The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 381854 |

Yong Tang, Ruizhi Yang, Xiaoqiang Bian, "A Review of Sequestration Projects and Application in China", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 381854, 11 pages, 2014.

A Review of Sequestration Projects and Application in China

Academic Editor: Arman Siahvashi
Received28 Apr 2014
Accepted06 Jun 2014
Published01 Jul 2014


In 2008, the top CO2 emitters were China, United States, and European Union. The rapid growing economy and the heavy reliance on coal in China give rise to the continued growth of CO2 emission, deterioration of anthropogenic climate change, and urgent need of new technologies. Carbon Capture and sequestration is one of the effective ways to provide reduction of CO2 emission and mitigation of pollution. Coal-fired power plants are the focus of CO2 source supply due to their excessive emission and the energy structure in China. And over 80% of the large CO2 sources are located nearby storage reservoirs. In China, the CO2 storage potential capacity is of about 3.6 × 109 t for all onshore oilfields; 30.483 × 109 t for major gas fields between 900 m and 3500 m of depth; 143.505 × 109 t for saline aquifers; and 142.67 × 109 t for coal beds. On the other hand, planation, soil carbon sequestration, and CH4–CO2 reforming also contribute a lot to carbon sequestration. This paper illustrates some main situations about CO2 sequestration applications in China with the demonstration of several projects regarding different ways of storage. It is concluded that China possesses immense potential and promising future of CO2 sequestration.

1. Introduction

The enormous emission from greenhouse gas, predominated by CO2, has caused increasing threat to human environment and the ecological system. The current global annual carbon emission reaches up to more than 30 billion tons. In China, fossil fuel takes up 92.6% of the total energy; 67.1% of CO2 is generated from coal and petroleum. Moreover, China is the biggest CO2 emitter by now. According to International Environment Agency, emission from China would overpass the whole world’s CO2 emission by 2020 [1]. Therefore, it is an urgent requirement for China to transform from high-carbon to low-carbon society.

According to “Report on the Development of Low Carbon Economy of China (2012),” China is the largest country for carbon emission reduction. The world’s largest carbon emission reduction project started in China in 2005, which is expected to reduce about 19 million tons of CO2 equivalent emission every year [2]. 1.5 billion tons of CO2 emission has been reduced during “11th five-year plan” in China, and it is likely to cut 7 billion tons of CO2 in 2020.

Various ways of reducing carbon emission have already been applied in China. And, among them, a major mitigation method is carbon capture and sequestration (CCS).

It is believed that CCS is the long-term isolation of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through physical, chemical, biological, or engineered process. It includes carbon sequestration through forestation, soil carbon sequestration, direct ocean injection of CO2 either into the deep seafloor or into the intermediate depths, and the deep geological sequestration, or even direct conversion of CO2 to carbonate minerals [3], of which geological sequestration is a major component. CCS is an effective way for China to alleviate pollution and enhance the oil recovery, and most underground spaces in China are good for CO2 geological storage [4]. However, CCS has just started in China, and there is a certain gap between China and abroad. But there are still some technical foundations in China, especially in the area of CO2 recycling and injection [5].

Several main types of geological storage media for carbon sequestration are mostly considered in China: depleted or active oil and natural gas field, coal layers, and deep saline aquifers. The win-win effects make oil and natural gas field and coal layers are the promising storage media with great advantages. By using CO2 for oil and gas fields and the coal seams, CO2 is stored and the production is increased. And the deep saline aquifers are attractive due to the large storage capacity of interest [69].

Figure 1 shows a map of large (100+ kt CO2/yr) CO2 sources and potential candidates for geologic CO2 storage basins in China [10].

2. CO2 Source Supply

A large amount of CO2 emitted by industry could be supposed to serve as the significant potential CO2 source to meet the storage demand if only the advanced capturing technology is available. And coal-fired power plant is the focus of CO2 capture due to its excessive emission and the energy structure in China [3, 11, 12]. Therein, technologies of solvents method, membranes separation, solid sorbents, and cryogenic fractionation have been applied to separate CO2 from natural gas or waste gas [13]. CO2 could be transported via highway, railway, shipping, and pipeline, of which pipeline is especially suitable for large-scaled and long-term gas injection, like the CO2-EOR project in Jilin oilfield.

Many efforts have been used to develop more efficient techniques for CO2 capture in China, like the blended solvent presented by the Joint International Center for CO2 Capture and Storage of Hunan University, MSA chemical absorption technique developed by Sinopec. And the research of Joint Research Center for Advanced Environmental Technology of Tsinghua University showed that carbon-based materials have high adsorption capacity with merits of low cost and easy regeneration. And Fang indicated that membrane vacuum regeneration has the potential to reduce energy consumption greatly [14].

CO2 capturing projects have been progressing extraordinarily throughout China. Post-Combustion Capture CO2 and Refining Utilization project with capacity of 0.12 × 106 t/yr in China is the biggest postcombustion capture project in the world then [15]. Sinopec has built the 100 t/d CCUS (Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage) project on coal-fired power plant flue gas and deployed three ways of recycling CO2 with more than 80% of capture efficiency and over 95% of purity. China Huaneng Group has built the first coal-fired power plant CO2 capture demonstration project in 2008 with 3000 t/yr of CO2 capture ability and completed the second power plant in Shanghai Shidongkou demonstration project with 0.1 × 106 t/yr of CO2 capture ability. Shenhua Group launched China’s first CO2 capture and geologic storage full process demonstration project in 2010 [16]. Moreover, the project with the scale of 50000 t/yr capture capacity which has product purity of more than 99.5% has been put into use in 2012 in Yanchang. And for the future, improving efficiency and reducing cost are the crucial development tendency.

3. CO2 Sequestration

3.1. Estimation of CO2 Sequestration Capacity

Several methods have been developed to assess the CO2 storage capacity in geological media at home and abroad [1727]. Examples are listed as follows.

Zhang et al. [18] developed the formula which considers the different storage mechanisms: where is the storage capacity of CO2 taking the volume previously occupied by produced oil; is the storage capacity of CO2 dissolved in residual oil; is the storage capacity of CO2 dissolved in water contained in reservoir; and is the storage capacity of CO2 reacting with reservoir rock.

Sun and Chen [19] proposed the study to calculate increased oil production and the CO2 storage capacity in oil reservoir and depleted oil reservoir.

Proportion of increased oil by CO2-EOR is as follows: where OOIP is the original oil in place, Mt; is the contact ratio between oil and CO2. is the amount of oil that can contact with CO2, Mt.

The increased oil production and storage capacity are as follows: where EOR is the increased oil production, Mt; CO2 is the storage capacity, t or Mt; is the ratio between the amount of injected CO2 and the amount of increased oil, t/bbl or t/t.

However, for the CO2 storage capacity in depleted oil reservoir, where RF_O is the oil recovery when depleted; FVF_O is the formation volume factor; is the density of SCCO2 under the reservoir temperature and pressure, Mt/m3.

Tanaka and coworkers [20, 21] set up two models based on underground structures: model (5) is suitable for aquifers that are well sealed by cap rocks and model (6) for aquifers in monoclonal structures and there may be problem of CO2 leakage into the upper portion. Consider where is the sweep efficiency (fraction, dimensionless), is storage area (m2), is effective formation thickness (m), is effective reservoir porosity (fraction, dimensionless), is saturation of supercritical CO2 (fraction, dimensionless), is CO2 formation volume factor (m2/m3, reservoir volume/standard volume), is CO2 solubility in formation water (m3/m2), is density of CO2 at standard condition (kg/m3), and is the storage factor (fraction, dimensionless).

3.2. Geological Sequestration

CO2 can be more effectively sequestrated at pressure higher than 7.38 MPa (equivalent depth of about 800 m), and at temperature above 31.1°C, where CO2 will stay in a supercritical state with an elevated density up to 600 kg/m3, 400 times more condensed compared to that at atmospheric conditions. SCCO2 (supercritical CO2) is characterized by stable and inert chemical property. Consequently, at pressures and temperatures typically encountered in the field, CO2 will behave as a supercritical fluid [28].

CO2 geosequestration has been implemented successfully around the world like CO2-EOR and storage in Weyburn project of Canada in 2000 [29, 30]; CO2 storage in K12-B gas field of The Netherlands in 2004 [31]; the upcoming ROAD project in 2015 with CO2 storage in P18-4 depleted gas field of The Netherlands [32]; associated CO2 separation and injection into the saline aquifer in Sleipner project of Norway in 1996 [33]; CO2 storage in In Salah aquifer of Algeria in 2004 and Snohvit aquifer of Norway in 2008 [34, 35]; CO2-enhanced coal bed methane (CO2-ECBM) and storage in San Juan Basin of New Mexico in 1995 [36], and other CO2-ECBM projects in USA [37, 38].

Research results suggest that CCS can provide a valuable greenhouse gas mitigation option for most regions and industrial sectors in China and can be able to store more than 80% of emissions from these large CO2 sources (2900 million tons of CO2 annually) at costs less than $70/t CO2 for perhaps a century or more [10]. Similarly, various geosequestration projects have been in progress in China, regarding the storage in oil and gas fields, in saline aquifer and in coal seams.

3.2.1. CO2 Sequestration in Oil and Gas Field

Carbon sequestration with enhanced oil recovery (CSEOR) is a kind of win-win process to increase oil production and store CO2. Moreover, the revenue created could be able to offset the storage cost and bring valuable profit.

CO2 has been widely used for EOR around the world. CO2-EOR projects now produce about 0.35 × 106 bbls/day in USA, accounting for 5.6% of total USA oil and gas production, compared to just 0.19 × 106 bbls/day in 2000. And approximately 50 million metric tons of CO2 is used each year for EOR in USA [39, 40].

CSEOR or CSEGR has been assessed and applied for several oil and gas fields across China. When the buried depth is more than 800 m (guarantee the supercritical state of CO2); the CO2 storage potential capacity is of about 3.6 × 109 t, assuming that all onshore oilfields in China are used for CO2-EOR, and it can reach up to 4.6 × 109 t while considering all onshore oilfields as depleted reservoirs. Therein, reservoirs in northeast and north China have tremendous sequestration potential, accounting for more than 60% of the total capacity [24].

Considering the depth between 900 m and 3500 m, China’s major gas fields are able to provide storage capacity of about 30.483 × 109 t of CO2, and the proven natural gas resources correspond to storage capacity of 4.103 × 109 t CO2. However, gas industry has been started late in China, and there will be no large-scale depleted gas field for a long time. In this way, gas fields should not be used to store CO2 in the near future but should serve as the strategic energy reserves due to the good sealing property of depleted gas fields [25].

Oil reservoirs are screened on the basis of oil gravity, reservoir temperature and pressure, MMP, and remaining oil saturation, to determine their suitability for CO2 flooding [17]. And several different types of screening criteria have been proposed at home and abroad for CO2-EOR and storage [17, 4144], regarding crude oil properties, reservoir characters, cap formation characters, and economic and environmental issues.

Jilin oilfield, located in northeast of China, is conducting the first large-scale demonstration project on CO2-EOR and storage. The oil-bearing formations are characterized by good development of sandbody, good connectivity, and well-defined cap rocks [45]. Natural source of CO2 is mainly from natural gas. And miscible flooding can be achieved in block Hei-59 and Hei-79; well location is indicated in Figure 2.

In 2008, Jilin oilfield built a pilot demonstration area of CO2 flooding and storage in the Daqingzi oilfield. And in 2009, a demonstration area with its annual CO2 storage of 0.2 × 106 t and annual oil displacement of 0.1 × 106 t was established, which indicated realization of commercial application of such technology. Good production response has been observed after about 6 months of CO2 injection since April 2008, as shown in Figure 3. Oil production in the whole pilot area has rapidly increased from 20 t/d to around 100 t/d and has been maintained at 60 t/d in 2011. By the end of May 8, 2011, about 0.167 × 106 t of CO2 was stored without obvious CO2 leakage; and 0.119 × 106 t of oil was produced by CO2-EOR. At the same time, a plant was built in the Jilin oilfield to separate and capture 0.2 × 106 t of CO2 annually [46, 47]. 0.27 × 106 t of CO2 has been safely stored until August 2012 with remarkable economic benefit, with 1 : 1.37 as the input and output ratio [48]. It is expected that, by 2015, the first production area will be built in China, with an annual CO2 displacement amount reaching 0.5 × 106 t and an annual CO2 storage over 0.7 × 106 t, all of which are equivalent to the total amount of CO2 released from burning of 0.3 × 106 t of coal [46].

And the further work will be focused on optimizing EOR performance, verifying of the geocapacity storage in the targeted zones and carrying forward the monitoring programs [45].

Caoshe oilfield is located in Subei Basin and has been selected to implement CO2-EOR and storage demonstration project. The geological map is shown in Figure 4. Taizhou formation is the main oil-bearing formation in Caoshe oilfield. And during the development periods, the oilfield has developed a complete well pattern of injectors and producers with good well connection, the water cut at the producer has been relatively low, and the reservoir pressure has been well maintained [23, 49].

Taizhou formation is geologically suitable for CSEOR. Taizhou formation has carried out the CO2-EOR pilot test in July 2005, and 5.842 × 107 m3 CO2 has been injected from July 2005 to December 2009 with increased oil production of 0.03 × 106 t [49, 50]. CO2 can achieve a miscible displacement process and be stored safely in the stratigraphic and structure traps of Taizhou formation reservoir [51]. Besides, Nanjing Chemical plant, a synthetic ammonia plant 120 km away from the Caoshe oilfield, would provide a low-cost CO2 source for the CCS demonstration project. The detailed numerical reservoir model indicates that the maximum CO2 storage capacity at standard condition is estimated to be 0.309 × 109 m3. Figure 5 shows the simulation result of CO2 miscible flooding. Furthermore, the revenue from incremental oil production is significant, which cannot only offset the cost of the CO2 storage, but also can generate certain economic benefit to Caoshe oilfield [23], while Zhang indicated that the storage cost of CO2-EOR process is $25.78/t, based on the economic evaluation model established [52].

The Ordos Basin is the second largest sedimentary basin in China, which takes account for 43% of resources of the whole country. In 2011, the oil and gas production exceeded 0.052 × 109 t of oil equivalents [53]. Ordos Basin is able to provide a huge potential capacity for CO2 storage.

Jingbian field is located in central Ordos Basin in northern Shaanxi slope and has been screened out to conduct the CO2 sequestration. CO2 will be captured from the energy and chemical engineering industrial zone in Jingbian City which is 30 km away from the operation site. And it is estimated to inject CO2 of 0.04 × 106 t/yr and increase oil production of 0.05 × 106 t/yr from CO2-EOR [53].

Furthermore, various feasibility studies of geological CO2 sequestration have been implemented for wide areas of Ordos Basin [5456]. For example, research indicates that, for 261 production layers of Changqing oilfield, total oil production increment and CO2 sequestration amount can reach about 0.098 × 109 t and about 0.239 × 109 t, respectively [54]. Results from the 50-year injection simulation indicate that a total of 450 Mt of CO2 can be injected into the targeted reservoir of Majiagou formation (northern Ordos Basin), while 166 Mt of original pore fluids will be displaced by CO2 [55].

Additionally, other fields around the country also show good results for CO2 application. Xinjiang oilfield, a vital oilfield in western China, is located in Junggar Basin. Around 0.181 × 109 t additional oil could be produced for the total screened out 275 production units, which could provide about 0.495 × 109 t for CO2 sequestration capacity [57]. Many mature oil reservoirs in Shengli oilfield (north China) are close to the main CO2 sources and have good geographical and geological conditions for CO2 storage. The total EOR potential can be 9.997 × 106 t, and the CO2 storage capacity can reach 95.539 × 106 t [44]. Zhongyuan oilfield (central China) and Daqing oilfield (northeast China) get obvious recovery increment after CO2 flooding.

The associated CO2 from natural gas is another major carbon emission. IPCC estimated that about 50 million tons of reservoir-CO2 is liberated into the atmosphere every year, from natural gas production [11]. Projecting this to year 2030, and assuming sourness does not increase, the emissions figure could be 150 Mt/yr [58]. And in South China Sea, the geological reserve of CO2 is huge [59].

DF1-1 gas field is located in the west of the South China Sea, which is associated with a high concentration of CO2. A demonstrative project of CO2 sequestration is considered for nearly abandoned southeast block of the lower Group II formation in the DF1-1 gas field, which was reassessed for the safety of CO2 storage [58]. The separated CO2 would be injected back into the original gas reservoir, similar to the demonstration projects carried out in K12-B (Netherlands).

The feasibility studies showed that the faults in gas field are characteristic of good sealing property for the targeted block. The injected CO2 of the southeast block will be effectively trapped in the reservoir because of its good sealing mechanism and poor connectivity with other blocks [60]. Simulation results indicate that CO2 can be injected steadily at a rate of 0.140 × 106 Sm3/d over 10 years, and the cumulative CO2 gas injection can be 0.511 × 109 Sm3 for the pressure control required. Zhang et al. [60] showed that unit storage of CO2 is approximately $20/t at the current economic situation, while there will be no extra finial returns for this demonstration CO2 sequestration project.

On the other hand, CO2 injection into oil and gas reservoirs associated with large aquifers takes advantages of lower geological leakage risk from oil and gas traps and large storage capacity from the connected aquifers [61]. Results of cases studies of five oil reservoirs selected from Shengli and Jiangsu oilfields in China demonstrate that CO2 storage capacity can be greatly increased if the lateral and underlying aquifers are included.

3.2.2. CO2 Sequestration in Saline Aquifer

Deep saline aquifers have proven to be the promising geological media for CO2 sequestration due to the large storage capacity and wide availability. The injected CO2 can be sequestrated in deep saline aquifers through a combination of physical and chemical trapping mechanisms, which include stratigraphic or structure trapping, residual trapping, solubility trapping, mineral trapping and hydrodynamic trapping [27, 6264].

143.505 × 109 t CO2 can be stored in saline aquifers of China [65]. Most of the north China plain; northern, eastern, and southern Sichuan Basin; southeast of Junggar Basin are the priority for CO2 aquifer storage in the future, like the deep saline aquifers in Songliao Basin (northeast China) can contribute about 8.96 × 109 t of CO2 sequestration capacity [66].

Saline aquifer trap LT13-1, located in the east of DF1-1 gas field, 60 km away from the Dongfang gas terminal, has been selected as the target CO2 storage site to sequestrate the CO2 discharged from the DF1-1 gas terminal [67]. The reservoir is relatively good in homogeneousness and high in salinity, indicating a good trap feature. The injected CO2 will be trapped both in a supercritical state and in dissolved state in formation water. Sandbodies A and C of LT13-1 structure can provide a CO2 storage capacity of approximately 0.1 × 109 t [67], as shown in Figures 6 and 7. Zhang et al. pointed out that the storage cost is about $33–37/t, slightly higher than abroad due to the high cost of offshore pipeline [68].

Being one of the most typical sedimentary basins in eastern coastal of China, the Bohai Bay Basin is a potential candidate for CO2 sequestration. CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers is considered as a viable option because of the wide-distribution with a high CO2 storage capacity. The CO2 storage capacity within the assessing range is 3.9 × 109 t in saline aquifers of Bohai Bay Basin, and storage capacity in Neogene Guantao formation lower than 3500 m is 3.3 × 109 t, accounting for 84.4% of the total potential [70].

Section 3 in the lower part of the Neogene Guantao formation of Beitang Sag, Huanghua depression, near the center of the Bohai Bay Basin, has been chosen as the test site for CO2 injection [71]. Due to the good cap-rock layers, CO2 can be stored safely in Section 3 in supercritical state. Based on the model (6) proposed by Tanaka, the CO2 storage capacity of the Beitang Sag is estimated to be 17.03 Mt.

3.2.3. CO2 Sequestration in Coal Seam

China has abundant coal bed methane (CBM) resources. CBM reserves buried lower than 2000 m are estimated to be 36.8 Tm3, accounting for 13% of the world’s resources and ranking third in the world [72].

Coal seams provide one of the most attractive sites for CO2 geological sequestration in China as a result of the huge resources and the high and stable adsorption of CO2, particularly in combination with ECBM [26, 73, 74]. Adsorption is the main trapping mechanism for CO2 storage in coal seams, which accounts for approximately 90% of the total storage. The ECBM potential associated with CO2 sequestration is estimated to be over 3.751 × 1012 m3. And the CO2 sequestration capacity of China coal beds is estimated to be about 142.67 × 109 t [75]. Based on the assessment for coal beds of China in depth between 300 m and 1500 m, 1.632 × 1012 m3 methane can be increased from CO2-ECBM, and about 12.078 × 109 t of CO2 can be stored [26].

The Yaojie coalfield is located in the western margin of Minhe and extends across the Gansu and Qinghai provinces of China. The Haishiwan coalfield is located in the deep part of the Yaojie coalfield. High concentrations of CO2 (34.1–98.64%) have been observed in the number 2 coal seam of Haishiwan coalfield [69].

And the temperature-pressure conditions in Haishiwan coalfield indicate that supercritical CO2 may occur in the eastern half of the coalfield. Moreover, the Haishiwan coalfield is an ideal storage area because of the good sealing features and the presence of large volumes of juvenile CO2 that have been naturally sequestered over 15 million years. The pure CO2 storage capacity of the Haishiwan coal seam is 44.7 m3/t at 7.5 MPa and 313.15 K [69], as shown in Figure 8.

3.3. Other Ways of Sequestration

Plantation forests are the most effective and ecofriendly way of absorbing CO2 and increasing carbon sinks in terrestrial ecosystems, mitigating global warming and promoting ecological restoration. China’s forestation rate is the highest in the world, contributing significantly to the nation’s carbon sequestration [76]. Cost of carbon mitigation through plantation is relatively low, generally under $10/t, compared with $25–120/t for cost limitation of energy industry [77].

China currently has one of the world’s most ambitious reforestation and afforestation programs, known as grain for green, which has been in place since 1999. It gives grain payouts to farmers who convert fields to forests. It is operating in many different regions across China. Although not one of its goals, carbon sequestration is a cobenefit of the program [78].

From 1950 to the present, plantations in China sequestered 1.686 PgC by net uptake into biomass and emission of soil organic carbon. Huang et al. [76] projected that China’s forestation activities will continue to net sequester carbon to a level of 3.169 PgC by 2050.

On the other hand, China’s rice paddies, accounting for 19% of the world’s total, play an important role in soil carbon sequestration. The simulations demonstrated that all the recommended management practices could result in an increase in carbon sequestration potential, varying greatly from 29.2 to 847.7 TgC by 2050 [79].

Additionally, CH4–CO2 reforming can effectively convert CO2 and CH4 into synthesis gas. Interests regarding the CO2 reforming of CH4 have been rising due to the feasible approach for resource utilization and greenhouse gas emission reduction and the generated raw materials needed by many manufacturing process. Many efforts have been carried to devote and investigate various types of catalysts to promote the conversion process [8084].

Overall, Table 1 summarizes the main comparative information of the above CO2 sequestration projects regarding different storage ways.

Storage mediaTotal CO2 storage capacityProjectCO2 storage capacityEOR potentialCost of storage

Oilfield  t (>800 m)Jilin  t  t 1 : 1.37
(input : output)
(by 2009)
(by 2009)
Jingbian  t/yr  t/yr
Changqing  t  t
Shengli  t  t
Xinjiang  t

Gas field  t  
(900–3500 m)
DF1-1  S $20/t

Saline aquifer  tLT13-1  t$33–37/t
Bohai Bay  t
Songliao  t

Coal seam  tHaishiwan44.7  /t

Plantation3.169 PgC  
(by 2050)

Soil carbon sequestration29.2–847.7 TgC  
(by 2050)

4. Challenge for Future

CCS is somehow a quite new technology in China. Even though a lot of assessments and potential analysis have been carried out across China, the real commercial implementations are limited. Various factors are supposed to be taken into consideration to promote CO2 sequestration and to mitigate the deteriorating environment in China.

International engagement is critical in developing and enlarging CO2 sequestration. China has already cooperated with other countries to start up a number of projects regarding CCS in many fields. However, more combined efforts are needed to move forward.

Technology is the priority determinant in CCS operation, including the technique from capture, transportation, assessment, and storage. The main oilfields in China are manifested in complex formation structure with strong heterogeneity, low or ultralow permeability, low porosity, and poor oil property [1]. CO2-EOR techniques would be challenged by high miscible pressure, severe gas channeling, heavy solid deposition, and development of complex reservoir [85].

On the other hand, effective policies are suggested to encourage and boost the CCS industry in China. Alternative ways should be developed to capture CO2 and reduce CO2 emission for different emitters.

Carbon emission trading system is forming in China. Market mechanism is important to reduce carbon emissions for China’s low-carbon future [86].

5. Conclusion

The demand for clean energy and low-carbon technologies is enormous in China, where the rapid growth and heavy reliance on coal provide a mass of opportunities for application of new techniques. A great amount of CO2 can be sequestered by geological media, forestation, soil, and reforming. As a result, CCS is the most attractive way for reducing CO2 emission in China.

CO2 sequestration in depleted oil and gas reservoirs, saline aquifers, and coal beds is promising in China. A great number of projects have been implemented to testify the feasibility of CCS, examine the potential for commercial-scale CCS, and assess the storage capacity and possibility of CSEOR in large parts of China like Jilin oilfield, the first large-scale demonstration project on CSEOR.

Forestation, soil, and CO2 reform could provide alternative ways for CO2 sequestration. Combination of variety of methods can deeply promote the emission-reducing work.

There is a gap in carbon sequestration between China and other countries. Besides, most of the CO2 storage projects in China are still in the evaluation and assessment stage. Further efforts are needed to move forward, involving international cooperation, advanced technology, positive policy, and society mechanism.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of reviewers for critical reading of the paper, constructive comments, and suggestions. This work was supported by National Science Foundation of China (no. 51274173) and National Major Project of China (no. 2011ZX05016-006).


  1. Z. Xuan and S. He, “Potential and early opportunity-analysis on CO2 geo-sequestration in China,” in Proceedings of the 72nd European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference and Exhibition (SPE EUROPEC '10), pp. 842–848, June 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. Miao, “The World’s Largest Carbon Emission Reduction Project start in China,” Chinese Enterprise News, vol. 1, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  3. S. J. Friedmann, Carbon Capture and Sequestration Technologies: Status and Future Deployment, UCRL-BOOK-235276, 2007.
  4. H. Jiang, P. Shen, J. Luo et al., “The present situation and prospect of carbon dioxide storage technology,” Energy and Environment, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 28–32, 2010 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  5. X. Li and Z. Fang, “Status quo of connection technologies of CO2 geological storage in China,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2229–2239, 2007 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  6. A. Saeedi and R. Rezaee, “Effect of residual natural gas saturation on multiphase flow behaviour during CO2 geo-sequestration in depleted natural gas reservoirs,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 82-83, pp. 17–26, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Loizzo, B. Lecampion, T. Brard, A. Harichandran, and L. Jammes, “Reusing O&G-depleted reservoir for CO2 storage: pros and cons,” in SPE International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, SPE 124317, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  8. S. R. Ren and L. Zhang, “Geological storage of CO2: overseas demonstration projects and its implications to China,” Journal of China University of Petroleum, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 93–98, 2010 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. Curtis and S. M. Benson, CO2 Injection for Enhanced Gas Production and Carbon Sequestration, vol. 74367, SPE, 2002.
  10. R. T. Dahowski, C. L. Davidson, X. C. Li, and N. Wei, “A $70/t CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation backstop for China’s industrial and electric power sectors: insights from a comprehensive CCS cost curve,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 11, pp. 73–85, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Zhang, “CCUS technology and projects of sinopec,” in Proceedings of the 4th Annual Global Carbon Capture Utilization & Storage Summit, pp. 144–163, Beijing, China, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  12. J. L. Luo, R. Gao, H. Wen-Hui, D. Huo, and Y. Wang, “Carbon dioxide emission reduction and utilization,” Resources & Industries, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 132–137, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, edited by B. Metz, O. Davidson, Cambridge University Press for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, UK, 2005.
  14. M. X. Fang, CO2 capture by membrane and adsorption technology, Institute for Thermal Power Engineering of Zhejiang University, 2013.
  15. S. S. Xu, “CO2 capture RD&D projects in China Huaneng Group,” in Proceedings of the 4th Annual Global Carbon Capture Utilization & Storage Summit (CCS '13), pp. 102–125, Beijing, China, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  16. X. M. Song and S. Y. Yang, “Current situation of CCS technology at home and abroad and the positive strategy that China should adopt toward it,” Reservoir Evaluation and Development, vol. 1, no. 1-2, pp. 25–30, 2011 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  17. S. Pingping, L. Xinwei, and L. Qiujie, “Methodology for estimation of CO2 storage capacity in reservoirs,” Petroleum Exploration and Development, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 216–220, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, B. Niu, and S. Ren, “Integrated assessment of CO2-enhanced oil recovery and storage capacity,” in Proceedings of the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, October 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. Sun and W. Y. Chen, “Assessment of CO2 geo-storage potential in onshore oil reservoirs, China,” China Population, Resources and Environment, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 76–81, 2012 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  20. S. Tanaka, H. Koide, and A. Sasagawa, “Possibility of underground CO2 sequestration in Japan,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 36, no. 6–9, pp. 527–530, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. Takahashi, T. Ohsumi, and K. Nakayama, “Estimation of CO2 aquifer storage potential in Japan,” Energy Procedia, vol. 1, pp. 2631–2638, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  22. J. Shaw and S. Bachu, “Screening, evaluation, and ranking of oil reservoirs suitable for CO2-flood EOR and carbon dioxide sequestration,” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 51–61, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  23. S. Bachu, J. C. Shaw, and R. M. Pearson, “Estimation of oil recovery and CO2 storage capacity in CO2 EOR incorporating the effect of underlying aquifers,” in Proceedings of the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, SPE 89340, Tulsa, Okla, USA, April 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. C. Burruss, S. T. Brennan, P. A. Freeman et al., “Development of a probabilistic assessment methodology for evaluation of carbon dioxide storage,” U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2009-1038, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  25. Y. F. Liu, X. C. Li, Z. Fang, and B. Bai, “Preliminary estimation of CO2 storage capacity in gas fields in China,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2277–2281, 2006 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  26. Y. Liu, X. Li, and B. Bai, “Preliminary estimation of CO2 storage capacity of coalbeds in China,” Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 24, no. 16, pp. 2947–2952, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  27. T. Vangkilde-Pedersena, K. L. Anthonsen, N. Smith et al., “Assessing European capacity for geological storage of carbon dioxide—the EU GeoCapacity project,” Energy Procedia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2663–2670, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  28. D. D. Mamora and J. G. Seo, “Enhanced gas recovery by carbon dioxide sequestration in depleted gas reservoirs,” in Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, pp. 151–159, San Antonio, Tex, USA, October 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Whittaker, B. Rostron, C. Hawkes et al., “A decade of CO2 injection into depleting oil fields: monitoring and research activities of the IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale CO2 Monitoring and Storage Project,” Energy Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 6069–6076, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. Preston, M. Monea, W. Jazrawi et al., “IEA GHG Weyburn CO2 monitoring and storage project,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 86, no. 14-15, pp. 1547–1568, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. G. H. Van Der Meer, E. Kreft, C. Geel, and J. Hartman, “K12-B A test site for CO2 storage and enhanced gas recovery,” in Proceedings of the 67th European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, EAGE Conference and Exhibition, incorporating (SPE EUROPEC '05), June 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  32. R. J. Arts, V. P. Vandeweijer, C. Hofstee et al., “The feasibility of CO2 storage in the depleted P18-4 gas field offshore the Netherlands (the ROAD project),” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 11S, pp. S10–S20, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. Baklid, R. Korbol, and G. Owren, Sleipner Vest CO2 Disposal, CO2 Injection into a Shallow Underground Aquifer, vol. 36600, SPE, 1996.
  34. O. Eiken, P. Ringrose, and C. Hermanrud, “Lessons learned from 14 years of CCS operations: sleipner, in Salah and Snøhvit,” Energy Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 5541–5548, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  35. K. Michael, A. Golab, V. Shulakova et al., “Geological storage of CO2 in saline aquifers—a review of the experience from existing storage operations,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 659–667, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. H. Stevens, D. Spector, and P. Riemer, “Enhanced coalbed methane recovery using CO 2 injection: Worldwide resource and CO 2 sequestration potential,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition in China (IOGCEC '98), pp. 489–501, November 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  37. G. Cairns, “Enhanced coal bed Methane recovery and CO2 sequestration in an unmineable coal seam,” CONSOL Energy, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  38. E. P. Robertson, “Enhanced coal bed methane recovery and CO2 sequestration in the powder River Basin,” DOE. DE-FC26-05NT42587, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  39. K. V. Veld, C. F. Mason, and A. Leach, “The Economics of CO2 sequestration through Enhanced Oil recovery,” Energy Procedia, vol. 37, pp. 6909–6919, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  40. J. Litynski, T. Rodosta, L. Myer, R. Kane, and G. A. Washington, “What is next in geologic CO2 storage research?” in Proceedings of the Carbon Management Technology Conference (CMTC '12), CMTC-151471-MS, Orlando, Fla, USA, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  41. J. J. Taber, F. D. Martin, and R. S. Seright, “EOR screening criteria reyisited—part 1: introduction to screening criteria and enhanced recovery field projects,” SPE Reservoir Engineering, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189–198, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. P. Zeng, X. W. Yang et al., “Fuzzy hierarchy analysis-based selection of oil reservoirs for gas storage and gas injection,” Henan Petroleum, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 40–46, 2005 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  43. H. Y. Lei, C. L. Gong, and B. C. Guan, “New screening method for reservoir by CO2 injection miscible flooding,” Journal of China University of Petroleum, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 72–76, 2008 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  44. Z. Liang, W. Shu, Z. Li, R. Shaoran, and G. Qing, “Assessment of CO2 EOR and its geo-storage potential in mature oil reservoirs, Shengli Oilfield, China,” Petroleum Exploration and Development, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 737–742, 2009 (Chinese). View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Ren, B. Niu, B. Ren et al., “Monitoring on CO2 EOR and storage in a CCS demonstration project of JiMn Oilfield China,” in Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 2011 (ATCE '11), pp. 498–505, November 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  46. Z. G. Hao, H. C. Fei, and L. Liu, “Integrated techniques of underground CO2 storage and flooding put into commercial application in the Jilin oilfield,” Acta Geologica Sinica, vol. 86, no. 1, p. 285, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  47. “Petrochina’s CO2—EOR Research and Demonstration Project in the Jilin Oil Field (n.d.),” 2014, View at: Google Scholar
  48. Major R&D Project of “Ji lin Oilfield CCS Technology Research” Passed the Acceptance Inspection, Jilin Xinhuanet, 2012,, (Chinese).
  49. Z. H. Chen, K. Yu, W. Liu, L. L. Jiao, and M. Yue, “CO2 miscible flooding and production characteristics and preliminary discussion about the development effects—taking Caoshe oilfield in Northern Jiangsu area as an example,” Reservoir Evaluation and Development, vol. 1, pp. 37–41, 2011 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  50. F. D. Zhang and Z. L. Wang, “The field experiment and result analysis of CO2 miscible displacement in Caoshe Oilfield of the North Jiangsu Basin,” Petroleum Geology & Experiment, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 296–300, 2010 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  51. K. Yu, W. Liu, and Z. H. Chen, “Study of CO2 miscible flooding technique in the caoshe oil field, the Qingtong Sag, the Northern Jiangsu Basin,” Petroleum Geology & Experiment, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 212–216, 2008 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  52. Y. Zhang, Research of CO2-EOR and Geological Storage in Jiangsu Caoshe Oilfield, China University of Petroleum, 2010, (Chinese).
  53. J. F. Ma, X. Z. Wang, R. Gao et al., “Monitoring the safety of CO2 sequestration in Jingbian field, China,” Energy Procedia, vol. 37, pp. 3469–3478, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. X. W. Liao, C. N. Gao, P. Wu, K. Su, and Y. Shangguan, “Assessment of CO2 EOR and its geo-storage potential in mature oil reservoirs, Changqing Oil Field, China,” in Proceedings of the Carbon Management Technology Conference, pp. 62–67, Orlando, Fla, USA, February 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. Z. S. Jiao, R. C. Surdam, L. Zhoub, P. H. Staufferc, and T. Luob, “A Feasibility Study of Geological CO2 sequestration in the Ordos Basin, China,” Energy Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 5982–5989, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  56. X. Ran, Y. Zhao, and X. Liao, “An assessment of a CO2 flood for EOR and sequestration benefits in the Ordos Basin, Northwest China,” in Proceedings of the Carbon Management Technology Conference (CMTC '12), 150272, pp. 90–94, February 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  57. H. Wang, W. X. Liao et al., “Potential evaluation of CO2 flooding enhanced oil recovery and geological sequestration in Xinjiang Oilfield,” Journal of Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 74–79, 2013 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  58. D. Huo and Y. Jalali, “An analysis of CO2 storage prospects in deep saline reservoirs,” in Proceedings of the SPE Production and Operations Conference and Exhibition, SPE 136077, Tunis, Tunisia, June 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. W. Xiang, W. Zhou, J. Zhang et al., “The potential of CO2-EOR in China offshore oilfield,” in Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, pp. 504–507, October 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  60. L. Zhang, B. L. Niu, S. Ren et al., “Assessment of CO2 storage in DFl-1 South China sea gas field for CCS demonstration,” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 9–14, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  61. L. Zhang, S. Ren, B. Ren, W. Zhang, and Q. Guo, “Assessment of CO2 storage capacity in oil reservoirs associated with large lateral/underlying aquifers: case studies from China,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1016–1021, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. K. Pruess and T. F. Xu, “Numerical modeling of aquifer disposal of CO2,” in Proceedings of the SPE/EPA/DOE Exploration and Production Environmental Conference, 2001, SPE 66537. View at: Google Scholar
