Efficient Iris Recognition Based on Optimal Subfeature Selection and Weighted Subregion Fusion

Table 3

Comparisons of CRR and EER.

Methods	Correct recognition rate (%)		Equal error rate (%)
	CASIA-V3 Interval	CASIA-V3 Lamp	CASIA-V3 Interval	CASIA-V3 Lamp
Bouraoui et al. [42]	99.97	99.97	1.74	18.21
Ma et al. [6]	94.90*	94.82	2.62*	—
Ma et al. [7]	95.54*	96.35	2.07*	—
Daugman [1]	95.19*	96.13	1.80*	3.47^#
Roy et al. [43]	97.21*	97.86	0.71*	—
Masek and Kovesi [44]	97.61^@	98.19	0.584^&	—
Mehrotra et al. [12]	98.55	—	—	—
Belcher and Du [13]	—	—	2.1^&	—
Tsai et al. [8]	—	—	0.148	—
Zhu et al. [9]	—	—	3.53^&	—
Sun amd Tan [10]	—	—	—	1.22
Zhang et al. [11]	—	—	—	0.37
Daugman [2]	—	—	—	1.05^∧
Wildes et al. [4]	—	—	—	0.86^∧
He et al. [45]	—	—	—	0.75^∧
Proposed	99.82	99.93	0.78	0.82

Note. Data labeled by *come from Roy et al. [43], ^#come from Zhang et al. [11], ^@come from Mehrotra et al. [12], ^& come from Tsai et al. [8], and ^∧come from He et al. [45].