Research Article
Determination of Haloacetic Acids in Bottled and Tap Water Sources by Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction and GC-MS Analysis
Table 2
Comparison between proposed method and methods reported in the literature for HAAs determination in water.
| Method | RSD (%) | D.Ra | D.Tb (min) | Sample volume (mL) | Reference |
| Evaporate-SPME-GC-MS | 6.3–7.9 | Acidic ethanol | 10 | 30 | [16] | HS-SPME-GC-ECD | 6.3–10.9 | Dimethyl sulphate | 5 | 10 | [19] | LLE-GC-ECD EPA 552-3 | 0.36–4.0 | Acidic methanol | 120 | 40 | [32] | LLE-GC-MS-MS | 0.9–19.9 | PFBBr | 180 | 1 | [35] | SDME-GC-MS | 5.1–8.5 | Octanol | 20 | 3 | [36] | LLE-GC-ECD EPA 552-1 | 7–59 | Diazomethane | 30 | 100 | [37] | HS-HFLPME-GC-MS-µECD | 5–12 | Acidic methanol | NA | 10 | [38] | µ-SPE-UPLC-UV | 0.03–7.40 | — | — | 20 | [39] | LLE-ESI-MS | NA | NA | NA | 188 | [40] | UPLC-MS | NA | NA | NA | 30 | [41] | DLLME-GC-MS | 2.38–9.34 | Octanol | 10 | 7 | Proposed method |
|
|
aDerivatization reagent. bDerivatization time.
|