Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2013, Article ID 136528, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/136528
Research Article

A Comparison of Averaged and Full Models to Study the Third-Body Perturbation

1Federal University of ABC (UFABC), Rua Santa Adélia, 166 Bairro Bangu, 09.210-170 Santo André, SP, Brazil
2National Institute of Research Space (INPE), Avenida dos Astronautas, 1758 Jd da Granja, 12227-010 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil

Received 8 August 2013; Accepted 17 September 2013

Academic Editors: M. Balasubramaniam and G. Martínez

Copyright © 2013 Carlos Renato Huaura Solórzano and Antonio Fernando Bertachini de Almeida Prado. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. Kozai, “On the Effects of the Sun and Moon Upon the Motion of a Close Earth Satellite,” Smithsonian Institution Astrophysical Observatory, Special Report 52.
  2. L. Blitzer, “Lunar-solar perturbations of earth satellite,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 27, pp. 634–645, 1959. View at Google Scholar
  3. P. Musen, “On the long-period lunar and solar effect on the motion of an artificial satellite,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 66, pp. 2797–2813, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  4. R. H. Frick and T. B. Garber, “Perturbations of synchronous satellites,” Tech. Rep. R-399 NASA, Rand Corp., 1962. View at Google Scholar
  5. W. M. Kaula, “Development of the lunar and solar disturbing functions for a close satellite,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 300–303, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  6. G. E. Cook, “Luni-solar perturbations of the orbit of an earth satellite,” The Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 271–291, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  7. C.-H. Zee, “Effects of the sun and the moon on a near-equatorial synchronous satellite,” Astronautica Acta, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 891–906, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. E. O. Giacaglia, “Lunar perturbations on artificial satellites of the earth,” Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Special Report 352, 1973.
  9. Y. Kozai, “A new method to compute lunisolar perturbations in satellite motions,” Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Special Report 349, 1973.
  10. G. E. O. Giacaglia, “The equations of motion of an artificial satellite in nonsingular variables,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Broucke and P. Cefola, “On the formulation of the gravitational potential in terms of equinoctial variables,” in Proceedings of the AIAA 13th Aerospace Science Meeting, EE.UU, Pasadena, Calif, USA, 1975.
  12. S. Dallas and I. Khan, “The singly averaged differential equations of satellite motion for 0 ≤ e < 1,” in Proceedings of the AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Conference, EE.UU, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1976.
  13. P. E. Nacozy and S. S. Dallas, “The geopotential in nonsingular orbital elements,” Celestial Mechanics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 453–466, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. E. Hough, “Orbits near critical inclination, including lunisolar perturbations,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 111–136, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. Delhaise and A. Morbidelli, “Luni-solar effects of geosynchronous orbits at the critical inclination,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 57, no. 1-2, pp. 155–173, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Breiter, “Lunisolar apsidal resonances at low satellite orbits,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 253–274, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. R. H. Solórzano and A. F. B. A. Prado, “Third-body perturbation using a single averaged model: application in nonsingular variables,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2007, Article ID 40475, 14 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. F. B. A. Prado, “Third-body perturbation in orbits around natural satellites,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. J. Cefola, V. S. Yurasov, Z. J. Folcik et al., “Comparison of the DSST and the USM semi-analytical orbit propagators,” Paper AAS 03-236, American Astronautical Society, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  20. M. A. Vashkov'yak, “A numerical-analytical method for studying the orbital evolution of distant planetary satellites,” Astronomy Letters, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 64–72, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. R. H. Solórzano and A. F. B. A. Prado, “Third-body perturbation using single averaged model: application to lunisolar perturbations,” Nonlinear Dynamics and Systems Theory, vol. 7, pp. 1–9, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  22. J. Laskar and G. Boué, “Explicit expansion of the three-body disturbing function for arbitrary eccentricities and inclinations,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 522, no. 5, article 60, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. G. Taff, Celestial Mechanics, A Wiley-Interscience, 1985.
  24. V. Szebehely, Theory of Orbits: The Restricted Problem of Three Bodies, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1967.
  25. C. D. Murray and S. F. Dermott, Solar System Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999.
  26. B. Garfinkel, “On the motion of a satellite in the vicinity of the critical inclination,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 65, p. 624, 1960. View at Google Scholar
  27. G. Hori, “The motion of an artificial satellite in the vicinity of the critical inclination,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 65, p. 291, 1960. View at Google Scholar
  28. Y. Hagihara, “Libration of an earth satellite with critical inclination,” Smithsonian Contribution Astrophysics, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 39, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  29. Y. Kozai, “Motion of a particle with critical inclination in the gravitational field of a spheroid,” Smithsonian Contribution Astrophysics, vol. 5, p. 53, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  30. I. G. Izsak, “On the critical inclination in satellite theory,” SAO Special Report 90, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  31. S. Aoki, “Contribution to the theory of critical inclination of close earth satellites,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 355–365, 1963. View at Google Scholar
  32. Y. Kozai, “Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 591–598, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  33. M. A. Vashkov'yak, “Orbital evolution of Saturn's new outer satellites and their classification,” Astronomy Letters, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 455–463, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Cuk, J. A. Burns, V. Carruba, P. D. Nicholson, and R. A. Jacobson, “New secular resonances involving the irregular satellites of saturn,” Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, vol. 34, p. 943, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  35. D. Nesvorný, J. L. A. Alvarellos, L. Dones, and H. F. Levison, “Orbital and collisional evolution of the irregular satellites,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 398–429, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. T. Yokoyama, M. T. Santos, G. Cardin, and O. C. Winter, “On the orbits of the outer satellites of Jupiter,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 401, no. 2, pp. 763–772, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. C. Domingos, A. F. B. A. Prado, and R. V. Moraes, “A study of double and single second order averaged models to evaluate third body perturbation considering elliptic orbits for the perturbing body,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 260830, 11 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar