vaccination, with GITRL fusion proteins induce CD8+ activation leading either to eradication or reduction of the tumor.

One concern about the use of anti-GITR antibodies is the possibility of development of autoimmunity. Treatments with agonistic anti-GITR Ab may induce or exacerbate autoimmunity through the effect on Treg cells. However, recent works support the demonstration of no overt autoimmunity [40, 72], or to a small extent [64], depending on the route of administration, the anti-GITR dose, the duration of treatment, and the genetic susceptibility of the mouse strain used. However, evidence is accumulating that systemic administration of agonist anti-GITR Ab has a higher probability to induce autoimmunity than local administration. Therefore, in our opinion, studies evaluating strategies to stimulate GITR preferentially in tumors are welcome to facilitate the application to human treatment.

Once CD8+ cells are activated by an anti-GITR Ab or its natural ligand, they expand and become activated by increasing IFN- 𝛾   production [40, 62, 64, 66, 7173]. So GITR-derived signals make CD8+ lymphocytes able to proliferate, activate, accumulate into the tumor site, and kill tumor cells either alone or with the help of other cytolytic cells such as NK [60]. But how do CD8+ cells manage their relationship with Treg tumor infiltrating cells? Are they sensitive or resistant to tumor suppression by Tregs? Tumors contain a large number of infiltrating Treg cells, helping cancer cells to escape immunity. Except one study [71], some others refer about a proven resistance of in vivo GITR-stimulated CD8+ cells to tumor Treg suppression [40, 65, 66, 73]. Therefore, it is possible that CD8+ cells become locally activated by GITRL+ tumors and escape the regulatory function of Treg cells.

6. Concluding Remarks

CD8+ cells remain the key players in the fight against infections and tumors thanks to their cytotoxic activity [74]. GITR has recently come out as an important molecule for CD8+ activity, and targeting GITR in these cells might be a potential instrument for treatment of infections and tumors (Figure 1). Vaccination strategies aimed at stimulating GITR on CD8+ cells will represent one of the future possibilities for tumor immunotherapy. The transfer of the knowledge deriving from mouse models to the clinical setting is hampered by the structural differences between murine and human GITR and by the differences in the tools able to activate GITR, as recently summarized [1]. Nonetheless, we believe that the use of biological tools such as GITRL recombinant proteins might be of benefit to clear viruses and in local anticancer therapies.

7. Authors Contribution

S. Ronchetti and G. Nocentini equally contributed to the paper.


This work was supported by a research grant from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) in Milan, Italy. The authors thank Graziella Migliorati for critical suggestions and critical review of the paper.


  1. G. Nocentini, S. Ronchetti, M. G. Petrillo, and C. Riccardi, “Pharmacological modulation of GITRL/GITR system: therapeutic perspectives,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 165, no. 7, pp. 2089–2099, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. Azuma, “Role of the glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein (GITR)-GITR ligand pathway in innate and adaptive immunity,” Critical Reviews in Immunology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 547–557, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  3. S. Ronchetti, G. Nocentini, M. G. Petrillo et al., “Glucocorticoid-Induced TNFR family Related gene (GITR) enhances dendritic cell activity,” Immunology Letters, vol. 135, no. 1-2, pp. 24–33, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. Nocentini and C. Riccardi, “GITR: a modulator of immune response and inflammation,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 647, pp. 156–173, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  5. G. Nocentini, S. Ronchetti, A. Bartoli et al., “Identification of three novel mRNA splice variants of GITR,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 408–410, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. Wang, V. Devgan, M. Corrado et al., “Glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor is a p21 Cip1/WAF1 transcriptional target conferring resistance of keratinocytes to UV light-induced apoptosis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 45, pp. 37725–37731, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. H. Shin, S. J. Kim, D. S. Lee, and H. S. Choi, “Soluble glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (sGITR) stimulates osteoclast differentiation in response to receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) in osteoclast cells,” Bone, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 832–839, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. W. O'Keeffe, H. Gutierrez, P. P. Pandolfi, C. Riccardi, and A. M. Davies, “NGF-promoted axon growth and target innervation requires GITRL-GITR signaling,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 135–142, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. H. H. Shin, S. J. Kim, S. Y. Kang, D. S. Lee, and H. S. Choi, “Soluble glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor stimulates osteoclastogenesis by down-regulation of osteoprotegerin in bone marrow stromal cells,” Bone, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 716–723, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H. Hwang, S. Lee, W. H. Lee, H. J. Lee, and K. Suk, “Stimulation of glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor family-related protein ligand (GITRL) induces inflammatory activation of microglia in culture,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 2188–2196, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. Santucci, M. Agostini, S. Bruscoli et al., “GITR modulates innate and adaptive mucosal immunity during the development of experimental colitis in mice,” Gut, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 52–60, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. K. Lee, B. K. Choi, Y. H. Kim et al., “Glucocorticoid-induced tumour necrosis factor receptor family-related receptor signalling exacerbates hapten-induced colitis by CD4+ T cells,” Immunology, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 479–487, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Cuzzocrea, S. Ronchetti, T. Genovese et al., “Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of GITR-GITRL interaction reduces chronic lung injury induced by bleomycin instillation,” FASEB Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 117–129, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Cuzzocrea, G. Nocentini, R. Di Paola et al., “Proinflammatory role of glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor-related gene in acute lung inflammation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 631–641, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  15. S. Cuzzocrea, E. Ayroldi, R. Di Paola et al., “Role of glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor family gene (GITR) in collagen-induced arthritis,” FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1253–1265, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Cuzzocrea, G. Nocentini, R. Di Paola et al., “Glucocorficoid-induced TNF receptor family gene (GITR) knockout mice exhibit a resistance to splanchnic artery occlusion (SAO) shock,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 933–940, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. G. P. Morris and Y. C. M. Kong, “Interference with CD4+CD25+ T-cell-mediated tolerance to experimental autoimmune thyroiditis by glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor monoclonal antibody,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. P. Kohm, J. S. Williams, and S. D. Miller, “Cutting Edge: ligation of the Glucocorticoid-Induced TNF Receptor Enhances Autoreactive CD4+ T Cell Activation and Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 8, pp. 4686–4690, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  19. M. Galuppo, G. Nocentini, E. Mazzon et al., “The glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor family-related protein (GITR) is critical to the development of acute pancreatitis in mice,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 162, no. 5, pp. 1186–1201, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Galuppo, G. Nocentini, E. Mazzon et al., “GITR gene deletion and GITR-Fc soluble protein administration inhibit multiple organ failure induced by zymosan,” Shock, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 263–271, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Y. Zhan, D. P. Funda, A. L. Every et al., “TCR-mediated activation promotes GITR upregulation in T cells and resistance to glucocorticoid-induced death,” International Immunology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1315–1321, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. Esposito, S. Bruscoli, E. Mazzon et al., “Glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper GILZ over-expression inT lymphocytes inhibits inflammation and tissue damage in spinal cord injury,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 210–225, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  23. E. Ayroldi and C. Riccardi, “Glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ): a new important mediator of glucocorticoid action,” FASEB Journal, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 3649–3658, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Agostini, E. Cenci, E. Pericolini et al., “The glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related gene modulates the response to Candida albicans infection,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 7502–7508, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. T. Krausz, R. Bianchini, S. Ronchetti, K. Fettucciari, G. Nocentini, and C. Riccardi, “GITR-GITRL system, a novel player in shock and inflammation,” TheScientificWorldJournal, vol. 7, pp. 533–566, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Ronchetti, O. Zollo, S. Bruscoli et al., “Frontline: GITR, a member of the TNF receptor superfamily, is costimulatory to mouse T lymphocyte subpopulations,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 613–622, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. F. Kanamaru, P. Youngnak, M. Hashiguchi et al., “Costimulation via glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor in both conventional and CD25+ regulatory CD4+ T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 12, pp. 7306–7314, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  28. M. Tone, Y. Tone, E. Adams et al., “Mouse glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor ligand is costimulatory for T cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 25, pp. 15059–15064, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. E. M. Esparza and R. H. Arch, “Glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor functions as a costimulatory receptor that promotes survival in early phases of T cell activation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 12, pp. 7869–7874, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  30. E. Ayroldi, G. Migliorati, L. Cannarile, R. Moraca, D. V. Delfino, and C. Riccardi, “CD2 rescues T cells from T-cell receptor/CD3 apoptosis: a role for the Fas/Fas-L system,” Blood, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 3717–3726, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  31. T. Baessler, M. Krusch, B. J. Schmiedel et al., “Glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related protein ligand subverts immunosurveillance of acute myeloid leukemia in humans,” Cancer Research, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1037–1045, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. M. Baltz, M. Krusch, T. Baessler et al., “Neutralization of tumor-derived soluble Glucocorticoid-Induced TNFR-related protein ligand increases NK cell anti-tumor reactivity,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 3735–3743, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. B. Liu, Z. Li, S. P. Mahesh et al., “Glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor negatively regulates activation of human primary natural killer (NK) cells by blocking proliferative signals and increasing NK cell apoptosis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 13, pp. 8202–8210, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. Hanabuchi, N. Watanabe, Y. H. Wang et al., “Human plasmacytoid predendritic cells activate NK cells through glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-ligand (GITRL),” Blood, vol. 107, no. 9, pp. 3617–3623, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. J. Kim, H. Y. Kim, B. K. Kim, S. Kim, and D. H. Chung, “Engagement of glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor costimulates NKT cell activation in vitro and in vivo,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 6, pp. 3507–3515, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  36. S. Chen, L. C. Ndhlovu, T. Takahashi et al., “Co-inhibitory roles for glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor in CD1d-dependent natural killer T cells,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 2229–2240, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. J. Shimizu, S. Yamazaki, T. Takahashi, Y. Ishida, and S. Sakaguchi, “Stimulation of CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells through GITR breaks immunological self-tolerance,” Nature Immunology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 135–142, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. R. S. McHugh, M. J. Whitters, C. A. Piccirillo et al., “CD4+CD25+ Immunoregulatory T Cells: gene expression analysis reveals a functional role for the glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor,” Immunity, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 311–323, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. G. L. Stephens, R. S. McHugh, M. J. Whitters et al., “Engagement of glucocorticoid-induced TNFR family-related receptor on effector T cells by its ligand mediates resistance to suppression by CD4+CD25+ T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 8, pp. 5008–5020, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  40. J. Mitsui, H. Nishikawa, D. Muraoka et al., “Two distinct mechanisms of augmented antitumor activity by modulation of immunostimulatory/inhibitory signals,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 2781–2791, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. R. W. van Olffen, N. Koning, K. P. J. M. van Gisbergen et al., “GITR triggering induces expansion of both effector and regulatory CD4+ T cells in vivo 1,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 12, pp. 7490–7500, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. H. Igarashi, Y. Cao, H. Iwai et al., “GITR ligand-costimulation activates effector and regulatory functions of CD4+ T cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 369, no. 4, pp. 1134–1138, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. E. M. Shevach and G. L. Stephens, “Opinion: the GITR-GITRL interaction: co-stimulation or contrasuppression of regulatory activity?” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 613–618, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. D. A. Schaer, A. D. Cohen, and J. D. Wolchok, “Anti-GITR antibodies-Potential clinical applications for tumor immunotherapy,” Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1378–1386, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  45. R. Bianchini, O. Bistoni, A. Alunno et al., “CD4+CD25lowGITR+ cells: a novel human CD4+ T-cell population with regulatory activity,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2269–2278, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. R. Gerli, G. Nocentini, A. Alunno et al., “Identification of regulatory T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 426–430, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. E. Bae, W. J. Kim, Y. M. Kang et al., “Glucocorticoid-induced tumour necrosis factor receptor-related protein-mediated macrophage stimulation may induce cellular adhesion and cytokine expression in rheumatoid arthritis,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 410–418, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Baumgartner-Nielsen, C. Vestergaard, K. Thestrup-Pedersen, M. Deleuran, and B. Deleuran, “Glucocorticoid-induced tumour necrosis factor receptor (GITR) and its ligand (GITRL) in atopic dermatitis,” Acta Dermato-Venereologica, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 393–398, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. R. Tomizawa, M. Watanabe, N. Inoue et al., “Association of functional GITR gene polymorphisms related to expression of glucocorticoid-induced tumour necrosis factor-receptor (GITR) molecules with prognosis of autoimmune thyroid disease,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 165, no. 2, pp. 141–147, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. T. Placke, H. G. Kopp, and H. R. Salih, “Glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related (GITR) protein and its ligand in antitumor immunity: functional role and therapeutic modulation,” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 2010, Article ID 239083, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. Ronchetti, G. Nocentini, R. Bianchini, L. T. Krausz, G. Migliorati, and C. Riccardi, “Glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein lowers the threshold of CD28 costimulation in CD8+ T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 9, pp. 5916–5926, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  52. S. J. Muriglan, T. Ramirez-Montagut, O. Alpdogan et al., “GITR activation induces an opposite effect on alloreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in graft-versus-host disease,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 200, no. 2, pp. 149–157, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. Kim, W. S. Choi, H. Kang et al., “Conversion of alloantigen-specific CD8+ T cell anergy to CD8+ T cell priming through in vivo ligation of glucocorticoid- induced TNF receptor,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 9, pp. 5223–5231, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  54. S. Chattopadhyay and N. G. Chakraborty, “GITR expression on T-cell receptor-stimulated human CD8+ T cell in a JNK-dependent pathway,” Indian Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 121–124, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. L. Scotto, A. J. Naiyer, S. Galluzzo et al., “Overlap between molecular markers expressed by naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells and antigen specific CD4+CD25+ and CD8+CD28 T suppressor cells,” Human Immunology, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 1297–1306, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. Suvas, B. Kim, P. P. Sarangi, M. Tone, H. Waldmann, and B. T. Rouse, “In vivo kinetics of GITR and GITR ligand expression and their functional significance in regulating viral immunopathology,” Journal of Virology, vol. 79, no. 18, pp. 11935–11942, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. La, E. Kim, and B. Kwon, “In vivo ligation of glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor enhances the T-cell immunity to herpes simplex virus type 1,” Experimental and Molecular Medicine, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 193–198, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  58. U. Dittmer, H. He, R. J. Messer et al., “Functional impairment of CD8+ T cells by regulatory T cells during persistent retroviral infection,” Immunity, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 293–303, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. L. M. Snell, A. J. McPherson, G. H. Y. Lin et al., “CD8 T cell-intrinsic GITR is required for T cell clonal expansion and mouse survival following severe influenza infection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 12, pp. 7223–7234, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. P. Zhou, L. L'Italien, D. Hodges, and X. M. Schebye, “Pivotal roles of CD4+ effector T cells in mediating agonistic anti-GITR mAb-induced-immune activation and tumor immunity in CT26 tumors,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 11, pp. 7365–7375, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  61. B. Calmels, S. Paul, N. Futin, C. Ledoux, F. Stoeckel, and B. Acres, “Bypassing tumor-associated immune suppression with recombinant adenovirus constructs expressing membrane bound or secreted GITR-L,” Cancer Gene Therapy, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 198–205, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. N. Imai, H. Ikeda, I. Tawara et al., “Glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor stimulation enhances the multifunctionality of adoptively transferred tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells with tumor regression,” Cancer Science, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 1317–1325, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. P. Hu, R. S. Arias, R. E. Sadun et al., “Construction and preclinical characterization of Fc-mGITRL for the immunotherapy of cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 579–588, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. D. Cohen, A. Diab, M. A. Perales et al., “Agonist anti-GITR antibody enhances vaccine-induced CD8+ T-cell responses and tumor immunity,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 4904–4912, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. J. Piao, Y. Kamimura, H. Iwai et al., “Enhancement of T-cell-mediated anti-tumour immunity via the ectopically expressed glucocorticoid-induced tumour necrosis factor receptor-related receptor ligand (GITRL) on tumours,” Immunology, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 489–499, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. H. Nishikawa, T. Kato, M. Hirayama et al., “Regulatory T cell-resistant CD8+ T cells induced by glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor signaling,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 14, pp. 5948–5954, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. A. L. Côte, P. Zhang, J. A. O'Sullivan et al., “Stimulation of the glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor family-related receptor on CD8 T cells induces protective and high-avidity T cell responses to tumor-specific antigens,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 1, pp. 275–283, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. J. S. Cho, J. V. Hsu, and S. L. Morrison, “Localized expression of GITR-L in the tumor microenvironment promotes CD8+ T cell dependent anti-tumor immunity,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1057–1069, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. J. Ma, S. Wang, B. Ma et al., “Dendritic cells engineered to express GITRL enhance therapeutic immunity in murine Lewis lung carcinoma,” Cancer Letters, vol. 301, no. 2, pp. 142–150, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. S. Tuyaerts, S. Van Meirvenne, A. Bonehill et al., “Expression of human GITRL on myeloid dendritic cells enhances their immunostimulatory function but does not abrogate the suppressive effect of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 93–105, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. A. D. Cohen, D. A. Schaer, C. Liu et al., “Agonist anti-GITR monoclonal antibody induces melanoma tumor immunity in mice by altering regulatory T cell stability and intra-tumor accumulation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 5, Article ID e10436, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. K. Ko, S. Yamazaki, K. Nakamura et al., “Treatment of advanced tumors with agonistic anti-GITR mAb and its effects on tumor-infiltrating Foxp3+CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 202, no. 7, pp. 885–891, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. T. Burckhart, M. Thiel, H. Nishikawa et al., “Tumor-specific crosslinking of GITR as costimulation for immunotherapy,” Journal of Immunotherapy, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 925–934, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. B. F. Zamarron and W. Chen, “Dual roles of immune cells and their factors in cancer development and progression,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 651–658, 2011. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Simona Ronchetti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.