Natural Killer Cells and Their Role in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Friend or Foe?

Shegarfi, Hamid; Naddafi, Fatemeh; Mirshafiey, Abbas

doi:https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/491974

The Scientific World Journal

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 | Article ID 491974 | https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/491974

Natural Killer Cells and Their Role in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Friend or Foe?

Hamid Shegarfi,¹Fatemeh Naddafi,²and Abbas Mirshafiey²

Academic Editor: E. Toma, A. Varas

Received24 Oct 2011

Accepted30 Nov 2011

Published01 Apr 2012

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a long-term disease that leads to inflammation of the joints and surrounding tissues. Natural killer (NK) cells are an important part of the innate immune system and are responsible for the first line of defense against pathogens during the initial immune challenge before the adaptive immune system eventually eliminates the infectious burden. NK cells have the capacity to damage normal cells or through interaction with other cells such as dendritic cells, macrophages, and T cells cause autoimmune diseases, such as RA. NK cells isolated from the joints of patients with RA suggest that they may play a role in this disease. However, the involvement of NK cells in RA pathology is not fully elucidated. Both protective and detrimental roles of NK cells in RA have recently been reported. A better understanding of NK cells' role in RA might help to develop new therapeutic strategies for treatment of the RA or other autoimmune diseases. We have decided in this paper to focus on the NK cell biology, and attempt to bring the interested readership of this Journal up to date on the NK cell, specifically its possible relation to RA.

1. Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease determined by an inflammation of the synovial membrane leading to destruction of cartilage and bone [1]. The interaction between genetic and environmental factors can contribute to RA occurrence [2]. RA is more prevalent among women than men [3]. It has been demonstrated that osteoclasts are crucial mediators of all forms of bone loss in RA [4]. TNF-α induces synovial fibroblasts and macrophages (MØs) to release IL-1. TNF-α, IL-1 and, RANKL promote osteoclast activation and osteolysis in RA [4]. Recent studies have indicated that HLA-DRB1 SE alleles are associated with a severe course of RA, and a parameter that can be measured is bone destruction [5]. It has been indicated that RA patients expressing a combination of two SE-associated HLA-DRB1 alleles exhibit the most severe small joint damage in the initial stages of the disease and suffer a high proportion of long-term large joint destruction [6]. Plasma soluble HLA-G levels are lower in RA patients than in controls, and low soluble HLA-G indicates that T and natural killer (NK) cell activities are not inhibited by soluble HLA-G molecules in RA [7]. The accumulation of NK cells has been demonstrated in the synovial fluid in patients with RA [8]. Hence, knowledge of NK cells and NK cell receptors may be of great interest for their role to RA. In this review, we focus on current knowledge regarding NK cells and NK cell receptors in human autoimmune diseases such as RA.

2. Natural Killer Cells

Natural killer (NK) cells were defined by their ability to spontaneously kill tumor cells and virally infected cells [9, 10]. To date, we know that these cells are capable of recognizing and destroying a wide variety of target cells, including transplanted, virally infected, antibody-coated, stressed, and transformed cells [11]. NK cells constitute the third major population of lymphocytes together with T and B cells. The majority of NK cells are believed to be relatively short lived, although more long-lived subpopulations of NK cells have been identified in lymph nodes (LNs) and thymus [12]. There are about 2 billion NK cells in adults and they are mostly found in the blood, bone marrow (BM), spleen, liver, LNs, thymus, lung, peritoneum, and in the uterus during gestation.

The two major functions of NK cells are cytotoxicity and cytokine production (Figure 1). NK cells display heightened cytotoxicity when activated by cytokines, such as IL-2 or IL-15. NK cells are capable of performing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) through CD16 (low-affinity Fcγ receptor IIIA). CD16 binds to the Fc tail of antibodies. When target cells are coated with antibodies, they may induce ADCC. NK cells may kill tumors and virally infected cells through the induction of apoptosis. Perforin is stored in cytoplasmic granules that are released upon NK cell activation. Perforin monomers are inserted into the plasma membrane of target cells and polymerize into a pore through which granzyme A and B enter and induce apoptosis. Perforin is constitutively expressed in NK cells but its expression is enhanced by IL-2 stimulation [12, 13]. NK cells also express TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and FasL, which are important mediators of apoptosis. TRAIL is only expressed by subpopulations of resting NK cells, but is generally expressed after stimulation by IL-2, IFN-α/β, or IL-15. Fas is a transmembrane protein expressed by abnormal cells and may induce apoptotic signals after binding to FasL on NK cells [13].

NK cells also produce cytokines, of which IFN-γ is critically important both in the innate and adaptive immune responses. It has both immunostimulatory and immunomodulatory effects. It induces T_H1 responses and upregulates MHC-I expression on a variety of cells, such as antigen presenting cells (APCs). Subpopulations of NK cells may also produce TNF-α, GM-CSF, IL-5, IL-13, IL-10, and TGF-β. It has been reported that some cytokines, including IL-2, IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 may stimulate cytokine production by NK cells [11, 13–15].

3. NK Cell Definition

NK cells are derived from haematopoietic stem cells in the BM. This is also the place for primary NK cell development. These cells may also develop at peripheral sites such as liver [16]. Peripheral activation of mature NK cells may result in phenotype modification and modulation of NK cell effector functions [14, 16]. In humans, NK cells have been phenotypically defined as CD3⁻CD56⁺ lymphocytes that may be further subdivided into CD5CD1 (90% of all NK) and CD5 CD16⁻ cells. These subpopulations differ in regard to cytotoxic capacity and cytokine profiles [17]. In mice, the best model for studying NK cells, NK cells are defined as CD3⁻NK1.1⁺CD122⁺ [12].

4. NK Gene Complex (NKC) and Leukocyte Receptor Cluster (LRC)

The human and mouse NKCs are located on chromosomes 12 and 6, respectively. These regions encode most of the NK cell receptors in these species. The murine NKC encodes lectin-like molecules that can be classified into families of highly homologous members. These receptors are encoded by clusters of closely linked genes that usually are separated from the other gene families. Among families, the receptors share some general structural features but display limited homology [18]. In humans, LRC located on chromosome 19 encodes killer cell Ig-like receptors (KIR).

5. NK Cell Receptors

Several NK cell receptor families have been identified (Table 1). NK cell functions are controlled by a repertoire of activating and inhibitory receptors. Usually more than one antigen receptor is expressed on a single NK cell. This is in contrast to B and T cells, which are mainly controlled by single antigen receptors (BCR and TCR, resp.). The genes that encode NK receptors do not undergo recombination. The killer immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR), Ly49 and CD94/NKG2 receptors monitor MHC-I molecules while other families such as the activating NKG2D receptor, the only member of this family, recognize MHC-like molecules; for example, MICA in humans and RAE ligands in mice [13].

NK cell receptors can be structurally divided in two groups: the killer cell lectin-like receptors (KLR) and immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily receptors. The former include the NKR-P1 (KLRB), CD94/NKG2 (KLRC/D), and NKG2D (KLRK) receptor families. The latter includes the killer cell Ig-like receptors (KIR), natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCR), and FcγRIII (CD16). It should be noted that many NK cell receptors are not restricted to NK cells but can also be found on other cells.

6. Killer Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor (KIR) Family

Killer cell Ig-like receptors (KIR) which apparently function as MHC-I recognizing receptors akin to Ly49 receptors in rodents encoded by the LRC located on chromosome 19. The KIR family is a highly polymorphic multigene family of receptors. The KIR receptors are classified by the number of extracellular Ig domains (2D or 3D). They have long (KIR-L) or short (KIR-S) cytoplasmic tails. KIR-L contains two ITIMs responsible for their inhibitory function. KIR-S lacks ITIMs, but instead has a charged amino acid in their transmembrane domains necessary for their activating function. KIRs may be expressed as monomers or disulphide-linked homodimers. Like Ly49s, KIRs are expressed by overlapping subsets of human NK cells and some T-cell subsets [11, 19].

Like Ly49 receptors in rodents, human KIRs recognize allelic variants of HLA class I, HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C, molecules. KIR can discriminate between different peptides presented by HLA molecules; however, these receptors do not distinguish self from nonself peptides [11, 20]. The specific ligands for some inhibitory KIR have been characterized and it has been shown that some of the KIR2D subfamily recognizes a polymorphism in HLA-C proteins while KIR3DL1 reacts with HLA-B and certain HLA-A proteins that possess the Bw4 serological epitope. KIR3DL2 has been shown to recognize certain HLA-A ligands. The specificity of the activating KIRs has been less characterized and, seemingly, they do not bind to HLA class I and if they bind, the affinity is much weaker than that of the paired inhibitory KIR. For instance, the extracellular domain of the activating KIR2DS2 differs from KIR2DL2 and KIR2DL3 by only 3 or 4 amino acids, respectively, and fail to bind to HLA-C*0304 [21].

KIR2DL4 is the most distinct gene in the KIR family and encodes the activating receptor KIR2DL4 while it contains ITIM in its cytoplasmic domain. In contrast to other activating KIR, it associates with the FcεRIγ adapter protein rather than with DAP12. It has been suggested that the HLA-G is the cognate ligand of KIR2DL4 [11]. As mentioned, HLA-G has been shown to be involved in RA [7].

7. NKG2 (KLRC)/CD94 (KLRD) Families

CD94 is expressed together with NKG2A, NKG2C, or NKG2E. NKG2A has two ITIMs in its cytoplasmic tail inferring an inhibitory function to the CD94/NKG2A receptor. The activating CD94/NKG2C/E receptor is associated with the adapter protein DAP12. DAP12 binding is necessary for stable surface expression and receptor signalling. Human CD94/NKG2A and CD94/NKG2C receptors bind to the nonclassical HLA-E molecules while mouse receptors recognize H2-Qa1^b [11]. These molecules present peptides from the leader segments of other MHC-I molecules. NK cells in this manner may indirectly monitor the general level of host MHC-I expression [11]. The CD94/NKG2 receptors and their corresponding ligands are relatively conserved. These receptors are expressed by subsets of NK and T cells. Unlike the stably expressed KIR and Ly49 receptors, receptor expression of CD94/NKG2 is modulated by cytokines. As for the KIRs and Ly49s, the inhibitory CD94/NKG2A receptor appears to have higher ligand affinity than its activated counterpart.

8. NKG2D Family

The NKG2D receptor is expressed as a homodimer on NK cells, activated CD8⁺ T cells, subsets of γδT cells, NKT cells and in certain conditions, human CD4⁺ T cells [17, 22]. NKG2D has received considerable attention because of its role in immune responses related to cancer, infection, and autoimmunity. NKG2D has little homology with other NKG2 receptors. Expression of NKG2D requires an association with the adaptor proteins DAP10 or DAP12 [11]. In the mouse, two isoforms of NKG2D have been identified. The longer protein (NKG2D-L) exclusively is associated with the DAP10 whereas the short isoform (NKG2D-S) can pair with either DAP12 or DAP10. NKG2D receptors mediate “induced self-recognition” that is, it recognizes ligands that are upregulated on stressed or diseased cells [23]. Human NKG2D ligands include the MHC-I-like molecules MICA and MICB and UL16-binding proteins: ULBP1, -2, -3, and -4. In mice the ligands include retinoic acid early transcript 1 (RAET1) ligands: RAE-1α, -β, -γ, -δ, and ε, H60, and MULT1 [11, 13]. NKG2D was first cloned in humans [24], and later in mice [25].

9. Natural Cytotoxicity Receptor (NCR) Family

The stimulatory receptors NKp30, NKp44, NKp46, and NKp80 belong to the natural cytotoxicity receptor (NCR) family [20]. They are involved in tumour surveillance possibly by mediating “induced self-recognition.” NKp46 and NKp30 are expressed by all NK cells whereas only activated NK cells express NKp44. NKp44 and NKp80 have not been found in rodents. Ligands for the NCRs may include viral haemagglutinins (NKp46 and NKp44), heparan sulphate proteoglycans (NKp30 and NKp46), the nuclear factor HLA-B-associated transcript 3 (NKp30), and activation-induced C-type lectin (NKp80) [20]. The NCRs are encoded by genes within the LRC which also encodes KIRs in humans. The stress-induced B7-H6 molecules expressed by human tumor cells may trigger NKp30-mediated activation of NK cells [26]. The NKp46 which plays an important role in killing cancer cells [27] and virally infected cells [28] has been characterized in humans, rodents, monkeys, and cattle [29]. NKp46 is exclusively expressed by NK cells, and is probably the best NK cell marker available. The ITAM present in NKp46 associated with CD3ζ and FcεRIγ suggests activating the NK cell cytotoxicity in a similar manner to CD16 [30].

10. NKR-P1 (KLRB) Family

The NKR-P1 receptors were initially characterized in the rat [31] but later in mice and humans [32]. They recognize the Clr molecules. NKR-P1A, -B, -F, and -G receptors have been characterized in the rat while NKR-P1A, -B/-D, -C, -F, and -G receptors have been studied in the mouse. NKR-P1A is the only receptor present in humans. It is an inhibitory receptor and shares 45% amino acid identity with the mouse NKR-P1 molecules. It is expressed by subsets of NK and T cells [33].

11. KLRG Family

KLRG1 or mast cell function-associated Ag (MAFA) belongs to the C-type lectin-like superfamily and is an ITIM-containing receptor. In mice and humans, this well-conserved receptor is found on subsets of T and NK cells. Ligands for KLRG1 are E-, N-, and R-cadherin. Expression of these ligands may be lower in metastatic tumours rendering these cells more sensitive to NK-mediated killing [34]. Expression of KLRG1 increases substantially in T and NK cells during viral, bacterial, and parasitic infections in mice. KLRG1 is also expressed on FoxP3⁺ regulatory T cells [35].

12. Other NK Cell Receptors

FcγRIII (CD16) is expressed by NK cells, MØ, neutrophils, and mast cells. It binds to the Fc (fragment, crystallisable) portion of the human IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies. Antibody binding induces ADCC, an effector mechanism that NK cells employ to kill antibody-coated target cells. However, some viruses, such as flaviviruses exploit Fc receptors to infect cells, a mechanism known as antibody-dependent enhancement of infection [11]. Signalling via CD16 may cause not only degranulation and cytokine production, but also apoptosis of NK cells [36]. 2B4 is a member of the signalling lymphocyte activation molecule-(SLAM-) related family of receptors and is expressed by all NK cells, γσT cells, subsets of CD8⁺ T cells and human monocytes [33]. CD48 is the ligand for 2B4. Mouse 2B4 may function as an activating or inhibitory receptor depending on its splice forms while human 2B4 is an activating receptor [33]. The DNAX accessory molecule 1/CD226 (DNAM-1) receptor is expressed by most NK cells, some B and T cells, DC, monocytes, and thrombocytes. It binds to CD155 and CD112 (nectin-2) present on cancer cells surface and endothelial cells and may be important for extravasation of NK cells [11].

13. NK Cell Signal Transduction

NK cell functions are controlled by inhibitory and activating receptors. The inhibitory receptors often have ITIMs in their cytoplasmic tails while most activating receptors noncovalently are associated with ITAM containing adaptors. Binding to these adaptors may elicit downstream signalling events leading to cytoskeleton rearrangements, proliferation, secretion of lytic granules and cytokines by activating-bearing NK cells and T cells. ITAMs have the consensus sequence (D/E)xxYxx(L/I)Yxx(L/I) where x denotes any amino acid and slashes separate alternative amino acids. The adapters have a negatively charged amino acid in their transmembrane segment that associates with a corresponding positively charged amino acid (arginine or lysine) in the receptor. Receptor ligation leads to phosphorylation of the ITAMs. This recruits and activates Syk or ZAP-70 tyrosine kinases that activate signalling cascades and ultimately lead to cellular activation. NK cells express three ITAM-bearing adaptor proteins: CD3ζ (having three ITAMs per chain), FcεRIγ and DAP12 (both having single ITAMs). FcεRIγ, and CD3ζ are expressed as either disulphide-linked homodimers or heterodimers whereas DAP12 is exclusively found as a disulfide-linked homodimer [36]. DAP10 shares little homology (20%) with DAP12 and is expressed as a disulfide-linked homodimer and has a cytoplasmic tail with an YxxM motif. This is a potential Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-binding site for the p85 regulatory subunit of the phosphatidyl-inositol (PI) 3-kinase [11, 13].

Inhibitory receptors often override signals that are generated by activating receptors, and binding these receptors to their ligands on target cells results in suppression of cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion by NK cells. Inhibitory receptors usually contain one or more ITIMs (I/L/V/S)x/Yxx(L/V) (x represents any amino acid) [36]. After engagement of the inhibitory receptor, the tyrosine residue of the ITIM is phosphorylated probably by Src family kinases. The ITIM may then recruit SH2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatises, such as SHP-1, SHP-2, or SHIP [36]. These phosphatases may then shut down cell activation. Many inhibitory NK receptors recognize MHC-I molecules. Cells expressing normal levels of MHC-I may in this manner be protected against NK cell killing [36, 37].

