Research Article

Planting Jatropha curcas on Constrained Land: Emission and Effects from Land Use Change

Table 3

Estimated monthly dry weight of biomass and litterfall of Jatropha curcas and mass of carbon stored in each respective part (mean ± standard error).

MonthYearBiomass dry weightCarbon in biomassLitterfall dry weightCarbon in litterfall
(Mg ha−1)(Mg ha−1)

August2009 0 . 6 0 ± 0 . 3 8 0 . 2 7 ± 0 . 1 7 0 . 0 5 ± 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 3 ± 0 . 0 1
September2009 0 . 8 3 ± 0 . 4 9 0 . 3 8 ± 0 . 2 2 0 . 0 3 ± 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 1 ± 0 . 0 1
October2009 1 . 0 2 ± 0 . 4 8 0 . 4 6 ± 0 . 2 2 0 . 0 8 ± 0 . 0 5 0 . 0 4 ± 0 . 0 3
November2009 1 . 0 4 ± 0 . 5 0 0 . 4 7 ± 0 . 2 3 0 . 1 1 ± 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 5 ± 0 . 0 4
December2009 1 . 4 4 ± 0 . 6 9 0 . 6 5 ± 0 . 3 1 0 . 1 8 ± 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 8 ± 0 . 0 4
January2010 1 . 6 4 ± 0 . 7 6 0 . 7 4 ± 0 . 3 4 0 . 0 8 ± 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 4 ± 0 . 0 2
February2010 2 . 0 6 ± 0 . 9 8 0 . 9 3 ± 0 . 4 4 0 . 1 1 ± 0 . 0 3 0 . 0 5 ± 0 . 0 2
March2010 2 . 4 2 ± 1 . 0 7 1 . 1 0 ± 0 . 4 8 0 . 0 5 ± 0 . 0 5 0 . 0 2 ± 0 . 0 2
April2010 2 . 9 9 ± 1 . 5 3 1 . 1 8 ± 0 . 5 8 0 . 1 2 ± 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 6 ± 0 . 0 4
May2010 3 . 6 9 ± 1 . 8 8 1 . 4 6 ± 0 . 7 3 0 . 1 2 ± 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 6 ± 0 . 0 2
June2010 4 . 0 9 ± 1 . 8 2 1 . 8 6 ± 0 . 8 2 0 . 1 6 ± 0 . 0 7 0 . 0 8 ± 0 . 0 3
July2010 4 . 6 8 ± 1 . 5 1 2 . 1 3 ± 0 . 6 8 0 . 2 2 ± 0 . 0 7 0 . 1 0 ± 0 . 0 3

Cumulated Total4.081.861.290.60