The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 258758 | 7 pages |

Radiation Sterilization of Anthracycline Antibiotics in Solid State

Academic Editor: S. J. Rajput
Received23 Aug 2013
Accepted19 Sep 2013
Published03 Nov 2013


The impact of ionizing radiation generated by a beam of electrons of 25–400 kGy on the stability of such analogs of anthracycline antibiotics as daunorubicin (DAU), doxorubicin (DOX), and epidoxorubicin (EPI) was studied. Based on EPR results, it was established that unstable free radicals decay exponentially with the half-time of 4 days in DAU and DOX and 7 days in EPI after irradiation. Radiation-induced structural changes were analyzed with the use of spectrophotometric methods (UV-Vis and IR) and electron microscope imaging (SEM). A chromatographic method (HPLC-DAD) was applied to assess changes in the contents of the analogs in the presence of their impurities. The study showed that the structures of the analogs did not demonstrate any significant alterations at the end of the period necessary for the elimination of unstable free radicals. The separation of main substances and related substances (impurities and potential degradation products) allowed determining that no statistically significant changes in the content of particular active substances occurred and that their conversion due to the presence of free radicals resulting from exposure to an irradiation of 25 kGy (prescribed to ensure sterility) was not observed.

1. Introduction

Anthracycline antibiotics belong to the group of anticancer drugs. They were originally isolated from cultures of Streptomyces. Anthracyclines are widely used in the treatment of neoplastic diseases such as leukemia, breast cancer, and AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma. They also demonstrate activity against tumors of the ovaries, lung, testes, prostate, cervix, bladder, and Ewing’s sarcoma [13]. The most widely used anthracyclines are doxorubicin (DOX), daunorubicin (DAU), and epidoxorubicin (EPI) [46] (Figure 1). Their low bioavailability necessitates parenteral administration [7, 8], which requires sterility [9] obtained mainly by filtration. Given the considerable exposure of medical personnel to anthracycline antibiotics and their adsorption to most surfaces, especially those of sterilization filters, there is a need to find new sterilization methods that do not rely on filtration. Although radiation sterilization is an effective alternative, the structure of drugs may alter as a consequence of exposure to irradiation. The aglycone attached to the aminosugar with a glycoside bond may be prone to cleavage resulting from electron transfer within the molecule. Stability studies demonstrated degradation of anthracycline antibiotics in solutions, under the influence of increased temperature and when exposed to light in the solid state as well as a consequence of combining chemotherapy with radiotherapy [1015]. Regarding the effects of radiation sterilization on anthracycline antibiotics, only DOX was studied in that respect with a focus on the impact of a standard dose of 25 kGy on its stability [16]. As DAU and EPI are widely used in anticancer pharmacotherapy, those antibiotics also require analysis of their vulnerability to ionizing radiation.

The aim of this work was to assess the possibility of applying radiation sterilization to DOX, DAU, and EPI as active substances or conversion-induced impurities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

DOX, DAU, and EPI were synthesized at the Institute of Biotechnology and Antibiotics, Department of Modified Antibiotics, Warsaw, Poland. They were reddish powders, freely soluble in water and methanol. Sodium lauryl sulfate, phosphoric acid, and all other chemicals were obtained from Merck KGaA (Germany) and were of analytical or high-performance liquid chromatographic grade.

2.2. Irradiation

0.025 g samples of each substance were placed in 3 mL colorless glass vials that were closed with plastic stoppers. The samples in the vials were exposed to beta irradiation in a linear electron accelerator LAE 13/9 (9.96 MeV electron beam and 6.2 μA current intensity) until they absorbed doses of 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 kGy.

2.3. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy

Detection of free radicals and determination of their concentration were carried out using a Bruker ELEXSYS 500 spectrometer (X-band) at 297 K. EPR spectra were recorded as a first derivative of the absorption signal. The number of free radicals was calculated using the integration procedure described elsewhere [17].

2.4. UV-Vis Spectroscopy

Chemical changes in nonirradiated and irradiated samples were analyzed by using a UV-Vis Varian Carry 100 spectrophotometer. 2 mg of each sample was dissolved in 20.0 mL of methanol. 1.0 mL of the so-obtained solution was diluted to 10.0 mL with methanol. The final concentration of the solutions was 0.01 mg/mL. Absorption spectra of the so-prepared solutions were recorded in the wavelength range 190–900 nm.

2.5. IR Spectroscopy

IR spectra of nonirradiated and irradiated anthracyclines were taken with the use of a Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS10 spectrophotometer with the Omnic software. The infrared transmittance spectra of the crystalline samples were recorded after a time necessary to achieve plateaus in EPR study, in the frequency range from 400 to 7500 cm−1, at room temperature.

2.6. HPLC Analysis

An HPLC Waters Alliance e2695 system was used for chromatographic separation of the degradation products of nonirradiated and irradiated DOX, DAU and EPI samples. All the samples (1 mg/mL) were dissolved in the mobile phase. A Symmetry C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) analytical column was employed as a stationary phase. The mobile phase consisted of solution A (acetonitrile) and solution B (2.88 g of sodium lauryl sulfate and 2.25 g of phosphoric acid(V) 85% in 1000 mL) (50 : 50, v : v). UV detection was performed at 254 nm. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. The injected volume was 5 μL.

2.7. Theoretical Analysis

All the calculations were made by using the Gaussian 03 package [18]. In order to interpret the experimental results of IR absorption scattering, quantum chemical calculations were performed based on a density functional theory (DFT) method with the B3LYP hybrid functional and 6-31G(d,p) basis set.

3. Results and Discussions

The first EPR analysis was performed 1 day after irradiation for samples exposed to a dose of 25 kGy. DOX, DAU, and EPI irradiated at 25 kGy contained about 3.94 × 1015 spins/g, 1.37 × 1015 spins/g, and 2.44 × 1015 spins/g, respectively. Exponential decay of unstable free radical was observed with the half-time of 4 days in DAU and DOX and 7 days in EPI after irradiation. The EPR signals of the sterilized anthracycline antibiotics were very weak. The plateaus of free radical concentrations versus time for DOX and DAU appeared after about 10 days, whereas for EPI after 20 days. EPR spectra after these periods consisted approximately of only stable free radicals.

The analytical study was conducted during a period when only stable free radicals were detected by EPR. The impact of an irradiation dose size on the structure of DAU, DOX, and EPI was studied at 0, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 kGy without the presence of unstable free radical in EPR spectra. By using UV-Vis spectroscopy the location and the intensity of the absorption maximum were determined, whereas IR spectroscopy was employed to establish the intensity, location, and type of characteristic vibrations. For the DAU, DOX, and EPI samples no significant changes in the location (~289 nm, ~233 nm, and 221 nm) or intensity of the absorption maximum were recorded (Figures 2, 3, and 4). The spectra of their nonirradiated and irradiated samples did not show any essential differences in the value of absorbance. All samples exhibited two absorption maxima, at 233 nm and 251 nm. The IR spectra of DOX, DAU, and EPI were compared with the theoretical spectra based on the density functional theory. The main characteristic vibrations obtained from the IR spectra are collected in Table 1. The conformation between the calculated and experimental spectra is quite good. The most significant is the region between 700 and 1800 cm−1, where intense and characteristic bands related to intramolecular vibrations of the molecules are observed, including the deformation of rings as well as stretching of various C–C bonds (Figures 5, 6, and 7). Vibrational spectra of the nonirradiated and irradiated samples of the three samples are very similar. We did not observe any change in the position and shape of the bands. This suggests that the radiation sterilization does not influence the stability of the DOX, DAU, and EPI. Similar results were received by comparing SEM images of the nonirradiated and irradiated samples. Taking into account the biological activity of the most important impurities specified by Ph. Eur. [9], changes in the concentration of the main substances in the presence of those impurities were analyzed (Figures 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13). By separating the compounds to be examined from the impurities, it was possible to assess changes in their content before and after irradiation at 25 kGy. It was found that exposure to such a dose of radiation did not produce any changes in the concentrations of the main substances or the impurities.

Calculation (cm−1)Experimental (cm−1)Band assignment

723736736764761761C–C–C in a ring + def. aglycone group + breathing tetrahydropyran ring in aminosugar group + NH2

752754749795795795NH2   + C–C–C in aminosugar group + C–H at d ring and in aminosugar group

776773774816804805C–C–C in a ring + def. aglycone group + breathing tetrahydropyran ring in aminosugar group + CH2 at d ring

931930935940939939C–O–H at c ring + C–H in aminosugar group

959957951955949949C–C–C in d ring + NH2  w + CH w at d ring and aminosugar group

984CH3w in COCH3 group

101010081006986990989Breathing aglycone group + CH2  r + NH2  r + CH3  w in COCH3 + CH2  w in COCH2OH

102110291032100810051005Breathing a ring + def. aglycone group + C–O s at a ring + C–O–H b at c ring + NH2  w + CH3  w in COCH3 group

107910781065107010721072C–O s between tetrahydropyran ring and O–H group in aminosugar group

110511041104108510891089C–O s in metoxy group at a ring + C–C–C b in a ring + CH2  r

112311231122110911141114C–O s in tetrahydropyran ring + C–O s in glycosidic bond + C–C s in d ring + C–H w in CH3 in aminosugar group

113711391136110911141114C–C s in d ring and in tetrahydropyran ring in aminosugar group + C–H b at d ring and in tetrahydropyran ring in aminosugar group + CH3  w in COCH3 group + C–O s in COCH2OH group

115711571156115311431143C–O s in glycosidic bond + C–O s between tetrahydropyran ring and O–H group in aminosugar group + C–H r in CH3 in aminosugar group + def. d ring

120612051200119412011201C–O s in glycosidic bond + C–C s I d ring + C–H b at d ring and aminosugar group

122612251221120512111211CH2  t at d ring + breathing a ring + C–O–H b at c ring

1239123912351235C–O–H b in COCH2OH group

127812751275126212631263C–O–H b at c ring + C–C s in aglycone group + CH2  t in COCH2OH group

129112901293128912841285C–O–H b at c ring + breathing a and c ring

131713171318128912841285Breathing c ring + C–O at c ring + C–O s at a ring + CH2 at a ring +C–H w at d ring

132913291330131713181318C–O s at a ring + breathing a and c ring

136713671366137413741374C–C–C b in d ring + C–C in a and b ring + C–O s at c ring + C–O– b at c ring

1404CH3  sc in COCH3 group

142514271423140414131413O–C–H b + N–C–H b

147614761478147414711472C–O s at c ring + def. c ring + CH3  umbrella mode at a ring + C–O–H b at c ring

150215021505150615071507C–O–H b at c ring + CH3  sc at a ring + C–C s in aglycone group

15241524152715251524C–O–H b at c ring + CH3  sc at a ring + C–C s in aglycone group

161416151615157615821581C–C s in c ring + C–O–H b at c ring + C=O s at b ring + C–C in a ring

164016401642157615821581C–C s in a ring + C–O–H b at c ring + CH3  w at a ring

166116631663161716161616NH2  sc

168816881688161716161616C=O s at b ring + C–O–H b at c ring

174417441745170717171717C=O s at b ring

179118081807171617301730C=O s at d ring

2967–32372844–3108C–H s

300930102960287828962896O–H s at c ring

348834883485N–H s symmetric

356635663571N–H s antisymmetric

363036343639316133263329O–H s

37913788378535273527O–H s

38093801O–H s

3831383135453545O–H s in COCH2OH group

Vibrational modes—s: stretching, b: bending, w: wagging, sc: scissoring, r: rocking, and t: twisting.

Slight alterations were registered when the samples of DAU, DOX, and EPI were exposed to greater doses of radiation. Under such conditions, EPI demonstrated the greatest content change, and the presence of unstable free radicals was noted for the longest period of time. It was also proved, by observing the mass balance, that the main substances did not convert into unknown impurities. Similar studies of some tetracycline analogs showed that the aglycon was stable when irradiated at 25 kGy and that changes occurred when greater radiation doses were applied [19]. It may therefore be proposed that not only a modification of the aglycon structure but also its ability to bind with a sugar moiety of specific stereoisomerism are the factors that stabilize the structures of analogs of anthracycline antibiotics.

4. Conclusions

The current study of the impact of radiation sterilization on the stability of DAU, DOX, and EPI demonstrates that this kind of sterilization may be an alternative to filtration recommended for sterilizing analogs of anthracycline antibiotics. The effect of radiation sterilization on the stability of DAU, DOX, and EPI depends on the structure of a particular compound. With regard to those analogs, it is important to assay the postirradiation content of the main substance in the presence of all possible related substances in order to determine whether other degradation products or postirradiation conversion occur.


  1. G. N. Hortobágyi, “Anthracyclines in the treatment of cancer: an overview,” Drugs, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1–7, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  2. G. Minotti, P. Menna, E. Salvatorelli, G. Cairo, and L. Gianni, “Anthracyclines: molecular advances and pharmacologie developments in antitumor activity and cardiotoxicity,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 185–229, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. B. Weiss, “The anthracyclines: will we ever find a better doxorubicin?” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 670–686, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  4. H. Cortés-Funes and C. Coronado, “Role of anthracyclines in the era of targeted therapy,” Cardiovascular Toxicology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 56–60, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. O. Pagani, C. Sessa, G. Martinelli et al., “Dose-finding study of epidoxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 539–545, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Romanini, L. Tanganelli, F. Carnino et al., “First-line chemotherapy with epidoxorubicin, paclitaxel, and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 354–359, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. Wang, K. Lew, M. Barecki, C. N. Casciano, R. P. Clement, and W. W. Johnson, “Quantitative distinctions of active site molecular recognition by P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 3A4,” Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1596–1603, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Fakhoury, C. Litalien, Y. Medard et al., “Localization and mRNA expression of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein in human duodenum as a function of age,” Drug Metabolism and Disposition, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1603–1607, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. European Pharmacopoeia, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France, 7th edition, 2010.
  10. A. Sobczak, A. Jelińska, M. Leśniewska, A. Firlej, and I. Oszczapowicz, “Stability of epidoxorubicin in solid state,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 869–872, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  11. J. Cielecka-Piontek, A. Jelińska, M. Zajac, M. Sobczak, A. Bartold, and I. Oszczapowicz, “A comparison of the stability of doxorubicin and daunorubicin in solid state,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 576–579, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Jelińska, J. Uszak, J. Cielecka-Piontek et al., “Stability of [(N-pyrrolidine)metylene]daunorubicin in aqueous solutions,” Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 69–75, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. P. Zalewski, M. Zając, A. Jelińska, J. Cielecka-Piontek, and I. Oszczapowicz, “Stability study of anticancer agent N-[(Hexahydroazepin-1-yl)methyl] daunorubicin in aqueous solutions using HPLC method,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 835–838, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  14. J. Cielecka-Piontek, A. Jelińska, A. Dołhań et al., “Stability of new anticancer agents in intravenous solutions',” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 769–772, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. Jelińska, M. Zaj̧c, J. Cielecka-Piontek et al., “Validation of a stability indicating LC-UV method for [(N-morpholine) methylene]daunorubicin hydrochloride,” Chromatographia, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 107–111, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. Varshney and P. B. Dodke, “Radiation effect studies on anticancer drugs, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin for radiation sterilization,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1103–1111, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. I. Morkunas and W. Bednarski, “Fusarium oxysporum-induced oxidative stress and antioxidative defenses of yellow lupine embryo axes with different sugar levels,” Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 262–277, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., Gaussian 03, Revision D.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, Conn, USA, 2004.
  19. G. P. Jocobs, “The radation-sterilization of tetracycline hydrochloride,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 28, supplement 7, 1976. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 A. Kaczmarek et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1569 Views | 586 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder