Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 483298, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/483298
Research Article

Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscapes: A Spatially Explicit Approach to Support Sustainable Soil Management

1Department of Forest and Ecosystem Science, The University of Melbourne, 4 Water Street, Creswick, VIC 3363, Australia
2Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Ecosystem Sciences, PMB 2, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia
3Future Farming Systems Research Division, Department of Environment & Primary Industries, P.O. Box 3100, Bendigo Delivery Centre, VIC 3554, Australia
4Agriculture Productivity Group, Department of Environment & Primary Industries, 32 Lincoln Square, North Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia

Received 13 November 2013; Accepted 11 December 2013; Published 30 January 2014

Academic Editors: E. de Blas and H. G. Rosatto

Copyright © 2014 Mohsen Forouzangohar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [9 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Fabrizio Ungaro, Ingo Zasada, and Annette Piorr, “Mapping landscape services, spatial synergies and trade-offs. A case study using variogram models and geostatistical simulations in an agrarian landscape in North-East Germany,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 46, pp. 367–378, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Maria R. Felipe-Lucia, Berta Martin-Lopez, Sandra Lavorel, Luis Berraquero-Diaz, Javier Escalera-Reyes, and Francisco A. Comin, “Ecosystem Services Flows: Why Stakeholders' Power Relationships Matter,” Plos One, vol. 10, no. 7, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Bertin Takoutsing, John C. Weber, Zacharie Tchoundjeu, and Keith Shepherd, “Soil chemical properties dynamics as affected by land use change in the humid forest zone of Cameroon,” Agroforestry Systems, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ben Zank, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Brian Voigt, and Ferdinando Villa, “Modeling the effects of urban expansion on natural capital stocks and ecosystem service flows: A case study in the Puget Sound, Washington, USA,” Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 149, pp. 31–42, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Luuk Fleskens, Mike J. Kirkby, and Brian J. Irvine, “The PESERA-DESMICE Modeling Framework for Spatial Assessment of the Physical Impact and Economic Viability of Land Degradation Mitigation Technologies,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 4, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Matthias Schroter, and Roy P. Remme, “Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services: comparing hotspots with heuristic optimisation,” Landscape Ecology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 431–450, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Costanza Calzolari, Fabrizio Ungaro, Nicola Filippi, Marina Guermandi, Francesco Malucelli, Nazaria Marchi, Francesca Staffilani, and Paola Tarocco, “A methodological framework to assess the multiple contributions of soils to ecosystem services delivery at regional scale,” Geoderma, vol. 261, pp. 190–203, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • M Forouzangohar, R Setia, Dd Wallace, Cr Nitschke, and Lt Bennett, “Predicted consequences of increased rainfall variability on soil carbon stocks in a semiarid environment,” Climate Research, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 61–69, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Cedric Marsboom, Dirk Vrebos, Jan Staes, and Patrick Meire, “Using dimension reduction PCA to identify ecosystem service bundles,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 87, pp. 209–260, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar