Helping Adolescents with Greater Psychosocial Needs: Subjective Outcome Evaluation Based on Different Cohorts

Table 2

Summary of the characteristics and effectiveness of the Tier 2 program.

Main program approach	Clientele	Average no. of participants	Average program attendance (%)	Average no. of program aims indicated in the reports	Average no. of constructs indicated in the reports	Mean of overall effectiveness
ABC plus VTS (Type A) (𝑛=525)	S1 (𝑛=315)	60.40	83.20	2.05	6.52	4.58
	S2 (𝑛=151)	50.58	81.56	2.49	6.56	4.64
	S3 (𝑛=59)	55.34	81.15	2.39	6.53	4.76
ABC only (Type B) (𝑛=373)	S1 (𝑛=196)	59.92	82.64	2.14	6.25	4.54
	S2 (𝑛=109)	58.44	81.53	2.06	6.65	4.59
	S3 (𝑛=68)	54.51	82.97	2.26	5.96	4.70
VTS only (Type C) (𝑛=220)	S1 (𝑛=82)	60.29	82.22	2.41	6.54	4.56
	S2 (𝑛=99)	54.35	82.54	2.37	6.61	4.62
	S3 (𝑛=39)	65.28	82.90	2.21	6.90	4.67
Other approaches (Type D) (𝑛=208)	S1 (𝑛=75)	67.03	86.06	2.09	5.24	4.56
	S2 (𝑛=84)	71.18	81.21	1.98	6.21	4.49
	S3 (𝑛=49)	61.65	83.72	2.20	5.65	4.61