Research Article
An Improved Cockroach Swarm Optimization
Table 8
Comparison of success performance of RIO, HRIO, CSO, MCSO, and ICSO.
| | SN | Function | RIO | HRIO | CSO | MCSO | ICSO |
| | 1 | Bohachevsky1 | 1 | 1 | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | | 2 | Bohachevsky2 | 1 | 1 | 0.2 | 1 | 1 | | 3 | Bohachevsky3 | 1 | 1 | 0.15 | 1 | 1 | | 4 | 3 hump camel back | 0.95 | 1 | 0.6 | 1 | 1 | | 5 | 6 hump camel back | 1 | 1 | 0.95 | 1 | 1 | | 6 | Easom | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 7 | Matyax | 1 | 1 | 0.55 | 1 | 1 | | 8 | Schaffer1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 9 | Schaffer2 | 0.1 | 0.65 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 10 | Sphere | 1 | 1 | 0.95 | 1 | 1 | | 11 | Rastrigin | 1 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 | | 12 | Rosenbrock | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 13 | Ackley | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 14 | Quadric | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 15 | Schwefel2.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 16 | Griewangk | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 | | 17 | Sumsquare | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 18 | Sinusoidal | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 19 | Zakharov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 20 | Step | 1 | 1 | 0.8 | 1 | 1 | | 21 | Powell | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 22 | ST9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 23 | ST17 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| | Number of 100% success rates | | 14 | 15 | 6 | 22 | 22 |
|
|
ST9 denotes Storn's Tchebychev 9. ST17 denotes Storn's Tchebychev 17.
|
