Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 132158, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/132158
Research Article

Study of Query Expansion Techniques and Their Application in the Biomedical Information Retrieval

Department of Computer Science, Higher Technical School of Computer Engineering, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain

Received 31 August 2013; Accepted 15 December 2013; Published 2 March 2014

Academic Editors: G. Lu and J. Tang

Copyright © 2014 A. R. Rivas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. A. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto, Modern Information Retrieval, Addison-Wesley Longman, 1999.
  2. C. D. Maning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schtze, An Introduction to Information Retrieval, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008.
  3. D. Hiemstra and D. van Leeuwen, Creating A Dutch information Retrieval Test Corpus, 2002.
  4. A. A. Chang, K. M. Heskett, and T. M. Davidson, “Searching the literature using medical subject headings versus text word with PubMed,” Laryngoscope, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 336–340, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. H. Coletti and H. L. Bleich, “Medical subject headings used to search the biomedical literature,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 317–323, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. O. Ebbert, D. M. Dupras, and P. J. Erwin, “Searching the medical literature using PubMed: a tutorial,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 87–91, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. V. Gault, M. Shultz, and K. J. Davies, “Variations in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) mapping: from the natural language of patron terms to the controlled vocabulary of mapped lists,” Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 173–180, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Shin and S. Y. Han, “Improving information retrieval in medline by modulating mesh term weights,” in Natural Language Processing and Information Systems, F. Meziane and E. Mtais, Eds., vol. 3136, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 137–166, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  9. M. F. Porter, “An algorithm for suffx stripping,” Program, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 130–137, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Leveling and G. J. F. Jones, “Sub-word indexing and blind relevance feedback for English, Bengali, Hindi, and Marathi IR,” ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing, vol. 9, no. 3, article 12, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. K. Zipf, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 1949.
  12. S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, S. Jones, M. M. Hancock-Beaulieu, and M. Gatford, Okapi at Trec-3, 1996.
  13. S. E. Robertson and K. S. Jones, “Relevance weighting of search terms,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 129–146, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Ramos, Using Tf-Idf to Determine Word Relevance in Document Queries, 2003.
  15. S. Robertson, “Understanding inverse document frequency: on theoretical arguments for IDF,” Journal of Documentation, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 503–520, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Gauch, J. Wang, and S. M. Rachakonda, “A corpus analysis approach for automatic query expansion and its extension to multiple databases,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 250–269, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Guo, G. Xu, X. Cheng, and H. Li, “Named entity recognition in query,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '09), J. Allan, J. A. Aslam, M. Sanderson, C. Zhai, and J. Zobel, Eds., pp. 267–274, ACM, 2009.
  18. S. Karimi, J. Zobel, and F. Scholer, “Quantifying the impact of concept recognition on biomedical information retrieval,” Information Processing and Management, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 94–106, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. J. Crouch and B. Yang, “Experiments in automatic statistical thesaurus construction,” in Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '92), pp. 77–88, New York, NY, USA, June 1992. View at Scopus
  20. Y. Qiu and H. P. Frei, “Concept based query expansion,” in Proceedings of the 16th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 160–169, July 1993. View at Scopus
  21. E. D. Liddy and S.-H. Myaeng, “Tipster panel—dr-link's linguistic-conceptual approach to document detection,” in TREC, pp. 113–130, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  22. G. A. Miller, R. Beckwith, C. Fellbaum, D. Gross, and K. J. Miller, “Introduction to wordnet: an on-line lexical database,” International Journal of Lexicography, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 235–244, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. Borrajo, R. Romero, E. L. Iglesias, and C. M. Redondo Marey, “Improving imbalanced scientific text classification using sampling strategies and dictionaries,” Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 176, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Hirschman, A. Yeh, C. Blaschke, and A. Valencia, “Overview of BioCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biology,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 6, supplement 1, article S1, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. D. Zhou, “Recognizing names in biomedical texts using hidden markov model and SVM plus sigmoid,” in Proceedings of the COLING International Joint Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and its Applications (NLPBA/BioNLP '04), N. Collier, P. Ruch, and A. Nazarenko, Eds., pp. 1–7, Geneva, Switzerland.
  26. R. Apweiler, A. Bairoch, C. H. Wu et al., “UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, pp. D115–D119, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Mitra, A. Singhal, and C. Buckley, “Improving automatic query expansion,” in Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 206–214, ACM Press, 1998.
  28. S. Abdou, “Evaluation of stemming, query expansion and manual indexing approaches for the genomic task,” in Proceedings of the 15th Text REtrieval Conference Proceedings (TREC '05), pp. 863–871, 2005.
  29. Z. Yang, H. Lin, Y. Li, B. Liu, and Y. Lu, “Trec genomics track experiments at dutai,” in Text REtrieval Conference, 2005.
  30. T. Brants and Google Inc, “Natural language processing in information retrieval,” in Proceedings of the 14th Meeting of Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands, pp. 1–13, 2004.
  31. Y. Fan, X. Huang, and York University at TREC, “Enterprise email discussion search,” in Proceedings of the 15th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC '06), M. Ellen Voorhees and P. Lori Buckland, Eds., vol. 500-272, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 2006.
  32. S. E. Robertson and S. Walker, “Okapi/keenbow at trec-8,” 1999.
  33. E. Greengrass, “Information retrieval: a survey,” Tech. Rep. tr-r52-008-001, united States Department of Defense, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  34. S. E. Robertson and S. Walker, Microsoft Cambridge at Trec-9: Filtering Track, 2001.
  35. S. Robertson and H. Zaragoza, “The probabilistic relevance framework: BM25 and beyond,” Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 333–389, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Trotman, An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Information Retrieval, 2004.
  37. A. Trotman, Learning to Rank. Information Retrieval, vol. 8, 2005.