Review Article

Problem-Based Learning in Pharmaceutical Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

The main characteristics of the included studies.

StudyCountryDates of researchPopulationRandom allocationType and length of coursePBL intervention ( )Control intervention ( )Outcomes

Raisch et al.
1995 [37]
USA1993-1994Undergraduate studentsYes8 weekly sessions of two hours during externshipSmall group discussion of cases led by facilitator and problem solving (26)Externship with no modifications (19)Objective and subjective evaluations

Nii 1996 [38] USA1994-1995Graduate students (PharmD)Yes2 semesters in the third year preceding clerkshipSmall group discussion of cases led by facilitator (58)Didactic lectures (60)Objective evaluation (grade point average)

Reeves and Francis
2002 [39]
United Kingdom1997-1998PharmacistsNo6 months of continuing educationAdverse drug reactions cases in the context of a clinical scenario (16)Didactic lectures (15)Objective evaluation (multiple-choice questions)

Whelan et al.
2007 [40]
Canada1998, 2001-2002Undergraduate studentsNoEntire graduation courseSmall group discussion of cases led by facilitator and problem solving (127)Didactic lectures (59)Subjective evaluation (survey of perception of preparedness)

Romero et al.
2010 [41]
USA2002–2008Graduate students (PharmD)Yes4 weeks of PBL during the first semester of PharmD curriculumSmall group discussion of cases led by facilitator and problem solving (675)Didactic lectures (645)Objective evaluation (midterm and final tests)

Notes:
: number of students.
PBL: problem-based learning.
PharmD: doctor of pharmacy (professional doctor degree).