Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 606947, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/606947
Research Article

Bone-Implant Contact around Crestal and Subcrestal Dental Implants Submitted to Immediate and Conventional Loading

1Master of Science Program, UNIFEB Educational Foundation of Barretos, Rua Prof. Roberto Frade Monte 389, Aeroporto, Barretos, SP, Brazil
2Department of Oral Health Care Sciences, Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara (UNICH), Chieti, AB, Italy
3Department of Periodontology, Araraquara Dental School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, SP, Brazil

Received 4 July 2014; Accepted 12 August 2014; Published 14 October 2014

Academic Editor: Stefano Corbella

Copyright © 2014 Ana Emília Farias Pontes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. P. Tarnow, S. C. Cho, and S. S. Wallace, “The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 546–549, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. S. Hermann, D. Buser, R. K. Schenk, J. D. Schoolfield, and D. L. Cochran, “Biologic Width around one- and two-piece titanium implants—a histometric evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 559–571, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. F. Todescan, F. E. Pustiglioni, A. V. Imbronito, T. Albrektsson, and M. Gioso, “Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 467–472, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Piattelli, G. Vrespa, G. Petrone, G. Iezzi, S. Annibali, and A. Scarano, “Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: a retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 346–352, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Buser, W. Martin, and U. C. Belser, “Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 19, pp. 43–61, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. A. Garber, H. Salama, and M. A. Salama, “Two-stage versus one-stage—is there really a controversy?” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 417–421, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Negri, J. L. Calvo-Guirado, M. P. Ramírez-Fernández, J. Maté Sánchez-de Val, J. Guardia, and F. Muñoz-Guzón, “Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part II: a pilot study in dogs,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 236–244, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Boquete -Castro, G. Gómez-Moreno, A. Aguilar-Salvatierra, R. A. Delgado-Ruiz, G. E. Romanos, and J. L. Calvo-Guirado, “Influence of the implant design on osseointegration and crestal bone resorption of immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. J. L. Calvo-Guirado, A. Boquete-Castro, B. Negri, R. Delgado Ruiz, G. Gómez-Moreno, and G. Iezzi, “Crestal bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. A pilot study in Foxhound dogs,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 344–351, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. L. Calvo-Guirado, G. Gomez Moreno, A. Aguilar-Salvatierra, J. E. Mate Sanchez de Val, M. Abboud, and C. E. Nemcovsky, “Bone remodeling at implants with different configurations and placed immediately at different depth into extraction sockets,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. H. M. Frost, “The role of changes in mechanical usage set points in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 253–261, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. E. F. Pontes, F. S. Ribeiro, G. Iezzi, A. Piattelli, J. A. Cirelli, and E. Marcantonio Jr., “Biologic width changes around loaded implants inserted in different levels in relation to crestal bone: histometric evaluation in canine mandible,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 483–490, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. E. F. Pontes, F. S. Ribeiro, V. C. Da Silvas et al., “Clinical and radiographic changes around dental implants inserted in different levels in relation to the crestal bone, under different restoration protocols, in the dog model,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 486–494, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Piattelli, A. Scarano, and M. Quaranta, “High-precision, cost-effective cutting system for producing thin sections of oral tissues containing dental implants,” Biomaterials, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 577–579, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. E. Roberts, “Bone tissue interface,” Journal of Dental Education, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 804–809, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus