Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 382390, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/382390
Research Article

Calculating Super Efficiency of DMUs for Ranking Units in Data Envelopment Analysis Based on SBM Model

1Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Firozkoh Branch, Firozkoh, Iran

Received 5 April 2014; Revised 18 July 2014; Accepted 20 July 2014; Published 19 August 2014

Academic Editor: Mohsen Vaez-ghasemi

Copyright © 2014 E. Zanboori et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. Adler, L. Friedman, and Z. Sinuany-Stern, “Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 249–265, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford, and J. Stutz, “Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 30, no. 1-2, pp. 91–107, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. F. H. Lotfi, G. R. Jahanshahloo, M. Khodabakhshi, M. Rostamy-Malkhlifeh, Z. Moghaddas, and M. Vaez-Ghasemi, “A review of ranking models in data envelopment analysis,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 492421, 20 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper, “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1078–1092, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Sueyoshi, “DEA non-parametric ranking test and index measurement: slack-adjusted DEA and an application to Japanese agriculture cooperatives,” Omega, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 315–326, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. R. Jahanshahloo and M. Afzalinejad, “A ranking method based on a full-inefficient frontier,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 248–260, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  8. H. Orkcu and H. Bal, “Goal programming approaches for data envelopment analysis cross efficiency evaluation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 218, no. 2, pp. 346–356, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  9. W. R. Rodder and E. Reucher, “A consensual peer-based DEA-model with optimized cross-efficiencies: input allocation instead of radial reduction,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 148–154, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Ramón, J. L. Ruiz, and I. Sirvent, “Reducing differences between profiles of weights: a “peer-restricted” cross-efficiency evaluation,” Omega, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 634–641, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Wu, J. Sun, L. Liang, and Y. Zha, “Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using Shannon entropy,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 5162–5165, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Wu, J. Sun, and L. Liang, “Cross efficiency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 513–519, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Wang, K. Chin, and Y. Luo, “Cross-efficiency evaluation based on ideal and anti-ideal decision making units,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 10312–10319, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Andersen and N. C. Petersen, “A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, vol. 39, pp. 1261–1264, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Mehrabian, M. R. Alirezaei, and G. R. Jahanshahloo, “A complete efficiency ranking of decision making units: an application to the teacher training university,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 14, pp. 261–266, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  16. S. Li, G. R. Jahanshahloo, and M. Khodabakhshi, “A super-efficiency model for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 638–648, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, G. R. Jahanshahloo, and A. Memariani, “A method for finding common set of weights by multiple objective programming in data envelopment analysis,” Southwest Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 1, pp. 44–54, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. G. R. Jahanshahloo, M. Sanei, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, and N. Shoja, “Using the gradient line for ranking DMUs in DEA,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 209–219, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. A. Amirteimoori, G. R. Jahanshahloo, and S. Kordrostami, “Ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis: a distance-based approach,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 122–135, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. G. R. Jahanshahloo, H. Lotfi, F. Shoja, N. Tohidi, and G. Razavian, “Ranking using norm in data envelopment analysis,” Applied Mathematics and Computational, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 215–224, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  21. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. H. Lotfi, F. R. Balf, and H. Z. Rezai, “Using Monte Carlo method for ranking efficient units,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 162, pp. 371–372, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  22. G. R. Jahanshahloo, L. Pourkarimi, and M. Zarepisheh, “Modified MAJ model for ranking decision making units in data envelopment analysis,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 1054–1059, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  23. G. R. Jahanshahloo, M. Soleimani-Damaneh, and M. Reshadi, “On Pareto (dynamically) efficient paths,” International Journal of Computer Mathematics, vol. 83, no. 8-9, pp. 631–635, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. F. Rezai Balf, H. Zhiani Rezai, G. R. Jahanshahloo, and F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, “Ranking efficient DMUs using the Tchebycheff norm,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 46–56, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. S. J. Sadjadi, H. Omrani, S. Abdollahzadeh, M. Alinaghian, and H. Mohammadi, “A robust super-efficiency data envelopment analysis model for ranking of provincial gas companies in Iran,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 10875–10881, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. Tone, “A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. J. Zhu, “Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 443–455, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. A. Amirteimoori, “DEA efficiency analysis: efficient and anti-efficient frontier,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 186, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  29. T. Chen, C. Bao, C. Huang, and I. Wang, “Efficiency decomposition with enhancing russell measure in data envelopment analysis,” American Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 438–441, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Gholam Abri, G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, N. Shoja, and M. Fallah Jelodar, “A new method for ranking non-extreme efficient units in data envelopment analysis,” Optimization Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 309–324, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. R. Jahanshahloo, M. Sanei, and N. Shoja, “Modified ranking models, using the concept of advantage in data envelopment analysis,” Working Paper, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  32. C. Kao, “Weight determination for consistently ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1779–1787, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  33. M. Khodabakhshi and K. Aryavash, “Ranking all units in data envelopment analysis,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 2066–2070, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  34. A. Ashrafi, A. B. Jaafar, L. S. Lee, and M. R. A. Bakar, “An enhanced russell measure of super-efficiency for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis,” American Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 92–96, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. Y. Chen, J. Du, and J. Huo, “Super-efficiency based on a modified directional distance function,” Omega, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 621–625, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Y. Chen, “Ranking efficient units in DEA,” Omega, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 213–219, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Y. Chen and H. D. Sherman, “The benefits of non-radial vs. radial super-efficiency DEA: an application to burden-sharing amongst NATO member nations,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 307–320, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. Y. Chen, “Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 545–551, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  39. J.-X. Chen, M. Deng, and S. Gingras, “A modified super-efficiency measure based on simultaneous inputoutput projection in data envelopment analysis,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 496–504, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. W. D. Cook, L. Liang, Y. Zha, and J. Zhu, “A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 276–281, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. H.-S. Lee, C.-W. Chu, and J. Zhu, “Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 141–147, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  42. H. Lee and J. Zhu, “Super-efficiency infeasibility and zero data in DEA,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 216, no. 2, pp. 429–433, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  43. C. A. K. Lovell and A. P. B. Rouse, “Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 101–108, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  44. H. Morita, K. Hirokawa, and J. Zhu, “A slack-based measure of efficiency in context-dependent data envelopment analysis,” Omega, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 357–362, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. A. Noura, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, G. R. Jahanshahloo, and S. Fanati Rashidi, “Super-efficiency in DEA by effectiveness of each unit in society,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 623–626, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  46. K. Tone, “A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 498–509, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus