Low-Complexity Saliency Detection Algorithm for Fast Perceptual Video Coding

Table 6

Algorithms performance comparison results.

Sequences	Comparison algorithms	Δ𝐶 time (%)	ΔKL𝐷
Foreman	[4]	−11.14	+0.59
	[6]	−12.88	+1.02
	[7]	−6.91	+0.32
Hall	[4]	−10.22	+0.31
	[6]	−13.75	+0.68
	[7]	−6.55	+0.21
Salesman	[4]	−12.25	+0.47
	[6]	−17.24	+0.96
	[7]	−7.12	+0.36
Paris	[4]	−12.26	+0.71
	[6]	−18.77	+1.28
	[7]	−4.90	+0.16
Silent	[4]	−7.34	+0.33
	[6]	−12.45	+0.60
	[7]	−2.76	+0.19
Akiyo	[4]	−8.19	+0.94
	[6]	−10.76	+1.56
	[7]	−4.81	+0.37
Bus	[4]	−9.75	+0.38
	[6]	−20.01	+1.49
	[7]	−5.47	+0.27
Mobisode2	[4]	−14.21	+0.31
	[6]	−10.78	+0.47
	[7]	−4.07	+0.05
Stefan	[4]	−13.38	+0.72
	[6]	−19.65	+1.34
	[7]	−5.78	+0.36
Container	[4]	−8.11	+0.22
	[6]	−10.27	+0.78
	[7]	−4.56	+0.11
Average	[4]	ΔComputing time (%)	ΔKL distance
		−10.69	+0.50
	[6]	ΔComputing time (%)	ΔKL distance
		−14.66	+1.02
	[7]	ΔComputing time (%)	ΔKL distance
		−5.29	+0.24