/ / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 454969 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/454969

M. Z. Ahmad, M. K. Hasan, S. Abbasbandy, "Solving Fuzzy Fractional Differential Equations Using Zadeh's Extension Principle", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 454969, 11 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/454969

# Solving Fuzzy Fractional Differential Equations Using Zadeh's Extension Principle

Accepted24 Jul 2013
Published04 Sep 2013

#### Abstract

We study a fuzzy fractional differential equation (FFDE) and present its solution using Zadeh’s extension principle. The proposed study extends the case of fuzzy differential equations of integer order. We also propose a numerical method to approximate the solution of FFDEs. To solve nonlinear problems, the proposed numerical method is then incorporated into an unconstrained optimisation technique. Several numerical examples are provided.

#### 1. Introduction

Fractional calculus is an important branch in mathematical analysis. It is a generalisation of ordinary calculus that allows noninteger order. At the beginning, it was slowly established. However, after Leibniz and Newton invented differential calculus, it has been a subject of interest among mathematicians, physicists, and engineers. Consequently, the theory of fractional calculus has been extensively developed and influenced in many areas of discipline. The fractional integral and fractional derivative of Riemann-Liouville, for example, have been applied to solve many mathematical problems [16]. One of the particular interests is the case of solving fractional differential equations [79]. The fractional derivative of Riemann-Liouville, however, has a common characteristic. It requires a quantity of fractional derivative of unknown solution at initial point. In practice, we do not clearly know what the meaning of the fractional derivative at that point is. In other words, the required quantity cannot be measured and perhaps may not be available [10, 11].

The well-known and popularly used method in solving fractional differential equations is the Caputo fractional derivative. It allows to specify a quantity of integer order derivatives at the initial point. This quantity typically is available and can be measured. It is therefore not surprising that there is a vast literature dealing with fractional differential equations involving the Caputo fractional derivative [1216]. The theory and application of fractional differential equations under both types of fractional derivatives have been discussed by many authors [11, 1725]. Some potential applications have been studied in [2628].

In the context of mathematical modelling, developing an accurate fractional differential equation is not a simple task. It requires an understanding of real physical phenomena involved. The real physical phenomena, however, are always pervaded with uncertainty. This is obvious when dealing with “living” materials such as soil, water, and microbial populations [29]. When a real physical phenomenon is modelled by a fractional differential equation, namely, we cannot usually be sure that the model is perfect. For example, the initial value in (1) may not be known precisely. It may take any value in the form of “less than ,” “about ,” or “more than .” Classical mathematics, however, fail to cope with this situation. Therefore, it is necessary to have other theories in order to handle this issue. Various theories exist for describing this situation and the most popular one is the fuzzy set theory [30].

In order to obtain a more realistic model than (1), Agarwal et al. [31] have taken an initiative to introduce the concept of solution for fuzzy fractional differential equations. This contribution has motivated several authors to establish some results on the existence and uniqueness of solution (see [32]). In [33], the authors derived the explicit solution of fuzzy fractional differential equations using the Riemann-Liouville H-derivative. Recently, Salahshour et al. [34] applied fuzzy Laplace transforms [35] to solve fuzzy fractional differential equations. Basically, the proposed ideas are a generalisation of the theory and solution of fuzzy differential equations [3641]. However, the authors considered fuzzy fractional differential equations under the Riemann-Liouville H-derivative. Again, it requires a quantity of fractional H-derivative of an unknown solution at the fuzzy initial point. In this paper, we propose a new interpretation of fuzzy fractional differential equations and present their solutions analytically and numerically. The proposed idea is a generalisation of the interpretation given in [4249], where the authors used Zadeh’s extension principle to interpret fuzzy differential equations. According to Mizukoshi et al. [43], this interpretation requires neither the concept of derivatives of a fuzzy function nor the use of selection theory to obtain a solution to the fuzzy differential equation.

This paper is organised in the following sequence. In Section 2, we recall some basic definitions and theoretical backgrounds needed in this paper. In Section 3, we present the solution of fuzzy fractional differential equations analytically and numerically. In Section 4, some numerical examples are given. Finally in Section 5, we give conclusions.

#### 2. Basic Concepts

In this section, we briefly elaborate some definitions and important concepts of fractional calculus and fuzzy set.

##### 2.1. The Fractional Integral and Fractional Derivative

The following definitions of fractional integral and fractional derivative are adopted from [11].

Definition 1. A real function , , is said to be in the space , , if there exists a real number , such that , where and it is said to be in the space if and only if , .

Definition 2. The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of of order with is defined as and for , the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of is defined as
Here, is the well-known gamma function defined as

Definition 3. The Caputo fractional derivative of of order with is defined as for , , , .

The following are two basic properties of the Caputo fractional derivative [50].(1)Let , . Then , , is well defined and . (2)Let , , and , . Then

The Laplace transform of the Caputo fractional derivative is given by [51]

##### 2.2. Fuzzy Set Theory

According to Zadeh [30], a fuzzy set is a generalisation of a classical set that allows a membership function to take any value in the unit interval .

Definition 4 (see [30]). Let be a universal set. A fuzzy set in is defined by a membership function that maps every element in to the unit interval .

Definition 5 (see [38]). Let be a fuzzy set defined in . is called a fuzzy number if(i) is normal: there exists such that ;(ii) is convex: for all and , it holds that (iii) is upper semicontinuous: for any , it holds that (iv) is a compact subset of .

Definition 6 (see [38]). Let be a fuzzy number defined in . The -cut of is the crisp set that contains all elements in such that the membership value of is greater than or equal to ; that is,

For a fuzzy number , its -cuts are closed intervals in and we denote them by

Definition 7 (see [52]). A fuzzy number is called a triangular fuzzy number if its membership function has the following form: and its -cuts are simply , .

In this paper, we denote as the triangular fuzzy number and as the set of all triangular fuzzy numbers.

Any crisp function can be extended to take fuzzy set as arguments by applying Zadeh’s extension principle [30]. Let be a function from to . Given a fuzzy set in , we want to find a fuzzy set in that is induced by . If is a strictly monotone, then we can extend to fuzzy set as follows:

It is clear that (13) can be easily calculated by determining the membership at the endpoints of the -cuts of . However, in general, the process of finding the fuzzy set is more complicated and cannot be gathered easily. For example, if is nonmonotone, then the problem can arise when two or more distinct points in are mapped to the same point in . If this is the case, then the above equation may take two or more different values. This requires a new extension of (13) as shown below: where

Some computational methods to compute (14) can be found in [53, 54].

Theorem 8 (see [55]). If is continuous, then is well defined and where .

For and , the sum and the product are defined as follows, respectively: for each .

Definition 9 (see [56]). If and are two fuzzy numbers, then the distance between and is defined as

In [57], the authors have shown that is a complete metric space and the following properties are well known: (i),(ii) and ,(iii).

#### 3. Fuzzy Fractional Differential Equations

In this section, we present analytical and numerical solutions of fuzzy fractional differential equations.

##### 3.1. Analytical Solution of Fuzzy Fractional Differential Equations

First, let us consider the following fractional differential equation: where is a real-valued function, , and . If , then (19) becomes an ordinary differential equation.

Assume that the initial value is replaced by a fuzzy number; then we have the following fuzzy fractional differential equation: where and . If , then (20) becomes a fuzzy differential equation.

In order to find the solution of (20), we first find the solution of (19). By taking the Laplace transform on both sides of (19), we get It follows that Assume that after simplifying (22), we get Then by taking the inverse Laplace transform to (23), we have for and . In order to find the solution of (20), we fuzzify (24) using Zadeh’s extension principle. Hence, we have which is the solution of (20).

This procedure can be shown precisely in the following theorem.

Theorem 10. Let be an open set in and . Suppose that is continuous and that for each and each there exists a unique solution of the problem (19) and that is continuous in for each fixed. Then, there exists a unique fuzzy solution of the problem (20).

Proof. The proof of this theorem uses the basic idea found in [46]. Since is continuous, there exists a unique solution . This solution is well defined and continuous in , for each fixed. Then, from Theorem 8, we have , which is continuous and well defined. Therefore, there exists a unique fuzzy solution of the form for the problem (20).

Remark 11. The existence of is guaranteed by Theorem 8 since is continuous.

Moreover, in order to have valid level sets, should satisfy the following Staking Theorem [58].

Theorem 12. If is a fuzzy solution of (20) and denoting for , then (i) is nonempty compact subset of ; (ii) for ; (iii) for any nondecreasing sequence in .

In the following result, we will show that and do not interchange at all .

Theorem 13. If is obtained by using Theorem 10 and for , then and do not interchange at all .

Proof. We know that is obtained by Zadeh’s extension principle through Theorem 10; then its membership function has the following form: It follows that for . It is obvious that This holds for all . This completes the proof.

In general, the solution of (20) may not be found analytically. Therefore, a numerical method must be proposed.

##### 3.2. Numerical Solution of Fuzzy Fractional Differential Equations

Fractional Euler method under the Caputo fractional derivative has been proposed in [59]. However, in order to approximate the solution of fuzzy fractional differential equations, the fractional Euler method has to be extended in the fuzzy setting. In this case, Zadeh’s extension principle plays an important role.

Let be the solution of (19). The first two terms of fractional Taylor series for at can be written as [59]

From (19), we have Let ; then we have the following fractional Euler method [59]: for . Let ; then (31) becomes To approximate the solution of (20), (32) will be fuzzified using Zadeh’s extension principle. We then obtain the following fuzzy fractional Euler method: for , and . Please note that if , then this fuzzy fractional Euler method becomes fuzzy Euler method as proposed in [47]. The membership function of in (33) can be defined as In general, the computation of (34) is not an easy task. By using the concept of -cuts, (34) can be calculated as follows:

The optimisation problems in (35) are performed as follows.(a)If is increasing or decreasing on the interval , then the optimal solutions are obtained at the endpoints of that interval (see Algorithm 1). (b)If is nonmonotone, we first split the interval into several subintervals and then solve the optimisation problems on the subintervals. By taking the minimum and maximum of all the results, we obtain the optimal solutions on the interval . These procedures are given in Algorithm 2.

 Input: Fractional Euler Equation, Fuzzy Initial Value, , , and Descritise ; ; for   = #( ) do ; ; end for    :    do for    : #( ) do ; ; end end Output: and

 Input: Fractional Euler Equation, Fuzzy Initial Value, , , and Descritise ; ; for     do ; ; end ; ; for     do for     do ; ; end for     do for     do ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; end end end Output: and

#### 4. Numerical Examples

In this section, we present three examples for solving fuzzy fractional differential equations.

Example 1. Consider the following linear fuzzy fractional differential equation: where , , and is any triangular fuzzy number.

This problem is a generalisation of the following fractional differential equation: where , , and is a real number.

In order to find the solution of (36), we first find the solution of (37). By taking the Laplace transform on both sides of (37), we have We then obtain Simplifying (39), we get By taking the inverse Laplace transform to (40), we obtain which finally has the following solution: where is the Mittag-Leffler function defined as By using Zadeh’s extension principle to (42) in relation to , we obtain which is the solution of (36).

Let and , where for ; then the first ten terms of (44) can be expressed as follows:

Clearly, (45) are the valid -cuts of the solution of (36). For numerical approximation, we set and . By using Algorithm 1, the results for different values of are plotted in Figure 1. From the graphs, we can see that if approaches , the approximate solutions will approach the approximate solution of fuzzy differential equation. Numerical values at for different values of are listed in Table 1.

 0.0 26063.941926 78191.825779 98.369851 295.109553 7.244646 21.733938 0.1 28670.336119 75585.431586 108.206836 285.272568 7.969110 21.009473 0.2 31276.730311 72979.037394 118.043821 275.435583 8.693575 20.285009 0.3 33883.124504 70372.643201 127.880806 265.598598 9.418039 19.560544 0.4 36489.518697 67766.249008 137.717791 255.761613 10.142504 18.836079 0.5 39095.912889 65159.854816 147.554776 245.924627 10.866969 18.111615 0.6 41702.307082 62553.460623 157.391761 236.087642 11.591433 17.387150 0.7 44308.701274 59947.066430 167.228746 226.250657 12.315898 16.662686 0.8 46915.095467 57340.672238 177.065732 216.413672 13.040363 15.938221 0.9 49521.489660 54734.278045 186.902717 206.576687 13.764827 15.213756 1.0 52127.883852 52127.883852 196.739702 196.739702 14.489292 14.489292

Example 2. Consider the following linear fuzzy fractional differential equation: The nonfuzzy problem associated with (46) is In order to find the solution of (46), we first find the solution of (47). By taking the Laplace transform on both sides of (47), we have It follows that After simplifying, we get By taking the inverse Laplace transform to (50), we obtain which finally has the following solution: where is the Mittag-Leffler function. Using Zadeh’s extension principle to (52) in relation to , we obtain the solution of (46) as follows: Let and where for ; then the first ten terms of (52) can be expressed as follows: Clearly, (54) are the valid -cuts of the solution of (46). By using Algorithm 1 with the same interval and interval as in Example 1, the numerical solutions of (46) for different values of are plotted in Figure 2. Again, we can see that the numerical solutions will approach the numerical solution of fuzzy differential equation as increases to . Numerical solutions at for different values of are listed in Table 2.

 0.0 0.000024 0.000048 0.016304 0.032608 0.265239 0.530478 0.1 0.000025 0.000047 0.017119 0.031793 0.278501 0.517216 0.2 0.000026 0.000046 0.017934 0.030978 0.291763 0.503954 0.3 0.000027 0.000044 0.018750 0.030163 0.305024 0.490692 0.4 0.000029 0.000043 0.019565 0.029347 0.318286 0.477430 0.5 0.000030 0.000042 0.020380 0.028532 0.331548 0.464168 0.6 0.000031 0.000041 0.021195 0.027717 0.344810 0.450906 0.7 0.000032 0.000040 0.022010 0.026902 0.358072 0.437644 0.8 0.000033 0.000038 0.022826 0.026087 0.371334 0.424382 0.9 0.000035 0.000037 0.023641 0.025271 0.384596 0.411120 1.0 0.000036 0.000036 0.024456 0.024456 0.397858 0.397858

In the following example, we provide detailed procedures for solving a nonlinear fuzzy fractional differential equation.

Example 3. Let us consider the following problem: where , , and is any triangular fuzzy number.

To solve this problem, we use Algorithm 2. First, let . We discretise up to points, which are . Let ; then we have where for and .

Let and ; then these procedures will result in the approximate solutions of (55) at different values of as plotted in Figure 3. From the graphs, we can see that the numerical solutions approach to the numerical solution of fuzzy differential equation as approaches . Numerical solutions at at different values of are listed in Table 3.

 0.0 0.316778 0.316778 0.320052 0.320052 0.328592 1.645658 0.1 0.316778 0.316778 0.320052 0.320052 0.328592 1.645476 0.2 0.316778 0.316778 0.320052 0.320052 0.328593 1.643608 0.3 0.316778 0.316778 0.320052 0.320052 0.328594 0.328664 0.4 0.316778 0.316778 0.320052 0.320052 0.328594 0.328629 0.5 0.316778 0.316778 0.320052 0.320052 0.328595 0.328617 0.6 0.316778 0.316778 0.320052 0.320052 0.328596 0.328610 0.7 0.316778 0.316778 0.320052 0.320052 0.328597 0.328606 0.8 0.316778 0.316778 0.320052 0.320052 0.328598 0.328604 0.9 0.316778 0.316778 0.320052 0.320052 0.328599 0.328602 1.0 0.316778 0.316778 0.320052 0.320052 0.328600 0.328600

#### 5. Conclusions

In this paper, we have studied a fuzzy fractional differential equation and presented its solution using Zadeh’s extension principle. The classical fractional Euler method has also been extended in the fuzzy setting in order to approximate the solutions of linear and nonlinear fuzzy fractional differential equations. Final results showed that the solution of fuzzy fractional differential equations approaches the solution of fuzzy differential equations as the fractional order approaches the integer order.

#### Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Short Term Grant (STG) of Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) under the Project code 9001-00319 and partially supported by Research Acculturation Grant Scheme (RAGS) under the Project code 9018-00003.