14. NK Cell Migration or Trafficking

NK cells secrete several chemokines, including CCL3, CCL4, and CCL5 (RANTES) [38] and express an array of chemokine receptors [39, 40]. Consistent with their role in immune surveillance, NK cells are widely distributed. Mouse NK cells are found most frequently in the lung and liver (lung > liver > blood > spleen > BM > LNs > thymus) [40]. NK cells also appear to be frequent in nonlymphoid organs, such as the epithelium of the gut [15, 41] and in the uterus during pregnancy [42]. NK cell functions and receptor profiles differ widely depending on their tissue localisation. Whether these alterations in NK cells properties are a consequence of having different homing capacities or an underlying cause of their tissue-dependent maturation is unclear. NK cells may be recruited to various tissues upon inflammation. The mechanisms governing NK cell trafficking remain poorly understood [40].

15. Regulation of NK Cell Effector Functions and Tolerance

NK cells have the capacity to damage normal cells. It is important to keep NK cells in check in the normal situation. NK cells may lyse cells lacking one or more self-MHC-I molecules. Engagement of self-MHC-I molecules by inhibitory NK receptors may be the principal mechanism by which killing of normal cells is prevented. There are still many unresolved questions regarding NK cell tolerance. Such knowledge needed to understand the role of NK cells in autoimmunity, tumour surveillance, stem-cell transplantations, and antiviral responses [23, 43–45].

The “missing self” hypothesis proposed by Kärre and colleagues in 1986 suggested that NK cells monitor cells for normal MHC-I expression by inhibitory NK receptors [46]. Virally infected cells and tumor cells often downregulate MHC-I expression in order to evade CD8⁺ T-cell recognition, but this may render them sensitive to NK mediated killing. In the absence of inhibitory ligands, NK-cells may become activated through stimulatory receptors and thus kill MHC-I-deficient cells. Alternative “missing self” mechanisms may also exist. Inhibitory NKR-P1 receptors may prevent killing of cells expressing Clr ligands. The 2B4 receptor may prevent killing of CD48 expressing target cells [33]. Conversely, high-level expression of activating ligands may lead to NK cell activation even in the presence of inhibitory ligands. This has been shown for the NKG2D receptor [47].

NK cells from MHC-I-deficient mice have been shown to be “hyporesponsive” [43, 48]. However, these cells can become fully functional when transferred to an MHC sufficient environment [49, 50]. Furthermore, the expression of NK receptor surface is often downmodulated in the presence of ligands. This has been clearly demonstrated for Ly49 receptors; a phenomenon referred to as “receptor calibration” [51, 52]. Different models explaining NK cell self-tolerance and “education” has been proposed [47, 53]. In the “at least one receptor model” proposed by Peter Parham, every NK cell with killing capacity must express at least one inhibitory receptor for self MHC-I molecules. Once engaged these mediate inhibitory signals that prevent NK-mediated killing of autologous cells. These interactions may also play a critical role in NK-cell maturation [16, 48]. According to the “arming” [44] or “licensing” hypothesis these inhibitory receptors allow NK cells to be fully functional [43, 45]. NK cells that are unable to come up with the appropriate inhibitory receptors are left in an “off” or “uneducated” state incapable of effectively recognizing and killing target cells. Furthermore, it has been argued that NK-cell “education” is a quantitative and dynamic process depending on which MHC-I and inhibitory receptors involved [47]. However, NK cell tolerance may be more complex since a subset of mouse NK cells lacking inhibitory MHC-I receptors have been shown to be functional [54, 55]. Therefore, alternative mechanisms for NK tolerance may exist [33, 48, 53].

16. NK Cells and Memory Cells

Immunological memory has been thought to be present only in the adaptive immune system. Recently “adaptive” memory-like NK cells have been described; first in a model for hapten-induced contact hypersensitivity (CHS) [56]. Later it was shown that Ly49H⁺ NK cells selectively proliferate and persist in mice for several months after CMV infection [57]. Upon reinfection, these mice created faster and stronger NK cell responses than naïve mice. Interestingly, transfer of low numbers of these adaptive NK cells into naïve neonatal mice resulted in greater protective immunity than that of naïve mature NK cells [57, 58].

17. NK Cells and Diseases

NK cells through their functions, cytotoxicity, and cytokine production, can act as an immune regulator. To date, the extremely rare cases of selective NK cell deficiencies in humans have been reported. This makes it difficult to elucidate in vivo the role of NK cells in the onset and/or progression of autoimmune diseases. However, several NK cell deficits have been described. Most of these can be attributed to broader immunological defects like caspase 8 deficiency, TAP-2 deficiency, and the DAP12-deficient form of Nasu-Hakola disease. A few examples of isolated NK cell deficiencies have been described. NK cell deficiencies in humans result in overwhelming fatal infection during childhood, in particular herpes virus infections [59, 60]. NK cells may also participate in immunity to HIV [61] and cancer [17].

18. NK Cells and Autoimmune Disease, RA

It has been suggested that NK cells have a disease-promoting or a disease-controlling role in autoimmune diseases. Here, we review some reports related to rheumatoid arthritis and our question is that: are NK cells involved in Rheumatoid arthritis disease?

The role of NK cells in RA is not clear. Several reports have indicated that NK cells may have direct or indirect role in RA [62]. Some of these reports have characterized NK cells in RA tissue with disease-promoting functions. Dalbeth and Callan reported that a subset of NK cells (CD5) is greatly expanded within inflamed (synovium) joints [63], in which they produce more IFN-γ compared with the blood NK cells from the same patients [64]. Moreover, these NK cells could induce the differentiation of monocytes into DCs. The communication between NK cells and other cell types through cytokines and chemokine actually is a potential risk for autoimmune diseases. Other example of this phenomena is the crosstalk between NK cells and myeloid DCs, referred to as “DC editing,” which may lead to NK cell activation and DC maturation. In this way, activated NK cells may in turn kill immature DCs that fail to undergo proper maturation [65]. Furthermore, it has been reported that NK cells can function as APCs in some instances, which complicate the involvement of these cells in the immune responses [66].

19. Genetic Background

Studies of possible genetic risk factors that link NK cell receptor genes to RA are preliminary. However, there is clear evidence that KIR is implicated in human autoimmune disorders. Yen et al. have found that patients with RA complications have an expansion of unique population of CD4⁺CD28⁻ T cells which is uncommon in healthy individuals [67]. This cell population is potentially involved in endothelial damage. Interestingly, CD4⁺CD28⁻ T cells are functionally distinct from classical CD4⁺ cells and share some features with NK cells. For instance, they do not express CD40 ligand, but express CD57 (an NK cell marker), and produce large amounts of IFN-γ, and produce granzyme B and perforin [67]. The authors further focus on T cell subsets which express the activating KIR molecule, KIR2DS2, in the absence of DAP12. Therefore, signalling in these T cells could be deviated and mediates autoimmune disease [68]. Furthermore, they have shown that individuals possessing a KIR2DS2 gene and certain HLA-C alleles are more exposed to RA with vascular complications than healthy individuals or arthritis patients without vascular complications.

These studies also indicate that expression of activating KIR, in the absence of an inhibitory receptor for self MHC-I, may contribute to autoimmune disorders. In this case, the activating KIR expressed in effector T cells may synergize with the signals transduced by TcR, otherwise insufficient for an autoantigen alone, to elicit an autoimmune response [11].

20. The Role of NK Cells in Immunopathogenesis of RA

It has been suggested that NK cells can play both a protective and a pathogenic role in rheumatoid arthritis [69]. The interplay between NK cells and other cells of natural and specific immunity will occur through release of cytokines. One of the most potent osteoclastogenic cytokines which is pivotal in the pathogenesis of RA is TNF-α [12]. TNF-α induces receptor acquisition by NK cells and the combination of TNF-α and IL-15 can enhance this effect [70]. TNF-α has a role in NK-dependent DC maturation [71]. Although MØs and monocytes are the major producers of TNF-α in RA, T cells are abundant in RA synovium, and both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells can produce large amounts of TNF-α and TNF-β [72]. As mentioned above, CD28⁻CD4⁺ T cells can express the NK cell receptors KIRs and CD57 [73].

It has been demonstrated that NF-κB is an important factor in regulation of NK cell growth and differentiation. NF-κB is activated in the presence of TNF-α plus IL-15 [70]. NF-κB signalling pathways can mediate crucial events in the inflammatory response by chondrocytes, leading to extracellular matrix damage and cartilage destruction [74]. NK cells can cause DC maturation during the innate phase of the immune response and membrane-bound IL-15 on DC surface seems to be essential for NK cell proliferation and survival [71]. NK cells produce IFN-γ which is induced by DC-derived IL-12 and IFN-γ can act as a synergistic or regulatory factor for DC maturation. Soluble factors as well as cell-to-cell contact have a roll in NK cell activation by DCs. Type 1 IFNs, IL-12, and IL-15 have been shown to be crucial in mature DC-dependent NK cell activation [71]. It is demonstrated that coculture of NK cell and DCs leads to DC maturation, production of TNF-α and IL-12 and also upregulation of ligands, such as CD86. In addition, IFN-γ can upregulate the NKG2D ligands MIC A/B on monocyte-derived DCs and these molecules activate NK cells in a cell contact-dependent fashion [71]. IL-15 is thought as one of the major instigators of RA pathogenesis, together with other cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-18 [75]. IL-6 has an important role in rheumatoid inflammation [76]. It can act synergistically with IL-15 to enhance the cytotoxic activity of NK cells [77]. IL-15 is produced by infected MØ and it can induce IFN-γ production, NK activation, and enhanced TNF-α production by T cells [78]. It can activate CD57⁺CD4⁺ cells to induce TNF-α production from monocytes [73]. IL-15 may have a role in initial stage of osteoclastogenesis. It has been demonstrated that osteoclastogenesis may occur through the expression of PLD1-induced RANKL in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts stimulated by IL-15 [79]. Both IL-15 and IL-2 can have same functions such as activation of T cells and stimulation of NK cell proliferation. Levels of IL-15 will increase with RA disease duration in the serum and synovial membrane [80]. IL-18 released by DCs and MØs induces NK cells to synthesize IFN-γ which acts with IL-12 and IL-15 to shift T cells toward the T_H1 profile. Moreover, IL-18 can cooperate with IL-2 to induce the T_H2 profile [78]. Thus, selective manipulation of T_H cell differentiation to induce T_H2 effectors can be an effective approach for interrupting ongoing and established T_H1-driven chronic inflammatory diseases, such as RA [81].

The combination of IL-18 and IL-12 can increase NK activity in both knockout and wild-type controls. NK cells can be an immediate source of both latent and active TGF-β [82]. IL-2 can up-regulate the production of active TGF-β, and TNF-α has a positive effect on TGF-β. The combination of IL-2 and TNF-α has additive effects on TGF-β [82]. It has been shown that IL-2 prevents the TGF-β-induced NKG2D downregulation in NK cells via the JNK pathway [83]. IL-10 can decrease the production of active TGF-β. Recent studies indicate that IL-17 is overexpressed in RA patients and IL-10 suppresses IL-17 expression. Thus, IL-10 may be useful in the treatment of autoimmune diseases [84].

IL-22 is an immune mediator, which is produced by activated T and NK cells. IL-22 can amplify the effects of TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-17 [85]. It has been proved that human T_H1 cells are the most important IL-22 producers. T_H17 and T_H22 are demonstrated to be important IL-22 producers, but in humans T_H22 and T_H1 cells play a more prominent role for IL-22 production. TGF-β can downregulate the IL-22 production capacity of T_H17 in both the human and mouse. TGF-β inhibits the development of T_H22 cells [85]. IL-22 production by T_H17 cells has been indicated to be dependent upon IL-23. Expression of IL-22 can be upregulated in synovium in RA and IL-22 can induce synovial fibroblast proliferation and chemokine production [86]. The level of IL-22 has been increased in the serum of half of the patients with RA. Thus, it indicates a possible involvement of IL-22 in the pathophysiology of RA [87].

For many years, it has been discussed that T_H17 is responsible for collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) as experimental model of RA in animals. Moreover, in CIA mice it has been shown that NK cells suppress T_H17 cell development by the production of IFN-γ [88]. The involvement of T_H1 cells in pathogenesis of RA cannot be ruled out, especially since studies in an animal model of arthritis different from CIA have indicated that IFN-γ is essential for disease development [88]. On the other hand, IL-1 can also activate monocytes, MØs, and NK cells, and it is produced by various cell types, such as MØ, monocytes, and synovial lining cells. These cell types can produce inflammatory mediators, such as IL-1, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8. These mediators are responsible for infiltration of inflammatory cells into inflammatory sites, increase in blood vessels permeability and induction of fever. IL-1 can activate synovial cells and osteoclasts to produce metalloproteases and collagenases that cause destruction of cartilage and bone [89].

Both the NK cell activity and the activity on a per-cell basis are reported to decrease in RA cases. The expression of NKG2D, CD16, and CD244 receptors also decreases in RA patients indicating that a low NK activity on a per-cell basis can contribute to an impaired NK activity in RA patients [64]. All these observations suggest that NK cells directly or indirectly are involved in the complex processes of RA.

21. Conclusions

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by joint inflammation and bone destruction. Excessive cytokine production driven by cell-cell interactions within the joint contributes to the disease progression. NK cells are prominent components of the innate immune response and because of their ability to secrete a variety of cytokines they could have a disease-promoting or a disease-controlling role in autoimmune diseases including RA. Our understanding of NK cell is recently much improved; however, many aspects of NK cell biology still are unexplained and unexplored. Nevertheless, further careful analysis and studies of how NK cells communicate with dendritic cells, macrophages, and T cells will contribute to a better understanding of their role in autoimmune diseases including RA. This knowledge might allow the development of new therapeutic strategies based on NK cells for the treatment of RA.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

A. Di Sabatino, S. A. Calarota, F. Vidali, T. T. MacDonald, and G. R. Corazza, “Role of IL-15 in immune-mediated and infectious diseases,” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 22, pp. 19–33, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Alamanos and A. A. Drosos, “Epidemiology of adult rheumatoid arthritis,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 130–136, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Tobón, P. Youinou, and A. Saraux, “The environment, geo-epidemiology, and autoimmune disease: rheumatoid arthritis,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. A288–A292, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Romas, M. T. Gillespie, and T. J. Martin, “Involvement of receptor activator of NFκB ligand and tumor necrosis factor-α in bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis,” Bone, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 340–346, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. R. P. De Vries, T. W. J. Huizinga, and R. E. M. Toes, “Redefining the HLA and RA association: to be or not to be anti-CCP positive,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 25, pp. 21–25, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Valenzuela, M. F. Gonzalez-Escribano, R. Rodriguez, I. Moreno, A. Garcia, and A. Núñez-Roldan, “Association of HLA shared epitope with joint damage progression in rheumatoid arthritis,” Human Immunology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 250–254, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Verbruggen, V. Rebmann, C. Demanet, S. De Cock, and H. Grosse-Wilde, “Soluble HLA-G in rheumatoid arthritis,” Human Immunology, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 561–567, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Laszlo, “Do NK cells regulate human autoimmunity?” Cytokine, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 76–80, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kiessling, E. Klein, and H. Wigzell, ““Natural” killer cells in the mouse. I. Cytotoxic cells with specificity for mouse Moloney leukemia cells. Specificity and distribution according to genotype,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 112–117, 1975.
View at: Google Scholar
R. B. Herberman, M. E. Nunn, H. T. Holden, and D. H. Lavrin, “Natural cytotoxic reactivity of mouse lymphoid cells against syngeneic and allogeneic tumors. II. Characterization of effector cells,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 230–239, 1975.
View at: Google Scholar
L. L. Lanier, “NK cell recognition,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 23, pp. 225–274, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
J. P. Di Santo, “Natural killer cell developmental pathways: a question of balance,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 24, pp. 257–286, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wu and L. L. Lanier, “Natural killer cells and cancer,” in Advances in Cancer Research, F. George, Ed., vol. 90, Academic Press, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
W. M. Yokoyama, S. Kim, and A. R. French, “The dynamic life of natural killer cells,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 22, pp. 405–429, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Colonna, “Interleukin-22-producing natural killer cells and lymphoid tissue inducer-like cells in mucosal immunity,” Immunity, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 15–23, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Di Santo and C. A. J. Vosshenrich, “Bone marrow versus thymic pathways of natural killer cell development,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 214, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. Raulet and N. Guerra, “Oncogenic stress sensed by the immune system: role of natural killer cell receptors,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 568–580, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. M. Yokoyama and B. F. M. Plougastel, “Immune functions encoded by the natural killer gene complex,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 304–316, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
M. B. Lodoen and L. L. Lanier, “Viral modulation of NK cell immunity,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Biassoni, C. Cantoni, D. Pende et al., “Human natural killer cell receptors and co-receptors,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 181, pp. 203–214, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. C. Winter, J. E. Gumperz, P. Parham, E. O. Long, and N. Wagtmann, “Direct binding and functional transfer of NK cell inhibitory receptors reveal novel patterns of HLA-C allotype recognition,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 571–577, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Bauer, V. Groh, J. Wu et al., “Activation of NK cells and T cells by NKG2D, a receptor for stress- inducible MICA,” Science, vol. 285, no. 5428, pp. 727–729, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Gasser and D. H. Raulet, “Activation and self-tolerance of natural killer cells,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 214, no. 1, pp. 130–142, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Houchins, T. Yabe, C. McSherry, and F. H. Bach, “DNA sequence analysis of NKG2, a family of related cDNA clones encoding type II integral membrane proteins on human natural killer cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 173, no. 4, pp. 1017–1020, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
E. L. Ho, J. W. Heusel, M. G. Brown, K. Matsumoto, A. A. Scalzo, and W. M. Yokoyama, “Murine Nkg2d and Cd94 are clustered within the natural killer complex and are expressed independently in natural killer cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 6320–6325, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. S. Brandt, M. Baratin, E. C. Yi et al., “The B7 family member B7-H6 is a tumor cell ligand for the activating natural killer cell receptor NKp30 in humans,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 206, no. 7, pp. 1495–1503, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Pessino, S. Sivori, C. Bottino et al., “Molecular cloning of NKp46: a novel member of the immunoglobulin superfamily involved in triggering of natural cytotoxicity,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 188, no. 5, pp. 953–960, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Mandelboim, N. Lieberman, M. Lev et al., “Recognition of haemagglutinins on virus-infected cells by NKp46 activates lysis by human NK cells,” Nature, vol. 409, no. 6823, pp. 1055–1060, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Storset, S. Kulberg, I. Berg, P. Boysen, J. C. Hope, and E. Dissen, “NKp46 defines a subset of bovine leukocytes with natural killer cell characteristics,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 669–676, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. H. Westgaard, S. F. Berg, J. T. Vaage et al., “Rat NKp46 activates natural killer cell cytotoxicity and is associated with FcεRIγ and CD3ζ,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 1200–1206, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Giorda, W. A. Rudert, C. Vavassori, W. H. Chambers, J. C. Hiserodt, and M. Trucco, “NKR-P1, a signal transduction molecule on natural killer cells,” Science, vol. 249, no. 4974, pp. 1298–1300, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
J. R. Carlyle, A. Mesci, J. H. Fine et al., “Evolution of the Ly49 and Nkrp1 recognition systems,” Seminars in Immunology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 321–330, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Kumar and M. E. McNerney, “A new self: MHC-class-I-independent natural-killer-cell self-tolerance,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 363–374, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Lodoen and L. L. Lanier, “Natural killer cells as an initial defense against pathogens,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 391–398, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. W. McMahon, A. J. Zajac, A. M. Jamieson et al., “Viral and bacterial infections induce expression of multiple NK cell receptors in responding CD8+ T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 1444–1452, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
L. L. Lanier, “Up on the tightrope: natural killer cell activation and inhibition,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 495–502, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Hamerman and L. L. Lanier, “Inhibition of immune responses by ITAM-bearing receptors,” Science's STKE, vol. 2006, no. 320, p. re1, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Fauci, D. Mavilio, and S. Kottilil, “NK cells in HIV infection: paradigm for protection or targets for ambush,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 835–843, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Maghazachi, “Insights into seven and single transmembrane-spanning domain receptors and their signaling pathways in human natural killer cells,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 339–357, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Grégoire, L. Chasson, C. Luci et al., “The trafficking of natural killer cells,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 220, no. 1, pp. 169–182, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Helgeland, J. T. Vaage, B. Rolstad, T. S. Halstensen, T. Midtvedt, and P. Brandtzaeg, “Regional phenotypic specialization of intraepithelial lymphocytes in the rat intestine does not depend microbial colonization,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 349–357, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Moffett-King, “Natural killer cells and pregnancy,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 656–663, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. Jonsson and W. M. Yokoyama, “Natural killer cell tolerance: licensing and other mechanisms,” in Advances in Immunology, W. A. Frederick, Ed., vol. 101, Academic Press, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
D. H. Raulet and R. E. Vance, “Self-tolerance of natural killer cells,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 520–531, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. M. Yokoyama and S. Kim, “How do natural killer cells find self to achieve tolerance?” Immunity, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 249–257, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Karre, H. G. Ljunggren, G. Piontek, and R. Kiessling, “Selective rejection of H-2-deficient lymphoma variants suggests alternative immune defence strategy,” Nature, vol. 319, no. 6055, pp. 675–678, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Brodin and P. Höglund, “Beyond licensing and disarming: a quantitative view on NK-cell education,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2934–2937, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Johansson and P. Höglund, “The dynamics of natural killer cell tolerance,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 393–403, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. T. Joncker, N. Shifrin, F. Delebecque, and D. H. Raulet, “Mature natural killer cells reset their responsiveness when exposed to an altered MHC environment,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 207, no. 10, pp. 2065–2072, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Elliott, J. A. Wahle, and W. M. Yokoyama, “MHC class I-deficient natural killer cells acquire a licensed phenotype after transfer into an MHC class I-sufficient environment,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 207, no. 10, pp. 2073–2079, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kåse, M. H. Johansson, M. Y. Olsson-Alheim, K. Kärre, and P. Höglund, “External and internal calibration of the MHC class I-specific receptor Ly49A on murine natural killer cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 161, no. 11, pp. 6133–6138, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Sundbäck, K. Kärre, and C. L. Sentman, “Cloning of minimally divergent allelic forms of the natural killer (NK) receptor Ly-49C, differentially controlled by host genes in the MHC and NK gene complexes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 157, no. 9, pp. 3936–3942, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
M. T. Orr and L. L. Lanier, “Natural killer cell education and tolerance,” Cell, vol. 142, no. 6, pp. 847–856, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. C. Fernandez, E. Treiner, R. E. Vance, A. M. Jamieson, S. Lemieux, and D. H. Raulet, “A subset of natural killer cells achieves self-tolerance without expressing inhibitory receptors specific for self-MHC molecules,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 4416–4423, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Orr, W. J. Murphy, and L. L. Lanier, ““Unlicensed” natural killer cells dominate the response to cytomegalovirus infection,” Nature Immunology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 321–327, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. G. O'Leary, M. Goodarzi, D. L. Drayton, and U. H. von Andrian, “T cell- and B cell-independent adaptive immunity mediated by natural killer cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 507–516, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Sun, J. N. Beilke, and L. L. Lanier, “Adaptive immune features of natural killer cells,” Nature, vol. 457, no. 7229, pp. 557–561, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Cooper, J. M. Elliott, P. A. Keyel, L. Yang, J. A. Carrero, and W. M. Yokoyama, “Cytokine-induced memory-like natural killer cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1915–1919, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Caligiuri, “Human natural killer cells,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 461–469, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Biron, K. S. Byron, and J. L. Sullivan, “Severe herpesvirus infections in an adolescent without natural killer cells,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 320, no. 26, pp. 1731–1735, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
W. H. Carr, D. B. Rosen, H. Arase, D. F. Nixon, J. Michaelsson, and L. L. Lanier, “Cutting edge: KIR3DS1, a gene implicated in resistance to progression to AIDS, encodes a DAP12-associated receptor expressed on NK cells that triggers NK cell activation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 647–651, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
D. J. Ahern and F. M. Brennan, “The role of Natural Killer cells in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: major contributors or essential homeostatic modulators?” Immunology Letters, vol. 136, pp. 115–121, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Dalbeth and M. F. C. Callan, “A subset of natural killer cells is greatly expanded within inflamed joints,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1763–1772, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Aramaki, H. Ida, Y. Izumi et al., “A significantly impaired natural killer cell activity due to a low activity on a per-cell basis in rheumatoid arthritis,” Modern Rheumatology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 245–252, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Moretta, G. Ferlazzo, C. Bottino et al., “Effector and regulatory events during natural killer-dendritic cell interactions,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 214, no. 1, pp. 219–228, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hanna, T. Gonen-Gross, J. Fitchett et al., “Novel APC-like properties of human NK cells directly regulate T cell activation,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 114, no. 11, pp. 1612–1623, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Yen, B. E. Moore, T. Nakajima et al., “Major histocompatibility complex class I-recognizing receptors are disease risk genes in rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 193, no. 10, pp. 1159–1167, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Snyder, M. Lucas, E. Vivier, C. M. Weyand, and J. J. Goronzy, “Selective activation of the c-Jun NH2-terminal protein Kinase signaling pathway by stimulatory KIR in the absence of KARAP/DAP12 in CD4+ T cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 197, no. 4, pp. 437–449, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Conigliaro, R. Scrivo, G. Valesini, and R. Perricone, “Emerging role for NK cells in the pathogenesis of inflammatory arthropathies,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 577–581, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lee, S. H. Lee, N. Shin et al., “Tumor necrosis factor-α enhances IL-15-induced natural killer cell differentiation,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 386, no. 4, pp. 718–723, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Guido, “Natural killer and dendritic cell liaison: recent insights and open questions,” Immunology Letters, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Alzabin and R. O. Williams, “Effector T cells in rheumatoid arthritis: lessons from animal models,” FEBS Letters, vol. 585, no. 23, pp. 3649–3659, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yamada, N. Kaibara, S. Okano et al., “Interleukin-15 selectively expands CD57+CD28-CD4+ T cells, which are increased in active rheumatoid arthritis,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 328–335, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Roman-Blas and S. A. Jimenez, “NF-κB as a potential therapeutic target in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 839–848, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Budagian, E. Bulanova, R. Paus, and S. Bulfone-Paus, “IL-15/IL-15 receptor biology: a guided tour through an expanding universe,” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 259–280, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Jazayeri, G. J. Carroll, and A. B. Vernallis, “Interleukin-6 subfamily cytokines and rheumatoid arthritis: role of antagonists,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Lin, T. F. Chuang, K. W. Liao, Y. J. Huang, C. C. Pai, and R. M. Chu, “Combined immunogene therapy of IL-6 and IL-15 enhances anti-tumor activity through augmented NK cytotoxicity,” Cancer Letters, vol. 272, no. 2, pp. 285–295, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Falgarone, O. Jaen, and M. C. Boissier, “Role for innate immunity in rheumatoid arthritis,” Joint Bone Spine, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Park, Y. M. Her, M. L. Cho et al., “IL-15 promotes osteoclastogenesis via the PLD pathway in rheumatoid arthritis,” Immunology Letters, vol. 139, no. 1-2, pp. 42–51, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chang and A. Kavanaugh, “Novel therapies for rheumatoid arthritis,” Pathophysiology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 217–225, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Schulze-Koops and J. R. Kalden, “The balance of Th1/Th2 cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 677–691, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Horwitz, J. D. Gray, and K. Ohtsuka, “Role of NK cells and TGF-β in the regulation of T-cell-dependent antibody production in health and autoimmune disease,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 1, no. 15, pp. 1305–1311, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Song, D. Y. Hur, K. E. Kim et al., “IL-2/IL-18 prevent the down-modulation of NKG2D by TGF-β in NK cells via the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 242, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. J. Heo, Y. B. Joo, H. J. Oh et al., “IL-10 suppresses Th17 cells and promotes regulatory T cells in the CD4+ T cell population of rheumatoid arthritis patients,” Immunology Letters, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 150–156, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Witte, K. Witte, K. Warszawska, R. Sabat, and K. Wolk, “Interleukin-22: a cytokine produced by T, NK and NKT cell subsets, with importance in the innate immune defense and tissue protection,” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 365–379, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. D. Church, A. D. Filer, E. Hidalgo et al., “Rheumatoid synovial fluid interleukin-17-producing CD4 T cells have abundant tumor necrosis factor-alpha co-expression, but little interleukin-22 and interleukin-23R expression,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 12, no. 5, article R184, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Leipe, M. A. Schramm, M. Grunke et al., “Interleukin 22 serum levels are associated with radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 1453–1457, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Aravena, B. Pesce, L. Soto et al., “Anti-TNF therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis decreases Th1 and Th17 cell populations and expands IFN-γ-producing NK cell and regulatory T cell subsets,” Immunobiology, vol. 216, no. 12, pp. 1256–1263, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Yoichiro, “Roles of IL-1 in the development of rheumatoid arthritis: consideration from mouse models,” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 13, no. 4-5, pp. 341–355, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2012 Hamid Shegarfi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

6831

Downloads

2117

Citations