The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Heart Failure

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 260298 |

Jacqueline Heger, Klaus-Dieter Schlüter, "Renin and the IGFII/M6P Receptor System in Cardiac Biology", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 260298, 10 pages, 2013.

Renin and the IGFII/M6P Receptor System in Cardiac Biology

Academic Editor: Y. Wang
Received12 Jun 2013
Accepted20 Aug 2013
Published27 Oct 2013


Nonenzymatic cardiac activities of renin are well described during the last years and contribute either to cardiac-specific effects of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) or to the pharmacological effects of RAAS inhibition. The interaction of renin with insulin-like growth factor II/mannose-6-phosphate (IGFII/M6P) receptors participates in nonclassical renin effects and contributes to cardiac remodelling caused by RAAS activation. The current findings suggest an important role for renin IGFII/M6P receptor interaction in cardiac adaptation to stress and support the idea that excessive accumulation of renin during inhibition of RAAS directly contributes to blood pressure-independent effects of these pharmacological interventions. It becomes a challenge for future studies focussing on chronic hypertension or myocardial infarction to comprise regulatory adaptations of the kidney, the main source of plasma renin and prorenin, because they directly contribute to key steps in regulation of cardiac (mal)adaptation via IGFII/M6P receptors. This receptor system is part of peptide/receptor interactions that modifies and possibly limits adverse remodelling effects caused by angiotensin II. Evaluation of interactions of renin with other pro-hypertrophic agonists is required to decide whether this receptor may become a target of pharmacological intervention.

1. Introduction

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has an outstanding position in cardiac adaptations that balance blood pressure and body requirement in response to orthostase reaction or physical stress. Although a quick and effective increase in blood pressure is required to withstand the challenge to physical stress, uncontrolled activation of this system leads to chronic hypertension. High blood pressure is a major risk factor for adverse cardiac events such as stroke, myocardial infarction, and chronic heart disease. Therefore RAAS which plays a major role in many types of chronic hypertension is a main target for antihypertensive treatment regimes. However, it has well been recognized that RAAS is a complex network of biologically active peptides and their corresponding receptors that go far beyond the proper control of blood pressure. It is also clear that not all side effects of peptides participating in this system and the activation of their corresponding receptors are necessarily inducing adverse effects on cardiac tissues. A nice example for this is the different role of angiotensin II type one and type two receptors in intracellular signalling (as reviewed in detail in [1]).

In recent years it has been noticed that the first step in the RAAS cascade, the release of renin from juxtaglomerular cells in response to an activation of the sympathetic nervous system, is far more than the release of an aspartyl protease required for converting angiotensinogen into angiotensin I. This review will focus on those effects of renin that are mediated by stimulation of cardiac-specific insulin-like growth factor II/mannose-6-phosphate receptors (IGFII/M6P) and will summarize our current understanding of how renin expression and posttranslational modification will lead to activation of this receptor. The central question is how this will influence the adaptation to chronic pressure overload and cardiac stress in general. Although we are far from a complete understanding of these basic questions, there are already enough data supporting the idea that renin-dependent IGFII/M6P receptor activation participates in structural remodelling of cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, it has anti-hypertrophic properties as well. Thereby it potentially counteracts an angiotensin II-dependent adverse remodelling.

2. The Role of Renin in the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) in Cardiac Adaptation to Pressure Overload

RAAS is one of the major systems involved in proper blood pressure control and it is causally involved in various cardiac-specific adaptations of the heart either to chronic pressure overload or to the consequences of myocardial infarction. In general two steps of proteolytic activation contribute to the effect. The first step converts angiotensinogen to angiotensin I and the second step converts angiotensin I into angiotensin II. Angiotensin II is considered as the most important molecule of this pathway. Renin, released from juxtaglomerular cells, causes the proteolytic cleavage of angiotensinogen to angiotensin I which is also a target of proteolytic cleavage. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) cleaves angiotensin 1 into angiotensin II. Finally angiotensin II acts on angiotensin receptors of which two types have been described, named type one and type two. Type 1 receptors are G-protein coupled receptors triggering most of the well described effects of angiotensin II on cardiac and vascular cells whereas type 2 receptors seem to be less prevalent and antagonize the action of type 1 receptors. There are important extensions to this system that have been described in greater detail before (see [2] for details). First, various site products such as angiotensin IV can be formed specifically in the presence of ACE inhibition or angiotensin receptor blockade and they activate mas receptors. Second, inhibition of angiotensin II by ACE blockade can be bypassed by chymases. Third, in addition to the classical angiotensin II-dependent effects on natrium retention, blood pressure, induction of thirst, and others, angiotensin II also acts on the release mechanisms of renin, thereby forming a feedback inhibition of the system (Figure 1). As a consequence of this any pharmacological inhibition within this cascade, such as ACE inhibition or receptor blockade, attenuates this feedback inhibition leading to an enhanced release of renin and increased plasma renin concentration (Table 1). It has been speculated that this increased renin release may hamper the beneficial effect of RAAS inhibition [3]. This has been a matter of debate since the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren may increase renin plasma concentration more effectively than ACE or AT1 receptor inhibition [4].

SpeciesSite of inhibitionRenin concentrationReferences

HumanRenin (aliskiren)14.9 mU/L48.4 mU/L[5]
HumanACE (ramipril)14.4 mU/L35.2 mU/L[5]
HumanAT1 (irbesartan)17 mU/L56 mU/L[6]
HumanRenin (aliskiren)5.6 pg/mL34.9 pg/mL*[7]
HumanAT1 (irbesartan)5.6 pg/mL11.3 pg/mL[7]
Rat (SHR)Renin (aliskiren)  mg/kg  mg/kg[8]
Rat (SHR)ACE (captopril)  mg/kg  mg/kg*[8]
Rat (SHR)ACE (captopril)  ng/mL  ng/mL*[9]
Rat (SHR)AT1 (irbesartan)  mg/kg  mg/kg*[8]
Mouse (ApoE−/−)Renin (aliskiren)  ng/mL  mg/mL[10]
Mouse (ApoE−/−)AT1 (irbesartan)755 ng/mL  ng/mL[10]

However, it may also be true that renin acts in nonenzymatic ways and improves cardiac remodelling and function and that the increase in renin plasma concentration offers the possibility that renin participates in anti-remodelling and anti-hypertrophic effects. Such nonenzymatic effects may be generated by binding to and activation of IGFII/M6P receptors. Here we discuss possible pathways by which such effects may be performed. These effects of renin require mannose-6-phosphate transfer to renin and prorenin but no aspartyl proteolytic activity of renin. In other words, antagonizing parts of RAAS either by direct inhibition of renin activity by aliskiren, by inhibition of ACE, or by angiotensin receptor blockade enhances plasma levels of renin and prorenin. This increases the ability of both molecules to activate IGFII/M6P receptors. Last but not least, the enzymatic activity of renin can be enhanced by binding to and activating prorenin receptors in cardiac tissues.

3. Renin: Transcription, Translation, and Regulation of Its Release

An extended review about the molecular understanding of the regulation of renin transcription, translation, and release has recently been published in a review article covering the physiology of kidney renin [11]. We will address only those topics of this area that are of specific interest for the role of renin in cardiac effects triggered by IGFII/M6P receptors. The renin gene was mapped to chromosome I and represents a protein with high interspecies homology, that is, 73% sequence homology between sheep and human renin, 85% sequence homology between rat and mouse DNA, and 68% sequence homology between rat and human renin [1215]. Its 5′ flanking region has a classical promoter function and the transcriptional regulation is further modified by a renal enhancer. The promoter region covers 123 bp from −117 to +6 (positions relative to the transcriptional start site). It contains a classical TATA box [16]. A row of important cis-regulatory elements is located downstream of −200 which are also important in transcriptional regulation [17]. Renin is a cAMP-inducible gene that contains a classical cAMP response element (CRE) in the promoters of its human and mouse gene. Subtle distinctions may be seen with respect to differences in the response between these species [1820]. In addition, the renin gene is also sensitive to PPARγ [2] which may be of particular interest in the context of cardiac effects of renin as some angiotensin receptor antagonists have PPARγ activating properties [21]. PPARγ activation downregulates angiotensin type 1 receptor expression but enhances renin expression. Thus the effect of PPARγ activation is rather complex but again directs RAAS to nonclassical plasma renin effects via IGFII/M6P receptors [22]. However PPARγ is less relevant in rodents in this context [23]. During embryonic development, HOX and NOTCH pathways control the expression of renin [24]. In addition to its tight transcriptional control renin mRNA can also be stabilized, that is, by Y-Box protein-1 (YB-1), or destabilized, that is, by hydroxyacyl-CoA-dehydrogenase/3 ketoacyl-CoA thiolase/enoyl CoA hydratase beta subunit (HADHB) [25, 26]. The steady state mRNA expression of renin is increased by activation of the cAMP/PKA pathway via two different mechanisms: (a) an increase of its transcription and (b) stabilizing its mRNA. It is suppressed by activation of the PKC/calcium pathway that reduces the expression of renin and destabilizes its mRNA. In principle, catecholamines increase renin expression (and release, see later), whereas angiotensin II, activating phospholipase C (PLC), suppresses its expression and forms a feedback inhibition [27]. It is generally accepted that the majority of circulating renin originates from the kidney (mainly from juxtaglomerular cells). Renin is translated into protein in juxtaglomerular cells as a preprorenin protein. After cleavage of its presequence, it is directed into the Golgi apparatus. Here renin undergoes posttranslational modification and this step seems to be required for renin trafficking into dense-core secretory vesicles from which renin can be released by regulated exocytosis [28]. Moreover, this glycosylation is also a prerequisite for renin uptake from circulation in other tissues such as the heart [29, 30]. Renin is glycosylated like a typical lysosomal protein. In a first step N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate is transferred to selected mannose residues on lysosomal proteins. This reaction is catalyzed by UDP-GlcNAc : lysosomal enzyme N-acetylglucosaminylphosphotransferase [31, 32]. N-acetylglucosamine is removed in a second step leading to the typical Man-6-P monoester signal required for binding to IGFII/M6P receptors. Nowadays, it is well accepted that any cardiac stress will also interfere with renal physiology, leading to the cardiorenal syndrome. It will be necessary to investigate the expression and regulation of the enzymes involved in M6P labelling of renin in future. Without these N-glycosylation sites, renin cannot be packed into dense-core secretory granules for regulated exocytosis and will be released in a rather constitutive way. Renin can be released as prorenin and renin. Although prorenin has no enzymatic activity it cannot be considered as an inactive molecule because it interferes with IGFII/M6P receptors due to its glycosylation and thus it can be activated by prorenin receptors [6, 29, 33]. The analysis of the exact mechanism by which renin secretion is controlled is hampered by the fact that renin-producing cell lines as well as cultured juxtaglomerular cells secrete renin in a constitutive way. In culture the cells lose the ability to direct renin into secretory granules [11]. In situ approximately 75% of all renin is released as prorenin in a constitutive form, whereas renin is released by only 25% in a regulated manner [34]. The extent of prorenin release by the constitutive pathway simply depends on the regulation of renin transcription (see above). If necessary, that is, under conditions of chronic salt depletion, the amount of renin release is increased by altering the number of renin-producing cells. The regulation of renin secretion is performed by changes of the membrane potential of juxtaglomerular cells. Angiotensin II depolarizes these cells and it suppresses renin release whereas cAMP-dependent pathways hyperpolarize these cells and increase their release [35, 36]. Pharmacological inhibition of the Na+, K+, 2Cl cotransporter activity by furosemide leads to hyperpolarization and release of renin [37]. Interestingly, myocardial infarction increases the renal expression of this cotransporter that results in depolarization of renin-secreting cells and reduction of renin release [38]. This already suggests renal side effects caused by myocardial infarction leading to dysregulation of renin release. This interaction requires future attention. Inhibition of renin release also depends on intracellular calcium levels. Plasma free calcium concentrations directly affect renin release probably by inhibition of calcium-dependent adenylyl cyclase isoforms [39, 40]. Furthermore, the cells also express calcium sensing receptors [41]. Stimulation of calcium sensing receptors by calcimimetics inhibits renin secretion [42]. In addition intracellular calcium is the trigger of angiotensin II-dependent feedback inhibition on renin release [43]. As expected, any interference with angiotensin II activity (ACE inhibition, direct renin inhibition, or angiotensin receptor inhibition) blocks this feedback and increases plasma levels of renin thereby increasing nonenzymatic effects of renin that depend on interaction with IGFII/M6P receptors.

4. IGFII/M6P Receptors: Structure and Regulation of Their Expression

It was one of the main advantages in the field during the last decade that renin was identified as a molecule that directly acts on cells of target tissues such as the heart. Receptors known as the (pro)renin receptor activate inactive prorenin, enhance renin activity, and generate receptor signalling [33]. Another receptor, IGFII/M6P receptor, is less specific for (pro)renin because it recognizes proteins marked by mannose-6-phosphate. As outlined above renin fits these criteria. There is evidence for the existence of another pathway that is able to internalize nonglycosylated renin [30]. Yet the physiological relevance of this finding requires further work. Concerning binding to IGFII/M6P receptors it is noteworthy that renin has three different N-glycosylation sites by which the protein can be marked with M6P. Upon this M6P attachment, it is able to bind to and activate the IGFII/M6P receptor. This receptor may either internalize renin or trigger direct cell-specific effects (see below). Considering these aspects the IGFII/M6P receptor is central for cardiac nonenzymatic effects of renin. The structure and the biochemical aspects of this receptor have been worked out well. In principle, the IGFII/M6P receptor is a protein with 15 repeated segments of 124 to 192 amino acids in its extracellular part, a short 23 amino acid residue transmembrane domain, and a 167 amino acid residue cytoplasmic domain. Approximately 5–10% of the whole protein is located at the cell surface and is able to interact with ligands that cover M6P moiety such as renin, latent TGFβ1, thyroglobulin, proliferin, leukemia inhibitory factor, and granzyme B. The receptor can also bind molecules that are not marked by M6P such as IGF-II, retinoic acid, urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, and plasminogen.

In contrast to its biochemical characterization less is known about its expression, specifically in the heart and the regulation of receptor expression under stress conditions. It is nevertheless confirmed that IGFII/M6P receptors are highly expressed in the heart specifically in the developing myocardium [44]. Mice deficient in IGFII/M6P receptors die around the time of birth and show severe cardiac defects [45]. The most likely explanation is the loss of cleavage function of the receptor in these mice because IGFII and IGFI null backgrounds are rescued from perinatal lethality [46]. Cardiac-specific knockout of the IGFII/M6P receptor, however, is not lethal and has no obvious phenotype [47]. IGFII/M6P receptor expression mimics the expression profile of our “so-called” foetal genes in the heart, such as ANP, creatine kinase B, and myosin heavy chain β. As found for these molecules, IGFII/M6P receptor expression is reactivated in chronic pressure overloaded hearts [48]. As mentioned above, RAAS does not only participate in adaptation to chronic pressure overload but also to postinfarct remodelling. Preliminary experiments from our lab investigated the cardiac mRNA expression of the IGFII/M6P receptor in response to ischemia and reperfusion. In these unpublished experiments we found a downregulation of the receptor 1 day postinfarction in rats exposed to 30 min occlusion of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery and subsequent reperfusion (Figure 2). Surprisingly this was found in the left and right ventricles indicating a hormonal regulation of IGFII/M6P receptor mRNA expression rather than a direct consequence of ischemia and/or reperfusion. Little is known about the regulation of IGFII/M6P receptors in cardiomyocytes but preliminary data on myoblasts may give some indication that angiotensin II upregulates the receptor expression [48]. But it is unclear whether these findings correctly reflect the regulation of IGFII/M6P receptor expression in cardiomyocytes. Since angiotensin II downregulates renin expression and release (see above), it is unclear why the receptor expression should be increased. In conclusion the analysis of IGFII/M6P receptor expression and its regulation requires future attention that has to be properly addressed.

5. IGFII/M6P Receptors in Cardiac Tissue: Specific Role and Comparison to Their Role in Other Tissues

The various physiological functions of the IGFII/M6P receptor can be ascribed to the numerous ligands that bind to this receptor (see above). The receptor is organized in a way that it covers a large extracellular domain with 15 repeated segments allowing binding of different types of ligands (Figure 3). In addition, the structure of this receptor enables it to function in two ways: as a clearance receptor through endocytosis in order to process or degrade proteins and as a signalling receptor that is attributed to G-protein dependent signals [49]. Most of the data so far cover the former role of IGFII/M6P receptors. One well studied ligand is IGFII. Unlike renin, IGFII is not labelled with mannose-6-phosphate and it interacts with the receptor via M6P-independent mechanisms. It binds at repeated segment 11, whereas mannose-6-phosphate labelled ligands bind at repeated segments 3 and 9. After binding to the M6P/IGFII receptor, IGFII becomes internalized, transported to lysosomes, and degraded, whereas the receptor is recycled back to the membrane. In this way the IGFII/M6P receptor regulates the extracellular level of IGFII and thereby controls the availability of IGFII [50]. An important role of this receptor function for cardiomyocytes was already suggested by the work of Kiess et al. [51] who could show in L6 myoblasts that IGFII in the medium of cultured cells is degraded largely by an IGFII/M6P receptor-mediated process. Nevertheless, this finding was never confirmed with cell culture models that represent more directly a fully differentiated type of cardiomyocytes.

Interestingly, cardiomyocytes express high levels of IGFII/M6P receptors, and already during embryonic development, the heart has the highest expression of the receptor of any foetal tissue [45]. Since the high receptor levels in foetal tissues decline in most tissues in late gestation and/or in the early postnatal period [52], the IGFII/M6P receptor seems to have a role in controlling normal foetal growth and development. Investigations with IGFII/M6P receptor knockout mice proved these assumptions. Lack of IGFII/M6P receptor resulted in foetal overgrowth and perinatal lethality of the transgenic progeny [45]. Further examination of the IGFII/M6P receptor knockout embryos yielded a 4-fold higher heart weight in the mutants than in wild type embryos at day 18.5. Perinatal lethality seems to be a result of cardiac abnormalities, including cardiac enlargement (38% mural thickening of the left ventricle), dilatation (89% increase), and septal and valvular defects [46]. Overgrowth of the ventricular myocardium is thereby not associated with cardiomyocytes hypertrophy but with hyperplasia due to an increase in cell number.

Moreover, Lau et al. [45] measured elevated levels of circulating IGFII- and IGF-binding proteins in mice lacking the IGFII/M6P receptor. Downregulation of IGFII/M6P receptor led to a decrease in internalization of IGFII and endocytosis in neonatal cardiomyocytes [53]. These data suggest that increased IGFII stimulates cardiac growth by alternatively binding IGFII to the IGFI receptor in such IGFII/M6P receptor knockout models. It remains to be elucidated whether cardiac downregulation of IGFII/M6P receptors as found in the early response to myocardial infarction is sufficient to reduce IGFII degradation and whether the same mechanism participates to the regulation of tissue-specific renin levels.

M6P/IGFII receptor-facilitated endocytosis is not restricted to IGFII. Work on cells distinct from cardiomyocytes suggests that IGFII/M6P receptors may also trigger cardiac growth responses modified by retinoic acid. In mouse macrophages overexpressing the IGFII/M6P receptor binding of retinoid acid induced growth inhibition and reduced spreading of these cells, which could not be seen in mouse macrophages lacking the IGFII/M6P receptor. So, IGFII/M6P receptor functions in mediating the growth-retarding effects of retinoids. Comparable effects of the retinoid acid have been seen in cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes [54].

Aside from IGFII and retinoid acid, neonatal cardiomyocytes as well as cardiac fibroblasts are able to bind and internalize recombinant renin and prorenin via M6P/IGFII receptors. Endocytosis of the prorenin/receptor complex results in intracellular activation of prorenin [29]. It was also shown that neonatal cardiomyocytes are capable of binding and activating native human prorenin of renal origin like plasma of probands with renal artery stenosis or plasma of hypertensive patients treated with captopril. However, native prorenin binds to a lesser extent than recombinant prorenin or renin possibly because the presence of growth factors in human body fluids leads to receptor dephosphorylation resulting in decreased M6P/IGFII receptor internalization [55].

Besides its well documented role as a “clearance receptor,” the IGFII/M6P receptor can also function as a signalling receptor. In neonatal cardiomyocytes interaction of the M6P/IGFII receptor with Gαq results in activation of PLCβ and calcineurin and leads to apoptosis [56]. Chen et al. [53] showed that IGFII/M6P receptor downregulation resulted in decreased sensitivity of cardiomyocytes to hypoxia- and TNFα-induced apoptosis. They explained these results with an improper trafficking and activation of cathepsins. It has been shown that these proteases can be bound, transported, and activated by the IGFII/M6P receptor [7]. Cathepsins are also known to induce apoptosis by TNFα in HeLa human epithelial carcinoma cells [57] or by oxidative stress in neonatal cardiomyocytes [58]. In neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocytes IGFII induces apoptosis when IGFI receptor was downregulated. In this case the authors used IGFI receptor short hairpin RNA to downregulate the receptor [56]. Likewise, selective activation of IGFII/M6P receptor by results in apoptosis by activating the intrinsic apoptosis pathway. M6P/IGFII receptors are known to be involved in the activation of other precursor proteins carrying the M6P recognition site like procathepsin, other aspartyl proteases, or latent TGFβ [7, 59]. Some of them have been shown to trigger apoptosis in cardiomyocytes [60, 61]. In summary these data suggest the participation of IGFII/M6P receptors in proapoptotic events but the available data on cardiac cells are limited to neonatal cardiomyocytes. Any conclusion for the role in cardiac remodelling of the adult heart remains speculative unless a verification of such findings has been performed in adult cardiomyocytes and whole tissue preparations. As a controversial example, data of trophoblast cells with IGFII/M6P receptor stimulation may be taken. In these cells receptor activation resulted in decreased apoptosis possibly due to a different receptor G-protein coupling. In trophoblast cells IGFII-induced migration is mediated by IGFII/M6P receptor coupled to Gαi that leads to an inhibition of adenylate cyclase A [62].

The role of IGFII/M6P receptor activation in the context of cardiac hypertrophy is not fully understood. Specific activation of these receptors leads to cardiac hypertrophy in a G-protein-dependent pathway in H9c2 cardiomyoblast cells. Downstream effectors are PKCα and CaMKII resulting in upregulation of ANP and BNP [63]. Interestingly, our studies with cultured adult ventricular cardiomyocytes showed that renin stimulates the elongation of cardiomyocytes [64]. This effect of renin is clearly dependent on IGFII/M6P receptor activation because elongation of cardiomyocytes could be antagonized by M6P but not by glucose-6-phosphate. It requires an activation of ERK1/2 consistent with findings in HEK cells as well [65]. The renin effect on elongation was antagonized by activation of PPARγ, another hormone that has been introduced as a factor mediating the nonclassical renin effects (see above). These experiments in rats indicate that renin and PPARγ regulate the length of cardiomyocytes. As explained before, PPARγ may be of less relevance in rodents. Therefore mammals other than rodents have to be analyzed additionally to clarify this interaction in the light of clinical relevance of heart failure and remodelling. Nevertheless, renin is the first hormone identified so far to affect cell length rather than cell thickness as has been shown for all other pro-hypertrophic agonists. Of note, the effect of renin on cell shape of cardiomyocytes does not seem to be a cell culture phenomenon as it could be reproduced with cardiomyocytes isolated from transgenic rats (TGR (mRen2) 27). Future studies will have to analyze the interplay between renin and classical pro-hypertrophic agonists, such as angiotensin II, endothelin 1, and catecholamines on cardiac growth. A key question addressed so far is to define cellular mechanisms that may explain elongation of cardiomyocytes. Thereby the effect of increasing cell size by prolongation of contractile subunits (sarcomeres) in series compared to an increase in cell size by cell thickening that means positioning of sarcomeres in parallel on cardiac function needs to be analyzed. This is the cellular counterpart of concentric and eccentric hypertrophy and is not clarified on the cellular level.

In conclusion, all data so far show that IGFII/M6P receptors and their agonist renin are involved in cardiac remodelling. Increased cardiac IGFII/M6P receptor expression, found in patients with end-stage heart failure, underlines the relevance of this receptor system during the development of heart failure [66]. Yet, we still have to define the role of this system in this process in greater detail.

6. Interaction between TGFβ1 and IGFII/M6P Receptor Stimulation

TGFβ1 is a cytokine that regulates cardiomyocytes apoptosis [61]. It is upregulated in the transition from compensated hypertrophy to heart failure [67]. TGFβ1 is embedded into RAAS because its cardiac expression is induced by angiotensin II [68]. TGFβ is synthesized as an inactive precursor molecule that consists of the TGFβ dimer, latency-associated proteins (LAPs), and latent TGFβ binding protein (LTBP) [69]. To obtain mature TGFβ this complex must be further processed. It is important in the light of this review that IGFII/M6P receptors play an important role in activating TGFβ. About two decades ago it has been shown that latent TGFβ (LTGFβ) can bind to IGFII/M6P receptor at M6P recognition sites with either recombinant LTGFβ [70] or LTGFβ isolated from platelets [71]. In face of this review it is essential that the IGFII/M6P receptor is required for the activation of latent TGFβ [59].

The physiological relevance of IGFII/M6P receptor in activation of latent TGFβ has been analyzed in several studies. Using a receptor inhibitor, PXS25, human proximal tubule (HK-2) cells exposed to high glucose released less amounts of active TGFβ. Also, hyperglycemia-induced increase in matrix proteins was inhibited by preincubation with PXS25. As the production of extracellular matrix proteins in this system depends on TGFβ activation these data demonstrate IGFII/M6P receptor’s participation [72]. It is likely to assume that similar mechanism also participates in the induction of cardiac fibrosis. The activation of latent TGFβ by IGFII/M6P receptors may be more complicated and possibly requires the involvement of plasmin. Cell culture experiments showed that migration of bovine aorta endothelial cells can be severely impaired by bovine smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts [55]. Cell-cell contacts induce the activation of latent TGFβ via plasmin since inhibitors of plasmin prevent this migration inhibition. Using antibodies against IGFII/M6P receptor migration of endothelial cells did not occur demonstrating that IGFII/M6P receptor is required for activation of TGFβ [59]. Another pathway for the activation of LTGFβ also involves the fibrinolytic system. IGFII/M6P receptor binds urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPA-R) and modulates its subcellular distribution [73]. In human monocytes the membrane contains a large complex consisting of IGFII/M6P receptor and uPA-R [74] that can additionally bind LTGFβ and plasminogen. A proposed mechanism is the binding of plasminogen to IGFII/M6P receptor that is converted to active plasmin by uPA-R leading to activation of LTGFβ. In HUVECs (human umbilical-vein endothelial cells) the association of IGFII/M6P receptor and uPA-R is essential for the activation of LTGFβ, release of TGFβ, and apoptosis induction [46]. Inflammation induced the generation of miniplasminogen (a proteolytic fragment of plasminogen) that then binds to IGFII/M6P receptor which associates with uPA-R. This binding results in formation of the active protease miniplasmin and activation of LTGFβ. Interestingly, human umbilical-vein smooth muscle cells cannot activate LTGFβ. This is due to the fact that IGFII/M6P receptor and uPA-R are not colocalized in these cells. Whether similar mechanisms occur in cardiomyocytes and contribute to the tissue-specific formation of active TGFβ remains to be evaluated. In summary, an activation of RAAS induces TGFβ1 expression and release and the activation of the cytokine requires IGFII/M6P receptor interaction. Once activated, TGFβ induces apoptosis and fibrosis. On the other hand, inhibition of RAAS will decrease TGFβ release and increase plasma renin levels favouring renin-dependent effects of this receptor. Thus, IGFII/M6P receptors are required for renin-dependent and renin-independent effects in cardiac remodelling.

7. Conclusive Remarks

Renin is far more than an aspartyl protease. Via binding to IGFII/M6P receptors it directly participates in the process of cardiac adaptation to cardiac stress such as pressure overload or myocardial infarction. These effects of renin require specific attention as they are intensified under conditions of pharmacological blockade of RAAS. Cardiac renin-dependent effects seem to be part of beneficial effects evoked by RAAS inhibition independent of the reduction of afterload. However, IGFII/M6P receptors are not specific for renin and the interaction between the effects of different ligands of this receptor system remains to be clarified.


The authors thank Dr. Lorenz (Alcedis, Germany) for proofreading of this paper. This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant to K.-D.Schlüter).


  1. K. D. Schlüter and S. Wenzel, “Angiotensin II: a hormone involved in and contributing to pro-hypertrophic cardiac networks and target of anti-hypertrophic cross-talks,” Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 311–325, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. V. T. Todorov, M. Desch, N. Schmitt-Nilson, A. Todorova, and A. Kurtz, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ is involved in the control of renin gene expression,” Hypertension, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 939–944, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. E. Sealey and J. H. Laragh, “Aliskiren, the first renin inhibitor for treating hypertension: reactive renin secretion may limit its effectiveness,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 587–597, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. H. Jan Danser, A. Charney, D. L. Feldman, J. Nussberger, N. Fisher, and N. Hollenberg, “The renin rise with aliskiren: it's simply stoichiometry,” Hypertension, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. e27–e28, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Andersen, M. H. Weinberger, C. M. Constance et al., “Comparative effects of aliskiren-based and ramipril-based therapy on the renin system during long-term (6 months) treatment and withdrawal in patients with hypertension,” Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 157–167, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. M. E. D. van den Eijnden, J. J. Saris, R. J. A. de Bruin et al., “Prorenin accumulation and activation in human endothelial cells: importance of mannose 6-phosphate receptors,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 911–916, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  7. C. M. Nolan and W. S. Sly, “Intracellular traffic of the mannose 6-phosphate receptor and its ligands,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 225, pp. 199–212, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  8. A. H. van den Meiracker, P. J. J. Admiraal, J. A. Janssen et al., “Hemodynamic and biochemical effects of the AT1 receptor antagonist irbesartan in hypertension,” Hypertension, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  9. W. W. Brooks, O. H. L. Bing, C. H. Conrad et al., “Captopril modifies gene expression in hypertrophied and failing hearts of aged spontaneously hypertensive rats,” Hypertension, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1362–1368, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. Nussberger, A. H. Gradman, R. E. Schmieder, R. L. Lins, Y. Chiang, and M. F. Prescott, “Plasma renin and the antihypertensive effect of the orally active renin inhibitor aliskiren in clinical hypertension,” International Journal of Clinical Practice, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 1461–1468, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. Castrop, K. Höcherl, A. Kurtz, F. Schweda, V. Todorov, and C. Wagner, “Physiology of kidney renin,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 607–673, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. J. Abel and K. W. Gross, “Close physical linkage of the murine ren-1 and ren-2 loci,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2111–2126, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. G. P. Aldred, P. Fu, R. J. Crawford, and R. T. Fernley, “The sequence and tissue expression of ovine renin,” Journal of Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  14. C. E. Burnham, C. L. Hawelu-Johnson, B. M. Frank, and K. R. Lynch, “Molecular cloning of rat renin cDNA and its gene,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 84, no. 16, pp. 5605–5609, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. Fukamizu, K. Nishi, T. Cho et al., “Structure of the rat renin gene,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 443–450, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  16. N. Petrovic, T. A. Black, J. R. Fabian et al., “Role of proximal promoter elements in regulation of renin gene transcription,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 37, pp. 22499–22505, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. W. Burt, N. Nakamura, P. Kelley, and V. J. Dzau, “Identification of negative and positive regulatory elements in the human renin gene,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 264, no. 13, pp. 7357–7362, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  18. S. Germain, T. Konoshita, S. Fuchs, J. Philippe, P. Corvol, and F. Pinet, “Regulation of human renin gene transcription by cAMP,” Clinical and Experimental Hypertension, vol. 19, no. 5-6, pp. 543–550, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  19. N. Nakamura, D. W. Burt, M. Paul, and V. J. Dzau, “Negative control elements and cAMP responsive sequences in the tissue-specific expression of mouse renin genes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 56–59, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  20. Q. Shi, T. A. Black, K. W. Gross, and C. D. Sigmund, “Species-specific differences in positive and negative regulatory elements in the renin gene enhancer,” Circulation Research, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 479–488, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  21. I. Imayama, T. Ichiki, K. Inanaga et al., “Telmisartan downregulates angiotensin II type 1 receptor through activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 184–190, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. T. Weatherford, H. Itani, H. L. Keen, and C. D. Sigmund, “Is peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ a new “Pal” of renin?” Hypertension, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 844–846, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. V. T. Todorov, M. Desch, T. Schubert, and A. Kurtz, “The Pal3 promoter sequence is critical for the regulation of human renin gene transcription by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ,” Endocrinology, vol. 149, pp. 4647–4657, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  24. L. Pan, S. T. Glenn, C. A. Jones, and K. W. Gross, “Activation of the rat renin promoter by HOXD10·PBX1b·PREP1, Ets-1, and the intracellular domain of Notch,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 21, pp. 20860–20866, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Skalweit, A. Doller, A. Huth, T. Kähne, P. B. Persson, and B. J. Thiele, “Posttranscriptional control of renin synthesis: identification of proteins interacting with renin mRNA 3′-untranslated region,” Circulation Research, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 419–427, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. J. Adams, D. J. Beveridge, L. van der Weyden, H. Mangs, P. J. Leedman, and B. J. Morris, “HADHB, HuR, and CP1 bind to the distal 3′-untranslated region of human renin mRNA and differentially modulate renin expression,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, pp. 44894–11903, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. R. D. Bruna, F. Pinet, P. Corvol, and A. Kurtz, “Opposite regulation of renin gene expression by cyclic AMP and calcium in isolated mouse juxtaglomerular cells,” Kidney International, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1266–1273, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  28. L. J. Mullins, C. M. Payne, N. Kotelevtseva et al., “Granulation rescue and developmental marking of juxtaglomerular cells using “piggy-BAC” recombination of the mouse Ren locus,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 51, pp. 40378–40384, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. A. M. van Kesteren, A. H. J. Danser, F. H. M. Derkx et al., “Mannose 6-phosphate receptor-mediated internalization and activation of prorenin by cardiac cells,” Hypertension, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1389–1396, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  30. J. Peters, R. Farrenkopf, S. Clausmeyer et al., “Functional significance of prorenin internalization in the rat heart,” Circulation Research, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 1135–1141, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Hasilik and E. F. Neufeld, “Biosynthesis of lysosomal enzymes in fibroblasts. Phosphorylation of mannose residues,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 255, no. 10, pp. 4946–4950, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  32. M. L. Reitman and S. Kornfeld, “UDP-N-acetylglucosamine:glycoprotein N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphotransferase. Proposed enzyme for the phosphorylation of the high mannose oligosaccharide units of lysosomal enzymes,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 256, no. 9, pp. 4275–4281, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  33. G. Nguyen and A. Contrepas, “The (pro)renin receptors,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 643–646, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. E. Pratt, J. E. Carleton, J. P. Richie, C. Heusser, and V. J. Dzau, “Human renin biosynthesis and secretion in normal and ischemic kidneys,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 84, no. 22, pp. 7837–7840, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  35. A. Kurtz and R. Penner, “Angiotensin II induces oscillations of intracellular calcium and blocks anomalous inward rectifying potassium current in mouse renal juxtaglomerular cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 9, pp. 3423–3427, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  36. U. G. Friis, F. Jørgensen, D. Andreasen, B. L. Jensen, and O. Skøtt, “Molecular and functional identification of cyclic AMP-sensitive BKCa potassium channels (ZERO variant) and L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels in single rat juxtaglomerular cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 213–220, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. Castrop, J. N. Lorenz, P. B. Hansen et al., “Contribution of the basolaferal isoform of the Na-K-2Cl- cotransporter (NKCC1/BSC2) to renin secretion,” American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 289, no. 6, pp. F1185–F1192, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Nogae, M. Michimata, M. Kanazawa et al., “Cardiac infarcts increase sodium transporter transcripts (rBSC1) in the thick ascending limb of Henle,” Kidney International, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 2055–2063, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. C. Grünberger, B. Obermayer, J. Klar, A. Kurtz, and F. Schweda, “The calcium paradoxon of renin release: calcium suppresses renin exocytosis by inhibition of calcium-dependent adenylate cyclases AC5 and AC6,” Circulation Research, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 1197–1206, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. L. Chen, S. M. Kim, C. Eisner et al., “Stimulation of renin secretion by angiotensin II blockade is Gsα-dependent,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 986–992, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. C. Ortiz-Capisano, P. A. Ortiz, J. L. Garvin, P. Harding, and W. H. Beierwaltes, “Expression and function of the calcium-sensing receptor in juxtaglomerular cells,” Hypertension, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 737–743, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. D. K. Atchison M, C. Ortiz-Capisano, and W. H. Beierwaltes, “Acute activation of the calcium-sensing receptor inhibits plasma renin activity in vivo,” American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 299, no. 4, pp. R1020–R1026, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Ichihara, H. Suzuki, M. Murakami, M. Naitoh, A. Matsumoto, and T. Saruta, “Interactions between angiotensin II and norepinephrine on renin release by juxtaglomerular cells,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 133, no. 5, pp. 569–577, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  44. K. M. McCormick, N. M. Dahms, and J. Lough, “Insulin-like growth factor-II/mannose-6-phosphate receptor expression during early heart development,” Developmental Dynamics, vol. 207, pp. 195–203, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  45. M. M. H. Lau, C. E. H. Stewart, Z. Liu, H. Bhatt, P. Rotwein, and C. L. Stewart, “Loss of the imprinted IGF2/cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor results in fetal overgrowth and perinatal lethality,” Genes and Development, vol. 8, no. 24, pp. 2953–2963, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  46. T. Ludwig, J. Eggenschwiler, P. Fisher, A. J. D'Ercole, M. L. Davenport, and A. Efstratiadis, “Mouse mutants lacking the type 2 IGF receptor (IGF2R) are rescued from perinatal lethality in Igf2 and Igf1r null backgrounds,” Developmental Biology, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 517–535, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. A. Wylie, D. J. Pulford, A. J. McVie-Wylie et al., “Tissue-specific inactivation of murine M6P/IGF2R,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 321–328, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  48. S. D. Lee, C. H. Chu, E. J. Huang et al., “Roles of insulin-like growth factor II in cardiomyoblast apoptosis and in hypertensive rat heart with abdominal aorta ligation,” American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 291, no. 2, pp. E306–E314, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. H. M. El-Shewy and L. M. Luttrell, “Chapter 24 Insulin-Like Growth Factor-2/Mannose-6 Phosphate Receptors,” Vitamins and Hormones, vol. 80, pp. 667–697, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. J. Brown, C. Delaine, O. J. Zaccheo et al., “Structure and functional analysis of the IGF-II/IGF2R interaction,” EMBO Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 265–276, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. W. Kiess, J. F. Haskell, L. Lee et al., “An antibody that blocks insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding to the type II IGF receptor is neither an agonist nor an inhibitor of IGF-stimulated biologic responses in L6 myoblasts,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 262, no. 26, pp. 12745–12751, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  52. P. Nissley, W. Kiess, and M. Sklar, “Developmental expression of the IGF-II/mannose 6-phosphate receptor,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 408–413, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  53. Z. Chen, Y. Ge, and J. X. Kang, “Down-regulation of the M6P/IGF-II receptor increases cell proliferation and reduces apoptosis in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes,” BMC Cell Biology, vol. 5, article 15, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. J. X. Kang, J. Bell, R. L. Beard, and R. A. S. Chandraratna, “Mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor II receptor mediates the growth-inhibitory effects of retinoids,” Cell Growth and Differentiation, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 591–600, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  55. J. J. Saris, F. H. M. Derkx, J. M. J. Lamers, P. R. Saxena, M. A. D. H. Schalekamp, and A. H. J. Danser, “Cardiomyocytes bind and activate native human prorenin role of soluble mannose 6-phosphate receptors,” Hypertension, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 710–715, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  56. C. H. Chu, B. S. Tzang, L. M. Chen et al., “Activation of insulin-like growth factor II receptor induces mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis through Gαq and downstream calcineurin signaling in myocardial cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 2723–2731, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. L. P. Deiss, H. Galinka, H. Berissi, O. Cohen, and A. Kimchi, “Cathepsin D protease mediates programmed cell death induced by interferon-γ, Fas/APO-1 and TNF-α,” EMBO Journal, vol. 15, no. 15, pp. 3861–3870, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  58. K. Roberg and K. Öllinger, “Oxidative stress causes relocation of the lysosomal enzyme cathepsin D with ensuing apoptosis in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 152, no. 5, pp. 1151–1156, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  59. P. A. Dennis and D. B. Rifkin, “Cellular activation of latent transforming growth factor β requires binding to the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor type II receptor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 580–584, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. Minarowska, Ł. Minarowski, A. Karwowska, and M. Gacko, “Regulatory role of cathepsin D in apoptosis,” Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 159–163, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  61. D. Schneiders, J. Heger, P. Best, H. M. Piper, and G. Taimor, “SMAD proteins are involved in apoptosis induction in ventricular cardiomyocytes,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. T. McKinnon, C. Chakraborty, L. M. Gleeson, P. Chidiac, and P. K. Lala, “Stimulation of human extravillous trophoblast migration by IGF-II is mediated by IGF type 2 receptor involving inhibitory G protein(s) and phosphorylation of MAPK,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 86, no. 8, pp. 3665–3674, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. C. H. Chu, B. S. Tzang, L. M. Chen et al., “IGF-II/mannose-6-phosphate receptor signaling induced cell hypertrophy and atrial natriuretic peptide/BNP expression via Gq interaction and protein kinase Cα-/CaMKII activation in H9c2 cardiomyoblast cells,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 381–390, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. S. Hinrichs, J. Heger, R. Schreckenberg et al., “Controlling cardiomyocyte length: the role of renin and PPAR-γ,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 344–352, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. H. M. El-Shewy, M. H. Lee, L. M. Obeid, A. A. Jaffa, and L. M. Luttrell, “The insulin-like growth factor type 1 and insulin-like growth factor type 2/mannose-6-phosphate receptors independently regulate ERK1/2 activity in HEK293 cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 36, pp. 26150–26157, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. Y. Wei, J. Li, J. Huang et al., “Elevation of IGF-II receptor and the possible underlying implications in end-stage heart failure patients before and after heart transplantation,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1038–1046, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. S. Rosenkranz, “TGF-β1 and angiotensin networking in cardiac remodeling,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 423–432, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. S. Wenzel, G. Taimor, H. M. Piper, and K. D. Schlüter, “Redox-sensitive intermediates mediate angiotensin II-induced p38 MAP kinase activation, AP-1 binding activity, and TGF-beta expression in adult ventricular cardiomyocytes,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 2291–2293, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  69. R. Öklü and R. Hesketh, “The latent transforming growth factor β binding protein (LTBP) family,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 352, no. 3, pp. 601–610, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. A. F. Purchio, J. A. Cooper, A. M. Brunner et al., “Identification of mannose 6-phosphate in two asparagine-linked sugar chains of recombinant transforming growth factor-β1 precursor,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 263, no. 28, pp. 14211–14215, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  71. K. S. Kovacina, G. Steele-Perkins, A. F. Purchio et al., “Interactions of recombinant and platelet transforming growth factor-β1 precursor with the insulin-like growth factor II/mannose 6-phosphate receptor,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 393–403, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  72. M. G. Wong, U. Panchapakesan, W. Qi, D. G. Silva, X. M. Chen, and C. A. Pollock, “Cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor inhibitor (PXs25) inhibits fibrosis in human proximal tubular cells by inhibiting conversion of latent to active TGF-β1,” American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 301, no. 1, pp. F84–F93, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. A. Nykjær, E. I. Christensen, H. Vorum et al., “Mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor-II receptor targets the urokinase receptor to lysosomes via a novel binding interaction,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 815–828, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. S. Godár, V. Hořejší, U. H. Weidle, B. R. Binder, C. Hansmann, and H. Stockinger, “M6P/IGFII-receptor complexes urokinase receptor and plasminogen for activation of transforming growth factor-β1,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1004–1013, 1999. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Jacqueline Heger and Klaus-Dieter Schlüter. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.