#### References

1. G. Jumarie, “Table of some basic fractional calculus formulae derived from a modified Riemann-Liouville derivative for non-differentiable functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 378–385, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
2. J. J. Trujillo, M. Rivero, and B. Bonilla, “On a Riemann-Liouville generalized Taylor's formula,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 231, no. 1, pp. 255–265, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
3. G. A. Anastassiou, “Opial type inequalities involving Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives of two functions with applications,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 48, no. 3-4, pp. 344–374, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
4. Y. S. Liang, “Box dimensions of Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of continuous functions of bounded variation,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 4304–4306, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
5. I. Podlubny, “Riesz potential and Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and derivatives of Jacobi polynomials,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 103–108, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
6. R. Almeida and D. F. M. Torres, “Calculus of variations with fractional derivatives and fractional integrals,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1816–1820, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
7. Z. Wei, W. Dong, and J. Che, “Periodic boundary value problems for fractional differential equations involving a Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 3232–3238, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
8. Z. Wei, Q. Li, and J. Che, “Initial value problems for fractional differential equations involving Riemann-Liouville sequential fractional derivative,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 367, no. 1, pp. 260–272, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
9. D. Qian, C. Li, R. P. Agarwal, and P. J. Y. Wong, “Stability analysis of fractional differential system with Riemann-Liouville derivative,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 52, no. 5-6, pp. 862–874, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
10. S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, and O. I. Marichev, Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications, Gordon and Breach, Yverdon, Switzerland, 1993.
11. I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equation, Academic Press, 1999.
12. V. Daftardar-Gejji and H. Jafari, “Analysis of a system of nonautonomous fractional differential equations involving Caputo derivatives,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 328, no. 2, pp. 1026–1033, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
13. D. A. Murio, “On the stable numerical evaluation of Caputo fractional derivatives,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 51, no. 9-10, pp. 1539–1550, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
14. Z. M. Odibat, “Computing eigenelements of boundary value problems with fractional derivatives,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 215, no. 8, pp. 3017–3028, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
15. V. S. Ertürk and S. Momani, “Solving systems of fractional differential equations using differential transform method,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 215, no. 1, pp. 142–151, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
16. V. S. Ertürk, S. Momani, and Z. Odibat, “Application of generalized differential transform method to multi-order fractional differential equations,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1642–1654, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
17. K. S. Miller and B. Ross, An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Differential Equations, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
18. K. Diethelm and N. J. Ford, “Analysis of fractional differential equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 265, no. 2, pp. 229–248, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
19. V. Lakshmikantham and R. N. Mohapatra, Theory of Fuzzy Differential Equations and Applications, Taylor & Francis, London, UK, 2003.
20. A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Elsevier Science B.V, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006.
21. V. Lakshmikantham and A. S. Vatsala, “Basic theory of fractional differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 2677–2682, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
22. V. Lakshmikantham and S. Leela, “Nagumo-type uniqueness result for fractional differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 71, no. 7-8, pp. 2886–2889, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
23. S. Zhang, “Monotone iterative method for initial value problem involving Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 71, no. 5-6, pp. 2087–2093, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
24. H. Jafari, H. Tajadodi, and S. A. Hosseini Matikolai, “Homotopy perturbation pade technique for solving fractional Riccati differential equations,” The International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, vol. 11, pp. 271–276, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
25. H. Jafari, H. Tajadodi, H. Nazari, and C. M. Khalique, “Numerical solution of non-linear Riccati differential equations with fractional order,” The International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, vol. 11, pp. 179–182, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
26. F. B. Adda and J. Cresson, “Fractional differential equations and the Schrödinger equation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 323–345, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
27. Z. E. A. Fellah, C. Depollier, and M. Fellah, “Application of fractional calculus to the sound waves propagation in rigid porous materials: validation via ultrasonic measurements,” Acta Acustica united with Acustica, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
28. M. Rahimy, “Applications of fractional differential equations,” Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 49–52, pp. 2453–2461, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
29. M. Z. Ahmad and B. De Baets, “A predator-prey model with fuzzy initial populations,” in Proceedings of the 13th IFSA World Congress and 6th European Society of Fuzzy Logic and Technology Conference, pp. 1311–1314, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
30. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at: Google Scholar
31. R. P. Agarwal, V. Lakshmikantham, and J. J. Nieto, “On the concept of solution for fractional differential equations with uncertainty,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 2859–2862, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
32. S. Arshad and V. Lupulescu, “On the fractional differential equations with uncertainty,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 3685–3693, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
33. T. Allahviranloo, S. Salahshour, and S. Abbasbandy, “Explicit solutions of fractional differential equations with uncertainty,” Soft Computing, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 297–302, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
34. S. Salahshour, T. Allahviranloo, and S. Abbasbandy, “Solving fuzzy fractional differential equations by fuzzy Laplace transforms,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1372–1381, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
35. T. Allahviranloo and M. B. Ahmadi, “Fuzzy Laplace transforms,” Soft Computing, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 235–243, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
36. O. Kaleva, “Fuzzy differential equations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 301–317, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
37. S. Seikkala, “On the fuzzy initial value problem,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 319–330, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
38. O. Kaleva, “A note on fuzzy differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 895–900, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
39. B. Bede, I. J. Rudas, and A. L. Bencsik, “First order linear fuzzy differential equations under generalized differentiability,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 7, pp. 1648–1662, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
40. B. Bede and S. G. Gal, “Generalizations of the differentiability of fuzzy-number-valued functions with applications to fuzzy differential equations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 581–599, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
41. M. Z. Ahmad and M. K. Hasan, “Numerical methods for fuzzy initial value problems under different types of interpretation: a comparison study,” in Informatics Engineering and Information Science, vol. 252 of Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 275–288, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
42. J. J. Buckley and T. Feuring, “Fuzzy differential equations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 43–54, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
43. M. T. Mizukoshi, L. C. Barros, Y. Chalco-Cano, H. Román-Flores, and R. C. Bassanezi, “Fuzzy differential equations and the extension principle,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 17, pp. 3627–3635, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
44. Y. Chalco-Cano and H. Román-Flores, “On new solutions of fuzzy differential equations,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 112–119, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
45. S. C. Palligkinis, G. Papageorgiou, and I. T. Famelis, “Runge-Kutta methods for fuzzy differential equations,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 209, no. 1, pp. 97–105, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
46. Y. Chalco-Cano and H. Román-Flores, “Comparation between some approaches to solve fuzzy differential equations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 160, no. 11, pp. 1517–1527, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
47. M. Z. Ahmad and M. K. Hasan, “A new approach to incorporate uncertainty into Euler's method,” Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 49–52, pp. 2509–2520, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
48. M. Z. Ahmad and M. K. Hasan, “A new fuzzy version of Euler's method for solving differential equations with fuzzy initial values,” Sains Malaysiana, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 651–657, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
49. M. Z. Ahmad, M. K. Hasan, and B. De Baets, “Analytical and numerical solutions of fuzzy differential equations,” Information Sciences, vol. 236, pp. 156–167, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
50. R. Gorenflo and F. Mainardi, “Fractional calculus: integral and differential equations of fractional order,” in Fractals and Fractional Calculus in Continuum Mechanics, pp. 223–276, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
51. Y. Li, Y. Chen, and I. Podlubny, “Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional order nonlinear dynamic systems,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1965–1969, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
52. L. X. Wang, A Course in Fuzzy Systems and Control, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1997.
53. M. Z. Ahmad, M. K. Hasan, and B. De Baets, “A new method for computing continuous functions with fuzzy variable,” Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1143–1149, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
54. M. Z. Ahmad and M. K. Hasan, “Incorporating optimisation technique into Zadeh's extension principle for computing non-monotone functions with fuzzy variable,” Sains Malaysiana, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 643–650, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
55. H. Román-Flores, L. C. Barros, and R. C. Bassanezi, “A note on Zadeh's extensions,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 327–331, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
56. R. Goetschel Jr. and W. Voxman, “Elementary fuzzy calculus,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
57. M. L. Puri and D. A. Ralescu, “Fuzzy random variables,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 409–422, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
58. R. P. Agarwal, D. O'Regan, and V. Lakshmikantham, “Viability theory and fuzzy differential equations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 563–580, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
59. Z. M. Odibat and S. Momani, “An algorithm for the numerical solution of differential equations of fractional order,” Journal of Applied Mathematics & Informatics, vol. 26, pp. 15–27, 2008. View at: Google Scholar