Helping Adolescents with Greater Psychosocial Needs: Subjective Outcome Evaluation Based on Different Cohorts

Table 3

Summary of the students’ perception towards the program.

		Respondents with positive responses (Options 4–6)
		S1		S2		S3		Overall
		𝑛	%	𝑛	%	𝑛	%	𝑛	%
(1)	The activities were carefully planned.	26,585	84.61	16,890	86.84	8,074	88.99	51,549	86.81
(2)	The quality of the service was high.	26,260	83.60	16,867	86.80	8,051	88.83	51,178	86.41
(3)	The service provided could meet the participants’ needs.	26,462	84.31	16,914	87.15	8,111	89.56	51,487	87.01
(4)	The service delivered could achieve the planned objectives.	26,861	85.59	17,028	87.76	8,155	90.09	52,044	87.81
(5)	I could get the service I wanted.	25,844	82.42	16,457	84.86	7,953	87.93	50,254	85.07
(6)	I had much interaction with other participants.	26,869	85.77	17,037	87.91	8,138	89.97	52,044	87.88
(7)	I would recommend others who have similar needs to participate in the program.	25,202	80.48	16,113	83.16	7,777	86.03	49,092	83.22
(8)	On the whole, I am satisfied with the service.	27,196	86.82	17,292	89.15	8,241	91.18	52,729	89.05

Note. All items are on a 6-point Likert scale with 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = slightly disagree, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = agree, 6 = strongly agree. Only respondents with positive responses (Options 4–6) are shown in the table.