Research Article
An Application of a Hybrid MCDM Method for the Evaluation of Entrepreneurial Intensity among the SMEs: A Case Study
Table 5
Final weights of criteria and subcriteria using FAHP.
| Criteria | Criteria weights | Subcriteria | Subcriteria weights | Local weights |
| C1: autonomy | 0.08 | C11: management style | 0.44 | 0.035 | C12: having ownership | 0.07 | 0.005 | C13: awareness of emerging | 0.49 | 0.039 |
| C2: innovativeness | 0.33 | C21: technological in. | 0.5 | 0.165 | C22: product/market in. | 0.5 | 0.165 |
| C3: risk taking | 0.1 | C31: venturing into the unknown business | 0.56 | 0.056 | C32: heavy borrowing | 0.25 | 0.025 | C33: committing large portions | 0.19 | 0.019 |
| C4: proactiveness | 0.29 | C41: being knowledgeable | 0.3 | 0.087 | C42: developing plans | 0.1 | 0.029 | C43: commitment to exploiting opportunities | 0.3 | 0.087 | C44: anticipation of future | 0.3 | 0.087 |
| C5: comp. aggr. | 0.2 | C51: intensity of a firm | 0.5 | 0.1 | C52: adopting unconventional | 0.5 | 0.1 |
|
|