Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 703650, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/703650
Research Article

An Application of a Hybrid MCDM Method for the Evaluation of Entrepreneurial Intensity among the SMEs: A Case Study

1Department of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
2Department of Management, East Azarbaijan Science & Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Received 14 February 2014; Accepted 30 June 2014; Published 10 August 2014

Academic Editor: Vincenzo Eramo

Copyright © 2014 Reza Rostamzadeh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. Tsai and H. Kuo, “Entrepreneurship policy evaluation and decision analysis for SMEs,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 8343–8351, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. G. Javalgi and P. R. Todd, “Entrepreneurial orientation, management commitment, and human capital: the internationalization of SMEs in India,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 1004–1010, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. Nooteboom, “Innovation and diffusion in small firms: theory and evidence,” Small Business Economics, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 327–347, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N. O. Ndubisi, O. K. Gupta, and G. C. Ndubisi, “The moguls’ model of computing: integrating the moderating impact of users’ persona into the technology acceptance model,” Journal of Global Information Technology Management, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 27–47, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  5. N. O. Ndubisi and K. Iftikhar, “Relationship between entrepreneurship, innovation and performance: comparing small and medium-size enterprises,” Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 214–236, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Ardichvili, R. Cardozo, and S. Ray, “A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 105–123, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Korunka, H. Frank, M. Lueger, and J. Mugler, “The entrepreneurial personality in the context of resources, environment and the startup process—a configurational approach,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 23–42, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  8. Y. R. Choi and D. A. Shepherd, “Entrepreneurs' decisions to exploit opportunities,” Journal of Management, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 377–395, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. Clarysse and N. Moray, “A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 55–79, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Shane and D. Cable, “Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures,” Management Science, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 364–381, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. R. DeTienne, “Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: theoretical development,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 203–215, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. E. Coviello, P. P. McDougall, and B. M. Oviatt, “The emergence, advance and future of international entrepreneurship research—an introduction to the special forum,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 625–631, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. R. Reuber and E. Fischer, “International entrepreneurship in internet-enabled markets,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 660–679, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. C. Carr and J. M. Sequeira, “Prior family business exposure as intergenerational influence and entrepreneurial intent: a Theory of Planned Behavior approach,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 1090–1098, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Kautonen, E. T. Tornikoski, and E. Kibler, “Entrepreneurial intentions in the third age: the impact of perceived age norms,” Small Business Economics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 219–234, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Kautonen, S. Luoto, and E. T. Tornikoski, “Influence of work history on entrepreneurial intentions in “prime age” and “third age”: a preliminary study,” International Small Business Journal, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 583–601, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. J. Schwarz, M. A. Wdowiak, D. A. Almer-Jarz, and R. J. Breitenecker, “The effects of attitudes and perceived environment conditions on students' entrepreneurial intent: an Austrian perspective,” Education and Training, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 272–291, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. L. Koe, J. R. Sa'ari, I. A. Majid, and K. Ismail, “Determinants of entrepreneurial intention among millennial generation,” Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 40, pp. 197–208, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  19. G. H. Tzeng and J. J. Huang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Taylor Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2011.
  20. C. T. Lin and C. S. Wu, “Selecting a marketing strategy for private hotels in Taiwan using the analytic hierarchy process,” The Service Industries Journal, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1077–1091, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Y. Han, Y. B. Yang, and Y. H. Zhao, “Evaluation of entrepreneurial environment based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC '12), pp. 305–309, Xian, China, July 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Z. Ni-Di and L. Yi, “Comprehensive evaluation of entrepreneurial capacity of college students,” in Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering (ICIME '10), pp. 490–494, Chengdu, China, April 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Rezaei, R. Ortt, and V. Scholten, “Measuring entrepreneurship: expert-based vs. data-based methodologies,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 4063–4074, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Rezaei, R. Ortt, and V. Scholten, “An improved fuzzy preference programming to evaluate entrepreneurship orientation,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 2749–2758, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. I. Y. Lu, C. B. Chen, and C. H. Wang, “Fuzzy multiattribute analysis for evaluating firm technological innovation capability,” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 40, no. 1–3, pp. 114–130, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Z. Chen, H. Li, S. C. W. Kong, and W. Xu, “An analytic knowledge network process for construction entrepreneurship education,” Journal of Management Development, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 11–27, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. V. Čančer and J. Knez-Riedl, “Why and how to evaluate the creditworthiness of SMEs' business partners,” International Small Business Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 143–162, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. A. Stevenson and A. Lundstrom, “Entrepreneurship policy for the future: best practice components,” in Proceedings of the 46th World Conference of the International Council for Small Business, Taipei, Taiwan, June 2001.
  29. J. G. Covin and D. P. Slevin, “A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 16, pp. 7–25, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  30. D. L. Sexton and M. H. Morris, “The concept of entrepreneurial intensity: implications for company performance,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 5–13, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. T. Smart and J. S. Conant, “Entrepreneurial orientation, distinctive marketing competencies and organization performance,” Journal of Applied Business Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 28–38, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  32. J. Wiklund, “The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientationperformance relationship,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 24, pp. 37–48, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  33. J. Wiklund and D. Shepherd, “Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 71–91, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. A. Zahra and J. G. Covin, “Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: a longitudinal analysis,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 43–58, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. H. T. Keh, T. T. M. Nguyen, and H. P. Ng, “The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 592–611, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. G. Covin and G. T. Lumpkin, “Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: reflections on a needed construct,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 855–872, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. G. Covin and M. P. Miles, “Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 23, pp. 47–63, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  38. M. H. Morris and D. F. Kuratko, Corporate Entrepreneurship, Harcourt College, Orlando, Fla, USA, 2002.
  39. B. R. Barringer and R. D. Ireland, Entrepreneurship, Successfully Launching New Ventures, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 2008.
  40. H. Stevenson, M. Roberts, and H. Grousback, New Business Ventures and the Entrepreneur, Irwin, Homewood, Ill, USA, 1989.
  41. D. Miller, “The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms,” Management Science, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 770–791, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. B. Antoncic and R. D. Hisrich, “Intrapreneurship: construct refinement and cross-cultural validation,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 495–527, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. G. T. Lumpkin and G. G. Dess, “Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 135–172, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. Z. Yang, R. Li-Hua, X. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “Corporate entrepreneurship and market performance: an empirical study in China,” Journal of Technology Management in China, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 154–162, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. S. Kraus, “The role of entrepreneurial orientation in service firms: empirical evidence from Austria,” The Service Industries Journal, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 427–444, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. P. C. Rigtering, S. Kraus, F. Eggers, and S. H. Jensen, “A comparative analysis of the entrepreneurial orientation/growth relationship in service firms and manufacturing firms,” The Service Industries Journal, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 275–294, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. R. Scheepers, J. Hough, and J. Bloom, “Entrepreneurial intensity: a comparative analysis of established companies in South Africa,” South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 238–255, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. Erasmus and R. Scheepers, “The relationship between entrepreneurial intensity and shareholder value creation,” Managing Global Transitions, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 229–256, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  49. L. Lee, P. K. Wong, M. D. Foo, and A. Leung, “Entrepreneurial intentions: the influence of organizational and individual factors,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 124–136, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. S. Cardon, D. A. Gregoire, C. E. Stevens, and P. C. Patel, “Measuring entrepreneurial passion: conceptual foundations and scale validation,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 373–396, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. H. Morris, Entrepreneurial Intensity: Sustainable Advantages for Individuals, Organisations and Societies, Quorum, Westport, Conn, USA, 1998.
  52. A. Rauch, J. Wiklund, G. T. Lumpkin, and M. Freese, “Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 761–787, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. G. George, D.R. Wood Jr., and R. Khan, “Networking strategy of boards: Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises,” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 269–285, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. J. G. Covin and D. P. Slevin, “New venture strategic posture, structure, and performance: an industry life cycle analysis,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 123–135, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. G. Covin, D. P. Slevin, and L. R. Schultz, “Implementing strategic missions: effective strategic, structural, and tactic choices,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 481–503, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  56. S. F. Slater and J. C. Narver, “The positive effect of a market orientation on business profitability: a balanced replication,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 69–73, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J. Wiklund and D. Shepherd, “Knowledge-base resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1307–1314, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  58. J. Soininen, K. Puumalainen, H. Sjögrén, and P. Syrjä, “The impact of global economic crisis on SMEs: does entrepreneurial orientation matter?” Management Research Review, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 927–944, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  60. C. Yang and B. Chen, “Key quality performance evaluation using fuzzy AHP,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 543–550, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Computation, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  62. C. C. Ragin, Fuzzy-Set Social Science, The University of Chicago Press, London, UK, 2000.
  63. J. J. Buckley, “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 233–247, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  64. D. Y. Chang, “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 649–655, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. C. H. Cheng, “Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 343–350, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. H. Deng, “Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 215–231, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. L. C. Leung and D. Cao, “On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 102–113, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  68. L. Mikhailov, “A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 687–704, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  69. P. J. M. van Laarhoven and W. Pedrycz, “A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 11, no. 1–3, pp. 229–241, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. S. Opricovic, Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia, 1998.
  71. S. Opricovic and G. Tzeng, “Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction,” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 211–220, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. S. Opricovic and G. H. Tzeng, “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 445–455, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. S. Opricovic and G. Tzeng, “Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 514–529, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  74. G. Tzeng, M. Teng, J. Chen, and S. Opricovic, “Multicriteria selection for a restaurant location in Taipei,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 171–187, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. G. Tzeng, C. Lin, and S. Opricovic, “Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation,” Energy Policy, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1373–1383, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. P. L. Yu, “A class of solutions for group decision problems,” Management Science, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 936–946, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  77. M. Zeleny, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1982.
  78. J. H. Park, H. J. Cho, and Y. C. Kwun, “Extension of the VIKOR method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 233–253, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  79. A. Sanayei, S. F. Mousavi, and A. Yazdankhah, “Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Application, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  81. Z. M. Zain, A. M. Akram, and E. K. Ghani, “Entrepreneurship intention among Malaysian business students,” Canadian Social Science, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 34–44, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  82. Economic Planning Unit and Prime Minister’s Department, Eighth Malaysia Plan, 2001–2005, Government Printers, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2001.
  83. M. Ariff and S. Y. Abu Bakar, “Strengthening entrepreneurship in Malaysia,” 2005, http://www.mansfieldfdn.org/backup/programs/program_pdfs/ent_malaysia.pdf.
  84. FMM Directory, Malaysian Industries, vol. 44th, 2013.