Review Article

An Overview of Clinical Studies on Fiber Post Systems

Table 1

The table summarizes general information on clinical studies performed on fiber posts between 1998 and 2012. The term “success” stands for those teeth without any indication of extraction as well as complications such as debonding, post fracture during the conclusion of the serving period.

YearAuthor(s)Study designType of posts assessedFollow-up periodSuccess rate (percentage)

11998 Fredriksson et al. [7]RetrospectiveComposipost2-3 years98

22000Glazer [14]ProspectiveComposipost6.7–45.4 months89.6

32000Ferrari et al. [15]ProspectiveComposipost, conventional cast post-core4 years95

42000Ferrari et al. [16]ProspectiveComposipost, Aestheti posts, Aestheti-Plus posts1–6 years96.8

52002Mannocci et al. [4]ProspectiveComposipost + full cast coverage
Composipost + direct composite restorations
1, 2, and 3 yearsComposiposts + full cast coverage:
1 year—100
2 year—94.7
3 year—100
Composiposts + direct composite restorations:
1 year—100
2 year—93.8
3 year—98

62003King et al. [17]ProspectiveCarbon fiber post, metallic prefabricated posts 24, 29, 56, and 87 monthsCarbon fiber post: 71
Metallic prefabricated posts: 89

72003 Hedlund et al. [19]RetrospectiveComposipost, Endopost2, 3 years97

82003Monticelli et al. [20]ProspectiveAestheti Plus (quartz fiber) posts, DT Light posts and FRC Postec posts2 years93.8

92003Malferrari et al. [21]ProspectiveAestheti-Plus posts (quartz fiber)30 months98.3

102005Naumann et al. [9]ProspectiveFiberKor posts (3 sizes) (parallel sided and tapered glass fiber)12 months and 24 months12 months: 96.2
24 months: 88.6

112005Naumann et al. [10]ProspectiveFiberKor posts (parallel sided)
DentinPost (tapered)
5-6 months (ave: 3.9)93.3

122005Grandini et al. [23]ProspectiveDT Light posts + direct resin composite6, 12, 24, and 30 monthsNo cumulative data given
(High performance in general) (100%)

132007 Schmitter et al. [8]ProspectiveGlass fiber posts, screw posts1 year93.5

142007Cagidiaco et al. [24]ProspectiveDT Light posts23–25 monthsPost debondings: 4.3
Endodontic failures: 3.0

152007Naumann et al. [22]ProspectiveTitanium posts, fiber reinforced posts2-3 years100

162007Piovesan et al. [25]ProspectivePolyethylene fiber posts97 months95

172008Preethi and Kala [26]ProspectiveCarbon fiber posts, glass fiber posts, cast posts1 year100

182008 Mehta and Millar [27]ProspectiveFibre-White Parapost cemented either by Calibra or Panavia. 38–54 monthsCalibra: 64.1
Panavia: 79.5

192009Signore et al. [28]RetrospectiveFibreKor fiber posts (parallel sided or tapered) 5.3 years98.5

202011Ghavamnasiri et al. [29]RetrospectiveRTD posts (quartz fiber), extensive composite resin1–6 years48.8

212011Schmitter et al. [6]ProspectiveER dentin posts (glass fiber) and titanium screw posts5 years71.8

222011 Zicari et al. [30]ProspectivePrefabricated posts
Custom-made glass fiber posts
7–37 monthsPrefabricated: 91.7
Custom made: 97.2

232012Naumann et al. [31]ProspectiveGlass fiber posts120 months63

242012Sterzenbach et al. [5]ProspectiveGlass fiber posts, titanium posts84 monthsGlass fiber posts: 90.2
Titanium posts: 93.5