Effects of Soil Temperature, Flooding, and Organic Matter Addition on N<sub>2</sub>O Emissions from a Soil of Hongze Lake Wetland, China

Lu, Yan; Xu, Hongwen

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/272684

The Scientific World Journal

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Impacts of Land Use Changes on Soil Properties and Processes

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 272684 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/272684

Effects of Soil Temperature, Flooding, and Organic Matter Addition on N₂O Emissions from a Soil of Hongze Lake Wetland, China

Yan Lu^1,2and Hongwen Xu¹

Academic Editor: Antonio Paz González

Received15 Apr 2014

Revised15 Jun 2014

Accepted04 Jul 2014

Published14 Jul 2014

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to test the effects of soil temperature, flooding, and raw organic matter input on N₂O emissions in a soil sampled at Hongze Lake wetland, Jiangsu Province, China. The treatments studied were—peat soil (I), peat soil under flooding (II), peat soil plus raw organic matter (III), and peat soil under flooding plus organic matter. These four treatments were incubated at 20°C and 35°C. The result showed that temperature increase could enhance N₂O emissions rate and cumulative emissions significantly; moreover, the flooded soil with external organic matter inputs showed the lowest cumulative rise in N₂O emissions due to temperature increment. Flooding might inhibit soil N₂O emissions, and the inhibition was more pronounced after organic matter addition to the original soil. Conversely, organic matter input explained lower cumulative N₂O emissions under flooding. Our results suggest that complex interactions between flooding and other environmental factors might appear in soil N₂O emissions. Further studies are needed to understand potential synergies or antagonisms between environmental factors that control N₂O emissions in wetland soils.

1. Introduction

Climate change has been a major issue within the twenty-first century. The main causes of global warming are the increase in carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), and nitrous oxide (N₂O). Concentrations of N₂O in the atmosphere are lower than those of either CH₄ or CO₂; however, on a per mole basis, N₂O has demonstrated a higher ability to disrupt the radiation balance than the other two gases aforementioned. Thus, N₂O has attracted much attention because it is a potent greenhouse gas with long atmospheric lifetimes, and it is involved in ozone depletion as well [1, 2]. Measurements of N₂O emissions have been increasing steadily. Until now, however, the vast majority of studies have focused on N₂O emissions from agroecosystem, as affected by temperature, soil type, crop growth, and management practices [3–5]. Therefore, there is much uncertainty surrounding the effect of flooding or the joint effects of several factors, for example, flooding and temperature changes.

Changes in land use patterns will cause alterations in the soil organic matter status and the soil nitrogen mineralization rates and therefore will also influence N₂O emissions. In addition, land use changes may also affect transfer and diffusion of N₂O in the soil through reorganization of the soil structure. Wetlands have been identified as major landforms regulating greenhouse gases dynamics [6]. CO₂ and CH₄ emissions from wetland system have been reported by numerous studies [7, 8]. However, research conducted on N₂O emission from the wetland soil has relatively fewer reports. The predominant factors affecting N₂O production and emission include soil temperature, soil moisture, exogenous organic matter inputs, and soil organic matter content [9–11]. They could have influence on microorganisms producing and consuming N₂O from wetland soils [12]. Soil temperature directly impacts production and consumption of N₂O though microorganism’s activity, soil aeration, substrate availability, and redistribution. Soil moisture is a key determinant of the microbial processes [13]. Organic matter fractions have been also found to enhance N₂O emissions as they supply substrates for nitrification and denitrification and augment microbial O₂ consumption [14].

The interactions among soil temperature, moisture, and raw organic matter addition on N₂O emissions are not well known and the gaps about the joint effects of these factors may increase the uncertainty in estimating global emissions budgets. Wetland soil from Hongze Lake was incubated under different temperature, moisture, and exogenous organic matter input. The objective was to analyze the interaction of soil temperature, flooding, and row organic matter inputs on N₂O losses. Knowledge about the nitrogen loss process of the wetland ecological system may provide the baseline data to undertake countermeasures allowing reductions of greenhouse gas emissions.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Site and Soil Characteristics

Hongze Lake is located in the northwest region of Jiangsu Province (33°06′ N~33°40′ N, 118°10′ E~118°55′ E), and it is the fourth largest freshwater lake in China. The lake surface area covers 1597 km², the water level is 12.5 m, and the average depth is 1.9 m. The lake region has a monsoon climate with four distinct seasons. The average annual rainfall is 925.5 mm, mostly concentrated in the rainy season from June to September. The lake and the surrounding area are representative of inland wetlands in China. Wetlands are widely distributed around the lake; several wetland types have been described and the three most common are estuarine, floodplain, and out of the lake wetland.

Estuary wetlands located in the west coast of the Hongze Lake have been sampled in November 2012. Soil samples were collected at 0–20 cm depth using the multipoint hybrid method and taken to the laboratory in field-moist condition. Soil samples were divided into two subsamples, after manually removing visible plant roots and rocks. A subsample was put in the refrigerator (4°C) for incubation after sieving with 2 mm sieve, and the second subsample was dried and fine grinded for chemical analysis.

Basic physical and chemical properties of the tested soil are shown in Table 1. This soil was rich in organic matter with a total carbon content of 62.11 g·kg⁻¹ and a total nitrogen content of 3.96 g·kg⁻¹. Available nitrogen was as high as 382.81 mg·kg⁻¹. Ammonia nitrogen (26.68 mg·kg⁻¹) was approximately four times greater than nitrate nitrogen (6.55 mg·kg⁻¹). Bulk density was 0.87 g·cm⁻³.

2.2. Incubation Experiment

An incubation experiment was setup to study NO₂ emissions under four treatments and each treatment was incubated at two different temperatures. Treatments were as follows: natural peat soil (I), peat soil under flooding (II), peat soil plus raw organic matter (III), and peat soil under flooding plus organic matter (IV). Three replications per treatments were analyzed. To assess the effect of temperature on N₂O treatments each replicate sample was incubated at 35°C (high temperature or treatment A) and at 20°C (room temperature or treatment B). At the same time, two blank tests were performed as a control treatment.

Soil sampled in the field was preincubated at room temperature for three days. Afterwards, 40 g of preincubated soil was enclosed in 1000 mL incubation bottles. Incubations were performed in 24 bottles (3 replicates × 4 different soil treatments × 2 temperatures). In the flooding treatment, 40 mL distilled water was added to the 40 g dry soil (soil was submerged by a 0.5 cm water column). In the treatment with exogenous organic matter addition, 1 g dried litter of Phragmites communis was grinded and mixed with the soil samples and added into each bottle. Bottles were sealed and maintained at constant temperatures of 20°C (treatment B) and 35°C (treatment A). Therefore, treatments incubated at high temperatures are labeled as AI, AII, AIII, and AIV, whereas labels for those incubated at low temperatures are BI, BII, BIII, and BIV.

2.3. N₂O Analysis

Measures of N₂O fluxes were a total of 12 times at the 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th, 11th, 13th, 16th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, and 28th days after incubation started. At each sampling date, 30 mL of gases was pumped from each incubation bottle. After then each bottle was open for half an hour to ensure that the gas in the bottle was equilibrated with that in the air and then the incubation bottles were again sealed. Gas chromatograph was used to measure the concentration of N₂O in the samples. Emission rates were expressed as g·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ of N₂O.

2.4. Data Analysis

The data set was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s test at 0.05 level to compare the mean of N₂O of each treatment. The SPSS 16.0 for Windows was used.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Temperature on N₂O Emissions

It was found that all of the four treatments studied exhibited higher N₂O emissions rates at 35°C than at 20°C. The highest N₂O emissions rates occurred during the first periods of incubation and then gradually decreased (Figure 1). Moreover, complex changes of emission rates were noticed after organic matter was added to the wetland incubated at high temperature (Figure 1, AIV). Higher cumulative N₂O emissions were observed under high temperature as well (Figure 2, BIV). N₂O emission in treatment AI was 49.67% higher than in BI, AII was 54.78% higher than BII, AIII was 119.81% higher than BIII, and AIV was 42.33% higher than that of BIV. Moreover, highly significant differences were found between treatments AI and AIII (high temperature and peat soil versus peat soil plus exogenous organics matter) and also between BI and BIII (room temperature and peat soil plus exogenous organic matter) (, or ).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

It could be deduced that increasing incubation temperature increased N₂O emissions. The maximum accumulative increase in N₂O emissions was for the peat soil added with raw organic matter, whereas the minimum accumulative was for the flooded peat soil added with raw organic matter.

3.2. Effect of Moisture Conditions on N₂O Emissions

Both N₂O emission rate and cumulative amount were lower in the flooding than in the unflooding treatment whether organic matter was added or no under high and room temperature conditions (Figures 1 and 2). N₂O emissions in AII were 20.72% lower than in AI; AIV emissions decreased by 72.23% with respect to AIII; meanwhile, BII was 23.34% lower than BI and BIV declined by 57.11% compared to BIII. Significant differences were found between AI and AII, AIII and AIV, BI and BII, and BIII and BIV (, ). These results show that irrespective of incubation temperature, flooding inhibits soil N₂O emissions; moreover, the decline of N₂O emissions under flooding was more obvious in soils plus organic matter.

3.3. Effect of Organic Matter Input on N₂O Emissions

Further additions of organic matter to the studied peat soils increased soil N₂O emission rates in the flooded and the unflooded treatments at the two levels of temperature studied (Figure 1). Moreover, sharp fluctuations of soil N₂O emission along the incubation period occurred in soils added with organic matter under high temperature (AIII and AIV treatments). Organic matter additions clearly amplified cumulative amount of N₂O emissions (Figure 2). N₂O emissions in AIII were 299.62% higher than in AI, whereas those of AIV were 39.98% higher than those of AII. Also BIII emissions were 172.11% higher than in BI, and BIV were 52.23% higher than in BII. Very significant differences have been shown between AI and AIII (high temperature and peat soil versus peat soil plus organic matter), between AII and AII (high temperature and flooded soil versus flooded soil plus organic matter), and also between BI and BIII and BII and BIV (, ). It was shown that the effect of exogenous organic matter input of increasing N₂O emissions was relatively much lower under flooding conditions, compared to normal unflooding conditions.

4. Discussion

Soil temperature has a great influence on N₂O formation through the biological processes of nitrification and denitrification. Optimum temperatures for nitrifying bacterial activities are in the range from 15 to 35°C, and nitrification will be inhibited at below 5°C or above 40°C. Optimum temperatures for denitrifying microorganism are from 30 to 67°C [15]. Soil temperature was an important factor affecting N₂O emission as well. N₂O emission rate was shown to be nearly synchronized with surface soil temperature, and the temperature variation was the main driver of diurnal and seasonal changes in N₂O emissions [16]. In our wetland soil, N₂O emission increased with increasing temperature, which was consistent with previous reports on forest soils [10, 17]. This result could be ascribed to the fact that rates of enzymatic reactions would increase with temperature when other environmental factors are not restrictive [18]. Moreover, temperature might regulate soil denitrification both directly and indirectly, and it could promote the activity of soil nitrifying and denitrifying microorganism and hence enhance N₂O emission rate and cumulative emissions [19–22].

N₂O production and emission may be influenced by soil moisture, through its effects on soil aeration status, reduction-oxidation conditions, microbial activities, and N₂O diffusion into atmosphere. Feng and Yin [23] found that more N₂O was produced at 45%–75% water filled pore space. When it was below the saturated water content, soil N₂O emission increased with the increase of soil moisture, and nitrification was accredited as the basic source of N₂O. However, when it was above the saturated water content, the denitrification process was the main source of N₂O. With increasing soil moisture content above this threshold, the proportion of denitrifying N₂ increased gradually and N₂O emissions gradually weakened. Results from N₂O emission observed in the rice and wheat crop rotation system in east China showed that if soil moisture content was less than 415 g·kg⁻¹, then soil N₂O emissions increased linearly with increasing soil moisture content; however, when the soil moisture content was more than 415 g·kg⁻¹, N₂O emissions reduced with the increase of soil moisture content [24], indicating much higher N₂ loss under saturated soil water condition. Therefore, the production of N₂O was not positively related to soil moisture under high moisture condition. Soil moisture content was also a key determinant of soil microbial activity [25], and it had impact on the diffusion of N₂O produced during denitrification from microbial air into the surrounding environment [26]. Consequently, we deduced that both nitrifier-denitrifier microorganisms and coupled nitrification-denitrification processes contributed to the elevated N₂O emission in wetland soil [27].

Organic matter input was thought to be an important regulator of N₂O emissions, because organic matter on the soil surface could influence nitrification and denitrification reactions resulting from N mobilization and immobilization [28]. Toma and Hatano found huge N₂O emissions when accepting low C/N ratio residues, mainly because these residues tended to break up [29]. Liu et al. reported that wheat straw incorporation increased N₂O emissions, while the incorporation of maize straw had no impact on the emissions [30]. Millar et al. observed greater N₂O emissions in areas cultivated with corn-wheat due to high amount of N applied to the corn field [31]. Therefore similar to our study, other results have shown that organic matter input enhanced soil N₂O emission rate and cumulative emissions. The contribution of the organic matter could be mainly explained by the mineralization of litter which supplied substrates and thus promoted the production of N₂O. In opposite, results about the negative role of organic matter on N₂O emissions have also been reported [32]. Moreover, Tang et al. found that there were no significant impacts of organic matter on soil N₂O emissions in a subtropical and two tropical forests [33–35], which underlies the potential adverse effects of organic matter. Consequently, we hypothesize that the net integrated effect of organic matter on N₂O emission was the result of the counterbalance between the positive and negative feedbacks arising from interactions with other factors.

5. Conclusions

Both temperature rise and exogenous organic matter inputs increased N₂O emission rates and cumulative amount from a wetland soil. The flooded soil with external organic matter inputs showed the lowest cumulative rise in N₂O emissions as the temperature increased. Irregular changes of N₂O emission along the incubation period were found in soils added with organic matter under high temperature condition. Soil N₂O emissions could be inhibited by flooding; however, complex internal connections and cooperative or antagonistic actions between flooding and other environmental factors might appear in soil N₂O emissions. Thus, it is recommended to conduct further studies for assessing the way through which other environmental factors affect soil N₂O emissions of wetland ecosystem.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41201559; 41301314), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu province (BK2011412), and the Natural Science Foundation of Universities in Jiangsu province area of China (10KJB170003).

References

S. Nadeem, S. Hansen, M. Azzaroli Bleken, and P. Dörsch, “N₂O emission from organic barley cultivation as affected by green manure management,” Biogeosciences, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 2747–2759, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Ravishankara, J. S. Daniel, and R. W. Portmann, “Nitrous oxide (N₂O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century,” Science, vol. 326, no. 5949, pp. 123–125, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. O. Petersen, P. Ambus, L. Elsgaard, P. Schjønning, and J. E. Olesen, “Long-term effects of cropping system on N₂O emission potential,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 706–712, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D.-G. Kim, R. Vargas, B. Bond-Lamberty, and M. R. Turetsky, “Effects of soil rewetting and thawing on soil gas fluxes: a review of current literature and suggestions for future research,” Biogeosciences, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 2459–2483, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Gomiero, D. Pimentel, and M. G. Paoletti, “Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: conventional vs. organic agriculture,” Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, vol. 30, no. 1-2, pp. 95–124, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Liengaard, L. P. Nielsen, N. P. Revsbech et al., “Extreme emission of N₂O from tropical wetland soil (Pantanal, South America),” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 2, article 433, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Yang, J. S. Liu, J. D. Wang, J. B. Yu, Z. G. Sun, and X. H. Li, “Emission rates of CH₄ and N₂O from a wetland in the Sanjiang Plain,” Journal of Plant Ecology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 432–440, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Paz-Ferreiro, E. Medina-Roldán, N. J. Ostle, N. P. McNamara, and R. D. Bardgett, “Grazing increases the temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition in a temperate grassland,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID 014027, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Luo, R. Kiese, B. Wolf, and K. Butterbach-Bahl, “Effects of soil temperature and moisture on methane uptake and nitrous oxide emissions across three different ecosystem types,” Biogeosciences, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 3205–3219, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Schaufler, B. Kitzler, A. Schindlbacher, U. Skiba, M. A. Sutton, and S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern, “Greenhouse gas emissions from European soils under different land use: effects of soil moisture and temperature,” European Journal of Soil Science, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 683–696, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wu, Z. Yao, N. Brüggemann et al., “Effects of soil moisture and temperature on CO₂ and CH₄ soil-atmosphere exchange of various land use/cover types in a semi-arid grassland in Inner Mongolia, China,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 773–787, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Jäger, C. F. Stange, B. Ludwig, and H. Flessa, “Emission rates of N₂O and CO₂ from soils with different organic matter content from three long-term fertilization experiments-a laboratory study,” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 483–494, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, C. Y. Tang, Z. W. Han, J. Q. Piao, Y. J. Cao, and C. P. Zhang, “Spatial and seasonal variation of dissolved nitrous oxide in wetland groundwater,” Environment and Pollution, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Markfoged, L. P. Nielsen, T. Nyord, L. D. M. Ottosen, and N. P. Revsbech, “Transient N₂O accumulation and emission caused by O₂ depletion in soil after liquid manure injection,” European Journal of Soil Science, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 541–550, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Alexander, Introduction to Soil Microbiology, pp. 4–35, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1977.
J. M. Bremner, S. G. Robbins, and A. M. Blackmer, “Seasonal variabity in emission of nitrous oxide from soil,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 641–644, 1980.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cheng, J. Wang, S. Q. Wang, Z. C. Cai, and L. Wang, “Effects of temperature change and tree species composition on N₂O and NO emissions in acidic forest soils of subtropical China,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 617–625, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
F. X. Meixner and W. X. Yang, “Biogenic emissions of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide from arid and semi-arid land,” in Dryland Ecohydrology, P. D'Odorico and A. Porporato, Eds., pp. 233–255, Springer, Dordrecht, Germany, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Lu, H. Xu, and C. Song, “Effects of plants on N₂O emission in freshwater marsh ecosystem,” Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 662–666, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Tang, X. Xiao, W. Tang, and G. Yang, “Effects of straw recycling of winter covering crop on methane and nitrous oxide emissions in paddy field,” Acta Agronomica Sinica, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1666–1675, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Simojoki and A. Jaakkola, “Effect of nitrogen fertilization, cropping and irrigation on soil air composition and nitrous oxide emission in a loamy clay,” European Journal of Soil Science, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 413–424, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. J. Zhang, H. Xu, and G. X. Chen, “Important factors controlling rates of N₂O emission and CH₄ oxidation from forest soil,” Environmental Science, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 8–12, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Feng and S. X. Yin, “Influence of soil properties on N₂O formation and emissions,” Progress in Soil Science, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 35–42, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Gou, X. H. Zheng, and M. X. Wang, “A simulating of N₂O emission from a rice-wheat rotation ecosystem in southeast China,” Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 835–842, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
A. M. Weitz, E. Linder, S. Frolking, P. M. Crill, and M. Keller, “N₂O emissions from humid tropical agricultural soils: effects of soil moisture, texture and nitrogen availability,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 33, no. 7-8, pp. 1077–1093, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Zeng and Z. P. Wang, “Research on production and emission of N₂O formation and emissions from agricultural soil,” Chinese Journal of Soil Science, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 132–134, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
X. J. Liu, A. R. Mosier, A. D. Halvorson, C. A. Reule, and F. S. Zhang, “Dinitrogen and N₂O emissions in arable soils: effect of tillage, N source and soil moisture,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2362–2370, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Signor, C. E. P. Cerri, and R. Conant, “N₂O emissions due to nitrogen fertilizer applications in two regions of sugarcane cultivation in Brazil,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID 015013, pp. 1–9, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Toma and R. Hatano, “Effect of crop residue C:N ratio on N₂O emissions from Gray Lowland soil in Mikasa, Hokkaido, Japan,” Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 198–205, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Liu, K. Wang, S. X. Meng et al., “Effects of irrigation, fertilization and crop straw management on nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from a wheat-maize rotation field in northern China,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 140, no. 1-2, pp. 226–233, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Millar, G. P. Robertson, P. R. Grace, R. J. Gehl, and J. P. Hoben, “Nitrogen fertilizer management for nitrous oxide (N₂O) mitigation in intensive corn (Maize) production: an emissions reduction protocol for US Midwest agriculture,” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 185–204, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. D. Wang, H. M. Wang, Z. L. Wang et al., “Effect of litter layer on soil-atmosphere N₂O flux of a subtropical pine plantation in China,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 82, no. 1-2, pp. 106–112, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Tang, S. Liu, G. Zhou, D. Zhang, and C. Zhou, “Soil-atmospheric exchange of CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O in three subtropical forest ecosystems in southern China,” Global Change Biology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 546–560, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Vasconcelos, D. J. Zarin, M. Capanu et al., “Moisture and substrate availability constrain soil trace gas fluxes in an Eastern Amazonian regrowth forest,” Globle Biogeochemical Cycles, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Yan, L. Sha, M. Cao et al., “Fluxes of CH₄ and N₂O from soil under a tropical seasonal rain forest in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 207–215, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Yan Lu and Hongwen Xu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3408

Downloads

1260

Citations