Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 194925, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/194925
Clinical Study

Measurement of SUVs-Maximum for Normal Region Using VOI in PET/MRI and PET/CT

1Department of Radiologic Technology, Daegu Health College, Youngsong-ro 15, Buk-gu, Daegu 702-722, Republic of Korea
2Department of Therapeutic Radiology & Oncology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Nam-gu, Daegu 705-717, Republic of Korea
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Nam-gu, Daegu 705-717, Republic of Korea

Received 19 August 2013; Accepted 27 November 2013; Published 4 February 2014

Academic Editors: C. Kappas and H. M. Lederman

Copyright © 2014 Jeong Kyu Park et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Antoch and A. Bockisch, “Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging?” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 36, no. 1, supplement, pp. 113–120, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. M. Vogt, G. Antoch, L. S. Freudenberg et al., “Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 290, no. 24, pp. 3199–3206, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Eiber, A. J. Beer, M. Souvatzoglou, M. Schwaiger, and B. J. Krause, “Radionuclide and hybrid imaging of recurrent prostate cancer,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 181–191, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. E. Kinahan, B. H. Hasegawa, and T. Beyer, “X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 166–179, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Zaidi, “Is MR-guided attenuation correction a viable option for dual-modality PET/MR imaging?” Radiology, vol. 244, no. 3, pp. 639–642, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Martinez-Möller, M. Souvatzoglou, G. Delso et al., “Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data,” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 520–526, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Zincirkeser, E. Şahin, M. Halac, and S. Sager, “Standardized uptake values of normal organs on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging,” The Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 231–236, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Boellaard, “Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis,” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50, supplement 1, pp. 11S–20S, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. S. LEE, “A study for distortion of standardized uptake value according to the does and lesion size using 18F-FDG PET/CT,” Graduates School Korea University. In press.
  10. Y. Menda, D. L. Bushnell, M. T. Madsen, K. McLaughlin, D. Kahn, and K. H. Kernstine, “Evaluation of various corrections to the standardized uptake value for diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy,” Nuclear Medicine Communications, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1077–1081, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. R. Zasadny and R. L. Wahl, “Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]- fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction,” Radiology, vol. 189, no. 3, pp. 847–850, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. L. Wahl, H. Jacene, Y. Kasamon, and M. A. Lodge, “From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors,” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50, supplement 1, pp. 122S–150S, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. C. Lauenstein and R. C. Semelka, “Emerging techniques: whole-body screening and staging with MRI,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 489–498, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Å. Riklund, “PET/CT: nuclear medicine imaging in the future,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 139, no. 1–3, pp. 8–11, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Hofmann, F. Steinke, V. Scheel et al., “MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI: a novel approach combining pattern recognition and atlas registration,” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1875–1883, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. V. Schulz, I. Torres-Espallardo, S. Renisch et al., “Automatic, three-segment, MRI-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MRI data,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 138–152, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. R. Boellaard, M. J. O’Doherty, W. A. Weber et al., “FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 181–200, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. A. Castelijns and M. W. M. van den Breckel, “Imaging of lymphadenopathy in the neck,” European Radiology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 727–738, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. G. Schaefer, T. F. Hany, C. Taverna et al., “Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin disease: coregistered FDG PET and CT at staging and restaging—do we need contrast-enhanced CT?” Radiology, vol. 232, no. 3, pp. 823–829, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus