Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 618421, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/618421
Research Article

Effect of Continuous Cropping Generations on Each Component Biomass of Poplar Seedlings during Different Growth Periods

1Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Science for Yellow River Delta, Binzhou University, Binzhou 256603, China
2Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Ecological Restoration, Forestry College, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
3Forestry College, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China

Received 7 June 2014; Revised 30 June 2014; Accepted 30 June 2014; Published 23 October 2014

Academic Editor: Xu Gang

Copyright © 2014 Jiangbao Xia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Fang, J. Yu, and J. L. Chen, “Effect of continuous cropping on leaf nutrient and growth of different species of poplar plantation,” Agricultural Science & Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 224–227, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  2. F. D. Liu, L. G. Kong, S. Q. An, H. T. Wang, Y. Z. Jiang, and H. L. Gao, “Characteristics of soi l micro-ecological environment at different growth stages of poplar plantation under continuous cropping,” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 121–125, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  3. F. D. Liu, Y. Z. Jiang, H. T. Wang, Y. Wang, and L. G. Kong, “Soil productivity maintenance technique of poplar plantation under continuous cropping,” Scientia Silvae Sinicae, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 58–63, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  4. Y. Wang, H. Wang, X. Tan, Y. Jiang, and L. Kong, “Comparison on rhizosphere effect of cultivar alternation and non-alternation continuous cropping poplar (Populus deltoids) plantation,” Acta Ecologica Sinica, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1379–1389, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Baniulyte, E. Favila, and J. J. Kelly, “Shifts in microbial community composition following surface application of dredged river sediments,” Microbial Ecology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 160–169, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Lei, X. D. Liu, S. L. Wang, Y. Li, and X. L. Zhang, “Assignment rule of alpine shrubs biomass and its relationships to environmental factors in Qilian Mountains,” Ecology and Environmental Sciences, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1602–1607, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  7. L. Li, D.-W. Zhou, and L.-X. Sheng, “Density dependence-determined plant biomass allocation pattern,” Chinese Journal of Ecology, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1579–1589, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. I. Müller, B. Schmid, and J. Weiner, “The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants,” Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 115–127, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. W. Hilbert and J. Canadell, “Biomass partitioning and resource allocation of plants from Mediterranean-type ecosystems: possible response to elevated atmospheric CO2,” in Global Change and Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems, J. M. Moreno, Ed., pp. 76–101, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  10. C. B. Xu, Q. L. Zhong, D. L. Cheng, and S. Z. Zhu, “Comparison of leaf phenotypic traits and biomass allocation of different provenances of Machilus pauhoi,” Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 920–924, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  11. B. Yang, J. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “Effect of long-term warming on growth and biomass allocation of Abies faxoniana seedlings,” Acta Ecologica Sinica, vol. 30, no. 21, pp. 5994–6000, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Mokany, R. J. Raison, and A. S. Prokushkin, “Critical analysis of root: shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes,” Global Change Biology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 84–96, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. I. Schmid, “The influence of soil type and interspecific competition on the fine root system of Norway spruce and European beech,” Basic and Applied Ecology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 339–346, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. L. Lewis and E. V. J. Tanner, “Effects of above-and belowground competition on growth and survival of rain forest tree seedlings,” Ecology, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 2525–2538, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. J. Hutchings, “Resource allocation patterns in clonal herbs and their consequences for growth,” in Plant Resource Allocation, F. A. Bazzaz and J. Grace, Eds., chapter 7, pp. 161–189, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. J. Bloom, F. S. Chapin III, and H. A. Mooney, “Resource limitation in plants—an economic analogy,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 16, pp. 363–392, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Weiner, “Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants,” Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 207–215, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Wang, “Biomass allometric equations for 10 co-occurring tree species in Chinese temperate forests,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 222, no. 1–3, pp. 9–16, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Poorter and O. Nagel, “The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review,” Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 595–607, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. G. Bloom and A. U. Mallik, “Indirect effects of black spruce (Picea mariana) cover on community structure and function in sheep laurel (Kalmia angustifolia) dominated heath of Eastern Canada,” Plant and Soil, vol. 265, no. 1-2, pp. 279–293, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. J. Bloom, F. S. Chapin III, and H. A. Mooney, “Resource limitation in plants: an economic analogy,” Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 16, pp. 363–392, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. A. Greco and J. B. Cavagnaro, “Effects of drought in biomass production and allocation in three varieties of Trichloris crinita P. (Poaceae) a forage grass from the arid Monte region of Argentina,” Plant Ecology, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 125–135, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. Guo, B. Li, X. Zhang, and R. Wang, “Architectural plasticity and growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides and Caragana intermedia seedlings to simulated water stress,” Journal of Arid Environments, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 385–399, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. L. Wang, D. X. Kong, R. Zou, S. F. Chai, Z. Y. Chen, and H. Tang, “Effect of different soil conditions on the growth and biomass allocation of Illicium difengpi K.I.B. et K.I.M seedlings,” Crops, no. 3, pp. 67–71, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  25. H.-X. Yan, L.-B. Fang, and D.-Z. Huang, “Effects of drought stress on the biomass distribution and photosynthetic characteristics of cluster mulberry,” Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 3365–3370, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. D. M. McConnaughay and J. S. Coleman, “Can plants track changes in nutrient availability via changes in biomass partitioning?” Plant and Soil, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 201–209, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. Y. Lu and Y. M. Zhang, “Response of growth and biomass allocation of Haloxylon persicum seedlings to different salt treatments,” Arid Zone Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 194–202, 2012. View at Google Scholar