Clinical Study

Characterization and Comparison of the 10-2 SITA-Standard and Fast Algorithms

Table 2

Reliability parameters (mean ± SD) for each of the 10-2 tests, using 2 programs (SITA-standard and SITA-fast) in 2 separate visits. There was no statistically significant difference in any parameter for all test pairs.

SITA-standard 1SITA-fast 1SITA- standard 2SITA-fast 2

Fixation loss (%) 4 . 7 ± 6 . 6 8 . 9 ± 1 8 . 3 9 . 5 ± 1 3 . 2 7 . 3 ± 1 2 . 9
False positive (%) 2 . 1 ± 3 . 5 2 . 1 ± 3 . 2 2 . 3 ± 4 . 4 1 . 4 ± 3 . 1
False negative (%) 5 . 3 ± 9 . 1 3 . 2 ± 5 . 4 4 . 4 ± 6 . 9 5 . 9 ± 1 0 . 8