Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 524367, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/524367
Research Article

Multicompare Tests of the Performance of Different Metaheuristics in EEG Dipole Source Localization

1Information Technology Laboratory, Center for Research and Advanced Studies (Cinvestav), Ciudad Victoria, TAMPS 87130, Mexico
2Biomedical Signal Processing Laboratory, Center for Research and Advanced Studies (Cinvestav), Apodaca, NL 66600, Mexico

Received 20 December 2013; Accepted 10 February 2014; Published 16 March 2014

Academic Editors: S. Balochian, V. Bhatnagar, and Y. Zhang

Copyright © 2014 Diana Irazú Escalona-Vargas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Niedermeyer and F. H. Lopes da Silva, Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields, Wolters Kluwer Health, 2005.
  2. P. S. Lewis and J. C. Mosher, “Genetic algorithms for minimal source reconstructions,” in Proceedings of the 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, pp. 335–337, November 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Haneishi, N. Ohyama, K. Sekihara, and T. Honda, “Multiple current dipole estimation using simulated annealing,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1004–1009, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Sekihara, H. Haneishi, and N. Ohyama, “Details of simulated annealing algorithm to estimate parameters of multiple current dipoles using biomagnetic data,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 293–299, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Gerson, V. A. Cardenas, and G. Fein, “Equivalent dipole parameter estimation using simulated annealing,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 161–168, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. McNay, E. Michielssen, R. L. Rogers, S. A. Taylor, M. Akhtari, and W. W. Sutherling, “Multiple source localization using genetic algorithms,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 163–172, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Khosla, M. Singh, and M. Don, “Spatio-temporal EEG source localization using simulated annealing,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1075–1091, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Uutela, M. Hämäläinen, and R. Salmelin, “Global optimization in the localization of neuromagnetic sources,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 716–723, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Nagano, Y. Ohno, N. Uesugi, H. Ikeda, A. Ishiyama, and N. Kasai, “Multi-source localization by genetic algorithm using MEG,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 2972–2975, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Scherg, T. Bast, and P. Berg, “Multiple source analysis of interictal spikes: goals, requirements, and clinical value,” Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 214–224, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Jiang, A. Luo, X. Li, and F. Kruggel, “A comparative study of global optimization approaches to MEG source localization,” International Journal of Computer Mathematics, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 305–324, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Zou, S. Zhu, and B. He, “Spatio-temporal EEG dipole estimation by means of a hybrid genetic algorithm,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC '04), pp. 4436–4439, September 2004. View at Scopus
  13. Y. Li, H. Li, R. He et al., “EEG source localization using differential evolution method,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC '04), pp. 1903–1906, September 2004. View at Scopus
  14. C. Sequeira, F. Sanchez-Quesada, M. Sancho, I. Hidalgo, and T. Ortiz, “A genetic algorithm approach for localization of deep sources in MEG,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Meeting on Applied Physics (APHYS '03), pp. 140–142, October 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. Qiu, Y. Li, and D. Yao, “A feasibility study of EEG dipole source localization using particle swarm optimization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '05), pp. 720–726, Edinburgh, UK, September 2005. View at Scopus
  16. C. Jiang, J. Ma, B. Wang, and L. Zhang, “Multiple signal classification based on genetic algorithm for MEG sources localization,” in Advances in Neural Networks—ISNN, D. Liu, S. Fei, Z. Hou, H. Zhang, and C. Sun, Eds., vol. 4492, pp. 1133–1139, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  17. C. Jiang, B. Wang, and L. Zhang, “Particle swarm optimization for MEG source localization,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition in Bioinformatics, pp. 73–82, 2008.
  18. Y. K. Alp, O. Arikan, and S. Karakas, “ERP source reconstruction by using Particle Swarm Optimization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '09), pp. 365–368, Taipei City, Taiwan, April 2009. View at Scopus
  19. K. E. Parsopoulos, F. Kariotou, G. Dassios, and M. N. Vrahatis, “Tackling magnetoencephalography with particle swarm optimization,” International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation, vol. 1, no. 1-2, pp. 32–49, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  20. R. Rytsar and T. Pun, “EEG source reconstruction using global optimization approaches: genetic algorithms versus simulated annealing,” International Journal of Tomography and Statistics, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 83–94, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. Shirvany, F. Edelvik, S. Jakobsson, A. Hedström, and M. Persson, “Application of particle swarm optimization in epileptic spike EEG source localization,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 2515–2525, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  22. D. I. Escalona-Vargas, D. Gutiérrez, and I. Lopez-Arevalo, “Performance of different metaheuristics in EEG source localization compared to the Cramér-Rao bound,” Neuro-Computing, vol. 120, pp. 597–609, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. Malmivuo and R. Plonsey, Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  24. J. W. Rohrbaugh, R. Parasuraman, and R. Johnson, Event-Related Brain Potentials: Basic Issues and Applications, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1990.
  25. B. N. Cuffin and D. Cohen, “Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 132–146, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. Stoica and A. Nehorai, “On the concentrated stochastic likelihood function in array signal processing,” Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 669–674, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Stoica and A. Nehorai, “MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 720–741, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Higgins, Introduction to Modern Nonparametric Statistics, Duxbury Press, 2003.
  29. J. Derrac, S. García, D. Molina, and F. Herrera, “A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms,” Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–18, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. H. Zar, Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 2009.
  31. Y. Hochberg and A. C. Tamhane, Multiple Comparison Procedures, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1987.
  32. A. Dogandzic and A. Nehorai, “Estimating evoked dipole responses in unknown spatially correlated noise with EEG/MEG arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. Gutiérrez, A. Nehorai, and C. H. Muravchik, “Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 2113–2122, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. Şengül and U. Baysal, “An extended Kalman filtering approach for the estimation of human head tissue conductivities by using EEG data: a simulation study,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 571–586, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Vallaghé and M. Clerc, “A global sensitivity analysis of three- and four-layer EEG conductivity models,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 988–995, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. B. M. Radich and K. M. Buckley, “EEG dipole localization bounds and MAP algorithms for head models with parameter uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 233–241, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. Fernandes and A. Rosa, “A study on non-random mating and varying population size in genetic algorithms using a Royal Road function,” in Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 60–66, May 2001. View at Scopus
  38. J. Brest, S. Greiner, B. Bošković, M. Mernik, and V. Zumer, “Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: a comparative study on numerical benchmark problems,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 646–657, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Zhang and A. C. Sanderson, “JADE: adaptive differential evolution with optional external archive,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 945–958, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. K. Qin and P. N. Suganthan, “Self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm for numerical optimization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '05), pp. 1785–1791, September 2005. View at Scopus
  41. P. Civicioglu, “Backtracking search optimization algorithm for numerical optimization problems,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 219, no. 15, pp. 8121–8144, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  42. A. Auger and N. Hansen, “A restart CMA evolution strategy with increasing population size,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '05), pp. 1769–1776, September 2005. View at Scopus