|
| Grade | Year | | Positive responses (%) | Top three responses among the positive responses |
|
| S1 | 2005/06 | 139 | 82% | Satisfied with the program (35) |
| Interactive (10) |
| Liked the program (6) |
| 2006/07 | 497 | 85% | Satisfied with the program (137) |
| Positive impression towards the program (51) |
| Clear objectives and strong theoretical support (39) |
| 2007/08 | 716 | 80% | Satisfied with the program (132) |
| Positive impression towards the program (87) |
| Good objectives/content/program design (67) |
| 2008/09 | 677 | 83% | Satisfied with the program (98) |
| Positive impression towards the program (86) |
| Good content/program design (46) |
| S2 | 2006/07 | 157 | 72% | Satisfied with the program (43) |
| Like the program (10) |
| Clear goals and objectives (8) |
| 2007/08 | 656 | 77% | Satisfied with the program (110) |
| Positive impression towards the program (75) |
| Clear objectives and strong theoretical support (46) |
| 2008/09 | 570 | 84% | Satisfied with the program (100) |
| Positive impression towards the program (91) |
| Liked the program (46) |
| S3 | 2007/08 | 153 | 74% | Satisfied with the program (46) |
| Clear objectives and strong theoretical support (11) |
| Positive impression toward the program (10) |
| 2008/09 | 572 | 85% | Satisfied with the program (86) |
| Positive impression towards the program (82) |
| Liked the program (46) |
|
| Total number of meaningful units | 4,137 | | Average positive responses: 80.22% |
|
