Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2012, Article ID 687198, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/687198
Research Article

Evaluation of the Training Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: Findings Based on the Perspective of the Participants from Different Cohorts

1Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
2Public Policy Research Institute, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
3Department of Social Work, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200000, China
4Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macau
5Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Kentucky Children's Hospital, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY 40506, USA

Received 1 August 2011; Accepted 2 September 2011

Academic Editor: Joav Merrick

Copyright © 2012 Daniel T. L. Shek and Yammy L. Y. Chak. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. T. L. Shek, “Adolescent developmental issues in Hong Kong: relevance to positive youth development programs in Hong Kong,” International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 341–354, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. T. L. Shek, “Conceptual framework underlying the development of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong,” International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 303–314, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. D. Angrist and V. Lavy, “Does teacher training affect pupil learning? Evidence from matched comparisons in Jerusalem public schools,” Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 343–369, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Chifunyise, H. Benoy, and B. Mukiibi, “An impact evaluation of student teacher training in HIV/AIDS education in Zimbabwe,” Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 377–385, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. L. Hamilton and V. Richardson, “Effects of the culture in two schools on the process and outcomes of staff development,” Elementary School Journal, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 367–385, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Veenman, M. van Tulder, and M. Voeten, “The impact of in-service training on teacher behaviour,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 303–317, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. F. Elmore, “Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: the imperative for professional development in education,” Albert Shanker Institute, 2002, http://www.ashankerinst.org/Downloads/Bridging_Gap.pdf.
  8. T. R. Guskey, “Attitude and perceptual change in teachers,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 439–453, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. R. Guskey, “Professional development and teacher change,” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 381–391, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. T. L. Shek and Y. L. Y. Chak, “Design of training programs for a positive youth development program: project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong,” International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 345–367, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Scriven, Evaluation Thesaurus, SAGE, Beverly Hills, Calif, USA, 1991.
  12. T. R. Guskey, Evaluating Professional Development, Corwin, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2000.
  13. D. T. L. Shek and C. L. Y. Wai, “Training workers implementing adolescent prevention and positive youth development programs: what have we learned from the literature?” Adolescence, vol. 43, no. 172, pp. 823–845, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, The Program Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 1994.
  15. M. Q. Patton, Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 1997.
  16. D. L. Kirkpatrick, “Evaluation of training,” in Training and Development Handbook: A Guide to Human Resource Development, R. L. Craig, Ed., pp. 301–319, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  17. D. L. Kirkpatrick, Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels, Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 3rd edition, 2006.
  18. R. O. Brinkerhoff, Achieving Results from Training, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1987.
  19. R. Kaufman, J. Keller, R. Watkins et al., “What works and what doesn't: evaluation beyond Kirkpatrick,” Performance & Instruction, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 8–12, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. D. L. Galloway, “Evaluating distance delivery and e-learning,” Performance Improvement, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 21–26, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. E. F. Holton, “The flawed four level evaluation model,” Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 5–21, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. J. J. Phillips, Return on Investment in Training and Performance Improvement Programs, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Tex, USA, 1997.
  23. A. Hargreaves and M. Fullan, Understanding Teacher Development, Teachers College Press, Columbia, SC, USA, 1992.
  24. D. T. L. Shek, “Quantitative evaluation of the training program of the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong,” International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 425–435, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. T. L. Shek and K. K. L. Wong, “Qualitative evaluation of the training program of the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong,” International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 413–423, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. T. L. Shek and K. K. L. Wong, “Subjective outcome evaluation of the training program of the project P.A.T.H.S. based on qualitative findings,” International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 437–447, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. T. L. Shek and Y. L. Y. Chak, “Subjective outcome evaluation of the secondary 2 training program of the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong,” International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 325–332, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  28. D. T. L. Shek and Y. L. Y. Chak, “Training evaluation of the secondary 3 training program of the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong,” International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 333–339, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. D. T. L. Shek, C. S. M. Ng, and P. F. Tsui, “Qualitative evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on focus groups,” International Journal on Disability and Human Development, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 307–313, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  30. D. T. L. Shek and C. M. S. Ma, “Impact of the project P.A.T.H.S. in the junior secondary school years: individual growth curve analyses,” TheScientificWorldJournal, vol. 11, pp. 253–266, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. D. T. L. Shek and L. Yu, “Prevention of adolescent problem behavior: longitudinal impact of the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong,” TheScientificWorldJournal, vol. 11, pp. 546–567, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. D. T. L. Shek, C. M. S. Ma, and V. W. M. Kan, “Subjective outcome evaluation of the project PATHS based on different cohorts of students,” International Journal on Disability and Human Development, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 227–234, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. T. L. Shek, L. Yu, and V. Y. T. Ho, “Subjective outcome evaluation of a positive youth development program targeting students with greater psychosocial needs,” International Journal on Disability and Human Development, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 241–248, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. D. T. L. Shek, C. M. S. Ma, and C. Y. P. Tang, “Predictors of subjective outcome evaluation findings in a positive youth development program in Hong Kong,” International Journal on Disability and Human Development, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 249–255, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. D. T. L. Shek, “Using students' weekly diaries to evaluate positive youth development programs: are findings based on multiple studies consistent?” Social Indicators Research, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 475–487, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. T. L. Shek and C. T. Chan, “Qualitative evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S. based on junior secondary school students in Hong Kong,” International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 511–525, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  37. D. T. L. Shek and R. C. F. Sun, “Subjective outcome evaluation based on secondary data analyses: the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong,” TheScientificWorldJournal, vol. 10, pp. 224–237, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus