Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2013, Article ID 610390, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/610390
Research Article

Risk Assessment of Groundwater Contamination: A Multilevel Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Approach Based on DRASTIC Model

1College of Hydropower and Information Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
2School of Municipal and Geomatics Engineering, Hunan City University, Yiyang 413000, China
3Institute of Disaster Prevention, Beijing 101601, China

Received 26 August 2013; Accepted 16 September 2013

Academic Editors: Z. Dai, K. Nemeth, and L. Tosi

Copyright © 2013 Qiuwen Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. C. Gogu and A. Dassargues, “Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods,” Environmental Geology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 549–559, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. M. Tartakovsky, “Probabilistic risk analysis in subsurface hydrology,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 34, no. 5, Article ID L05404, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. S. Alyamani and Z. Sen, “Determination of hydraulic conductivity from complete grain-size distribution curves,” Ground Water, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 551–555, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Z. Dai, A. Wolfsberg, Z. Lu, and H. Deng, “Scale dependence of sorption coefficients for contaminant transport in saturated fractured rock,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 36, no. 1, Article ID L01403, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Z. Dai, A. Wolfsberg, P. Reimus et al., “Identification of sorption processes and parameters for radionuclide transport in fractured rock,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 414-415, pp. 220–230, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. D. Foster, “Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy, vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants,” Proceedings and Information, vol. 38, pp. 69–86, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  7. L. Aller, T. Bennet, J. H. Lehr, and R. J. Petty, “DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings,” US EPA Report 600/2-85/018, US Environment Protection Agency, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  8. S. D. Van, L. Evert, and L. Wassenaar, “Aquifer vulnerability index: a GIS compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping,” Canadian Water Resources Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 25–37, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Li, G. H. Huang, G. Zeng, I. Maqsood, and Y. Huang, “An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for risk assessment of groundwater contamination,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 173–188, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. Dixon, “Applicability of neuro-fuzzy techniques in predicting ground-water vulnerability: a GIS-based sensitivity analysis,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 309, no. 1–4, pp. 17–38, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. Dixon, “Groundwater vulnerability mapping: a GIS and fuzzy rule based integrated tool,” Applied Geography, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 327–347, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Dixon, “Prediction of groundwater vulnerability using an integrated GIS-based Neuro-Fuzzy techniques,” Journal of Spatial Hydrology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–38, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  13. D. Thirumalaivasan, M. Karmegam, and K. Venugopal, “AHP-DRASTIC: software for specific aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC model and GIS,” Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 645–656, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. A. Bojórquez-Tapia, G. M. Cruz-Bello, L. Luna-González, L. Juárez, and M. A. Ortiz-Pérez, “V-DRASTIC: using visualization to engage policymakers in groundwater vulnerability assessment,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 373, no. 1-2, pp. 242–255, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. L. Satty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
  16. A. Ahmed, R. Kusumo, S. Savci, B. Kayis, M. Zhou, and Y. B. Khoo, “Application of analytical hierarchy process and Bayesian belief networks for risk analysis,” Complexity International, vol. 12, pp. 1–10, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. I. Millet and W. C. Wedley, “Modelling risk and uncertainty with the analytic hierarchy process,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 97–107, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. S. Sipahi and M. Timor, “The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications,” Management Decision, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 775–808, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Q. W. Zhang and M. Zhong, “Using multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation to assess reservoir induced seismic risk,” Journal of Computers, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1670–1676, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Zuo, “Indirect method to obtain the reciprocal judgment matrix in analytic hierarchy process,” Systems Engineering, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 56–63, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  21. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. R. Shrestha, A. Bárdossy, and F. Nestmann, “Analysis and propagation of uncertainties due to the stage-discharge relationship: a fuzzy set approach,” Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 595–610, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Tesfamariam and R. Sadiq, “Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP),” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 35–50, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. H. Chang and T. C. Wang, “Using the fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for measuring the possibility of successful knowledge management,” Information Sciences, vol. 179, no. 4, pp. 355–370, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Shouyu and F. Guangtao, “A DRASTIC-based fuzzy pattern recognition methodology for groundwater vulnerability evaluation,” Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 211–220, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus