Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2012, Article ID 835917, 9 pages
Research Article

An Assessment of Japanese Carbon Tax Reform Using the E3MG Econometric Model

1Faculty of Economics, Meijo University, 1-501 Shiogamaguchi Tenpak-ku, Nagoya 468-8502, Japan
2International Modelling, Cambridge Econometrics, Covent Garden, Cambridge CB1 2HT, UK
3Graduate School of Economics, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan

Received 24 September 2012; Accepted 10 October 2012

Academic Editors: B. Chen, Z.-M. Chen, and H.-S. Tang

Copyright © 2012 Soocheol Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. J. Park, “A CGE analysis of environmental tax reform,” Journal of Political Economy and Commercial Science (Kokumin-KeizaiZasshi), vol. 186, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  2. A. Kawase, Y. Kitaura, and K. Hashimoto, “Environmental tax and the double dividend: a computational general equilibrium analysi,” Public Choice Studies (Kokyo Sentaku No Kenkyu), vol. 41, pp. 5–23, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  3. S. Takeda, “The double dividend from carbon regulations in Japan,” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 336–364, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Hertel, Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  5. P. Capros, D. Van Regemorter, L. Paroussos, and P. Karkatsoulis, “The GEM-E3 model,” IPTS Scientific and Technical Report, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  6. H. Sugawara, “Greenhouse gas emission policies and impacts on the Japanese economies,” Journal of International Business Management of Kanagawa University, vol. 39, pp. 17–32, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  7. Committee on Institutional Design for Emissions Trading, A Proposal for National Emissions Trading, Ministry of the Environment, 2000.
  8. Kiko Network, The Opinion Expressed at the Subcommittee on the National Emissions Trading System, Kiko Network, 2010.
  9. T. Morotomi and Y. Ayukawa, A Low-Carbon Society and Emissions Trading: Policy Mix Centering on National Emissions Trading, Nippon Hyoronsha, Tokyo, Japan, 2007.
  10. T. Barker, H. Pan, J. Köhler, R. Warren, and S. Winne, “Avoiding dangerous climate change by inducing technological progress: scenarios using a large-scale econometric model,” in Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, H. J. Schellnhuber, W. Cramer, N. Nakicenovic, T. Wigley, and G. Yohe, Eds., chapter 38, Cambridge University Press, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  11. System of National Accounts 2008, European Communities, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations and World Bank, New York, NY, USA, 2009.
  12. T. Barker, H. Pollitt, and O. Lofsnaes, “The ETM in E3ME43,” Tech. Rep., Cambridge Econometrics Working Paper, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  13. K. Lee, M. H. Pesaran, and R. G. Pierse, “Aggregation Bias in Labour Demand Equations for the UK Economy,” in Disaggregation in Econometric Modelling, T. Barker and M. H. Pesaran, Eds., chapter 6, Routledge, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  14. R. F. Engle and C. W. J. Granger, “Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing,” Econometrica, vol. 55, pp. 251–276, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  15. D. F. Hendry, A. Pagan, and J. D. Sargan, “Dynamic specification,” in Handbook of Econometrics, Z. Griliches and M. D. Intriligator, Eds., vol. 2, North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. S. Dagoumas and T. S. Barker, “Pathways to a low-carbon economy for the UK with the macro-econometric E3MG model,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 3067–3077, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Barker, A. Anger, U. Chewpreecha, and H. Pollitt, “A new economics approach to modelling policies to achieve global 2020 targets for climate stabilisation,” International Review of Applied Economics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 205–221, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  18. IEA, International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2010, OECD/IEA, Paris, Francs, 2010.
  19. European Commission, “Analysis of options to move beyond 20% greenhouse gas emission reductions and assessing the risk of carbon leakage,” COM(2010) 265 final, Brussels, 2010.
  20. T. Barker, H. Pun, J. Köhler, R. Warren, and S. Winne, “Decarbonizing the global economy with induced technological change: scenarios to 2100 using E3MG,” The Energy Journal, vol. 27, pp. 241–258, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. Barker, T. Foxon, and S. S. Scrieciu, “Achieving the G8 50% target: modelling induced and accelerated technological change using the macro-econometric model E3MG,” Climate Policy, vol. 8, pp. S30–S45, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. Barker and S. S. Scrieciu, “Unilateral climate change mitigation, carbon leakage and competitiveness: an application to the European Union,” International Journal of Global Warming, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 405–417, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  23. T. Barker, A. Dagoumas, and J. Rubin, “The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy,” Energy Efficiency, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 411–427, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Jansen and G. Klaassen, “Economic impacts of the 1997 EU energy tax: simulations with three EU-wide models,” Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 179–197, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. Bosetti, R. Gerlagh, and S. P. Schleicher, Modelling Sustainable Development: Transitions to a Sustainable Future, Edward Elgar, 2009.
  26. M. S. Andersen and P. Ekins, Carbon Energy Taxation: Lessons from Europe, Oxford University Press, 2010.
  27. P. Ekins and S. Speck, Environmental Tax Reform (ETR), Oxford University Press, 2011.
  28. L. H. Goulder, “Environmental taxation and the double dividend: a reader's guide,” International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 157–183, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. J. Park, “Double dividend of an environmental tax reform in Japan: a CGE analysis based on the 1995 input-output table,” Journal of Kyoto Sangyo University, vol. 21, pp. 137–157, 2004. View at Google Scholar