Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 507076, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/507076
Research Article

Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator for Robotic Surgery

1Division of Women and Baby, Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, Room F05-126, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
2Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Tornavagen 10, 221 85 Lund, Sweden
3Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Tornavagen 10, 221 85 Lund, Sweden
4Lund Clinical Skills Center, Skåne University Hospital, Barngatan 2 B, 221 85 Lund, Sweden
5Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 11 August 2013; Accepted 13 November 2013; Published 30 January 2014

Academic Editors: P. Chien and T. Levy

Copyright © 2014 Henk W. R. Schreuder et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. W. Holloway, S. D. Patel, and S. Ahmad, “Robotic surgery in gynecology,” Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 96–109, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. W. R. Schreuder and R. H. M. Verheijen, “Robotic surgery,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 198–213, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. E. Ritter and D. J. Scott, “Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic Surgery,” Surgical Innovation, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 107–112, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Gurusamy, R. Aggarwal, L. Palanivelu, and B. R. Davidson, “Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 95, no. 9, pp. 1088–1097, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Ahlberg, L. Enochsson, A. G. Gallagher et al., “Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 193, no. 6, pp. 797–804, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. R. Larsen, J. L. Soerensen, T. P. Grantcharov et al., “Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial,” British Medical Journal, vol. 338, p. b1802, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. S. Thijssen and M. P. Schijven, “Contemporary virtual reality laparoscopy simulators: quicksand or solid grounds for assessing surgical trainees?” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 199, no. 4, pp. 529–541, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. M. Herron and M. Marohn, “A consensus document on robotic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 313–325, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. A. Finan, M. E. Clark, and R. P. Rocconi, “A novel method for training residents in robotic hysterectomy,” Journal of Robotic Surgery, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. W. R. Schreuder, R. Wolswijk, R. P. Zweemer, M. P. Schijven, and R. H. M. Verheijen, “Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 137–149, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. M. Albani and D. I. Lee, “Virtual reality-assisted robotic surgery simulation,” Journal of Endourology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 285–287, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. A. Lerner, M. Ayalew, W. J. Peine, and C. P. Sundaram, “Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system?” Journal of Endourology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 467–472, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. M. McDougall, “Validation of surgical simulators,” Journal of Endourology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 244–247, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. “ESGE-Standard laparoscopy,” 2013, http://www.esge.org/education/guidelines.
  15. M. S. Matell and J. Jacoby, “Is there an optimal number of alternatives for likert scale items?” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 657–667, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. P. A. Kenney, M. F. Wszolek, J. J. Gould, J. A. Libertino, and A. Moinzadeh, “Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery,” Urology, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1288–1292, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. S. Lendvay, P. Casale, R. Sweet, and C. Peters, “Initial validation of a virtual-reality robotic simulator,” Journal of Robotic Surgery, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 145–149, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. S. Sethi, W. J. Peine, Y. Mohammadi, and C. P. Sundaram, “Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator,” Journal of Endourology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 503–508, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. S. Lendvay, P. Casale, R. Sweet, and C. Peters, “VR robotic surgery: randomized blinded study of the dV-Trainer robotic simulator,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 132, pp. 242–244, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. G. Kang, K. S. Yang, Y. H. Ko et al., “A Study on the learning curve of the robotic virtual reality simulator,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 22, pp. 438–462, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  21. R. Korets, A. C. Mues, J. A. Graversen et al., “Validating the use of the Mimic dV-trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents,” Urology, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1326–1330, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Y. Lee, P. Mucksavage, D. C. Kerbl, V. B. Huynh, M. Etafy, and E. M. McDougall, “Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulatorrole as an assessment tool?” Journal of Urology, vol. 187, no. 3, pp. 998–1002, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. Perrenot, M. Perez, N. Tran et al., “The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 26, pp. 2587–2593, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Katsavelis, K.-C. Siu, B. Brown-Clerk et al., “Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment,” Surgical Endoscopy and other Interventional Techniques, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 66–73, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. W. Sun, F. van Meer, J. Schmid, Y. Bailly, A. A. Thakre, and C. K. Yeung, “Advanced da Vinci surgical system simulator for surgeon training and operation planning,” International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 245–251, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. F. H. Halvorsen, O. J. Elle, V. V. Dalinin et al., “Virtual reality simulator training equals mechanical robotic training in improving robot-assisted basic suturing skills,” Surgical Endoscopy and other Interventional Techniques, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1565–1569, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. O. A. van der Meijden, I. A. Broeders, and M. P. Schijven, “The SEP, “Robot”: a valid virtual reality robotic simulator for the da vinci surgical system?” Surgical Technology International, vol. 19, pp. 51–58, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  28. S. A. Seixas-Mikelus, T. Kesavadas, G. Srimathveeravalli, R. Chandrasekhar, G. E. Wilding, and K. A. Guru, “Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator,” Urology, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 357–360, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. A. Seixas-Mikelus, A. P. Stegemann, T. Kesavadas et al., “Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator,” BJU International, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 1130–1135, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. S. Lee, A. Bland, F. A. Valea, L. J. Havrilesky, A. Berchuck, and A. A. Secord, “Robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic procedures in a fellowship training program,” Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 467–472, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. L. Ferguson, T. M. Beste, K. H. Nelson, and J. A. Daucher, “Making the transition from standard gynecologic laparoscopy to robotic laparoscopy,” Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons/Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 326–328, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. Al Bareeq, S. Jayaraman, B. Kiaii, C. Schlachta, J. D. Denstedt, and S. E. Pautler, “The role of surgical simulation and the learning curve in robot-assisted surgery,” Journal of Robotic Surgery, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. L. Chang, J. Petros, D. T. Hess, C. Rotondi, and T. J. Babineau, “Integrating simulation into a surgical residency program: is voluntary participation effective?” Surgical Endoscopy and other Interventional Techniques, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 418–421, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. K. W. van Dongen, W. A. van der Wal, I. H. M. B. Rinkes, M. P. Schijven, and I. A. M. J. Broeders, “Virtual reality training for endoscopic surgery: voluntary or obligatory?” Surgical Endoscopy and other Interventional Techniques, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 664–667, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. J. Hung, P. Zehnder, M. B. Patil et al., “Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator,” Journal of Urology, vol. 186, pp. 1019–1024, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  36. K. T. Finnegan, I. Staff, A. M. Mareaney, and S. J. Shichman, “Da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overallscore and score simulator performance,” Urology, vol. 80, pp. 330–336, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  37. A. J. Hung, M. B. Patil, P. Zehnder et al., “Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study,” Journal of Urology, vol. 187, pp. 630–637, 2012. View at Google Scholar