  63. J. Moore, M. Adams, R. Allis, S. Lutz, and S. Rauzi, “Mineralogical and geochemical consequences of the long-term presence of CO2 in natural reservoirs: an example from the Springerville-St. Johns Field, Arizona, and New Mexico, U.S.A,” Chemical Geology, vol. 217, no. 3-4, pp. 365–385, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. M. Wigand, J. W. Carey, H. Schütt, E. Spangenberg, and J. Erzinger, “Geochemical effects of CO2 sequestration in sandstones under simulated in situ conditions of deep saline aquifers,” Applied Geochemistry, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 2735–2745, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. X. C. Li, Y. F. Liu, B. Bai, and Z. Fang, “Ranking and screening of CO2 saline aquifer storage zones in China,” Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 963–968, 2006 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  66. L. M. Liao and J. Wang, “Study of geological storage of carbon dioxide in the Songliao Basin,” Geological Journal of Sichuan, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 268–271, 2012 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  67. L. Zhang, Y. Zhang, H. G. Mi, S. R. Ren, and Y. X. Ma, “CO2 storage in saline aquifers: design of a demonstration project to dispose CO2 associated with natural gas fields in South China sea,” in Proceedings of the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, pp. 95–101, Alberta, Canada, October 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. L. Zhang, S. Ren, R. Wang, P. Yi, H. Mi, and J. Li, “Feasibility study on associated CO2 geological storage in a saline aquifer for development of Dongfang 1-1 gas field,” Journal of China University of Petroleum, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 89–93, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. W. Li, Y. Cheng, L. Wang, H. Zhou, and H. Wang, “Evaluating the security of geological coalbed sequestration of supercritical CO2 reservoirs: the Haishiwan coalfield, China as a natural analogue,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 13, pp. 102–111, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. Z. H. Pang, “Study on CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers in the Bohai Bay Basin,” in Proceedings of the 4th Annual Global Carbon Capture Utilization & Storage Summit, pp. 769–782, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  71. Z. Pang, Y. Li, F. Yang, and Z. Duan, “Geochemistry of a continental saline aquifer for CO 2 sequestration: the Guantao formation in the Bohai Bay Basin, North China,” Applied Geochemistry, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1821–1828, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. “Natural Gas Industry” Editorial Department, “CBM resources in China ranks third in the world,” Natural Gas Industry, vol. 30, no. 5, p. 128, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  73. Z. Fang, X. Li, H. Li, and H. Chen, “Feasibility study of gas mixture enhanced coalbed methane recovery technology,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 3223–3229, 2010 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  74. S. D. Golding, I. T. Uysal, C. J. Borehama, D. Kirstea, K. A. Baublysb, and J. S. Esterle, “Adsorption and mineral trapping dominate CO2 storage in coal system,” Energy Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 3131–3138, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. H. Yu, G. Zhou, W. Fan, and J. Ye, “Predicted CO2 enhanced coalbed methane recovery and CO2 sequestration in China,” International Journal of Coal Geology, vol. 71, no. 2-3, pp. 345–357, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. L. Huang, J. Y. Liu, Q. Shao, and X. Xu, “Carbon sequestration by forestation across China: past, present, and future,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1291–1299, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. W. L. Wang, “Plantation—the effective way for low-carbon life,” Fujian Daily, vol. 3, 2013 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  78. I. M. Caldwell, V. W. Maclaren, J. M. Chen et al., “An integrated assessment model of carbon sequestration benefits: a case study of Liping county, China,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 757–773, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. S. X. Xu, X. Z. Shi, Y. Zhao et al., “Carbon sequestration potential of recommended management practices for paddy soils of China, 1980–2050,” Geoderma, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 206–213, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. G. J. Zhang, Y. Dong, M. R. Feng, Y. Zhang, W. Zhao, and H. Cao, “CO2 reforming of CH4 in coke oven gas to syngas over coal char catalyst,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 519–523, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. G. J. Zhang, Y. N. Du, Y. Xu, and Y. F. Zhang, “Effects of preparation methods on the properties of cobalt/carbon catalyst for methane reforming with carbon dioxide to syngas,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1677–1683, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. G. J. Zhang, J. W. Qu, and A. T. Su, “Towards understanding the Carbon catalyzed CO2 reforming of Methane to syngas,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. X. P. Yu, N. Wang, W. Chu, and M. Liu, “Carbon dioxide reforming of methane for syngas production over La-promoted NiMgAl catalysts derived from hydrotalcites,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 209, pp. 623–632, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. Y. Zhang, G. Zhang, Y. Zhao, X. Li, Y. Sun, and Y. Xu, “Ce-K-promoted Co-Mo/Al2O3 catalysts for the water gas shift reaction,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 6363–6371, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. X. A. Yue, R. B. Zhao, and F. L. Zhao, “Technological challenges for CO2 EOR in China,” Sciencepaper Online, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 487–491, 2007 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  86. R. Y. Li, “Report on the Development of Low Carbon Economy of China,” Released. GMW, 2013, View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Yong Tang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.