Research Article

Subjective Outcome Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Extension Phase) Based on the Perspective of Program Implementer

Table 2

Summary of the program implementersโ€™ perception towards their own performance.

Respondents with positive responses (options 4โ€“6)
S1S2S3Overall
๐‘› % ๐‘› % ๐‘› % ๐‘ %

(1) I have a good mastery of the curriculum.114290.2189787.3482587.77286488.59
(2) I prepared well for the lessons.114390.7191989.5783589.11289789.89
(3) My teaching skills were good.115391.5192189.5983288.79290690.11
(4) I have good professional attitudes.122096.6099396.6989895.63311196.35
(5) I was very involved.119494.4696593.8786391.81302293.50
(6) I gained a lot during the course of instruction.108386.0285983.7278683.71272884.62
(7) I cared for the students.123797.63100297.4791397.13315297.43
(8) I was ready to offer help to students when needed.124798.42101098.2591997.77317698.18
(9) I had much interaction with the students.120094.7996493.8787593.09303994.00
(10) Overall speaking, I have very positive evaluation of myself as an instructor.122896.9298195.4389995.64310896.07

Note: all items are on a 6-point Likert scale with 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = slightly disagree, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = agree, and 6 = strongly agree. Only respondents with positive responses (Options 4โ€“6) are shown in the table. S1: Secondary 1 level; S2: Secondary 2 level; S3: Secondary 3 level.