Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 751279, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/751279
Research Article

Effects of GA3 Pregerminative Treatment on Gentiana lutea L. var. aurantiaca Germination and Seedlings Morphology

1Research Group of Engineering and Sustainable Agriculture, Natural Resources Institute, University of León, Avenue Portugal 41, 24071 León, Spain
2Research Group of Engineering and Sustainable Agriculture, Department of Agrarian Engineering and Sciences, University of León, Avenue Portugal 41, 24071 León, Spain

Received 29 April 2014; Accepted 11 June 2014; Published 29 June 2014

Academic Editor: Antonio M. De Ron

Copyright © 2014 Óscar González-López and Pedro A. Casquero. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Gentiana lutea L. is widely used in bitter beverages and in medicine; Gentianae Radix is the pharmaceutical name of the root of G. lutea. These uses have generated a high demand. The wild populations of Gentiana lutea var. aurantiaca (M. Laínz) M. Laínz have been decimated; it is necessary to establish guidelines for its cultivation. Gentian as most alpine species has dormant seeds. Dormancy can be removed by cold and by means of a gibberellic acid (GA3) treatment. However, cold treatments produce low germination percentages and GA3 treatments may produce off-type seedlings. So, the objective was to determine, for the first time, the presowing treatments that allow high germination rate and good seedling morphology. The best pregerminative doses of GA3 to break seed dormancy were 100, 500, and 1000 ppm, while the best doses to optimize the seedling habit were 50 and 100 ppm. This study provides, for the first time, a 100 ppm GA3 dose that led to a high germination rate and good seedling morphology, as the starting point for gentian regular cultivation.

1. Introduction

Gentiana lutea L. (Gentianaceae) is a herbaceous perennial plant native to the mountains of central and southern Europe [1, 2]. Gentian roots are widely used in bitter beverages, in food products, and also in traditional medicine to stimulate the appetite and improve digestion [3, 4]. These uses have generated a great demand, so that more than 1500 tons of gentian root is produced from 6000 tons of wild stocks every year around the world [5]. Due to the slow growth of this species, the wild populations of G. lutea have been decimated and are now close to their disappearance and/or are difficult to revive. The increasing demand has provoked alarm about the extinction of the species, and for this reason gentian is being protected throughout Europe by law.

In the Northwest part of Iberian Península (Western Cantabric Mountains), gentian root has been used as a tonic for the stomach and to restore appetite [6]. In this area Gentiana lutea L. flowers show a colour ranging from orange to almost red when compared to yellow flowers of G. lutea L. subsp. lutea. These populations have been classified as Gentiana lutea L. var. aurantiaca [7]. In the León province some populations of aurantiaca variety populations show signs of isolation with low level of genetic diversity [8] which indicates reduced reproductive fitness and elevated extinction risks [9].

The main economic sources in European mountain areas include mining (a decreasing activity), ranching (in crisis), and tourism. Collection of gentian roots has traditionally been a supplement to the family income. Due to the current economic crisis, people have started to collect gentian again in a furtive way for an extra income. Considering the harsh climate conditions of the mountain regions, where both horticulture and fruit growths are difficult to carry out, the cultivation of gentian is an alternative economic activity for large unused lands with agro climatic characteristics suitable for its growth.

G. lutea, as most alpine species, has dormant seeds, exhibiting mainly physiological dormancy [10, 11]. This dormancy can be removed by cold treatment [12, 13], by cold stratification [14], and by GA3 treatment. GA3, alone or together with other chemical or physical treatments, is widely used to remove seed dormancy [15] or to improve the development of the seedlings, although diverse results have been obtained [1619]. Related to this, a study with G. lutea seeds was carried out on germination rates in Petri dishes using GA3 and a stratification treatment [20]. However, some of these treatments, such as gibberellic acid, may produce weak and off-type seedlings in G. lutea [21].

Therefore, this study aims to establish which GA3 dose, applied as pregerminative treatment, improves the germination rate without affecting the development of seedlings, as the first step for gentian cultivation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Seed Trials

Seeds of Gentiana lutea L. var. aurantiaca from population located in the western part of the Cantabrian mountains (Spain) were collected (Figure 1). Seeds from mature capsules containing well-developed ripe seeds were taken from 10 randomly selected plants. After this, the seeds were manually cleaned, removing any damaged, empty, or visually malformed seeds, kept in paper bags, and then stored in a fridge at 4°C inside a dark glass bottle with silica gel.

751279.fig.001
Figure 1: Map showing the location of sampled population of Gentiana lutea L. var. aurantiaca.

