Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 356712, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/356712
Clinical Study

Grade 2 Spondylolisthesis at L4-5 Treated by XLIF: Safety and Midterm Results in the “Worst Case Scenario”

Spine Midwest, Inc., Suite 301, 200 St. Mary’s Medical Plaza, Jefferson City, MO 65101, USA

Received 7 May 2012; Accepted 29 July 2012

Academic Editors: G. J. Hooper, C. C. Niu, and Y. K. Tu

Copyright © 2012 W. B. Rodgers et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. S. Kalanithi, C. G. Patil, and M. Boakye, “National complication rates and disposition after posterior lumbar fusion for acquired spondylolisthesis,” Spine, vol. 34, no. 18, pp. 1963–1969, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. M. Pearson, J. D. Lurie, E. A. Blood et al., “Spine patient outcomes research trial: radiographic predictors of clinical outcomes after operative or nonoperative treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis,” Spine, vol. 33, no. 25, pp. 2759–2766, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. N. Weinstein, J. D. Lurie, T. D. Tosteson et al., “Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 22, pp. 2257–2270, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. N. Weinstein, J. D. Lurie, T. D. Tosteson et al., “Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT),” Spine, vol. 33, no. 25, pp. 2789–2800, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. K. Resnick, T. F. Choudhri, A. T. Dailey et al., “Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: fusion in patients with stenosis and spondylolisthesis,” Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 679–685, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. K. Sengupta and H. N. Herkowitz, “Degenerative spondylolisthesis: review of current trends and controversies,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. S71–S81, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. N. Tosteson, T. D. Tosteson, J. D. Lurie et al., “Factors Affecting 4-year cost-effectiveness of surgery for stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (Sport),” International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine. In press.
  8. T. Moro, S. I. Kikuchi, S. I. Konno, and H. Yaginuma, “An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery,” Spine, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 423–427, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Lauber, T. L. Schulte, U. Liljenqvist, H. Halm, and L. Hackenberg, “Clinical and radiologic 2 - 4-Year results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2,” Spine, vol. 31, no. 15, pp. 1693–1698, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. S. Kim, B. U. Kang, S. H. Lee et al., “Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 114–121, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. M. Ozgur, H. E. Aryan, L. Pimenta, and W. R. Taylor, “Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion,” Spine Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 435–443, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. M. Ozgur, V. Agarwal, E. Nail, and L. Pimenta, “Two-year clinical and radiographic success of minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach for the treatment of degenerative lumbar conditions,” SAS Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 41–46, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. W. B. Rodgers, C. S. Cox, and E. J. Gerber, “Experience and early results with a minimally invasive technique for anterior column support through extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF),” US Musculoskeletal Review, vol. 2, pp. 28–32, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  14. W. B. Rodgers, C. S. Cox, and E. J. Gerber, “Minimally invasive treatment (XLIF) of adjacent segment disease after prior lumbar fusions,” The Internet Journal of Minimally Invasive Spinal Technology, vol. 3, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  15. W. B. Rodgers, C. S. Cox, and E. J. Gerber, “Early complications of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the obese,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 393–397, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. B. Rodgers, E. J. Gerber, and J. R. Patterson, “Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography,” SAS Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 63–66, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. B. Rodgers, E. J. Gerber, and J. A. Rodgers, “Lumbar fusion in octogenarians: the promise of minimally invasive surgery,” Spine, vol. 35, pp. S355–S360, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. B. Rodgers, E. J. Gerber, and J. Patterson, “Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases,” Spine, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. L. Bergey, A. T. Villavicencio, T. Goldstein, and J. J. Regan, “Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine,” Spine, vol. 29, no. 15, pp. 1681–1688, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. C. Booth, K. H. Bridwell, B. A. Eisenberg, C. R. Baldus, and L. G. Lenke, “Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion,” Spine, vol. 24, no. 16, pp. 1721–1727, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Q. Knight, P. Schwaegler, D. Hanscom, and J. Roh, “Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication profile,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 34–37, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. D. M. Benglis, S. Vanni, and A. D. Levi, “An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: laboratory investigation,” Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 139–144, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. K. Hu, S. S. He, S. C. Zhang et al., “An MRI study of psoas major and abdominal large vessels with respect to the X/DLIF approach,” European Spine Journal, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 557–562, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. K. Kepler, E. A. Bogner, R. J. Herzog, and R. C. Huang, “Anatomy of the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus with respect to the surgical approach for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion,” European Spine Journal, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 550–556, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. K. Park, M. J. Lee, E. L. Lin, K. Singh, H. S. An, and F. M. Phillips, “The relationship of intrapsoas nerves during a transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: anatomic study,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 223–228, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. J. Regev, L. Chen, M. Dhawan, Y. P. Lee, S. R. Garfin, and C. W. Kim, “Morphometric analysis of the ventral nerve roots and retroperitoneal vessels with respect to the minimally invasive lateral approach in normal and deformed spines,” Spine, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1330–1335, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. S. Uribe, N. Arredondo, E. Dakwar, and F. L. Vale, “Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study,” Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 260–266, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. G. Lenke, K. H. Bridwell, D. Bullis, R. R. Betz, C. Baldus, and P. L. Schoenecker, “Results of in situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis,” Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 433–442, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. C. Sasso, N. M. Best, P. V. Mummaneni, T. M. Reilly, and S. M. Hussain, “Analysis of operative complications in a series of 471 anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 670–674, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L. Y. Carreon, R. M. Puno, J. R. Dimar, S. D. Glassman, and J. R. Johnson, “Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 2089–2092, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. P. DiPaola and R. W. Molinari, “Posterior lumbar interbody fusion,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 130–139, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. N. A. Tosteson, J. D. Lurie, T. D. Tosteson et al., “Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 149, no. 12, pp. 845–853, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. I. Kimura, H. Shingu, M. Murata, and H. Hashiguchi, “Lumbar posterolateral fusion alone or with transpedicular instrumentation in L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis,” Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 301–310, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. I. Suk, C. K. Lee, W. J. Kim, J. H. Lee, K. J. Cho, and H. G. Kim, “Addding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis,” Spine, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 210–220, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. H. Min, J. S. Jang, and S. H. Lee, “Comparison of anterior- and posterior-approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis,” Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Laupacis, D. Feeny, A. S. Detsky, and P. X. Tugwell, “How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations,” CMAJ, vol. 146, no. 4, pp. 473–481, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Laupacis, D. Feeny, A. S. Detsky, and P. X. Tugwell, “Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations revisited,” CMAJ, vol. 148, no. 6, pp. 927–929, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. S. Dhall, M. Y. Wang, and P. V. Mummaneni, “Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up: Clinical article,” Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 560–565, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. K. J. Deluzio, J. C. Lucio, and W. B. Rodgers, “Value and cost in less invasive spinal fusion surgery: lessons from a community hospital,” SAS Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 37–40, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. Y. Wang, M. D. Cummock, Y. Yu, and R. A. Trivedi, “An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion,” Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 694–699, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus