The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 865645 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/865645

Huimei Wang, Wei Liu, Wenjie Wang, Yuangang Zu, "Influence of Long-Term Thinning on the Biomass Carbon and Soil Respiration in a Larch (Larix gmelinii) Forest in Northeastern China", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 865645, 9 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/865645

Influence of Long-Term Thinning on the Biomass Carbon and Soil Respiration in a Larch (Larix gmelinii) Forest in Northeastern China

Academic Editor: F. Darve
Received06 Feb 2013
Accepted12 Mar 2013
Published04 Apr 2013

Abstract

Thinning management is used to improve timber production, but only a few data are available on how it influences ecosystem C sink capacity. This study aims to clarify the effects of thinning on C sinks of larch plantations, the most widespread forests in Northeastern China. Both C influx from biomass production and C efflux from each soil respiration component and its temperature sensitivity were determined for scaling-up ecosystem C sink estimation: microbial composition is measured for clarifying mechanism for respiratory changes from thinning treatment. Thinning management induced 6.23 mol C m−2 yr−1 increase in biomass C, while the decrease in heterotrophic respiration ( ) at the thinned sites (0.9 mol C m−2 yr−1) has enhanced 14% of this biomass C increase. This decrease in was a sum of the 42% decrease (4.1 mol C m−2 yr−1) in litter respiration and 3.2 mol C m−2 yr−1 more CO2 efflux from mineral soil in thinned sites compared with unthinned control. Increases in temperature, temperature sensitivity, alteration of litters, and microbial composition may be responsible for the contrary changes in from mineral soil and litter respiration, respectively. These findings manifested that thinning management of larch plantations could enhance biomass accumulation and decrease respiratory efflux from soil, which resulted in the effectiveness improvement in sequestrating C in forest ecosystems.

1. Introduction

Carbon dynamics in forest plantations have become a hot topic for forest ecological researches due to their important role in global climate change [1, 2]. In recent Kyoto Protocol negotiations, it was agreed that carbon sequestration in intensively managed plantation forests could be used to offset industrial carbon efflux [2, 3], and this was highlighted in the Marrakesh Accords. To determine the optimal management techniques for these forests, the effects of commonly used management practices (e.g., selective thinning) on ecosystem carbon sinks need to be assessed. Thinning was originally performed to obtain larger diameter and higher quality timber, and more recently, an increasing number of studies have investigated the biomass productivity. The effects of thinning on biomass carbon accumulation have varied between studies [47], due to differences in thinning intensity and the length of time after thinning practice was carried out [7, 8]. Estimation of the effect of thinning on biomass carbon accumulation should be surveyed and analyzed.

China is home to the world’s largest plantation forests (over 62 Mha), and selective thinning is one of the main management practices used in this region. Larch forests are widely distributed around the world at a latitude of 60 degrees north, and about 4.5 Mha of larch forests is distributed in Northeastern China [9, 10]. Comparison in boreal and temperate region indicates that larch forest in Northeastern China is more productive than that of Siberian forests, boreal evergreen, and south Boreas sites and similar to that of Europe Russia forest, boreal deciduous, and temperate evergreen forests [11]. Therefore, quantification of the influence of long-term thinning on the ecosystem carbon budget in these forests is of both scientific and economic significances [3, 5, 6].

Owing to the large storage, a small change in soil carbon from soil heterotrophic respiration changes can reverse the direction of forest ecosystem balance [12]. Instead of biomass carbon alone, net ecosystem productivity (the difference between annual biomass carbon increase (NPP) and soil heterotrophic respiration ( )) is often used to assess ecosystem carbon sink capacity as well as in international carbon trading [3, 13]. To calculate net ecosystem productivity, needs to be distinguished from root autotrophic respiration, and few partitioned data is available for thinning management of forests. This makes it difficult to evaluate the effects of thinning on the ecosystem carbon sink. Given that a decrease of after thinning practices, enhancement of forest carbon sink could be observed via decreasing CO2 efflux from soil. Or else, the biomass carbon gain from NPP may be offset by the increase in . A long-term respiration separating (litter decomposition and microbial respiration in mineral soil) and autotrophic respiration from roots may facilitate the quantification of changes owing to thinning management [12, 14, 15].

Forest management has been shown to have profound but inconsistent influences on soil respiration [1618]. This inconsistent effect may be related to the composition of the microbial community [19, 20], thermal condition alteration [21], temperature sensitivity changes [14, 15], and as litter amount and composition. Removal trees and shrubs in thinning management may possibly alter soil respiration and its contribution to different components, and as the decomposer, the changes in soil microbes are important [21]. A full check on soil microbial composition will help the understanding of underlying mechanism of thinning effects on soil carbon processes [14, 21].

The aims of this study were (1) to quantify the effects of long-term thinning on ecosystem carbon sink capacity via survey of biomass carbon and soil respiratory efflux and (2) to check the microbial and thermal changes for soil respiratory alteration from thinning treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site and Experimental Design

The study was conducted at Laoshan Experimental Station (127°34′  E, 45°20′  N). The larch plantation (L. gmelinii) being studied was afforested in 1969 at an initial planting density of 3300 plants·ha−1. Thinning was performed on 3 occasions following afforestation: at 11 years (1980), 20 years (1989), and 25 years (1994). The removal of the first and third thinnings was approximately 200 tree·ha−1, while the second thinning was approximately 300 tree·ha−1. During thinning, weak larches and other competing shrubs and saplings under the canopy were removed. The unthinned site is a long-term permanent plot located in the same larch plantation. This site was established in 1978 and has no artificial thinning except dead tree movement for timber utilization. Three replicating pairs of thinned and unthinned treatments (ca. 20 m * 20 m) were selected in this paper. For each replicating pair, thinned plot and unthinned plot are neighbor for securing the data reliability. Area of the thinned site (2.5 ha) and unthinned site (0.5 ha) is approximately 3 ha.

2.2. Soil Respiration Partitioning and Environmental Parameters

Owing to its simple and cost effective and realistic respiration partitioning [22, 23], the trenched box method was used to partition respiration by autotrophic roots from respiration by heterotrophic soil microbes and litter decomposition. Each trenched box was deep and settled permanently during the measurements. Soil respiration was measured using a Li-6400 system (LI-COR Inc., USA), and measurements were taken at least 12 hours after PVC collars insertion to avoid soil disturbance from affecting the result. At each unthinned and thinned site, 4 trenched boxes were settled to make respiration measurements. Within each trenched box, microbial respiration in the mineral soil excluding recognizable litters and roots was measured, while outside the trenched box, soil respiration excluding recognizable litters and total soil respiration were measured. Root respiration can be calculated as the difference between and , while respiration from litter decomposition is the difference between and . Duration of the measurement was in the growing season (end of April to early Oct) from April 2005 to September 2007. The measurements were carried out one time per month.

At both the thinned and unthinned sites, a thermometer probe (Li-6400 system) was used to measure soil temperature at a depth of 5 cm at the same time as soil respiration measurements were taken. Continuous soil temperature data were also recorded at 30 min intervals using a thermo Recorder mini Rt-21s (Espec, Japan) from 2005 to 2007. These data were used to compare thermal conditions at the thinned and unthinned sites and were scaled-up to estimate whole ecosystem respiration.

2.3. Tree Growth and Biomass-Related Parameters

An inventory of the arbor layer species larch (L. gmelinii), birch (Betula platyphylla), and ash (Fraxinus mandshurica) was carried out at both the thinned and unthinned sites. Tree height (H) and diameter at breast height (DBH) were recorded, and tree density was calculated for each species. Similarly, measurements of the height, basal diameter, and tree density of 7 understory shrubs and saplings (Syringa amurensis, F. mandshurica, Ulmus propinqua, Tilia amurensis, Corylus heterophylla, Pinus koraiensis, and Acer mono) were also carried out using 4 quadrats at both the thinned and unthinned sites. Following the arbor layer censuses, 10 to 18 different-sized individuals of each species were harvested to determine the biomass of each of plant parts (leaves, stems, branches, and roots); no such distinction between different organs was made for the understory species. Oven-dried biomass (108°C) was used to determine the allometric relationship between biomass and DBH2H for each species (see Table s1 in Supplementary Materials available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/865645). These relationships were then used to determine the difference in total biomass between the thinned and unthinned sites.

2.4. Soil Microbial Carbon and Microbial Composition

Soil microbial carbon was measured using the chloroform (CHCL3) fumigation method, which was first proposed by Jenkinson and Powlson [24] and subsequently revised by Lin et al. [25]. Six soil samples were collected from a depth of 0–10 cm from both the thinned and unthinned sites in summer (August). Enumeration of soil bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes was carried out using a plate counting method [26]. The number of colony-forming units (CFU) was then counted, and a CFU number per unit of fresh soil was calculated.

2.5. Data Analysis

The relationship between soil respiration and soil temperature was expressed by the exponential relationship: , where is the measured soil respiration rate ( , , and ), is the measured soil temperature, and and are the best-fitting coefficients. is theoretical soil respiration rate at 0°C. was then calculated using the expression exp( ), to assess temperature sensitivity [15]. The best-fitted equation from thinned sites and unthinned sites was used to scale-up respiration of each component (mineral soils, litters and roots) from the continuous measurement of soil temperatures.

The differences of diameter, tree height, biomass of trees between different treatments, respiration between different treatments as well as among measured seasons were statistical analyzed by SPSS 17.0.

3. Results

3.1. Impact of Long-Term Thinning on Forest Biomass Carbon

Long-term thinning had a significant effect on tree size and density and most parameters for larch were statistically significant (Table 1). DBH and of larch trees were, on average, 3.7 cm and 0.7 m larger, respectively, at the thinned site than at the unthinned site. Similarly, DBH and of ash were 3.9 cm and 2.8 m larger, respectively, at the thinned site than at the unthinned site. In contrast, DBH and of birch were 2.6 cm and 0.6 m smaller at the thinned site than at the unthinned site. Three arbor species were generally present at a higher density at the unthinned site than at the thinned site, and overall, total density was 20% higher at the unthinned site (1263 individuals·ha−1) than at the thinned site (1050 individuals·ha−1). The basal diameter and height of shrubs and saplings were 0.78 cm and 0.4 m smaller, respectively, at the thinned site than at the unthinned site (Table 1).


ParametersTreatmentArbor layerShrubs and saplingsTotal
Larix gmelinii Betula platyphylla Fraxinus mandshurica Arbor total

Diameter (cm)Thinned21.7 (4.7)b19.2 (2.4)a18.1 (9.2)a1.34 (1.57)a
Unthinned 18.0 (5.3)a21.8 (3.8)a14.2 (6.7)a2.12 (2.06)a
Density (No·hm−2)*Thinned950 (45)a38 (15)a63 (16)a1050 (40)a10500 (550)a
Unthinned 1063 (67)b100 (18)b100 (24)b1263 (60)b7700 (450)b
Mean height (m)Thinned18.5 (1.9)a17.5 (3.4)a16.6 (6.5)a1.68 (1.22)a
Unthinned 17.8 (2.0)a18.1 (4.3)a13.8 (6.8)a2.08 (1.46)a
Biomass (Mg·ha−1)Thinned216.0 (12.1)a7.1 (3.1)b5.0 (1.3)b231.1 (13.2)a1.52 (0.73)a232.6
Unthinned 156.4 (13.1)b15.1 (4.2)a12.9 (3.2)a191.2 (15.1)b2.51 (0.63)a193.7
Biomass C (g C m−2)Thinned10800 (605)a355 (155)a250 (38)b11555 (660)a76 (36)a11630
Unthinned 7820 (655)b756 (210)b646 (160)a9560 (755)b126 (31)a9686
Difference
(g C m−2)
Thinned-Unthinned2980−400−3961994−501944
Annual C change (g C m−2 yr−1)#114.6−15.4−15.276.7−1.974.8

Tree density for arbor layer species was calculated for trees of DBH > 10 cm, while for shrubs and saplings it was calculated for plants of basal diameter > 0.4 cm. #The annual C change is the difference between thinned and unthinned divided by the total thinning duration (26 years).

The allometric relationships (Table s1) and inventory data were used to calculate differences in biomass accumulation between the thinned and unthinned sites (Table 1). The biomass of the arbor layer at the unthinned site (191.2 Mg·ha−1) was lower than that at the thinned site (231.1 Mg·ha−1) , while the biomass of the shrub layer at the unthinned site (2.51 Mg·ha−1) was approximately 1.0 Mg·ha−1 higher than that at the thinned site . By summing the biomass of the 2 layers, total biomass at the unthinned site was 38.9 Mg·ha−1 (approximately 20%) lower than that at the thinned site. In total, arbor biomass carbon at the thinned site was 1994 g C m−2 higher than that at the unthinned site , while understory carbon at the thinned site was 50 g C m−2 lower than that at the unthinned site (Table 1). By dividing the differences between the thinned site and the unthinned site by 26 years (duration of long-term thinning), we can determine the annual changes owing to the thinning treatment, about 74.8 g C m−2 yr−1 increase in total biomass carbon (Table 1).

3.2. Influence of Long-Term Thinning on Microbial Carbon and Composition

Microbial carbon at the thinned site was 8% lower than that at the unthinned site (Figure 1). Similarly, total CFU number at the thinned site was 90% of that at the unthinned site (Figure 1). The main differences observed in the soil microbe composition at the thinned site were 1% increase in the percentage of actinomycetes and fungi but a 2% decrease in the percentage of bacteria (Figure 1).

3.3. Influence of Long-Term Thinning on Soil Temperature and Respiration Rates

The effect of long-term thinning on soil temperature can be observed by comparing the continuous measurements and discrete measurements taken at the thinned and unthinned sites (Figure 2). On average across the 3-year period, the discrete soil temperature measurements were 0.38°C higher at the thinned site (13.14°C) than at the unthinned site (12.76°C). In the growing season (May to Oct) of 2005 and 2007, the continuous measurement data also showed 0.25°C higher soil temperature at the thinned site, while in the nongrowing season, contrary tendency was observed (   at the unthinned site while   at the thinned site) (Figure 2).

Thinning had a varied effect on the different soil respiration components, with no general pattern being observed (Figure 3). Nine out of the 18 measurements showed that was higher at the thinned site than at the unthinned site, while the other half showed the opposite pattern (Figure 3(a)). For both and , most of the measurements (11 out of 18 for each) showed that the unthinned site had higher respiration rates than the thinned site, while the remainder indicated that the unthinned site had lower or similar respiration rates compared to the thinned site (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)).

By classifying the measurements by season, it was found that the respiration of soil microbes peaked in summer. In spring and autumn, soil microbes contributed more to the total soil respiration at the thinned site (73.6% and 69.2%, resp.) than at the unthinned site (55.9% and 65.2%), while levels were similar during the summer (55.2% and 54.5%) (Table s2). This seasonal difference resulted in the contribution being 7% higher at the thinned site (65.8%) than at the unthinned site (58.8%), on average. In contrast, root respiration was generally higher at the unthinned site than that at the thinned site throughout the year, contributing by 15.2% of total respiration compared with 9.1% at the thinned site. The 3-year average litter respiration was the same at the unthinned site and the thinned site (0.69 μmol m−2 s−1). However, its contribution to total respiration was slightly higher at the unthinned site in spring and autumn but lower in summer. These resulted in a slightly higher overall average contribution at the unthinned site (26.2%) than at the thinned site (25.2%) (Table s2).

3.4. Influence of Long-Term Thinning on Temperature Respiration Relationships and Values

There were significant exponential relationships between soil temperature and , , and (Figure 4). There was a steady increase in b values for , , and at the thinned site compared with the unthinned site (Figure 4). value for at the unthinned site (2.15) is 10% lower than that at the thinned site (2.37). Higher values for and at the thinned site were also observed; however, the percentage was less than 5% (Figure 4). value for was almost the same between thinned and unthinned sites. A 7% higher for but a 6% lower for at the thinned site were observed (Figure 4).

3.5. Influence of Long-Term Thinning on Annual CO2 Efflux from Soil Microbes, Roots, and Litter

Based on the continuous soil temperature data (Figure 2) and the exponential relationships (Figure 4), the respiration from soil microbes, roots, and litter was scaled-up (Figure s1). Generally, microbial respiration was higher at the thinned site, while root respiration was similar between the thinned and unthinned sites. However, respiration from litter decomposition was generally higher at the unthinned site than that at the thinned site (Figure s1).

The annual total for each component of soil respiration was calculated from Figure s1 (Table 2). Although almost no change in total respiration was found; however its distribution in different components was altered (Table 2). Heterotrophic respiration from mineral soils at the thinned site was 3.0 to 3.4 mol m−2 yr−1 higher than that at unthinned site, while respiration from litter decomposition at thinned site was 4.0 to 4.2 mol m−2 yr−1 lower than that at unthinned site. Summing of these two components of heterotrophic respiration, thinned treatment decreased 0.7–1.2 mol m−2 yr−1 (averaged at 0.9 mol m−2 yr−1) in total heterotrophic respiration. Autotrophic respiration from roots in thinned site was 0.7–0.9 mol m−2 yr−1 higher than that at the unthinned site (Table 2).


Heterotrophic Autotrophic R
from roots
Total
YearItemsFrom mineral soilFrom littersSubtotal
Unthinned Thinned Unthinned Thinned Unthinned Thinned Unthinned Thinned Unthinned Thinned

2005Amount
(mol m−2 yr−1)
28.732.110.15.938.838.08.08.846.846.8
Difference3.4−4.2−0.80.80.0

2006Amount
(mol m−2 yr−1)
27.730.79.75.537.436.27.68.344.944.6
Differences3.0−4.2−1.20.7−0.3

2007Amount
(mol m−2 yr−1)
27.730.99.65.637.336.57.58.444.844.8
Differences3.2−4.0−0.70.90.0

MeanAmount
(mol m−2 yr−1)
28.031.29.85.737.836.97.78.545.545.4
Differences3.2−4.1−0.90.8−0.1

4. Discussion

Forest management practices such as tending and thinning can dramatically affect stand biomass and volume of harvested timber [4, 8, 27]. In this paper, average analysis showed that biomass carbon increased by 6.23 mol C m−2 yr−1 as the result of the long-term thinning (Table 1). Larch plantations are widespread in China and other northern hemisphere countries, and thinning is a common tending practice. At 2012, over 4.5 million hectares of land in Northeastern China was covered by larch forests (2 Mha in Heilongjiang Province, Liaoning Province, and Jilin Province [10] and 2.5 Mha in Daxinganling district of the Inner Mongolia autonomous region [9]). Based on our findings, approximately 12.1 Tg CO2 (total area 4.5 Mha × annual C sink increase, 6.23 mol m−2 yr−1 as a result of the thinning practice) could be captured annually by these managed forests compared with unthinned forests. During the same period (2005–2007), total industrial CO2 efflux was 670 Tg CO2 on average, and the annual increase was as high as 60 Tg CO2 in Northeastern China [28]. Thus, the management of larch forests in this region alone could offset 2% of this industrial CO2 efflux and 20% of its annual increase of this industrial efflux.

However, feasibility of this carbon increase used in tradeoff industrial emission depends on the ecosystem carbon sink, instead of biomass carbon alone [3, 13]. Thus, the influences on soil heterotrophic respiration should be numerated, owing to that ecosystem carbon sink equals the differences between biomass productivity and soil heterotrophic respiration. Although total CO2 efflux from soil was similar in the thinned site (45.4 mol m−2 yr−1) and the unthinned site (45.5 mol m−2 yr−1), the percentage of heterotrophic respiration and autotrophic respiration were altered (Table 2). On average, heterotrophic respiration of the thinning practice has decreased by 0.9 mol m−2 yr−1. This has resulted in a 14% increase in total ecosystem carbon sink at the thinned site. Therefore, calculation of ecosystem carbon sink proved that thinned treatment could enhance carbon sink size via increase in biomass and decrease in respiratory efflux. Thinning practices is a common method for managing forest [4, 27]. Its effects on biomass and soil respiration were studied previously, although conclusions are variable [2, 8, 16]. In our study, we proved that light thinning (tree density decreased from 1263 trees·ha−1 to 1050 trees·ha−1 following 3 selective thinned treatments) could be a practical silvicultural strategy to offset industrial CO2 emission fulfilling the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol [3, 13].

In the past, the effect of thinning on soil respiration has been found to vary. For example, investigations in a young Pinus ponderosa plantation demonstrated a 13% reduction in soil respiration in the first year after thinning [16]. Similar reductions have been found in other forests [1, 29]. In contrast, some other studies have found increased soil respiration in thinned stands [16, 30]. In this study, we found no overall differences in , , and in any season using the instant measurements from 2005 to 2007 (Figures 3 and 4). Similarly, there were no differences in between the unthinned and thinned sites when the annual data were used (Figure s1, Table 2). However, obvious alternation in its contrition in variable components was observed; that is, microbial respiration in the mineral soil at the thinned site increased, while litter respiration decreased (Table 2). The sum of these 2 components finally resulted in a decrease in total heterotrophic carbon efflux (Table 2).

These differences in respiration between the long-term thinned and unthinned sites should be related to variations in thermal condition, temperature sensitivity of respiration ( values), and the soil microbial composition [12]. At the thinned site, the increased soil temperature (Figure 2) and increased temperature sensitivity of (Figure 4) are responsible for the higher level of heterotrophic respiration from mineral soil (Table 2). On the other hand, the decrease in litter respiration at thinned site (Table 2) should be in accordance with the less return from litter both in total amount and in diversity, as shown in Table 1. Organic matter decomposition depends on specific soil microbial communities [19]. The difference in total microbial biomass decrease (biomass C and CFU data) as well as composition alteration (Figure 1) resulted in changes in the level of litter decomposition, too.

Forest thinning is one basic silviculture method to improve timber quality and productivity; this study gave a case study for the influences of thinning on ecosystem carbon sink. Just as mentioned by many previous studies, biomass C changes during forest managements are the most important item that needs to be fully considered, and our study also confirmed this. However, underground soil C dynamics should be considered in C sink evaluation, particularly in region (like northeastern China) with highly intensive agricultural exploitation [31]. In short-term instant measurement, soil respiration and its heterotrophic components showed diversified seasonal changes (Figure 3); thus instant measurement is difficult to identify the long-term effect on soil C efflux. In this study, annual sum of respiration and its components can be used to find the difference between thinning and control treatment, and data in replicating years showed similar pattern.

5. Conclusion

Our findings support the suggestion that long-term thinning of larch plantation in Northeastern China can improve forest carbon sink through both increase in biomass carbon and decrease in soil heterotrophic CO2 efflux, although the short-term instant measurement may show diversified result. Scaled-up data manifested that biomass increase could trade off 21% of the annual increase of total emission of local industry, and inclusion of soil respiration can give another 14% increase in the sink size. These findings support the use of thinning practices in larch plantation management in Northeastern China for improving ecosystem carbon sink capacity.

Authors’ Contribution

Huimei Wang contributed to data analysis, laboratory assay, and paper preparation; Wei Liu contributed to field data measurement; Wenjie Wang contributed to experiment design and paper preparation and revision; Yuangang Zu provided long-term data for thinning history and experiment design.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported financially by China’s and the Ministry of Science and Technology (2011CB403205), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31170575), and the basic research fund for national universities from Ministry of Education of China (DL12DA03).

Supplementary Materials

Table s1. Allometric equations for trees in the arbor layer, and shrubs and saplings in the study plantation. (DBH/BD: cm; height (H): m; biomass (W): kg; Ws = shoot biomass, Wl = leaf biomass, Wb = branch biomass, and Wr = root biomass).

Table s2. Differences in soil microbe, root, and litter respiration between the unthinned and thinned sites during different seasons from 2005 to 2007. Data in parentheses are the standard deviation of data measured in different months.

Fig. s1 Difference in daily respiration rate of different components of soil between thinned and unthinned sites. a) Respiration of soil microbes; b) respiration of roots; c) respiration of litter; d) total soil respiration.

  1. Supplementary Material

References

  1. M. F. Laporte, L. C. Duchesne, and I. K. Morrison, “Effect of clearcutting, selection cutting, shelterwood cutting and microsites on soil surface CO2 efflux in a tolerant hardwood ecosystem of northern Ontario,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 174, no. 1–3, pp. 565–575, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. Jandl, M. Lindner, L. Vesterdal et al., “How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration?” Geoderma, vol. 137, no. 3-4, pp. 253–268, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. H. Borden, G. Marland, B. Schlamadinger et al., “‘Kyoto forests#8217; and a broader perspective on management,” Science, vol. 290, no. 5498, pp. 1895–1896, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  4. X. B. Dong, “The impacts of cutting intensity on the growth of larch forest,” Journal of Northeast Forestry University, vol. 29, pp. 44–47, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  5. C. Kim, Y. Son, W. K. Lee, J. Jeong, and N. J. Noh, “Influences of forest tending works on carbon distribution and cycling in a Pinus densiflora S. et Z. stand in Korea,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 257, no. 5, pp. 1420–1426, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Novak, M. Slodicak, and D. Dusek, “Thinning effects on forest productivity and site characteristics in stands of Pinus sylvestris in the Czech Republic,” Forest Systems, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 464–474, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  7. S. Y. Tian, “Modeling water, carbon, and nitrogen dynamics for two drained pine plantations under intensive management practices,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 264, pp. 20–36, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  8. P. Nilsen and L. T. Strand, “Thinning intensity effects on carbon and nitrogen stores and fluxes in a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stand after 33 years,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 256, no. 3, pp. 201–208, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. J. Sun, J. Zhang, A. H. Han, X. J. Wang, and X. J. Wang, “Biomass and carbon pool of Larix gmelini young and middle age forest in Xing'an Mountains Inner Mongolia,” Acta Ecologica Sinica, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1756–1762, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  10. Z. H. Sun, G. Z. Jin, and C. C. Mu, Study on the keeping long-term productivity of Larix olgensis plantation, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2009.
  11. W. J. Wang, W. J. ZU, H. M. Wang, Y. Matsuura, K. Sasa, and T. Koike, “Plant biomass and productivity of Larix gmelinii forest ecosystems in Northeast China: intra- and inter-species comparison,” Eurasian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 21–41, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  12. E. A. Davidson and I. A. Janssens, “Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change,” Nature, vol. 440, no. 7081, pp. 165–173, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. D. Schulze, C. Wirth, and M. Heimann, “Managing forests after Kyoto,” Science, vol. 289, no. 5487, pp. 2058–2059, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. J. Hanson, N. T. Edwards, C. T. Garten, and J. A. Andrews, “Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations,” Biogeochemistry, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 115–146, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. D. Boone, K. J. Nadelhoffer, J. D. Canary, and J. P. Kaye, “Roots exert a strong influence on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration,” Nature, vol. 396, no. 6711, pp. 570–572, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. W. Tang, Y. Qi, M. Xu, L. Misson, and A. H. Goldstein, “Forest thinning and soil respiration in a ponderosa pine plantation in the Sierra Nevada,” Tree Physiology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  17. M. F. Selig, J. R. Seiler, and M. C. Tyree, “Soil carbon and CO2 efflux as influenced by the thinning of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations on the Piedmont of Virginia,” Forest Science, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 58–66, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  18. B. W. Sullivan, T. E. Kolb, S. C. Hart, J. P. Kaye, S. Dore, and M. Montes-Helu, “Thinning reduces soil carbon dioxide but not methane flux from southwestern USA ponderosa pine forests,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 255, no. 12, pp. 4047–4055, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. P. C. Houston, S. Visser, and R. A. Lautenschlager, “Microbial processes and fungal community structure in soils from clear-cut and unharvested areas of two mixedwood forests,” Canadian Journal of Botany, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 630–640, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  20. S. Maassen, H. Fritze, and S. Wirth, “Response of soil microbial biomass, activities, and community structure at a pine stand in northeastern Germany 5 years after thinning,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1427–1434, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Y. G. Zu, W. J. Wang, H. M. Wang, W. Liu, S. Cui, and T. Koike, “Soil CO2 efflux, carbon dynamics, and change in thermal conditions from contrasting clear-cut sites during natural restoration and uncut larch forests in northeastern China,” Climatic Change, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 137–159, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. P. Rochette, L. B. Flanagan, and E. G. Gregorich, “Separating soil respiration into plant and soil components using analyses of the natural abundance of carbon-13,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1207–1213, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  23. M. S. Lee, K. Nakane, T. Nakatsubo, and H. Koizumi, “Seasonal changes in the contribution of root respiration to total soil respiration in a cool-temperate deciduous forest,” Plant and Soil, vol. 255, no. 1, pp. 311–318, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. S. Jenkinson and D. S. Powlson, “The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil-V. A method for measuring soil biomass,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 209–213, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  25. Q. M. Lin, Y. G. Wu, and H. L. Liu, “Modification of fumigation extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass carbon,” Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 18, pp. 63–66, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  26. A. Pandey and L. M. S. Palni, “The rhizosphere effect of tea on soil microbes in a Himalayan monsoonal location,” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 131–137, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Juodvalkis, L. Kairiukstis, and R. Vasiliauskas, “Effects of thinning on growth of six tree species in north-temperate forests of Lithuania,” European Journal of Forest Research, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 187–192, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Li, “Evolution and decomposition analysis of industrial CO2 emissions in Northeast China during the period 1995–2009,” Resources Science, vol. 34, pp. 309–315, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  29. D. E. Toland and D. R. Zak, “Seasonal patterns of soil respiration in intact and clear-cut northern hardwood forests,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1711–1716, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  30. Y. Peng and S. C. Thomas, “Soil CO2 efflux in uneven-aged managed forests: temporal patterns following harvest and effects of edaphic heterogeneity,” Plant and Soil, vol. 289, no. 1-2, pp. 253–264, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. W. Wen-Jie, Q. Ling, Z. Yuan-Gang et al., “Changes in soil organic carbon, nitrogen, pH and bulk density with the development of larch (Larix gmelinii) plantations in China,” Global Change Biology, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 2657–2676, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Huimei Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1637
Downloads1966
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.