The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 713081 |

Xuehua Yan, Xinmin Song, "Global Practical Tracking by Output Feedback for Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Growth Rate and Time Delay", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 713081, 7 pages, 2014.

Global Practical Tracking by Output Feedback for Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Growth Rate and Time Delay

Academic Editor: Carlo Bianca
Received28 Jun 2014
Accepted07 Aug 2014
Published03 Sep 2014


This paper is the further investigation of work of Yan and Liu, 2011, and considers the global practical tracking problem by output feedback for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems with not only unmeasured states dependent growth but also time-varying time delay. Compared with the closely related works, the remarkableness of the paper is that the time-varying time delay and unmeasurable states are permitted in the system nonlinear growth. Motivated by the related tracking results and flexibly using the ideas and techniques of universal control and dead zone, an adaptive output-feedback tracking controller is explicitly designed with the help of a new Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional, to make the tracking error prescribed arbitrarily small after a finite time while keeping all the closed-loop signals bounded. A numerical example demonstrates the effectiveness of the results.

1. Introduction

As well known that the presence of time delay has a significant effect on system performance, it often causes deterioration of control system performance and may induce instability, oscillation, and poor performance in a large number of important physical, industrial, and engineering problems involving [1] networked control systems, information, or energy transportation. Therefore, the study of time delay systems has important practical significance and has received much attention in recent years [118]. Generally speaking, control design methods for time delay systems can be classified into two categories: delay-dependent [24, 11] and delay-independent [510].

From the survey on the problems of delayed systems in [19], there still have been many research issues coming up in the control problems of delayed systems. In this paper, we are concerned with the practical tracking for a more general class of uncertain nonlinear systems in the following form. (The following notations will be used throughout this paper. denotes the set of all real numbers. denotes the set of all nonnegative real numbers. denotes the real -dimensional space. For a given vector or matrix , denotes its transpose; for any , denotes the 1-norm; that is, ; denotes the Euclidean (or 2-) norm of vector , and for the matrix , we use to denote its norm induced by the 2-norm of the corresponding vector; for any , there always holds .) Consider where is the system state vector with the initial value ;  ,  , and ,  , are the control input, system output, and reference signal, respectively; is the time-varying time delay satisfying for a known constant ; and , , , are unknown functions but continuous in the first argument and locally Lipschitz in the second one. In what follows, suppose only the system output is measurable.

The objective of the paper is to design an adaptive controller such that the resulting closed-loop system is well-defined and globally bounded on , and furthermore, for any prescribed tracking precision and every initial condition, there is a finite time such that (as described in [20]). To make this possible, the following assumptions are imposed on system (1) and reference signal .

Assumption 1. There exists an unknown constant such that

Assumption 2. There exists an unknown constant such that

Assumption 3. The reference signal is continuously differentiable, and moreover, there is an unknown constant such that

From Assumptions 13, it can be seen that the system investigated is substantially different from those of closely related tracking work [4, 10, 20] since the system considered in this paper contains not only the time delay term but also the unmeasured state dependent growth. In fact, [4, 10] consider the state feedback tracking problem, and in both of those papers, the assumption on reference signal is stronger than Assumption 3 in the paper. Although [20] studies global practical tracking problem by output feedback, it does not include the time delay.

2. Global Practical Tracking Control via Output Feedback

In the section, we design an adaptive output-feedback tracking controller for system (1) satisfying Assumptions 13 and prove that, with unknown time-varying time delay and unknown growth rate in Assumption 1 and without knowing the bound of the reference signal and its derivation in Assumption 3, the global practical tracking for the systems (1) can also be achieved.

First, with the help of the coordinates transformation , , , system (1) becomes where , , .

By Assumptions 1 and 2, for , it is easy to get the following inequalities: where and are unknown constants.

Then, motivated by [20], for any pregiven , we still construct the following adaptive tracking controller for system (5): where and , , are design parameters to be determined.

Similar to [20], before proving the claims of the theorem below, we first provide three fundamental propositions. The proof of Proposition 4 can be referred to Proposition 1 of [20]. The last two propositions are rigorously proven in Appendices A and B. Besides, by Proposition 4, it is not difficult to verify that the right-hand side of the resulting closed-loop system is continuous and locally Lipschitz in in an open neighborhood of the initial condition, and hence the closed-loop system has a unique solution on a small interval (see Theorem 3.1, page 18 of [21]). Let be its maximal interval on which a unique solution exists, where (see Theorem 2.1, page 17 of [21]).

Proposition 4. The gain determined by (8) is monotone nondecreasing on its existence interval, and its dynamics are locally Lipschitz in .

Proposition 5. Define , , and , , and denote , . Then, by choosing the suitable Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional , there holds on where is a positive constant.

Proposition 6. For the resulting closed-loop system, if is bounded on , then and are bounded on as well.

Remark 7. Definitions of , in Proposition 5 inspired by [20] are given the same as those in [20]. In fact, such definitions make it possible to offset the time delay term induced by the nonlinear time delay term by skilly choosing a Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional and thereby still can obtain the similar result (inequality (10)), which plays a key role in the proof of the theorem below. In addition, since Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional method can provide less conservative and delay-independent results than Razumikhin theorem approach, we use Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional method to design the controller of system (1) in this paper.

Now, we are in a position to state the following theorem, to summarize the main results of the paper. For the proof of the theorem, the reader is referred to Theorem 1 in [20].

Theorem 8. Under Assumptions 13, the global practical output-feedback tracking problem of system (1) can be solved by the dynamic output-feedback controller of forms (8) and (9).

3. An Illustrative Example

This section gives a numerical example to illustrate the effectiveness of Theorem 8.

Example 1. Consider the following uncertain nonlinear system: where and denotes the signal function; that is, when and when ; suppose , .

Then a direct application of our proposed methodology yields a suitable adaptive output-feedback controller. Choose design parameters , , , and  . Let the tracking accuracy be , and let initial conditions be , , , and ; we obtain Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 by numerical simulation. From these figures, all the signals in the closed-loop system are bounded. From Figure 1, it can be seen that although the system contains time-varying time delay, after about seven seconds, the tracking error satisfies , which means that the prescribed tracking performance is achieved.

4. Conclusions

In this paper we extend the result in [20] to solve the global practical tracking problem for a class of nonlinear time delay systems by output feedback. Unlike most of the existing results, we allow the existence of unmeasurable states and time-varying time delay in the nonlinear growth. A stability analysis has been established based on the new Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional. The proposed controller independent of the derivative of time delay can make the tracking error arbitrarily small. Our future research is to extend the proposed framework for more general uncertain nonlinear systems, such as the systems with unknown control coefficients. Since the adopted controller in this paper is delay-independent, another topic of future work is to explore new delay-dependent, less conservative control design method.


Appendices A and B provide the rigorous proofs of fundamental Propositions 5 and 6, which are collected here for the sake of compactness.

A. The Proof of Proposition 5

With the aid of the definitions of ’s, ’s, and ’s and by (5) and (8), one has where , , and ,

In terms of Lemma 1 in [22], suitable constants ’s and ’s can be chosen such that the matrices , are Hurwitz ones and there exist and satisfying Keeping this in mind, choose the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional for system (A.2), where and , , defined by Then, on the interval , along the solutions of (A.2), the derivative of satisfies

By supposition, , , and noticing that is nondecreasing with , the following inequality holds: This, together with (A.4) and the fact that , on , leads to By the method of completing square, we have Thus, setting , from these inequalities and (A.9), it follows that (10) holds on , and this completes the proof of Proposition 5.

B. The Proof of Proposition 6

Notice that since is monotone nondecreasing, continuous, and bounded on . Along the same line as A2 of [20], the boundedness of on is easily obtained. Then, let us show that is bounded on . To this end, we introduce the change of coordinates ,  , where is a constant satisfying Then, the error dynamics (A.1) is transformed into where , , and .

For system (B.2), we choose Similar to (A.8), one readily gets and then, on , differentiating function yields that With the definitions of and , using (6), (7), and (B.1), by the method of completing the square, we obtain which, together with (B.1), means that, on , where is a constant. From this, one easily gets that is bounded on . Moreover, by the definitions of and and the boundedness of (just proved), is bounded on .

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 61304013 and 61104126), the Doctoral Foundation of Jinan University (no. XBS1413), the Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (20113704120005), and the Excellent Young Scholars Research Fund of Shandong Normal University.


  1. S. L. Niculescu, Delay Effects on Stability: A Robust Control Approach, Springer, London, UK, 2001.
  2. E. T. Jeung, D. C. Oh, and H. B. Park, “Delay-dependent control for time-delayed T-S fuzzy systems using descriptor representation,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 182–188, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  3. W. Chen, Z. Guan, and X. Lu, “Delay-dependent output feedback guaranteed cost control for uncertain time-delay systems,” Automatica, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1263–1268, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  4. W. S. Chen and J. M. Li, “State feedback tracking control for nonlinear time-delay systems,” Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 514–508, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  5. F. Mazenc, S. Mondie, and R. Francisco, “Global asymptotic stabilization of feedforward systems with delay in the input,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 844–850, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  6. S. K. Nguang, “Robust stabilization of a class of time-delay nonlinear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 756–762, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  7. Y. S. Fu, Z. H. Tian, and S. J. Shi, “Output feedback stabilization for time-delay nonlinear systems,” Acta Automatica Sinica, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 802–805, 2002. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  8. X. Zhang and Z. Cheng, “State feedback stabilization for a class of time-delay nonlinear systems,” Acta Automatica Sinica. Zidonghua Xuebao, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 287–290, 2005. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  9. H. Choi and J. Lim, “Output feedback regulation of a chain of integrators with an unknown time-varying delay in the input,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 263–268, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  10. Z. Mao and X. Xiao, “Decentralized adaptive tracking control of nonaffine nonlinear large-scale systems with time delays,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 23, pp. 5291–5303, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  11. W. Chen and J. Li, “Adaptive control for a class of nonlinear time-delay output-feedback systems,” Control Theory and Applications, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 844–847, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  12. T. Erneux, Applied Delay Differential Equations, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2009. View at: MathSciNet
  13. P. J. Cunningham and W. J. Wangersky, Time Lag in Population Models, Yale, 1958.
  14. C. Bianca, M. Ferrara, and L. Guerrini, “The Cai model with time delay: existence of periodic solutions and asymptotic analysis,” Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  15. U. Fory and M. Bodnar, “Time delays in proliferation process for solid avascular tumour,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1201–1209, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. M. Byrne, “The effect of time delays on the dynamics of avascular tumor growth,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 83–117, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  17. C. Bianca and L. Guerrini, “On the Dalgaard-Strulik model with logistic population growth rate and delayed-carrying capacity,” Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, vol. 128, pp. 39–48, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  18. M. J. Piotrowska, “Hopf bifurcation in a solid avascular tumour growth model with two discrete delays,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 47, no. 5-6, pp. 597–603, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  19. J. Richard, “Time-delay systems: an overview of some recent advances and open problems,” Automatica, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1667–1694, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  20. X. Yan and Y. Liu, “Global practical tracking by output-feedback for nonlinear systems with unknown growth rate,” Science China. Information Sciences, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 2079–2090, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  21. J. K. Hale, Ordinary Differential Equations, Krieger, Huntington, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1980.
  22. L. Praly and Z. P. Jiang, “Linear output feedback with dynamic high gain for nonlinear systems,” Systems and Control Letters, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 107–116, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH

Copyright © 2014 Xuehua Yan and Xinmin Song. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.