The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 351074 |

Karolina Sunjog, Zoran Gačić, Stoimir Kolarević, Željka Višnjić-Jeftić, Ivan Jarić, Jelena Knežević-Vukčević, Branka Vuković-Gačić, Mirjana Lenhardt, "Heavy Metal Accumulation and the Genotoxicity in Barbel (Barbus barbus) as Indicators of the Danube River Pollution", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2012, Article ID 351074, 6 pages, 2012.

Heavy Metal Accumulation and the Genotoxicity in Barbel (Barbus barbus) as Indicators of the Danube River Pollution

Academic Editor: A. K. Basu
Received31 Oct 2011
Accepted30 Nov 2011
Published26 Apr 2012


The aim of this study was to analyze 16 trace elements (Al, As, B, Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Li, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sr, and Zn) in different barbel (Barbus barbus) tissues and to detect the presence of genotoxic effects in erythrocytes with the alkaline comet assay. Barbel specimens were collected in the Danube river near Belgrade, Serbia, where the discharge of untreated communal and industrial wastewaters is likely to produce negative effects on fish residing in this area. The highest concentrations of Sr, Mn, Fe, Ba, B, and Al were found in gills, Mo and Cu in liver, and As and Zn in gonads. Concentrations of Zn and Fe were above maximum acceptable concentrations (MACs) in a number of gonad, gill, and liver samples. Three-year-old barbel specimens had higher tail moment and Zn concentrations in gills (1.71 and 51.20 μg/g dw, resp.) than 5-year-old specimens (0.85 and 42.51 μg/g dw, resp.). Results indicate that the younger barbel specimens might be more suitable for the monitoring of environmental pollution.

1. Introduction

Intensive industrialization and different anthropogenic influences have resulted in an increased presence of contaminants in aquatic habitats, thus requiring permanent monitoring of the presence of pollutants and their impact [1]. The Danube river in Serbia receives untreated wastewaters from a number of industrial facilities that are situated along the river [2, 3], especially in the vicinity of large cities [4]. Milijašević et al. [5] estimated that approximately 90% of all industrial wastewaters in Serbia are being discharged into water bodies without previous treatment. Furthermore, sediments in the Danube and its tributaries, such as the Tisza and the Sava rivers, contain increased levels of Zn, Mn, and Pb [6]. Chemical analyses of toxicant concentrations in the environment or in biological samples are not sufficient if their impact on the aquatic biota is not also properly evaluated [7, 8].

Aquatic ecosystems receive a number of toxic substances, among which heavy metals are of significant importance, due to their toxicity, their bioaccumulation potential, and their ability to induce damage in DNA [9]. Fish are often used as sentinel organisms due to their role in food webs, their potential for bioaccumulation of toxic substances, and their sensitivity to even low concentrations of mutagens. Investigations conducted on sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) and the Pontic shad (Alosa immaculata) from the Serbian part of the Danube River have revealed that concentrations of Cd, Pb, and Fe had exceeded maximum acceptable concentration (MAC) prescribed by both EU and national legislation [10, 11].

It is well known that a number of chemicals have a high persistency when they are released into an environment and have mutagenic and/or clastogenic properties [12]. The analysis of DNA alterations in aquatic organisms is widely accepted as a suitable method for evaluating genotoxic contamination of the environment and can be used to detect exposure in a wide range of species [12]. The comet assay, or a single cell gel electrophoresis, has a wide application as a simple and sensitive method for evaluating DNA damage in fish exposed to various xenobiotics in the aquatic environment [12, 13]. The alkaline comet assay was approved in fish as more sensitive to the genotoxicity of river contaminants than the micronucleus test [14]. Unlike classical chromosome breakage studies, such as micronucleus formation or cell survival studies, comet assay allows scanning complete genomes in all cell cycles, rather than just during mitosis.

The aim of the present study was to acquire information on concentrations of heavy metals in gills, muscle, liver, and gonads of barbel (Barbus barbus) from the Serbian part of the Danube river and on the possible biological effects of the pollution on this species, through the analysis of DNA damage.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Preparation

Barbel is a commercially important fish species in the Serbian part of the Danube river. As a bottom feeder, it is exposed to toxicants from both water and sediments. A total of 10 specimens of barbel were collected at the end of March 2010 by professional fishermen from the Danube (river kilometer 1173) in the vicinity of Belgrade, in the area where the river receives untreated communal and wastewaters from the city. Fish specimens were anesthetized with clove oil, and the blood was immediately collected from the heart with heparinized syringes. The collected blood for comet assay was stored on ice and transferred to the laboratory in a dark cool box. The total mass (g) and the total body length (cm) of each specimen were measured. Samples of liver, gills, muscle, and gonads were quickly removed, washed with distilled water, and stored at −20°C prior to analysis. Age determination was performed analyzing the growth marks of scales. It was not possible to determine the sex by macroscopic inspection of gonads. Comparison for DNA damage was made with 4 specimens caught from an unpolluted reference site (Uvac reservoir −43°25’N, 19°55’E).

2.2. Heavy Metal and Trace Elements Analysis

Samples were dried by Freeze Dryers Rotational Vacuum Concentrator, GAMMA 1–16 LSC, Germany, and sample portions between 0.2 and 0.5 g (dry weight) were processed in a microwave digester (speed wave MWS-3+; Bergof Products+ Instruments GmbH, Eningen, Germany), using 6 mL of 65% HNO3 and 4 mL of 30% H2O2 (Merck suprapure) at a food temperature program (100–170°C). The digested samples were diluted with distilled water to a total volume of 25 mL, and the analysis was performed by inductively coupled plasma optical spectrometry (ICP-OES). The following 16 heavy metals and trace elements were analyzed: Al, As, B, Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Li, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sr, and Zn. The following wavelength lines of the ICP-OES analysis were used: Al 394.401, As 189.042, B 249.773, Ba 233.527, Cd 228.802, Co 228.616, Cr 205.552, Cu 324.754, Fe 259.941, Li 460.289, Mn 259.373, Mo 202.095, Ni 231.604, Pb 220.353, Sr 460.733, and Zn 206.191. BCR-185R reference material of bovine liver as well as IAEA-336 Lichen reference material was used for the assessment of the accuracy and precision of the analysis. Analysis indicated that the concentrations were within 90–115% of the certified values for all measured elements. All heavy metal concentrations were expressed as μg g−1 dry weight (dw).

2.3. Comet Assay

The alkaline comet assay procedure was performed under yellow light, in accordance with the method described by Singh et al. [15]. Microscopic slides were precoated with 0.5% NMP agarose and air dried for 24 h. To form the second, supportive layer, 80 μL of 1% NMP agarose, was gently placed on the top of the 0.5% NMP layer and spread over the slide using coverslip. The slide was placed on ice for 5 min to allow complete polymerization of the agarose. After the coverslips were removed, 30 μL of erythrocyte pellet suspension, gently mixed with 70 μL of 1% LMP (37°C) agarose, was pipetted on the supportive layer of 1% NMP agarose and covered with a coverslip. After keeping coverslips for 5 min on ice, they were removed and the slides were placed into freshly made cold lysis buffer (2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 10 mMTris, 1.5% Triton X-100, 10% Dimethyl sulfoxide, pH 10) for 1 hour. To allow DNA unwinding, slides were put into electrophoresis chamber containing cold alkaline electrophoresis buffer (300 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA, pH 13) for 20 min. Electrophoresis was performed at 0.75 V/cm at 4°C for 20 min. After the electrophoresis, slides were placed into freshly made neutralizing buffer (0.4 M Tris, pH 7.5) for 15 min. Staining was performed with 20 μL per slide of EtBr (2 μg/mL). The slides were examined with a fluorescence microscope (Leica, DMLS, Austria, 400x magnification, 510–560 nm excitation filter, 590 nm barrier filter). Microscopic images of comets were scored using Comet IV Computer Software (Perceptive Instruments, UK). Images of 25 cells were collected from each of the two replicate slides per sample, and, among the parameters available for analyses, the tail moment, tail length, and tail intensity were used to assess DNA damage.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses of data were performed by Statistica for Windows [16]. Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA) was utilized to evaluate differences among tissues in heavy metal accumulation. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare concentrations of 10 heavy metals in 4 analyzed tissues, as well as differences between sites and between fish of different age.

3. Results and Discussion

The weight and the total body length of the studied barbel ranged from 205 to 671 g and from 29 to 41 cm, respectively. According to the age assessment, specimens were between 3+ (in the fourth year of life) and 5+ (in the sixth year of life) old. Heavy metal and trace element concentrations in each of the four analyzed tissues are presented in Table 1. Concentrations of Cd, Co, Cr, Li, Ni, and Pb were below the detection threshold level in all samples.


AlMean ± SDND 4 . 8 8 , 9 2 . 7 6 4 4 . 2 3 ± 7 1 . 0 8 ND
AsMean ± SD 1 . 4 0 0 . 5 4 0 . 5 9 1 . 4 1 ± 0 . 9 0
BMean ± SDNDND 1 0 . 7 1 ± 5 . 7 0 ND
BaMean ± SDNDND 1 0 . 6 3 ± 7 . 0 7 ND
CuMean ± SDND 2 7 . 4 9 ± 2 7 . 0 5 NDND
FeMean ± SDND 7 8 . 8 2 ± 2 4 . 6 6 a 1 2 0 . 9 1 ± 3 2 . 9 1 bND
MnMean ± SDND 0 . 7 8 ± 0 . 6 4 a 7 . 7 6 ± 2 . 5 4 bND
MoMean ± SDND 0 . 2 7 ± 0 . 1 1 0 . 0 6 , 0 . 8 1 ND
SrMean ± SD 4 . 3 8 ± 2 . 2 4 a 0 . 1 1 ± 0 . 0 7 b 5 9 . 6 0 ± 1 2 . 9 3 c 0 . 0 7 ± 0 . 0 1 d
ZnMean ± SD 1 2 . 8 9 ± 1 1 . 7 2 a 4 7 . 0 8 ± 1 8 . 4 4 b 4 7 . 8 5 ± 5 . 5 3 b 7 1 . 6 9 ± 5 3 . 9 4 b

a,b,c,dThe value with a different letter in the same row is different (Man-Whitney U-test, 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 ).
*Concentrations above detection threshold only in one sample.
**Concentrations above detection threshold only in two samples.

Comparisons of the extent of accumulation among analyzed tissues showed that the differences were statistically significant for most of the assessed metals and trace elements ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 , Table 1).

Concentrations of Sr, Mn, Fe, Ba, B, and Al were highest in gills, which made gills the most affected tissue. Such results are consistent with the literature. In fish, gills represent the largest surface in contact with the aquatic environment and they are thus expected to show the greatest tissue alteration, genotoxicity, and the accumulation of toxic chemicals [17]. As a consequence, respiratory function of gills can become decreased, consequently affecting the general health and ultimately resulting in death of the affected individual [18].

Concentrations of Mo and Cu were highest in the liver, while As and Zn had the highest concentrations in gonads. Studies of Bagdonas and Vosyliene [19], and Obiakor et al. [20] revealed that even a short-term exposure of fish to Cu and Zn in concentrations higher than those prescribed as MAC could produce genotoxic effects on erythrocytes. These studies also emphasized synergistic effects of these two metals.

CDA showed a clear differentiation among the four analyzed barbel tissues (Figure 1). The first two canonical functions accounted for 77.04% of the total heterogeneity (Root1 −55.83% and Root2 −21.21%). Gills were separated from the other three tissues along the first canonical function, while the liver was mostly differentiated from other tissues along the second canonical function. Gonads were differentiated by the third canonical function (Root3 −17.79%). Liver was mostly differentiated by high concentrations of Mo, gonads by high concentrations of As, and gills by high concentrations of Sr.

Comparison of heavy metals and trace elements between 3+- and 5+-year-old barbel specimens showed only significant difference in concentrations of Zn in gills, with higher values present in 3+-year-old fish ( 5 1 . 2 0 ± 4 . 2 5 μg/g dw) than in 5+-year-old fish ( 4 2 . 5 1 ± 2 . 8 2 μg/g dw). Thielen et al. [21] and Nachev et al. [1] found higher concentrations of heavy metals and trace elements in helminths than in barbel, their host, from the Hungarian and Bulgarian part of the Danube River. These authors also found negative correlation between the number of parasites and the level of metal accumulation in organs of the barbel. Our investigation revealed a higher occurrence of the parasite Pomphorhynchus laevis (Acanthocephala) in the older barbel specimens than in the younger ones ( 1 2 8 ± 7 . 8 and 7 2 . 5 ± 2 1 . 5 , resp.). Significantly higher concentrations of Zn in gills in younger barbel specimens, as well as a lower number of parasites, indicate potential existence of the negative correlation between the abundance of parasites and the metal levels in barbel organs. Linde et al. [22] found that the older trouts (Salmo trutta) seem less appropriate for the monitoring of heavy metal pollution than the younger specimens. Results obtained in the present study indicate that the younger barbels seem to be more suited for the monitoring of environmental pollution, due to their higher susceptibility.

In some tissues, concentrations of heavy metals exceeded acceptable levels for human consumption. Concentrations of Zn were above limits recommended by FAO (30 μg/g wet weight) in five gonad samples. Concentrations of Fe were above the national MAC (30 μg/g wet weight) in five gill and two liver samples.

The three parameters of genotoxicity—tail moment, tail length, and tail intensity—have been widely used by researchers for evaluating DNA damage. As the amount of damage increases in a cell, more DNA migrates into the tail region and is quantified in terms of an increased amount of determined fluorescence in the tail region, as well as by tail length. The ratio of the DNA in the tail region (tail intensity) is commonly used for quantifying DNA strand breakage and represents the most reliable parameter [23]. However, the main disadvantage of this parameter is that two cells with different tail lengths may have the same degree of tail intensity and may produce the same result. A major advantage when using the tail moment as an index of the DNA damage is that both the amount of the damaged DNA and the distance of the genetic material migration in the tail are represented by a single number [24]. Which parameter of DNA migration will be applied often depends on the personal preferences of the investigator. In this study, we used all three parameters and conducted the scoring with the comet assay IV software, to reduce the possibility of bias due to subjectivity.

The results of the comet assay analysis are summarized in Table 2. We compared the comet parameters of the fish from the Danube river with those from Uvac reservoir, Special Nature Reserve, as a control site with a very low anthropogenic influence. We observed differences between the three- and five-year fish, with significant differences in two of the three assessed parameters (tail moment and tail intensity), which is in accordance with previous studies [25]. All three parameters showed significant differences when the studied site and the reference site were compared. The tail intensity in fish from the Danube river (7.92) was significantly higher ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 1 ) than in fish from the reference site (4.76). Furthermore, the tail moment and the tail length parameters in fish from the Danube river (1.28 and 28.51, resp.) were both significantly higher ( 𝑃 = 0 ) than in fish from the reference site (0.31 and 12.80, resp.). Tail moment in carp (Cyprinus carpio) from the Lake Mogan, which is under pollution stress of agricultural activities, was 1 . 5 0 ± 1 . 4 8 [24], which is a similar result to the one obtained in the present study ( 1 . 2 8 ± 1 . 4 1 ) .

LocationNumber of cellsAgeTail length (μm)Tail momentTail intensity (%)

River Danube, Zemun1503+ 2 8 . 3 5 ± 1 0 . 9 3 1 . 7 1 ± 1 . 6 5 1 0 . 7 7 ± 1 0 . 9 3
1505+ 2 8 . 6 7 ± 7 . 8 0 0 . 8 6 ± 1 . 1 7 5 . 0 7 ± 7 . 0 1
Total 300 2 8 . 5 1 ± 9 . 3 6 1 . 2 8 ± 1 . 4 1 7 . 9 2 ± 8 . 9 7
Reference site, Uvac200 1 2 . 8 0 ± 4 . 3 1 0 . 3 1 ± 0 . 3 7 4 . 7 6 ± 5 . 3 6

Fish can serve as useful genetic models for the evaluation of pollution in aquatic ecosystems [26]. Marcon et al. [27] found that a high content of certain metals in the water could be one of the factors that might cause genetic damages in fish. The comet assay has been successfully used to investigate effects of genotoxic pollutants on the integrity of DNA [24, 2830]. There are numerous studies dealing with the comet assay conducted in vitro [2933], while few studies have been focused on in situ genotoxicity [34]. Micronucleus test was the only genotoxicity test applied thus far on barbel specimens from the natural population in the Danube river [33]. Therefore, the present study represents the first application of the comet assay for the evaluation of the Danube river water genotoxicity on barbel.

Our results confirm earlier claims that fish represent a good model system for water monitoring. Biomarkers of genotoxicity have confirmed their sensitivity and suitability for this type of research. Since heavy metals do not represent the only group of water pollutants, it is very likely that other types of pollutants have also contributed to the increase in genotoxicity, determined in the present study. White and Rasmussen [35] presented evidence that despite the substantial genotoxicity of some industrial wastewaters, domestic wastewaters constitute a major genotoxic hazard to aquatic ecosystems. Since the industrial and domestic wastewaters in Serbia are still not processed before being released into watercourses, pollution indicators and genotoxicity parameters represent an essential tool for efficient monitoring of aquatic ecosystems in Serbia.


This research was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of Serbia (Grant no: ON173045).


  1. M. Nachev, S. Zimmermann, T. Rigaud, and B. Sures, “Is metal accumulation in Pomphorhynchus laevis dependent on parasite sex or infrapopulation size?” Parasitology, vol. 137, no. 8, pp. 1239–1248, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Stanković, “The physical and chemical characteristics of Danube water quality near Kovin (Vojvodina) in Serbia,” in Proceedings of the 36th International Conference of IAD, pp. 399–403, Austrian Committee DanubeResearch/IAD, Vienna, Austria, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  3. A. Milanović, J. Kovačević-Majkić, and M. Milivojević, “Water quality analysis of Danube River in Serbia—pollution and protection problems,” Bulletin of the Serbian Geographical Society, vol. 90, pp. 59–68, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  4. B. Stanic, N. Andric, S. Zoric, G. Grubor-Lajsic, and R. Kovacevic, “Assessing pollution in the Danube River near Novi Sad (Serbia) using several biomarkers in sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus L.),” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 395–402, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. Milijašević, J. Brankov, and A. Milanović, “Water quality in the Hydro—System Danube—Tisza—Danube,” in Proceedings of the BALWOIS Conference, pp. 1–7, Ohrid, Macedonia, May 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. Janković and M. Jovičić, “Concluding considerations,” in The Danube in Yugoslavia, D. Jankovic and M. Jovicic, Eds., pp. 213–218, Institute for Biological Research, Belgrade, Serbia, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. Nigro, A. Falleni, I. D. Barga et al., “Cellular biomarkers for monitoring estuarine environments: transplanted versus native mussels,” Aquatic Toxicology, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 339–347, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. N. Jha, “Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay,” Mutagenesis, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 207–221, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. Szefer, K. Szefer, and B. Skwarzec, “Distribution of trace metals in some representative fauna of the southern Baltic,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 60–62, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Z. Višnjić-Jeftić, I. Jarić, L. Jovanovic et al., “Heavy metal and trace element accumulation in muscle, liver and gills of the Pontic shad (Alosa immaculata Bennet 1835) from the Danube River (Serbia),” Microchemical Journal, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 341–344, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. I. Jarić, Ž. Višnjić-Jeftić, G. Cvijanović et al., “Determination of differential heavy metal and trace element accumulation in liver, gills, intestine and muscle of sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) from the Danube River in Serbia by ICP-OES,” Microchemical Journal, vol. 98, pp. 77–81, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. Frenzilli, M. Nigro, and B. P. Lyons, “The Comet assay for the evaluation of genotoxic impact in aquatic environments,” Mutation Research, vol. 681, no. 1, pp. 80–92, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Dhawan, M. Bajpayee, and D. Parmar, “Comet assay: a reliable tool for the assessment of DNA damage in different models,” Cell Biology and Toxicology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. V. Moraes De Andrade, J. da Silva, F. R. da Silva et al., “Fish as bioindicators to assess the effects of pollution in two Southern Brazilian rivers using the comet assay and micronucleus test,” Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 459–468, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. N. P. Singh, M. T. McCoy, R. R. Tice, and E. L. Schneider, “A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 184–191, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  16. StatSoft, STATISTICA for Windows [Computer program manual], StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, Okla, USA, 2001.
  17. S. Yildiz, B. Gurcu, Y. Basimoglu Koca, and S. Koca, “Histopathological and genotoxic effects of pollution on Anguilla anguilla in the Gediz River (Turkey),” Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 2890–2899, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Thophon, M. Kruatrachue, E. S. Upatham, P. Pokethitiyook, S. Sahaphong, and S. Jaritkhuan, “Histopathological alterations of white seabass, Lates calcarifer, in acute and subchronic cadmium exposure,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 307–320, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. E. Bagdonas and M. Z. Vosyliene, “A study of toxicity and genotoxicity of copper, zinc and their mixture to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss),” Biologija, vol. 1, pp. 8–13, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  20. M. O. Obiakor, J. C. Okonkwo, C. D. Ezeonyejiaku, and C. O. Ezenwelu, “Genotoxicology: single and joint action of copper and zinc to synodontisclarias and Tilapia nilotica,” Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, vol. 14, pp. 59–64, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  21. F. Thielen, S. Zimmermann, F. Baska, H. Taraschewski, and B. Sures, “The intestinal parasite Pomphorhynchus laevis (Acanthocephala) from barbel as a bioindicator for metal pollution in the Danube River near Budapest, Hungary,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 421–429, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. R. Linde, S. Sánchez-Galán, J. I. Izquierdo, P. Arribas, E. Marañón, and E. García-Vázquez, “Brown trout as biomonitor of heavy metal pollution: effect of age on the reliability of the assessment,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 40, no. 1-2, pp. 120–125, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. L. Mitchelmore and J. K. Chipman, “DNA strand breakage in aquatic organisms and the potential value of the comet assay in environmental monitoring,” Mutation Research, vol. 399, no. 2, pp. 135–147, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. I. Çok, O. K. Ulutaş, O. Okuşluk, E. Durmaz, and N. Demir, “Evaluation of DNA damage in common Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) by comet assay for determination of possible pollution in Lake Mogan (Ankara),” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 11, pp. 1455–1461, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  25. F. Akcha, G. Leday, and A. Pfohl-Leszkowicz, “Measurement of DNA adducts and strand breaks in dab (Limanda limanda) collected in the field: effects of biotic (age, sex) and abiotic (sampling site and period) factors on the extent of DNA damage,” Mutation Research, vol. 552, no. 1-2, pp. 197–207, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Elliott, A. H. Griffiths, and C. J. L. Taylor, “The role of fish studies in estuarine pollution assessment,” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 33, pp. 51–61, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  27. A. E. Marcon, D. D. M. Ferreira, M. F. V. de Moura et al., “Genotoxic analysis in aquatic environment under influence of cyanobacteria, metal and radioactivity,” Chemosphere, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 773–780, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. Belpaeme, K. Delbeke, L. Zhu, and M. Kirsch-Volders, “Cytogenetic studies of PCB77 on brown trout (Salmo trutta fario) using the micronucleus test and the alkaline comet assay,” Mutagenesis, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 485–492, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  29. M. V. M. Ferraro, A. S. Fenocchio, M. S. Mantovani, C. de Oliveira Ribeiro, and M. M. Cestari, “Mutagenic effects of tributyltin and inorganic lead (Pb II) on the fish H. malabaricus as evaluated using the comet assay and the piscine micronucleus and chromosome aberration tests,” Genetics and Molecular Biology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 103–107, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  30. M. C.S. Scalon, C. Rechenmacher, A. M. Siebel et al., “Evaluation of Sinos River water genotoxicity using the comet assay in fish,” Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 70, pp. 1217–1222, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  31. S. Sharma, N. S. Nagpure, R. Kumar et al., “Studies on the genotoxicity of endosulfan in different tissues of fresh water fish Mystus vittatus using the comet assay,” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 617–623, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. Rajaguru, S. Suba, M. Palanivel, and K. Kalaiselvi, “Genotoxicity of a polluted river system measured using the alkaline comet assay on fish and earthworm tissues,” Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 85–91, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Boettcher, S. Grund, S. Keiter et al., “Comparison of in vitro and in situ genotoxicity in the Danube River by means of the comet assay and the micronucleus test,” Mutation Research, vol. 700, no. 1-2, pp. 11–17, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. Wirzinger, L. Weltje, J. Gercken, and H. Sordyl, “Genotoxic damage in field-collected three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.): a suitable biomonitoring tool?” Mutation Research, vol. 628, no. 1, pp. 19–30, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. P. A. White and J. B. Rasmussen, “The genotoxic hazards of domestic wastes in surface waters,” Mutation Research, vol. 410, no. 3, pp. 223–236, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Karolina Sunjog et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.