Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 341075, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/341075
Research Article

Intracochlear Pressure Changes due to Round Window Opening: A Model Experiment

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Warenerstraße 7, 12683 Berlin, Germany

Received 17 March 2014; Accepted 29 April 2014; Published 22 May 2014

Academic Editor: Afshin Teymoortash

Copyright © 2014 P. Mittmann et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Aschendorff, J. Kromeier, T. Klenzner, and R. Laszig, “Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 75S–79S, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. J. Balkany, S. S. Connell, A. V. Hodges et al., “Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1083–1088, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. L. Carlson, C. L. W. Driscoll, R. H. Gifford et al., “Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 962–968, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. O. Adunka, M. H. Unkelbach, M. Mack, M. Hambek, W. Gstoettner, and J. Kiefer, “Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 124, no. 7, pp. 807–812, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Havenith, M. J. Lammers, R. A. Tange et al., “Hearing preservation surgery: cochleostomy or round window approach? A systematic review,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 34, pp. 667–674, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  6. C. Richard, J. N. Fayad, J. Doherty, and F. H. Linthicum Jr., “Round window versus cochleostomy technique in cochlear implantation: histologic findings,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 33, pp. 1181–1187, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. K. Niedermeier, S. Braun, C. Fauser, J. Kiefer, R. K. Straubinger, and T. Stark, “A safety evaluation of dexamethasone-releasing cochlear implants: comparative study on the risk of otogenic meningitis after implantation,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 132, pp. 1252–1260, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  8. E. Lehnhardt, “Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique,” HNO, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 356–359, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. S. Roland, C. G. Wright, and B. Isaacson, “Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 117, no. 8, pp. 1397–1402, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. S. Olson, “Observing middle and inner ear mechanics with novel intracochlear pressure sensors,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 3445–3463, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Paprocki, B. Biskup, K. Kozłowska, A. Kuniszyk, D. Bien, and K. Niemczyk, “The topographical anatomy of the round window and related structures for the purpose of cochlear implant surgery,” Folia Morphologica, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 309–312, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Puria, W. T. Peake, and J. J. Rosowski, “Sound-pressure measurements in the cochlear vestibule of human-cadaver ears,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 101, pp. 2754–2770, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. A. D'Elia, R. Bartoli, F. Giagnotti, and N. Quaranta, “The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 33, pp. 343–347, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  14. M. K. Cosetti, D. R. Friedmann, B. Z. Zhu et al., “The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 34, pp. 516–521, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  15. D. A. Gudis, M. Montes, D. C. Bigelow, and M. J. Ruckenstein, “The round window: is it the, “cochleostomy” of choice? Experience in 130 consecutive cochlear implants,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 33, pp. 1497–1501, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  16. R. J. S. Briggs, M. Tykocinski, J. Xu et al., “Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode,” Audiology & Neurotology, vol. 11, 1, pp. 42–48, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Stieger, J. J. Rosowski, and H. H. Nakajima, “Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea,” Hearing Research, vol. 301, pp. 105–114, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  18. V. Nedzelnitsky, “Sound pressures in the basal turn of the cat cochlea,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1676–1689, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. O. de la Rochefoucauld, W. F. Decraemer, S. M. Khanna, and E. S. Olson, “Simultaneous measurements of ossicular velocity and intracochlear pressure leading to the cochlear input impedance in gerbil,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–177, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y.-J. Yoon, S. Puria, and C. R. Steele, “Intracochlear pressure and organ of corti impedance from a linear active three-dimensional model,” ORL, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 365–372, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. A. Feijen, J. M. Segenhout, F. W. J. Albers, and H. P. Wit, “Cochlear aqueduct flow resistance depends on round window membrane position in guinea pigs,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 404–410, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. N. Salt and H. Rask-Andersen, “Responses of the endolymphatic sac to perilymphatic injections and withdrawals: evidence for the presence of a one-way valve,” Hearing Research, vol. 191, no. 1-2, pp. 90–100, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. J. Park, J. J. Boeven, S. Vogel, S. Leonhardt, H. P. Wit, and M. Westhofen, “Hydrostatic fluid pressure in the vestibular organ of the guinea pig,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 269, pp. 1755–1758, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  24. B. I. G. Carlborg and J. C. Farmer Jr., “Transmission of cerebrospinal fluid pressure via the cochlear aquaduct and endolymphatic sac,” American Journal of Otolaryngology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 273–282, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. M. Graham and P. Ashcroft, “Direct measurement of cerebrospinal fluid pressure through the cochlea in a congenitally deaf child with mondini dysplasia undergoing cochlear implantation,” The American Journal of Otology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 205–208, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. T. Dunn, “Raised intracranial pressure,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, vol. 73, supplement 1, pp. i23–i27, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus