Table 1: Comparative results for the proposed approach.

Classification methodsIrisWineSonar

Classification performances
Proposed classifier97.33 ± 3.0697.6 ± 3.9892.17 2.92
[5]
[3]94.889.1
[2]95.784.9

Number of memory cells
Proposed classifier213060
[5]100100
[3]2871
[2]32177