An <i>In Vitro</i> Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators

<table class="table-group" id="tab2"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left"> </td><td align="center" colspan="2">Mean gap—percentage (%) from the total canal </td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left"> </td><td align="center" colspan="2">periphery</td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left" rowspan="2">Material</td><td align="center">2 mm</td><td align="center">4 mm</td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left">Mean ± SD</td><td align="center">Mean ± SD</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">RealSeal 1</td><td align="center">46.78 ± 25.1</td><td align="center">48.49 ± 24.4 </td></tr><tr><td align="left">Thermafil</td><td align="center">30.35 ± 24.2</td><td align="center">33.03 ± 27.2</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="3"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

The mean percentage gap observed in RealSeal 1 and Thermafil at 2 mm and 4 mm sections away from the root apex.

The Scientific World Journal

tab2

Table 2

Table 2: An <i>In Vitro</i> Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators 

The Scientific World Journal

An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators

Table 2