Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2012, Article ID 585791, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/585791
Research Article

Source Apportionment of PM10 by Positive Matrix Factorization in Urban Area of Mumbai, India

National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Mumbai Zonal Centre, 89/B Dr. A.B. Road, Worli, Mumbai 400018, India

Received 14 October 2011; Accepted 25 December 2011

Academic Editor: Donald H. Stedman

Copyright © 2012 Indrani Gupta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Mage, G. Ozolins, P. Peterson et al., “Urban air pollution in mega cities of the world,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 30, pp. 681–686, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  2. E. Goswami, T. Larson, T. Lumley, and L. J. S. Liu, “Spatial characteristics of fine particulate matter: Identifying representative monitoring locations in Seattle, Washington,” Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 324–333, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. W. Dockery, C. A. Pope III, X. Xu et al., “An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 329, no. 24, pp. 1753–1759, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. J. Schwartz, D. W. Dockery, and L. M. Neas, “Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles?” Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 927–939, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. K. Hopke, Workbook on Data Analysis, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2000.
  6. R. C. Henry, C. W. Lewis, P. K. Hopke, and H. J. Williamson, “Review of receptor model fundamentals,” Atmospheric Environment A, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1507–1515, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. C. Henry, “History and fundamentals of multivariate air quality receptor models,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 37–42, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. C. Chow and J. G. Watson, “Review of PM2.5 and PM10 apportionment for fossil fuel combustion and other sources by the Chemical Mass Balance receptor model,” Energy and Fuels, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 222–260, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Paatero and U. Tapper, “Positive matrix factorization: a non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values,” Environmetrics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111–126, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Pekney, C. Davidson, A. Robinson et al., “Major source categories for PM2.5 in Pittsburgh using PMF and UNMIX,” Aerosol Science and Technology, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 910–924, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. L. Poirot, P. R. Wishinski, P. K. Hopke, and A. V. Polissar, “Comparative application of multiple receptor methods to identify aerosol sources in northern Vermont,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 23, pp. 4622–4636, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. J. Rizzo and P. A. Scheff, “Utilizing the chemical mass balance and positive matrix factorization models to determine influential species and examine possible rotations in receptor modeling results,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 41, no. 33, pp. 6986–6998, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. S. Callén, M. T. de la Cruz, J. M. López, M. V. Navarro, and A. M. Mastral, “Comparison of receptor models for source apportionment of the PM10 in Zaragoza (Spain),” Chemosphere, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 1120–1129, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. Zhou, E. Kim, P. K. Hopke, C. O. Stanier, and S. Pandis, “Advanced factor analysis on Pittsburgh particle size-distribution data,” Aerosol Science and Technology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 118–132, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Z. Ramadan, B. Eickhout, X. H. Song, L. M. C. Buydens, and P. K. Hopke, “Comparison of Positive Matrix Factorization and Multilinear Engine for the source apportionment of particulate pollutants,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Kim, S. R. Deshpande, and K. C. Crist, “Source apportionment of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) at a rural Ohio River Valley site,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 41, no. 39, pp. 9231–9243, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Kim and P. K. Hopke, “Source apportionment of fine particles in Washington, DC, utilizing temperature-resolved carbon fractions,” Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 773–785, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Z. Li, P. K. Hopke, L. Husain et al., “Sources of fine particle composition in New York city,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 38, no. 38, pp. 6521–6529, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Kim, P. K. Hopke, T. V. Larson, N. N. Maykut, and J. Lewtas, “Factor analysis of Seattle fine particles,” Aerosol Science and Technology, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 724–738, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. RTI, PM2.5 speciation trends network – measurement uncertainties and method detection limits, RTI, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2008.
  21. S. G. Bhanuprasad, C. Venkataraman, and M. Bhushan, “Positive matrix factorization and trajectory modelling for source identification: a new look at Indian Ocean Experiment ship observations,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 42, no. 20, pp. 4836–4852, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Paatero, User’s guide for positive matrix factorization programs PMF2 and PMF3, part 1: tutorial, University of Helsinki, Finland, 2000.
  23. “EPA Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) 3.0, Fundamentals & User Guide,” EPA 600/R-08/108, July 2008, http://www.epa.gov/.
  24. A. Reff, S. I. Eberly, and P. V. Bhave, “Receptor modeling of ambient particulate matter data using positive matrix factorization: review of existing methods,” Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 146–154, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. Lee, C. K. Chan, and P. Paatero, “Application of positive matrix factorization in source apportionment of particulate pollutants in Hong Kong,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 33, no. 19, pp. 3201–3212, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. S. Kim, J. B. Huh, P. K. Hopke, T. M. Holsen, and S. M. Yi, “Characteristics of the major chemical constituents of PM2.5 and smog events in Seoul, Korea in 2003 and 2004,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 41, no. 32, pp. 6762–6770, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. G. Watson et al., Desert Research Institute, Protocol for Applying and Validating the CMB Model for PM2.5 and VOC, US Environmental Protection Agency, Air Quality Modeling Group, 2004.
  28. R. M. Harrison, D. I. T. Smith, and L. Luhana, “Source apportionment of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons collected from an urban location in Birmingham, U.K,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 825–832, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. O. Allen, P. R. Mayo, L. S. Hughes, L. G. Salmon, and G. R. Cass, “Emissions of size-segregated aerosols from on-road vehicles in the Caldecott Tunnel,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 21, pp. 4189–4197, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Y. B. de Bruin, K. Koistinen, T. Yit-Tuomi, S. Kephatopoulos, and M. Lantunen, A review of Source Apportionment Techniques and Marker substances available for identification ogf personal exposure, Indoor and Outdoor sources of Chemicals, European Commission, Directorate General, Joint Research Centra, EUR 22349EN, 2006.
  31. N. A. H. Janssen, D. F. M. Van Mansom, K. Van Der Jagt, H. Harssema, and G. Hoek, “Mass concentration and elemental composition of airbornse particulate matter at street and background locations,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1185–1193, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. R. Cass and G. J. McRae, “Source-receptor reconciliation of routine air monitoring data for trace metals: an emission inventory assisted approach,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 129–139, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus