Research Article

Effect of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Naming Abilities in Early-Stroke Aphasic Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study

Table 3

Comparison of baseline characteristics between the two subgroups with lesion including the anterior part of language area.

E group ( )C group ( ) value

Gender M/F ( )4/45/51a
Age (mean, SD)63 (12.07)58.7 (11.38)0.42b
Years of education (mean, SD)13.3 (4.06)11.1 (2.08)0.28b
Days from onset to pretreatment exam (mean, SD)26.6 (12.27)55.4 (33.58)0.037b
Days from posttreatment exam to followup (mean, SD)106 (9.6)108.1 (6.7)0.76b
Language training between posttreatment exam and followup, hours (mean, SD)18.25 (13.9)14 (14.72)0.3b
Motor threshold (mean, SD)58.4 (11.8)60.7 (12)0.55b
Aphasia severity—ASRS (mean, SD)2.5 (1.1)2 (1.2)0.34b
Language lesion location ( , %)
 Anterior5 (38.5)4 (30.7) c
 Anterior + Posterior3 (23.1)6 (46.2)

E: experimental group, C: control group, SD: standard deviation; a ; bMann-Whitney U test; canalysis not performed due to small number of data.