|
| Aspect | Subaspect | Value and description |
|
| Provinces | | Chiang Rai, Phayao, Sukhothai, Kamphaeng Phet, Nakhon Sawan, Chainat, and Pathumthani |
|
| Age range | | 25–79 |
|
| Cultivated area (ha) | Owned | 385 |
| Rented | 9.44 |
|
| Irrigation systems | | Canals, pumped groundwater |
|
| Number of seasons (year−1) | | 2 or 3 |
|
| Yield | Yield for cultivar (t ha−1) | |
| Hom Mali* | 3.13 to 5.00 |
| Hom Pathum | >6.25 |
| Phitsanulok 2 | 5.00 to 7.50 |
| Samphao Thong | 6.25 to 7.50 |
| Suphan Buri 1 | 6.25 |
| RD 6 | 3.15 to 5.32 |
| RD 31, RD 41 | 5.63 to 7.50 |
| RD 47 | 5.63 to 8.75 |
| Yield increase after the adoption | |
| Hom Mali* | 23% (4.06 to 5.00 t ha−1) |
| Samphao Thong | 57% (4.38 to 6.88 t ha−1) |
| Suphan Buri 1 | 33% (4.69 to 6.25 t ha−1) |
| RD 31 | 20% (6.25 to 7.50 t ha−1) |
| RD 47 | 10 to 20% (5.0 to 5.5~6.0 t ha−1) |
|
| Cost reduction | Pesticides, insecticides, herbicides | up to 80% |
| Fertilizer | up to 70% |
| Others | Labor/time, water, seedlings, and seeds |
|
| Net profit (Baht ha−1 season−1) | | 62,356 ± 30,588 () |
|
| Perceivable advantages | Quality of life | Improvement of total life quality, health promotion, greater freedom, extra time, and less anxiety (especially regarding water constraints) |
| Financial aspect | Saving time saves labor and reduces investment |
| Technological aspect | Easy and comfortable work, yield increase, knowledge (trans-)formation, and improved rice quality |
| Social aspect | Enhanced cooperation among the villagers |
|