Stratification Treatment. Seeds were stratified for 3 months over a silica sand base (Ø 0.3–0.9 mm). Both tray and silica sand were sterilized by autoclaving at 1.0 kg cm−2 and 120°C for 1 h, on each of three consecutive days. After placing the seeds well distributed over the tray surface, another layer (1 cm in height) of silica sand was added covering the seeds (Figure 2). Finally, the sand was moistened with distilled water, avoiding saturation and placing the tray inside the refrigerator at 4°C 1°C. The tray was checked every week during the next 90 days in order to control the sand humidity. Stratified seeds were cleaned using a metallic sieve with Ø 1.5 mm.

751279.fig.002
Figure 2: Addition of silica sand over gentian seeds for stratification treatment.

GA3 Treatment. Seeds were soaked at 25°C for 24 hours in GA3 (Sigma-Aldrich) water solution (50, 100, 500, and 1000 ppm) and were cleaned with distilled water to remove GA3 residues before sowing.

2.2. Petri Dishes Germination Assay

Two treatments were applied to the gentian seeds: cold treatment (stratified or not) and GA3 dose (0, 50, 100, 500 and 1000 ppm). Five replicates of 100 seeds in each treatment were tested for germination on top of a filter paper sheet with 4 ml distilled water in 9 cm plastic Petri dishes (Figure 3(b)). Filter papers were rewetted with distilled water as required. Dishes were checked twice a week during a 90-day test period and germinated seeds were counted and removed. It was established that seeds were germinated when the length of the radicle exceeded the seed coat with 1 mm (Figure 3(c)). The conditions during this time were in a growth chamber (Figure 3(a)) with a constant temperature of 15°C and a 16 h light photoperiod (provided by cool white fluorescent tubes with an irradiance of 35 μmol·m−2·s−1). At the end of the incubation period (90 days), the final germination percentage and the mean germination time (MGT) were calculated according to Ellis and Roberts [22].

751279.fig.003
Figure 3: Petri dishes germination assay of G. lutea L. var. aurantiaca: (a) growth chamber; (b) Petri dishes distribution; (c) germinated seeds.
2.3. Forest Trays Assay

Five replicates of 100 seeds each were tested with five GA3 dose (0, 50, 100, 500 and 1000 ppm). All seeds were stratified as specified in Section 2.1. The forestry seed trays had a volume of 200 cm3 and a height of 15 cm. A commercial substrate, n° 28 from Pindstrup Mosebrug Sae, was used. This substrate has a mix of 70% white peat and 30% black peat (pH 5.5–6), with similar conditions to those of the mountain soils. Pesticide seed treatment (Tiram 80% WP) was applied according to Valenciano et al. [23] to control the development of phytopathogenic fungi [24]. Every lot of 100 seeds was sowed in a unique tray and every cell was covered with 15 cm3 of sterilized silica sand, which is equivalent to 1 cm in height.

180 days after sowing, the measurement of the plants was carried out. Once the development of the plants was observed, two different characteristics were measured: stem length, that is, the length of the stem (mm) from the substrate level to the apex of the primary stem, and leaf length, the length (mm) of the most developed leaf in the third pair of leaves starting from the base. Both measurements were performed in 20 random seedlings per replication.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The values of final germination percentages were arcsine transformed (untransformed data appears in the figures). In each experiment, the data was analyzed using the general linear model (GLM procedure) and whenever the analyses showed significance least significant differences (LSD) were computed at the 0.05 probability level to compare means. All analyses were performed using the SAS version 9.1.2 software (SAS Institute Inc., 2004, Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Germination

According to analysis of variance, stratified seeds showed higher germination rates than nonstratified seeds for each tested GA3 dose. There were no interactions between the sources of variation used (cold treatments and GA3 treatments). The GA3 treatment had an effect on germination time so a generalized early germination was observed when 500 and 1000 ppm doses were used (Figure 4). In these cases, after 21 days, most of the seeds were germinated. Medium germination time (MGT) for these doses was and , respectively. Regarding 100 ppm, a quick germination was also observed, but not as strong (MGT = ), and newly germinated seeds were observed until the 56th day. Finally, the 50 ppm dose meant a good final germination rate, but the number of germinated seeds increased until the 90th day at a gradual rate (MGT = ).

751279.fig.004
Figure 4: Germination curves of Gentiana lutea var. aurantiaca seeds using different doses of GA3 (50, 100, 500, and 1000 ppm) and control (C).

At the end of the 90 days of the germination test, none of the sterilized water pretreated seeds were germinated. All GA3 treatments yielded significantly higher germination percentages compared to the control. The greater the hormonal dose used, the greater the percentage of germination obtained. Seeds pretreated with 1000 ppm of GA3 resulted in the highest germination percentage (93%), not significantly different compared to the 100 ppm (91%) or 500 ppm (88%) doses, but significantly different to the 50 ppm dose (76%) (Figure 5).

751279.fig.005
Figure 5: Germination percentages of Gentiana lutea var. aurantiaca seeds using different GA3 doses (50, 100, 500, and 1000 ppm) and control at the end of the test of 90 days of germination. Bars with different letters are significantly different () according to LSD.

The results obtained in Petri dishes germination test are in accordance with those obtained by Pérez-García et al. [20], which verify the high degree of success in the elimination of seed dormancy using GA3, this effect being greater with high doses (Figure 5). The highest GA3 doses (500 and 1000 ppm) provided a quick and grouped germination. The effect of the GA3 dose of 100 ppm was that the germination was slower during the first part of the test compared to higher GA3 doses, but MGT and germination were similar for all three doses.

3.2. Seedlings Development

Analysis of variance shows significant differences between GA3 treatments. Stem length was greater when the GA3 dose used was higher. The dose of 1000 ppm provided the longest (23.93 mm) stem, being significantly different from the others, as well as the 500 ppm dose (17.58 mm). Significant differences were not found between the remaining doses of 50 ppm and 100 ppm, both providing the shortest stems of all the treatments (4.94 mm and 3.53 mm, resp.) (Figure 6).

751279.fig.006
Figure 6: Stem length of Gentiana lutea var. aurantiaca seedlings using different GA3 doses (50, 100, 500, and 1000 ppm) on the 90th day after sowing. Bars with different letters are significantly different () according to LSD.

Depending on the GA3 dose, gentian seedlings showed different growth habits (Figure 7). H1: the aerial part of the plant is formed by a basal rosette of well-developed leaves and the stem is very short. H2: the aerial part of the plant is formed by a basal rosette of well-developed leaves; the stem is formed and strong. H3: the leaves are elongated; they are arranged along a stem formed with short internodes. H4: small leaves are arranged on a very long and weak stem: long internodes; light yellow-green color. H5: poorly developed and large leaves: filiform appearance; long internodes; light yellow-green color.

751279.fig.007
Figure 7: Growth habits (H1–H5) of Gentiana lutea var. aurantiaca seedlings on the 180th day after sowing treated seeds with GA3 (50, 100, 500, and 1000 ppm).

Considering these five growth habits the number of plants showing each of the habits was counted according to the different GA3 doses (Figure 8). The habit shown by the seedlings at low doses was similar, H1 being the predominant. Meanwhile, for high GA3 doses, 500 and 1000 ppm, the predominant growth habit was H3, and also H4 was abundant. In both, 500 ppm and 1000 ppm, none of the seedlings showed the H1 habit, which is considered the best for the gentian seedlings.

751279.fig.008
Figure 8: Percentage of Gentiana lutea var. aurantiaca seedlings showing different growth habits for each of the GA3 doses (50, 100, 500, and 1000 ppm). Bars with different letters for each GA3 doses are significantly different () according to LSD.

The negative effect on the development of the seedlings was observed only at 500 and 1000 ppm doses, whereas a high percentage of seedlings showed off-type growth habits with long stems. Using these doses, seedlings were very weak, poorly developed, and with a threadlike appearance, therefore, more susceptible to low temperatures, insect attacks, physical breakage, or drying out. While at low doses (50 ppm and 100 ppm) the stems were very short and the predominant seedlings morphology was very similar to that observed in nature, where the seedlings are formed by a basal rosette, like other perennial mountainous plants, protecting themselves from the hard conditions of the mountain climate.

4. Conclusion

The best GA3 pregerminative doses to break seed dormancy of Gentiana lutea L. var. aurantiaca were 100, 500, and 1000 ppm. Doses of 500 and 1000 ppm GA3 not only allow obtaining a high and uniform germination, but also produce high percentages of weak and off-type seedlings. The best doses to optimize seedling habit were 50 and 100 ppm. This study provides, for the first time, a 100 ppm GA3 doses that led to a high germination rate and good seedling morphology, as the starting point for gentian regular cultivation.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Regional Ministry of Education of the Junta de Castilla y León and the European Social Fund PIRTU Grants (Orden EDU/1867/2009), the Regional Ministry of the Environment of the Junta de Castilla y León Project no. 2008/00134/001, the staff from the Forest and Range Management Research Institute (CRA Agricultural Research Council-Trento), and Asociación Promotora de la Genciana y otras plantas de interés de la montaña occidental leonesa for collaborating to collect gentian material.

References

  1. N. Aiello, R. Bontempo, and C. Vender, “Use of morphological features and amarogentin content for characterization of wild yellow gentian (Gentiana lutea L.) populations in north-east Italy,” Acta Botanica Gallica, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. E. Anchisi and F. Cattaneo, Genziane d'Europa, Verba&Scripta, 2010.
  3. A. Y. Leung, Encyclopedia of Common Natural Ingredients Used in Food, Drugs, and Cosmetics, Wiley, 1980.
  4. L. Struwe and V. A. Albert, Gentianaceae: Systematics and Natural History, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  5. H. Ando, Y. Hirai, M. Fujii et al., “The chemical constituents of fresh Gentian root,” Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 269–279, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. O. González, S. Mayo, A. Rodríguez, and P. A. Casquero, “Effect of soil in the growth of Gentiana lutea radical system in North mountain of Léon (Spain),” Acta Horticulturae, vol. 955, pp. 281–285, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Renobales, “Notas acerca del tratamiento de las Gentianaceae para Flora Ibérica,” 2003.
  8. O. González-López, C. Polanco, Z. György et al., “Genetic variation of the endangered Gentiana lutea L. var. aurantiaca (Gentianaceae) in populations from the Northwest Iberian Peninsula,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 10052–10066, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. D. Spielman, B. W. Brook, and R. Frankham, “Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 42, pp. 15261–15264, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. M. Baskin and C. C. Baskin, “A classification system for seed dormancy,” Seed Science Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. Schwienbacher, J. A. Navarro-Cano, G. Neuner, and B. Erschbamer, “Seed dormancy in alpine species,” Flora, vol. 206, no. 10, pp. 845–856, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Favarger, “Sur la germination des gentianes,” Phyton, vol. 4, pp. 274–289, 1953. View at Google Scholar
  13. C. H. Franz and D. Fritz, “Cultivation aspects of Gentiana lutea L,” Acta Horticulturae, vol. 73, pp. 307–314, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  14. D. Fritz, C. Franz, and M. Kretschmer, “Keimung, saatgutlagerung und jungpflanzenanzucht von gelbem enzian,” Deutscher Gartenbau, vol. 34, no. 31, pp. 1350–1353, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  15. P. Dissanayake, D. L. George, and M. L. Gupta, “Effect of light, gibberellic acid and abscisic acid on germination of guayule (Parthenium argentatum Gray) seed,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 111–117, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. R. McKenzie and M. K. Deyholos, “Effects of plant growth regulator treatments on stem vascular tissue development in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.),” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1119–1127, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Amooaghaie and M. Valivand, “The combined effect of gibberellic acid and long time osmopriming on seed germination and subsequent seedling growth of Klussia odoratissima mozaff,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 66, pp. 14873–14880, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. C. Endler, W. Matzer, C. Reich et al., “Seasonal variation of the effect of extremely diluted agitated gibberellic acid (10e-30) on wheat stalk growth: a multiresearcher study,” TheScientificWorldJournal, vol. 11, pp. 1667–1678, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. J. Nakasha, U. R. Sinniah, A. Puteh, and S. A. Hassan, “Potential regulatory role of gibberellic and humic acids in sprouting of Chlorophytum borivilianum tubers,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 168950, p. 9, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. F. Pérez-García, F. Varela, and M. E. González-Benito, “Morphological and germination response variability in seeds of wild yellow gentian (Gentiana lutea L.) accessions from northwest Spain,” Botany, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 731–742, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Bezzi and N. Aiello, “La coltivazione di Gentiana lutea L.nell'ambito del progetto “Piante officinali” del Ministero dell'Agricoltura e delle Foreste,” in Atti del Convegno su “La Coltivazione delle Piante Officinali”, pp. 159–190, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  22. R. H. Ellis and E. H. Roberts, “The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds,” Seed Science and Technology, vol. 9, pp. 373–409, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. B. Valenciano, P. A. Casquero, J. A. Boto, and M. Guerra, “Effect of sowing techniques and seed pesticide application on dry bean yield and harvest components,” Field Crops Research, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 2–12, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. B. Valenciano, P. A. Casquero, and J. A. Boto, “Evaluation of the occurrence of bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) affected by bean seed fly, Delia platura (Meigen), grown under different sowing techniques and with different forms of pesticide application,” Field Crops Research, vol. 85, no. 2-3, pp. 103–109, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus